I need this asap! Find each product. 8.5 x 4

A. 0.34
B. 3.4
C. 34
D. 340

There are 608400 plates are possible.

If the first is A, we have 26 possibilities:

AA, AB, AC,AD,AE ...................................... AW, AX, AY, AZ.

If the first is B, we have 26 possibilities:

BA, BB, BC, BD, BE .........................................BW, BX,BY,BZ

And so on for every letter of the alphabet.

There are 26 choices for the first letter and 26 choices for the second letter. The number of different combinations of 2 letters is:

26×26=676

The same applies for the three digits.

There are 9 choices for the first as first digit cannot be 0

10 for the second,

10 for the third

9×10×10=900

So for a license plate which has 2 letters and 3 digits, there are:

676 × 900 = 608400 possibilities

To learn more about calculating possibilities from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ4

Answer: 62.5% water

100 * 50 / (50 + 30) = 100 times, then you do 50/80 and you get 62.5.

Answer:

62.5% or 62.5

Step-by-step explanation:

;)

Formula

2*(L + W) = L * W

Given

W = 3

Solution

2*(L + 3) = 3*L

2L+ 6 = 3L                      Subtract 2L from both sides

2L - 2L + 6 = 3L - 2L      combine

6 = L

Answer: The length is 6 units long.

Answer:I’m trying to find that too

Step-by-step explanation:

Mrs. Davis travelled a total of 553 miles.

This can be calculated as:

Distance covered when she flew from Atlanta to Washington d.c.= 547 miles

Distance covered when she rented a car and drove to Baltimore = 6 miles.

Therefore, total miles can simply be calculated as:

Distance covered when she flew from Atlanta to Washington d.c + Distance covered when she rented a car and drove to Baltimore = 547miles+ 6 miles

                                                                                             = 553 miles

Hence, the total miles Mrs. davis travelled is equal to 553 miles.

To know about distance related problems:

https://brainly.com/question/27640162

#SPJ4

Answer: f(2) = g(2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, this is kind of a comparison so you can do this by putting "2" as x value for both functions.

If you do that for both functions:

\(f(x) = 4x^{5}\\f(2) = 128 = (2^{7}) \\----------\\g(x) = 8.4^{x} = 2^{2x + 3}\\g(2) = 128\)

So, this shows that f(2) = g(2).

In a two-regressor regression model, if you exclude one of the relevant variables, both options a and b are true.
The assumption of homoskedasticity is no longer reasonable, and the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator becomes biased. By excluding the relevant variable, you are no longer controlling for its influence on the dependent variable.

a. When you exclude a relevant variable from a regression model, the assumption of homoskedasticity may no longer hold. Homoskedasticity assumes that the variance of the errors is constant across all levels of the independent variables. However, by excluding a relevant variable, you might introduce heteroskedasticity, where the variance of the errors differs across different values of the remaining independent variable. This violates the assumption of homoskedasticity.

b. By excluding a relevant variable, the OLS estimator becomes biased. The OLS estimator aims to minimize the sum of squared residuals, assuming that all relevant variables are included in the model. However, when you exclude a relevant variable, the estimated coefficients may be biased and do not provide an accurate representation of the true relationships between the variables. This bias can lead to incorrect inference and flawed predictions.

c. By excluding a relevant variable, you are no longer controlling for its influence on the dependent variable. In a regression model, controlling for relevant variables is essential to isolate the relationship between the included variables and the dependent variable. By excluding a relevant variable, you lose the ability to account for its effects, potentially confounding the relationships between the remaining variables and the dependent variable.

Therefore, options a and b are both true when you exclude a relevant variable in a two regressor regression model. The assumption of homoskedasticity is no longer reasonable, and the OLS estimator becomes biased due to the omission of a relevant variable.

To learn more about regression model click here: brainly.com/question/31411127

#SPJ11

The equation that he used to find n, the number of gallons of water he should remove is 3.52 / (22 - n) = 24 / 100. Option C is correct.

Functions are the relationship between sets of values. e g y=f(x), for every value of x there is its exists in a set of y. x is the independent variable while Y is the dependent variable.

Amount of ammonia in the solution 16%  x 22 gallons  =  3.52 gallons

The proportion of ammonia remains the same as the water evaporates, but the total composition of the solution is decreased by the amount of water that evaporates.

Quantity of ammonia = 3.52 gallons

Quantity of water after evaporation = 22 - n

Composition of ammonia after evaporation of water, 24% = 24/100

Now the percentage of ammonia after evaporates
Quantity of ammonia / Remaining water = 24%
3.52 / (22 - n) = 24 / 100

Thus, the equation that he used to find n, the number of gallons of water he should remove is 3.52 / (22 - n) = 24 / 100.

Learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ1

Answer: The value of f(-1) is equal to 5(-1)^2 + (-1) + 4 = -5 + (-1) + 4 = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

To evaluate f(-1), we substitute -1 for x in the function f(x)=5x^2+x+4. This gives us f(-1)=5(-1)^2+(-1)+4. We simplify this by applying the exponent first, so (-1)^2=1. Then we substitute the result in the function, which gives us f(-1)=5(1)+(-1)+4. Now we can simplify it by adding and subtracting the values which gives us f(-1)=5+(-1)+4=8.

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

All steps correct apart from the last one.

The student worked out the value of b = 4.4 but when finalizing the equation he subtracted 4.4 instead of adding:

Correct answer choice is D

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it is a decimal, it can't be an integer. Integers are whole numbers and can be positive or negative.

Hope this helps!

After considering the given data we conclude that the correct answer which is the correct option is b which is 3/28, regarding the conditional probability.

We are given that an urn contains 3 green balls and 5 red balls. Let Rᵢ be the event that the i-th ball without replacement is red. We need to find \(P(R_3| R_2 \cap R_1).\)
Using the conditional probability formula, we have:
\(P(R_3| R_2\cap R_1) = P(R_3 \cap R_2 \cap R_1) / P(R_2 \cap R_1)\)
Since we are drawing balls without replacement, the probability of drawing a red ball on the first draw is 5/8. The probability of drawing a red ball on the second draw given that the first ball was red is 4/7. Similarly, the probability of drawing a red ball on the third draw given that the first two balls were red is 3/6 = 1/2. Therefore, we have:
\(P(R_3 \cap R_2 \cap R_1) = (5/8) * (4/7) * (1/2) = 5/56\)
To find P(R₂ ∩ R₁), we can use the law of total probability:
\(P(R_2 \cap R_1) = P(R_2 \cap R_1 | R_1) * P(R_1) + P(R_2 \cap R_1 | R_1') * P(R_1')\)
where R₁' is the complement of R₁ (i.e., the event that the first ball drawn is not red). Since we are drawing balls without replacement, the probability of drawing a red ball on the second draw given that the first ball was not red is 5/7. Therefore, we have:
\(P(R_2 \cap R_1) = (5/8) * (5/7) + (3/8) * (3/7) = 29/56\)
Substituting these values into the conditional probability formula, we get:
\(P(R_3| R_2 \cap R_1) = (5/56) / (29/56) = 5/29\)
Therefore, the answer is (b) 3/28.
To learn more about conditional probability
https://brainly.com/question/28339868
#SPJ4
The complete question is
An urn contains 3 green balls and 5 red balls. Let R, be the event the i-th ball without replacement is red. Find P(R3| R2 \cap R₁).
a) 1/56
b) 3/28
c) 1/2
d) 5/8

Answer:

me

Step-by-step explanation:

gbgtgrygthfthfthf i do lol

The general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx is (1/3)x³ + x + (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C

To find the general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx, we can use the linearity property of integration and integrate each term separately.

The integral of x² with respect to x is (1/3)x³ + C₁, where C₁ is the constant of integration.

The integral of 1 with respect to x is simply x + C₂, where C₂ is another constant of integration.

To integrate (1/(x²+1)), we can use the substitution method by letting u = x² + 1. Therefore, du/dx = 2x and dx = (1/2x)du. Substituting these expressions, we get:

∫(1/(x²+1))dx = (1/2)∫(1/u)du

= (1/2)ln|u| + C₃

= (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C₃

where C₃ is another constant of integration.

Therefore, the general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx is:

(1/3)x³ + x + (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C

where C is the constant of integration that accounts for any possible constant differences in the integrals of each term.

In summary, to find the general indefinite integral of a sum of functions, we can integrate each term separately and add up the results, including the constant of integration. When necessary, we can use substitution to simplify the integration process for certain terms.

To learn more about integral click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31606071

#SPJ4

Answer:

he spends $1.5 on strawberries and $6.75 on apples

579 MPa is 0.1446.

The probability that a randomly chosen sample of glass will break at less than 579 MPa can be found using the Normal Distribution. Using the mean and standard deviation given, we can calculate the probability that a randomly chosen sample will have a fracture strength of less than 579 MPa. This is calculated using the formula P(X < 579) = 1 - P(X > 579) = 1 - 0.8554 = 0.1446.

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen sample of glass will break at less than 579 MPa is 0.1446.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The sample size increases, the probability of obtaining a sample mean less than 3500 decreases. The mean of the sample mean distribution is equal to the population mean, which is 7500.

a) The probability that, on a single test, x is less than 3500 can be calculated using the standard normal distribution. We need to standardize the value using the z-score formula: z = (x - μ) / σ. Substituting the given values, we get z = (3500 - 7500) / 1750 ≈ -2.286.

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the probability associated with a z-score of -2.286. The probability is approximately 0.0116, or 1.16%. Therefore, there is a 1.16% chance that a single test result will be less than 3500, indicating leukopenia.

(b) When the doctor uses the average x (sample mean) for two tests taken about a week apart, the probability distribution of x (sample mean) follows a normal distribution. The mean of the sample mean distribution is equal to the population mean, which is 7500. The standard deviation of the sample mean distribution is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. In this case, the sample size is 2.

The probability distribution of x (sample mean) < 3500 can be calculated by standardizing the value using the z-score formula and then finding the corresponding probability from the standard normal distribution table or a calculator. With two tests, the probability distribution will be narrower compared to a single test. The exact probability depends on the specific value of the sample mean and the standard deviation of the sample mean distribution.

(c) When considering three tests taken a week apart, the process is similar to part (b). The mean of the sample mean distribution remains the same at 7500, but the standard deviation of the sample mean distribution is now divided by the square root of 3, since the sample size is 3. As the sample size increases, the standard deviation of the sample mean distribution decreases, resulting in a narrower distribution.

The probability distribution of x (sample mean) < 3500 can be calculated using the z-score formula and finding the corresponding probability from the standard normal distribution table or a calculator. With three tests, the probability distribution will be even narrower compared to two tests.

In summary, as the sample size increases, the probability of obtaining a sample mean less than 3500 decreases. With more tests, we can have greater confidence in the accuracy of the sample mean and draw stronger conclusions about the individual's condition. If a person had a sample mean less than 3500 based on three tests, it would indicate a higher level of certainty about the presence of leukopenia, potentially leading to further investigation or treatment options.

Learn more about mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/30112112

#SPJ11

The probability that battery lasts more than 3 years is \(e^{-0.6 }\).

Parameter of Exponential Distribution

It is given that the average lifespan of the car battery = 5 years

⇒ μ = 5

And, we have to find the probability that the car battery lasts more than 3 years.

Now, the relation between the parameter of exponential distribution, λ and average, μ is given as,

1/ λ = μ

⇒ λ = 1/5

Calculating the Probability

The probability for the car battery to lasts more than 3 years is given by P(N>3). Here, N is the lifespan of the car battery.

P(N>3) = 1 - P(N≤3)

P(N>3) = 1-F(4)

Here, F is the exponential distribution  for the lifespan of the car battery.

P(N>3) = 1-(1-e^(-λn))

P(N>3) = \(e^{-3/5}\)

Thus, the required probability is,

P(N>3) = \(e^{-0.6 }\)

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = -2 + 2/3 = -4/3

x = -2 - 2/3 = -8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

The real zeros of the polynomial f(x) = 2x - 3x² +8x - 4 can be found using the quadratic formula. The quadratic formula states that the roots of a quadratic equation of the form ax² + bx + c = 0 are given by:

x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a

a = -3, b = 8, and c = -4

x = (-8 ± √(8² - 4(-3)(-4))) / 2(-3)

x = (-8 ± √(64 - 48)) / -6

x = (-8 ± √(16)) / -6

x = (-8 ± 4) / -6

x = (-4 ± 2) / -3

x = -2 ± 2/3

Therefore, the real zeros of the polynomial f(x) = 2x - 3x² +8x - 4 are:

x = -2 + 2/3 = -4/3

x = -2 - 2/3 = -8/3

The real zeros of the polynomial f(x) = 2x - 3x² + 8x - 4 are x = 1 and x = 2.To find the real zeros of the polynomial, we set f(x) equal to zero and solve for x. By factoring the polynomial or using the quadratic formula, we can find the values of x that make the polynomial equal to zero.

By factoring, we have:

f(x) = 2x - 3x² + 8x - 4

= -3x² + 10x - 4

= -3(x² - (10/3)x + 4/3)

= -3(x - 1)(x - 2/3)

Setting each factor equal to zero, we find:

x - 1 = 0 => x = 1

x - 2/3 = 0 => x = 2/3

Therefore, the real zeros of the polynomial are x = 1 and x = 2.

Learn more about quadratic formulas here:- brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

The values of the given expression having exponent with negative fractional base i.e. \(-2^{(3/2)^2}\\\) is evaluated out to be 16/9.

First, we need to simplify the expression inside the parentheses using the rule that says "exponents with negative fractional base can be rewritten as a fraction with positive numerator."

\(-2^{(3/2)^2}\) = (-2)² × (2/3)²

Now, we can simplify the expression  further by solving the exponent of (-2)² and (2/3)²:

(-2)² × (2/3)² = 4 × 4/9 = 16/9

Therefore, the value of the given expression \(-2^{(3/2)^2}\\\)  is 16/9.

Learn more about Exponents :

https://brainly.com/question/30441288

#SPJ4

The question is :

What is the value of the expression \(-2^{(3/2)^2}\) ?

Answer: Part a= The probability of rolling a six on each roll is 1 in 6

So, a 100 in 600 chance but Julie has twice the probability.

So the die is most likely unfair,

Part b= Diagram is not attached to the question so to solve the first branch the probability of drawing show  each of the three colors from the five jellies

On the second draw, there are only four beans left and one of the three suits will be reduced by one. So while the probabilities of the first draw were fractions of 5, the probabilities of the second draw will be fractions of 4. The eight outcomes are the probability space of the two draws, which shows the composition of each event in the space and how likely that event is determined to be. Note that the sum of all eight probabilities is 1. You should be able to use this tree to find the answer to all the questions.

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/23780714

The IQR measures the spread of the middle 50% of the data.

Without knowing the actual values of the fuel economy ratings or the summary statistics, we cannot provide an exact answer. However, we can make some general observations about the effects of removing an extreme outlier on the standard deviation and the interquartile range (IQR).

First, the standard deviation measures the spread of the data around the mean. Removing an extreme outlier that is far from the mean could potentially decrease the standard deviation, as the remaining values may be more tightly clustered around the mean. However, the effect on the standard deviation will depend on the exact values of the data points and how much they vary from the mean.

Second, the IQR measures the spread of the middle 50% of the data. Removing an extreme outlier that is far from the bulk of the data may not have a significant effect on the IQR, as the remaining.

To learn more about statistics :

https://brainly.com/question/29093686

#SPJ1

The answer is 20

Work:

w=4

2w (2 X 4) + 12

8 + 12= 20

Hope this helps.

    。　.  .   。  ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ 。  . • . [Northstar] was ejected. . .   。　.    　。      ﾟ  　.    　. ,    .  .   ..  。    •  　ﾟ  。  　.  　.      .    　。。    •  　ﾟ  。  　.  　.      .    　。。    •  　ﾟ  。  　.  　.      .    　。。    •  　ﾟ  。  　.  　.      .    　。

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

g(x) =1

x-1

it's either g(x) or f(x)

Answer:

x .       x+4 .          y

-2        -2+4          2

-1         -1+4           3

0          0+4           4

1           1+4           5

2           2+4          6

Answer:

x + 4    y

-2+4    2

-1+4     3

0+4     4

1+4      5

2+4     6

Step-by-step explanation:

y=x+4

We just need to plug it in

y=-2+4=2

y=-1+4=3

y=0+4=4

y=1+4=5

y=2+4=6

El monto perdido por el cuentahabiente fue de 140 unidades monetarias.

En este problema encontramos el caso de un cuentahabiente, esto es, la persona que dispone de un cuenta de ahorros. Tal cuenta muestra que tiene actualmente 490 unidades monetarias después de perderse 2 / 9 del saldo inicial. Debemos determinar el monto perdido.

Primero, divida el monto actual por la fracción perdida para determinar el saldo inicial:

x = 490 / (7 / 9)

x = 630

Segundo, calcule el monto perdido al sustraer el saldo final del resultado anterior:

x = 630 - 490

x = 140

El cuentahabiente perdió un monto de 140 unidades monetarias.

Para aprender más sobre fracciones: https://brainly.com/question/28440655>
#SPJ1

Answer:

x^2=y

Step-by-step explanation:

6x2=12

7x2=14

9x2=18

10x2=20

you can solve this by dividing x by y that's how I solved it

Answer:

slope:y/x=12/6=2

Similarly

y/x=18/9=2

so

y=2x

is a required relationship between x and y