I rlly need help with this question please don't guess will give brainly​

Answer:

He organized a march on Washington, DC. He went on a pilgrimage to Mecca. He delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech.

The writer narrates events One way the author displays prejudice in this chapter is through the use of chronological order.

Listing, explaining, or talking about how events happened in relation to time in chronological sequence. To observe what happened first and what followed, it is essentially like looking at a timeline.

putting together a timeline choosing the important events to be documented. ensuring that the information is accurate and chronologically correct. keeping a record of facts and important life events. recognizing the importance of events for the child or adult at the centre, or taking into consideration their perspective.

To know more about chronology visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17451618

#SPJ1

Answer:

The mood is calm.

Explanation:

In the poem 'Autumn in the Hills' Meera Uberoi appreciates the beauty of the season. Autumn comes before winter. The trees shed their leaves in this season.

The poet says that the mulberry trees and poplar trees have shed their leaves and become bare. The slender spears of the peach tree have become exposed to the cold air.

There are no humming bees which pick up pollen grains from the flowers. There are no flowers which will spread their fragrance in the night. The blossoms are withered and old.

The last song of the birds will be heard after which there will be silence. The air will no longer be filled with the melodious songs of the birds.

The days will be foggy in the last phase of autumn. Cold weather will set in with the coming of winter season and autumn will fade away.  

I copy pasted the explanation. When I read this, I felt that the mood is peaceful and calm. Pls correct me if I am wrong.

This question refers to the short story "The Refusal" by Franz Kafka. We can describe the townspeople's attitudes toward the soldiers and the colonel in the following manner:

The narrator describes the soldiers as being "the terror of the children" because of their appearance: they all look alike, have small twitching eyes and mouths overcrowded with teeth.

However, the children are not the only ones who dislike the soldiers. Adults also feel uncomfortable in their presence. Although the soldiers speak a different dialect, they act as if they can understand the townspeople:

"The soldiers speak a dialect utterly incomprehensible to us . . . which produces a certain shut-off, unapproachable quality . . . A soldier, for example, enters a shop . . . he listens to the conversations . . . just stares blankly at the speaker . .  the customers start leaving the shop . . ."

As for the colonel, the townspeople are afraid of him. He is the closest thing they know to a government. His behavior, silent and imposing, intimidates the people who need to address him:

". . . each time people take fright all over again. On this occasion, too, the man chosen to speak could not begin; he was already standing opposite the colonel when his courage failed him . . . During all this time, the colonel stood there motionless . . ."

We can conclude the townspeople are annoyed by the soldiers' presence and fearful of the colonel. They only interact with them because of their position of authority, but the colonel and the soldiers are not appreciated.

Learn more about the story here:

https://brainly.com/question/24577307

One problem is that it puts people into bubbles that they don’t even realize that they’re in. These bubbles are sometimes called echo chambers, and they lead people to incorrect beliefs about the world.

For example, I was recently having a discussion with my oldest daughter. She’s 21 and in college and sometimes we have these deep parent-to-young-adult-child discussions, particularly when I’m driving her somewhere. We were discussing politics, as we sometimes do, and I was probably saying something really cynical, as I often do, and she went off on a tangent about how last summer’s BLM protests were a world-changing event and marked a major positive shift in race relations in the United States and the world and had a positive impact on policing in the United States. She put them on the same pedestal as anti-Vietnam, Civil Rights, or women’s suffrage protests of the 1900s.

She believed that, because that’s the social media bubble she’s in. I imagine that the majority of people in her social media circle… mostly college-aged people… were either supportive of, or directly involved in, those protests, posted about them on social media, and were absolutely convinced that everyone else was, too. In her social media bubble, everyone had a strong opinion on the matter, and those opinions were either supportive, or suspiciously silent. But not having a strong opinion wasn’t really an option.

Meanwhile, in my social media bubble… mostly people over the age of 25… the only mentions of the protests came from our news feeds and a handful of people who posted vaguely supportive things about them, and an even smaller number of people who participated in the protests when there was one close to their neighborhood at a convenient time for them, like on a Saturday afternoon between soccer practice and dinner. But, for the most part, it was a small wave of stories that came and went and didn’t have much of an impact on anything.

What seemed like a societal tidal wave to one social media bubble was a just a ripple to people in other social media bubbles. In my bubble, the main impact of the protests was a bunch of early retirements of police officers, trouble for cities trying to recruit new police officers, and the protests provided cover for people who wanted to do some looting. But that’s not how she saw it at all.

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. The protests were more important than you’d think from my social media circle, but not as important as you’d think from her social media circle. Not a ripple, not a tidal wave… maybe like the wake of a medium-sized ship passing by.

But it takes effort to step out of your social media bubble and see what’s happening in other people’s bubbles. A lot of people don’t know that they need to do that to be well informed, or don’t have any desire to do it. And that’s one of the major problems with social media: it makes it very, very easy to live in an information bubble.

Answer:

Cyberbullying and addiction.

Explanation:

Cyberbullying: basically online hate

Addiction: Obsession to a point where it interferes with your day-to-day life

Answer:

c

Explanation:

i read the passage

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

I took the test.

Answer:

by telling events without revealing the outcome

Explanation:

Answer:

A. by telling events without revealing the outcome

Explanation:

The person above me is correct and I've done the quiz.

Answer: uhhh I think she was born with it

Explanation:

Answer:

Answer no A . because

A:jersey

B:Jersey

Use a third-person point of view when working on an expository writing assignment and never use first person and opinions, hence option A is correct.

When doing expository writing you should not use the first person and do not add opinions because it is not personal opinion. Expository writing is used to suggest a situation, event, or another person's views.

Keep in mind that your expository writing relies on giving your reader knowledge about a given topic or process. Your main aim is to inform, describe or define the subject for your readers. As you goal to achieve this, your essay writing must be formal, objective, and concise.

Therefore, option A is correct.

Learn more about expository writing, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1543500

#SPJ1

Answer:

Here are the definitions of each of those kinds of sentences, so that you can write your own if you're not a fan of mine:

Declarative sentence = A sentence that relays information; Almost always ends in periods.

Exclamatory sentence = A sentence that conveys hightened emotion, often using exclamation points.

Interrogative sentence = Asks a question; It can be open-ended (does not require yes or no answer) or direct (requires a yes or no answer).

Explanation:

Declarative sentences:

- The French Revolution began in May of 1789.

- Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun.

- Berlin is in Germany.

- In the United States, minors cannot legally drink alcohol.

- Llamas are a kind of animal.

Exclamatory sentences:

- I hate you!

- I'm so sick of people saying that love is all a woman is fit for, I'm so sick of it!

- Don't you disrespect me, little man!

- Kill the beast!

- Beware!

Interrogative sentences:

- How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

- What is two plus two?

- Is that carriage magenta or burgundy?

- Where are my keys?

- Am I a fool?

William Shakespeare influence the English language by Neologisms, Innovative uses of language, Enriching the English vocabulary, and Borrowing from other languages.

William Shakespeare's works have made a significant impact on the English language. The following are some ways in which Shakespeare has influenced the English language:

Overall, Shakespeare's influence on the English language cannot be overstated. His works have had a profound impact on the language, helping to shape it into the rich and expressive form that it is today.

Learn more about William Shakespeare:

https://brainly.com/question/28742026

#SPJ11

  the reason people feel better after hearing about another person's problem, is due to a thing I call personal therapy. Many people use this when they have a bad day. When they hear someone had something worse happen to them, they feel better and obligated to say they had a better day.

( this is all i can come up with sorry)

Among the given options, the characteristic of language that is NOT accurate is option b: "Language is concrete." Language is an abstract and symbolic system of communication that allows us to convey meaning and share information. It does not rely on concrete or physical objects.

Language is primarily composed of words, grammar, syntax, and semantics. These elements enable individuals to express thoughts, emotions, and concepts, transcending the realm of physical objects. While language can certainly refer to concrete objects or describe specific sensory experiences, it is not inherently tied to concreteness.

Language's characteristic of being arbitrary implies that there is no inherent connection between the sounds or symbols used and their corresponding meanings. Different languages use different words and grammatical structures to represent the same concept, highlighting the arbitrariness of language. For example, the English word "dog" and the French word "chien" both refer to the same animal but have no direct correlation in terms of sound or form.

Language is self-reflexive in the sense that it can be used to talk about language itself. Humans have the unique ability to analyze and discuss linguistic structures and properties, such as grammar rules or the meanings of words. This metalinguistic capacity enables us to reflect on language and engage in discussions about its nature and usage.

Lastly, language is known for its ambiguity, which means that it can contain multiple possible interpretations or meanings. Ambiguity arises from various linguistic phenomena, such as homonyms, homophones, metaphors, and contextual factors. This characteristic allows for creativity, wordplay, and the expression of complex ideas.

In summary, language is an abstract, arbitrary, self-reflexive, and ambiguous system of communication. However, it is not inherently concrete, as it is not bound to physical objects but rather operates in the realm of concepts and meanings.

Learn more about Language :

https://brainly.com/question/10585737

#SPJ11

Hamlet is a tragic play of the story of the Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. He should confront Claudius directly instead of plotting secretly.

Hamlet was the main protagonist of the play and is presented as bitter and full of hatred in the play. He acts impulsively and is often hesitant in making decisions.

King Claudius is the main antagonist of the play and is uncle of Hamlet. He is the villain of the play as he murdered his brother and plots to take the throne.

The relationship between Hamlet's mother and uncle, and his father's murder make him plot revenge against Claudius.

Therefore, option D. Hamlet should stop plotting secretly against Claudius is the correct option.

Learn more about Hamlet here:

https://brainly.com/question/11742337

Answer:

He analyzes things too much; he needs to be more decisive and take action.

He is torn between his loyalty to his father and his sense of right and wrong.

He is truly suffering from madness and cannot control what he does.

He should stop plotting secretly and should confront King Claudius openly.

He should give up the idea of revenge and just try to make the best of his situation.

Explanation:

Answer:

Ram doesn't eat rice.

Explanation:

when you turn a sentence to be negative, you would add a negative word such as:

does (not) - doesn't

will (not) - won't

can (not) - can't

when contracting these negative words you get not

not is a negative, almost like no but the action of it

therefore adding doesn't to the sentence turns it negative (they are not performing the action)

Ram doesn't eat rice.

(removing the s from eats since 'Ram doesn't eats rice.' is the wrong verb form.)

if you were turning this interrogative (asking questions,) and still negative (not; no)

then you would say

Ram doesn't eat rice, right?

since the positive would be

Ram eats rice.

hope this helps:)

Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Here you go! Good luck presenting this!

Empathy is an essential quality in every individual's growth, and Eric shows tremendous growth in empathy throughout the book.

In the novel "Tangerine" by Edward Bloor, Eric's character has been depicted as a dynamic one.

He is the younger brother of Paul, who is the protagonist of the story.

Eric has impaired vision, which is corrected by the end of the book.

Despite this impairment, he is a confident and insightful boy.

Empathy is an essential quality in every individual's growth, and Eric shows tremendous growth in empathy throughout the book.

Towards the beginning of the book, Eric is indifferent to his brother's interests and gives less importance to Paul's aspirations in soccer.

He is less attentive to Paul's life and spends more time focusing on his own.

However, as the story progresses, Eric's attitude changes significantly.

He begins to pay attention to the people around him and shows concern towards his peers.

An instance in which Eric shows empathy is when he visits the families of his peers that died in the lightning strike.

He is genuinely interested in getting to know the victims' families, and this act of kindness shows his growth in empathy.

Another instance of Eric's growth in empathy is when he is willing to help Luis, who was accused of killing Mike.

Eric goes out of his way to find the truth and support his friend.

Eric's character develops empathy by exhibiting understanding, concern, and kindness for the people around him.

By paying attention to the needs of others, Eric learns to empathize with others and become a better person.

For more questions on Empathy

https://brainly.com/question/13964777

#SPJ8

The figurative language used in the sentence "Still I scoffed it wasn't that expensive" is understatement.

Understatement is a figure of speech that deliberately represents something as less important or less intense than it actually is. In this case, the person is downplaying the expensive nature of the trip to Italy by stating that it wasn't that expensive, even though it drained every penny from their bank account. This understatement emphasizes the high cost of the trip by minimizing it.

Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. The sentence states, "I went on a very costly trip to Italy that drained every penny from my bank account."
2. The person then says, "Still I scoffed it wasn't that expensive."
3. By using the phrase "it wasn't that expensive," the person is downplaying the actual cost of the trip.
4. The sentence is an example of understatement because it presents the trip as less expensive than it actually was, emphasizing the significant impact it had on the person's finances.

In conclusion, the figurative language used in the sentence is understatement.

To know more about understatement refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/27973246#

#SPJ11

The term "single story" was popularized by the Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in her TED Talk titled "The Danger of a Single Story." It refers to the idea that if we only hear or believe a single narrative about a person, place, or culture, we risk forming incomplete or stereotypical judgments.

The single story can be seen in various aspects of our lives, including media representation, cultural perceptions, and personal experiences. Here are a few examples:

Media Representation: The single story often manifests in media portrayals that focus on stereotypes and reinforce biases. For instance, certain racial or ethnic groups might be consistently portrayed in narrow and negative ways, perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

Cultural Perceptions: Cultural misunderstandings can arise from the single story. When we have limited exposure to a particular culture, we may develop preconceived notions based on a single narrative, overlooking the diversity and complexity within that culture. This can lead to misunderstandings and biased judgments.

Personal Experiences: On an individual level, the single story can impact our interactions and relationships. If we form judgments about others based on a limited understanding or a single encounter, we may fail to see the full range of their experiences and perspectives. This can hinder empathy & create barriers between people.

To know more about Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

brainly.com/question/29382774

#SPJ4

Single stories refer to the limited and often stereotyped perceptions that arise when people are exposed only to narrative and perspectives about specific groups and cultures.

This is true today both in media representations that perpetuate stereotypes and in face-to-face interactions where assumptions are made based on limited information. This can lead to misunderstandings, prejudices and discrimination.

This single narrative may have also applied to individuals at some point, subjecting them to stereotypes and misconceptions based on gender, race, and social background. Challenging a single story requires pursuing multiple perspectives and embracing diversity. 

By recognizing the existence of a single narrative and actively seeking multiple perspectives, we can aim for a broader and more nuanced understanding of people, cultures and societies. 

To learn more about single stories:

https://brainly.com/question/30697578

#SPJ4

The passage from "Us and Them." support the inference by supporting the inference well because it suggests that the narrator feels no remorse over his decisions.

An inference refers to a conclusion made by the reader on a passage based on the information given in the passage.

From the passage given, it can be deduced that the speaker felt generous about the Tomkey's family but decided to hate them but the speaker's mother advised against it and instead take a good look at myself in order to turn one's hatred inward.

Learn more about inference:

https://brainly.com/question/24729498

To include the possessive form of the joint ownership noun, we add an apostrophe and an "s" ('s) to the name of the joint owners. In this case, the sentence is revised to "After they left, Gary and Peg's car broke down."

After they left, Gary and Peg's car broke down.

To include the possessive form of the joint ownership noun, we need to add an apostrophe and an "s" ('s) to the name of the joint owners. In this case, the joint owners are Gary and Peg.

The original sentence "After they left, Gary and Peg car broke down" lacks the possessive form. To correct this, we need to add the possessive form of the joint ownership noun, which is "Gary and Peg's."

By adding the possessive form, the revised sentence becomes "After they left, Gary and Peg's car broke down."

This revised sentence indicates that the car that broke down belongs to both Gary and Peg. The possessive form of the noun "Gary and Peg" is indicated by adding an apostrophe and an "s" ('s) after the joint owners' names.

For more such questions on noun, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31381833

#SPJ8

The play "The Crucible" was written by Arthur Miller in the sense of artistic history.

What is meant by artistic history?

Even without examining the distinction Miller makes between himself and what he calls the “academic historian”, it can certainly be agreed that "The Crucible" is not history. To be sure, in 1692 people were killed in Salem, Massachusetts. Even to say that in 1692 people were persecuted in Salem is to add something to the events that took place; it is to introduce art.

An artist does not just write history. By interpreting it, an artist creates history. He gives it a form and a content. He is more interested in what is happening than what happened, which is hypothetical anyway.

Therefore, when Miller wrote, "This play is not history in the sense in which the word is used by the academic historian," he referred to the artistic meaning of the word.

To learn more about "The Crucible" from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/26121334

#SPJ13

1. What do you think Miller meant when he wrote, "This play is not history in the sense in which the word is used by the academic historian"? In what sense of "history" do you think the play was written? Why?

Answer:

assonance is the repetition of vowel sounds that are closer together in a sentence or verse

Explanation:

The correct answer is A

6 and 5 are constants, 2 is the coefficient.

\( \blue{\huge{\red{\boxed{\green{\mathfrak{AWSWER}}}}}} \)

A) 6 and 5 are coefficients

\( \orange{\underline{\huge{\bold{\textit{\green{\bf{EXPLANATION}}}}}}} \)

2y+6=5

2y=(-1)

y=(-0.5)

coefficients --> 2

constants--> 6&5

variable--> y

equation--> 2y+6=5

Answer:

The Latrobe floor plan of the White House includes both public and private spaces. The State Rooms, which are located on the first floor, are designated for official functions and meetings with important guests. Meanwhile, the family quarters, including the President's bedroom, are located on the second floor, which is inaccessible to the public. The East Room, located on the State Floor, is the largest and most formal room in the White House, and it has been used for a variety of public events throughout history, including press conferences, ceremonies, and receptions. Additionally, the Cross Hall, which runs the length of the State Floor, serves as a grand corridor for public receptions and as a connecting passage between the State Rooms. These elements of the floor plan demonstrate how the White House was designed to function both as a private residence for the President and their family, as well as a public meeting place for official functions and events.

Explanation: