Identify the error in the sentence using the following abbreviations: MM (Misplaced Modifier), SM (Squinting Modifier), or
DM (Dangling Modifier).
We were so hungry that we almost ate the whole pizza.
Type of Error:

The chapter "Good Form" by Tim O'Brien can be considered an example of postmodernism for several reasons The work talks about the stories themselves, The characters realize they are a part of the story, The narrator acknowledges his emotions, and The work includes footnotes.

A. The work talks about stories themselves: Postmodern literature often explores the nature of storytelling and challenges traditional narrative structures. In "Good Form," O'Brien reflects on the concept of truth in storytelling and discusses the role of fiction and imagination in recounting war experiences.

B. The characters realize they are a part of the story: Postmodernism often explores the self-awareness of characters within a narrative. In "Good Form," O'Brien's narrator reflects on his role as a storyteller and acknowledges the constructed nature of the narrative. He explicitly addresses the readers, discussing the choices he made in telling the stories and admitting that some details might be fictionalized.

C. The narrator acknowledges his emotions: Postmodern literature often highlights the subjectivity and unreliability of the narrator's perspective. In "Good Form," O'Brien openly discusses his emotions and uncertainties related to the war experiences he is recounting. He acknowledges the emotional impact of storytelling and how it can shape and reshape the narrative.

D. The work includes footnotes: Footnotes and other meta-references are common in postmodern literature as they disrupt the linear narrative and challenge the authority of the text. In "Good Form," O'Brien includes footnotes that provide additional context or commentary on the events and characters, further blurring the lines between fact and fiction and emphasizing the role of the author as a storyteller.

know more about O'Brien's here:

https://brainly.com/question/1279779

#SPJ8

The words in the brackets are base words and it is required that a new word is formed from th base words in order to complete the ________ according to the context of the sentence.

2. When you are in that area, you should eat the locally grown fruit, which is well-known for its strange taste.

3. She couldn’t hide her content smile when he saw him appear round the corner.

4. “When must I arrive at the conference?” – “You must be there at exactly 7.30 a.m.”

5. I grew up in a neighborhood where there were a lot of kids.

6. One of my friends was elected as leader of the campaign group.

7. All the fruit and vegetables sold in this market are grown locally

8. There are so many restaurants and coffee shops in this neighborhood

9. She smiled contently as she watched her baby learning to walk.

10. We have the Physics Education lesson on Thursday morning, just before the English lesson.

11. My friend, Joe, asked me to give him some information about life of Vietnamese farmers.

12.Transplanting of organs from living donors are becoming more popular.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/1668413

Answer:

Yes the words are correct .

Explanation:

-- 'abjure' means to solemnly reject or renounce. The priest in the context, rejected the beliefs of the worshipper and the atheist.

-- 'equanimity' means the calmness and peace of mind.

-- 'flayed' means taking the skin off from the body. In the context, the priest were asked to reject their beliefs in order to avoid their skin being pulled off from their body, or punished in such a way that the skin might come out of the body.

-- 'ubiquitous' in the context, it means the enemy may be present anywhere at any time, so General Eisenhower was very much passionate and confident about his plannings.

-- 'interminable' means endless. In the context, the word 'interminable' meant that he was waiting from a long time for the spy's contact and it seems that the waiting was endless.

-- 'lugubrious' meaning sad and unhappy speech. In the context, the politician's speech was sad and mournful and the crowd booed.

Hence, all the words are correct in the sentences.

Answer:

The main theme of Stop and Frisk: Right or Wrong by Mike Kubic is the illegitimate use of government power, against the values on which the country was founded.

Explanation:

This text questions the values with which the country was founded, claiming that it is not always respected that the government is in charge of enforcing rights, protecting and offering security to the inhabitants of their nation.

It establishes that the theory says one thing, when in practice sometimes the opposite happens completely.

Then he gives examples of the police abusing their power and takes a particular case to exemplify this controversy.

Dear diary, today I saw an athlete help one of their competitors by helping them finish the game fairly. That act of kindness brought me joy. It was a very heart-warming act to witness. Mostly because you rarely ever see anyone do something like that when it comes to serious competition.

i tried bro XD

I. Introduction

  A. Hook: Cultural diversity is a valuable asset that enriches societies worldwide.

  B. Background information: Define cultural assimilation and its significance in societies.

  C. Thesis statement: While some argue that cultural assimilation promotes social cohesion and economic development, it is important to recognize the negative consequences it can have on individual identity and cultural heritage.

II. Body

  A. Argument in favor of cultural assimilation

     1. Claim: Cultural assimilation promotes social cohesion.

        a. Supporting evidence: Integration of diverse cultures leads to better understanding and communication among individuals.

        b. Supporting evidence: Shared values and norms foster a sense of unity and belonging.

     2. Claim: Cultural assimilation drives economic development.

        a. Supporting evidence: A common culture facilitates cooperation and collaboration in the workforce.

        b. Supporting evidence: Cultural assimilation can lead to greater cultural exchange and innovation.

  B. Counterargument: Negative consequences of cultural assimilation

     1. Claim: Cultural assimilation erodes individual identity.

        a. Supporting evidence: Forcing individuals to conform to a dominant culture undermines their unique perspectives and experiences.

        b. Supporting evidence: Loss of cultural identity can lead to feelings of alienation and identity crisis.

     2. Claim: Cultural assimilation diminishes cultural heritage.

        a. Supporting evidence: Traditional customs, languages, and practices are at risk of being lost.

        b. Supporting evidence: Cultural homogeneity leads to a loss of diversity and cultural richness.

III. Refutation of counterargument

  A. Addressing concerns of eroded individual identity

     1. Counterclaim: Cultural assimilation can also provide individuals with new identities and opportunities for personal growth.

     2. Rebuttal: Encouraging cultural integration without suppressing individual uniqueness can strike a balance between assimilation and identity preservation.

  B. Addressing concerns of diminished cultural heritage

     1. Counterclaim: Cultural assimilation does not necessarily lead to the complete loss of cultural heritage.

     2. Rebuttal: Promoting cultural diversity and providing platforms for cultural expression can help preserve and celebrate unique traditions.

IV. Conclusion

  A. Restate thesis statement: While cultural assimilation may have potential benefits, it is crucial to consider its negative effects on individual identity and cultural heritage.

  B. Summarize key points: Acknowledge the arguments in favor of assimilation while highlighting the importance of preserving diversity.

  C. Call to action: Encourage the promotion of inclusive societies that embrace diversity while preserving cultural identities and heritage.

Answer:

Sentence 2

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe it is the second sentence.

Explanation:

Although he is hurt, he does not rebel because it would not be the best idea.

Using 'will be eating' sounds too simple, this also would make any sense if you wrote 'we will be eating at fancy restaurant.' To improve this you could write 'Jason would like to eat at a fancy restaurant tonight as he having thoughts about it yesterday.'

I hope this is helpful.

Please mark brainliest :D

Answer:

Explanation: The word that means the right to vote is "suffrage."

Yes, I believe that Victor Frankenstein is the true murderer of both William and Justine.

Victor has directly not killed either of them but his actions and choices led to their deaths. His creation of the monster, his abandonment of it and his refusal to take responsibility for its actions all contributed to the tragic events that unfolded.

Instead of taking responsibility for monster's actions, Victor selfishly allowed others to take the blame and suffer the consequences. So, his actions ultimately led to the deaths of William and Justine, making him the true murderer.

Read more about victor frankenstein

brainly.com/question/30919082

#SPJ4

Part A : "An understanding between right and wrong " does the word "ethics" most closely mean as it is used in paragraph 6.Option A is the correct option.

Part B : "destroyed some 1,500 schools"  phrase from the text provides the best clue to the meaning of the word "ethics" as it is used in paragraph 6. Option B is the correct option.

Part C : It provides the perspective of someone who knows her well, and emphasizes the importance of encouraging educational equality. Option D is the correct option.

Part A : Yes, as used in paragraph 6, the word "ethics" most closely refers to a comprehension of right and evil. The study of ethics, a subfield of philosophy, is concerned with the concepts of good and wrong and how they relate to people's actions. When the term "ethics" is used in this context, it refers to knowing the difference between right and wrong as well as the effects of acting in a given way.Option A is the correct option.

Part B: Because it implies that the company's activities were unethical, the phrase "destroyed some 1,500 schools" in paragraph 6 offers a hint as to what the word "ethics" means. Unmoral conduct and a disrespect for the rights of others are frequently linked to unethical behaviour. Option B is the correct option.

Part C : The story of Malala's life in the news article by her father is a first-hand view that highlights the value of promoting educational equality. His tale emphasises how crucial Malala's education is, against all odds. It also serves as a reminder that ensuring equal access to education for all people, regardless of gender, is crucial for establishing a more just society. Option C is the correct option.

To learn more about ethics link is here:

brainly.com/question/11992384

#SPJ1

Below are some points that you can add to your essay to make it more authentic:

Topic: Global warming: is there enough evidence for this phenomena

Hence these were some points to note down in your essay.

To know more about essay writing visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20694139

#SPJ1

Count Duckula and Baron Silas von Greenback are both villains and antagonists in the animated series "Danger Mouse," a British cartoon that follows the adventures of a secret agent mouse and his sidekick, Penfold.

Dr. Loo-cifer, on the other hand, is a villain and antagonist in the British animated series "Kipper," which is about a dog named Kipper and his friends. So, Dr. Loo-cifer is not a villain for the British secret agent from "Danger Mouse."

"Danger Mouse" is a British animated television series that first aired in 1981. The show follows the adventures of Danger Mouse, a mouse who works as a secret agent for the British government, and his sidekick, Penfold. Count Duckula is one of the main villains in the show, a vegetarian vampire duck who often teams up with other villains to try to take over the world. Baron Silas von Greenback is another main villain, a toad who is Danger Mouse's arch-nemesis and is constantly trying to come up with schemes to defeat him.

On the other hand, "Kipper" is another British animated television series that first aired in 1997. The show is about a friendly dog named Kipper and his animal friends. Dr. Loo-cifer is a villain in "Kipper," an evil toilet who causes trouble for Kipper and his friends. Dr. Loo-cifer is not related to "Danger Mouse" or any British secret agent.

To get a similar answer on Danger Mouse:

https://brainly.com/question/27089263

#SPJ11

Answer:Uploading is the process of putting web pages, images and files onto a web server. Downloading is the process of getting web pages, images and files from a web server. To make a file visible to everyone on the internet, you will need to upload it.

Explanation:

Answer:

A phrase doesn't require a verb .A clause require a verb

Explanation:

To know if a sentence is a phrase or a clause check if its has a verb or not

if it does have a verb then it's a clause while if its doesn't have a verb then it's a phrase sentence

Answer:

Phrase is a small group of words that perform a single function within the sentence. It may have a partial subject or a verb but not both, or neither a subject or a verb. A phrase never have a subject doing the action of a verb. Ex: with a white dress. Need a pencil.

A clause is also a group of words with subject and a verb. Ex: she plays piano. He wants to be a doctor.

Answer:

The women form an important part of the folk epic “The Odyssey”. Within the story there are three main types of women: the goddess, the seductress, and the good hostess/wife. Each particular female character adds a different element and is essential to the telling of the story.

Explanation:

Homer portrays the females in contradictory ways: the characters of Athena and Eurykleia are given strong, admirable roles while Melantho, the Sirens and Circe are depicted in a much more negative way. ... Penelope—the central female character—is given both negative and positive attributes.

There is a camera on the telescreen he is working out in front of, the teacher can see. Newspeak, doublethink, and the mutability of the past are all terms used by Orwell to describe mutability.

O'Brien concurs. 6. Winston shouts, "Julia! Julia! ", while he works out in Crimestop.

In this chapter, Orwell goes into considerable depth about Winston's position and the Ministry of Truth's Records Department, where Winston is responsible for rewriting history to suit Party needs.

A man named Winston Smith arrives home at the Victory Mansions, a run-down apartment complex, on a chilly April day in 1984. He's old, thin, and has a varicose ulcer above his right ankle, making it uncomfortable for him to stomp up the stairs.

To learn more about Winston Smith here:

https://brainly.com/question/29449429

#SPJ4

In a story, the change in pace can be used as a literary device to build up to the climax, and it can also be used to create tension. The change in pace in the last paragraph of a story can be used to create suspense, and it can also be used to bring the story to a close.

How the change in pace in the last paragraph affects the story in terms of the rescue mission is discussed below:

In a rescue mission story, the change in pace in the last paragraph can be used to create a sense of urgency. For example, the pace might quicken as the rescuers realize that they are running out of time to save the people they are trying to rescue.

Alternatively, the pace might slow down as the rescuers finally reach the people they are trying to save, and they begin to assess the situation and figure out the best way to get the people to safety.

In conclusion, the change in pace in the last paragraph of a rescue mission story can affect the story in various ways, depending on how it is used. It can create suspense, build up to the climax, and bring the story to a close.

For more questions on: paragraph

https://brainly.com/question/27287090

#SPJ8  

An example of a scientific hypothesis will be:

If I grow watermelon in a pot, then it will grow bigger than the average watermelon.

A scientific hypothesis is a tentative and testable explanation for a phenomenon in nature. This is the first component of the scientific method. Many describe it as a "reasonable guess" based on prior knowledge and observation. This is true, but a hypothesis is better than a guess.

How do you write a scientific hypothesis?

Scientific hypothesis are educated guesses about what will happen during an experiment. Scientific hypothesis are often written with the words "IF" and "THEN". For example, "If you don't study, you won't pass the exam." The "if" and "then" statements reflect independent and dependent variables.

Learn more about Scientific hypothesis here:- https://brainly.com/question/896413

#SPJ9

Answer/Explanation:

The slave Caroline under covey's control was Covey raping her himself or letting other slaves raped her to produce more slaves. Covey is a poor man with a reputation for successfully taming problem slaves. Covey owns one slave named Caroline whom he bought to be a breeder.  

I will choose the second

Shel Silverstein once examined an interesting question in his poem "Zebra Question". Are we good with bad habits, or bad with good habits? I believe we are naturally meant for good. There is no doubt that bad people have and continue to live on this Earth. I do contend, however, that such is the exception. People are imperfect, but all of us are searching for happiness in some way. Most people tell you that helping others makes you happy. Some souls do not heed or recognize this advice. People are happiest when they have a purpose, a meaning to life. They're even happier if that purpose benefits others. Humans are social animals; we're hardwired to want to help each other.

This is a rough draft. Edit it and change it as needed. Hope this helps!

The content of a communication message is the new information, ideas, or suggested actions that the speaker wishes to express.

It is the heart of the message and is the primary reason for communicating in the first place. The content can vary greatly depending on the context and purpose of the communication. For example, in a business setting, the content may be related to a new project, a proposal, or a problem that needs to be solved. In a personal setting, the content may be related to sharing news, opinions, or emotions. Whatever the content may be, it is crucial to express it clearly and effectively to ensure that the intended message is received and understood.

More on communication: https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ11

Answers:

===================================================

Explanations:

Part 1

The term "post hoc" has the longer name "post hoc ergo propter hoc". It's a Latin phrase that translates to "after this, therefore because of this". An example of a fallacy like is: "I turned on the sprinklers, then it started to rain outside. Therefore I caused it to rain". Clearly the sprinklers have no connection to the clouds on whether they release water or not. It was simply a coincidence the two events happened together like that.

------------------

Part 2

A slippery slope is when you start with one premise and then work your way in a chain reaction through more events. Those events may be directly connected or very loosely indirectly connected. Also, these events tend to get worse and worse as time goes on. An example of this would be a Direct TV ad that has this script "if the cable goes out, you get stressed. If you get stressed, you go on vacation. If you go on vacation, you get bitten by something exotic and your face swells up. Don't let your face swell up and ditch cable". I'm paraphrasing the ad. But the idea is that the fact the cable goes out leads to the person's face being swollen.

------------------

Part 3

The term "bandwagon fallacy" is also applicable here. Just because everyone says something is true doesn't always make it so. During the medieval period, people thought the sun revolved around the earth, but instead it's the other way around. So if someone said "the sun revolves around the earth because everyone else agrees", then they would be using a bandwagon fallacy. You would need to go out and do scientific studies and observations to prove the claim.

------------------

Part 4

Fear is a good motivator, as well as appealing to anger as well. Strong emotions like this tend to connect with people. It's likely due to just how people's brains are wired. There may be more factors as well. An example would be "vote for me or else my opponent will start another foreign war".  

------------------

Part 5

A dichotomy is the idea of having 2 choices only. For example, a coin flip has 2 sides it could land on. A false dichotomy is where the person introduces only two choices for the audience to pick. This gives the audience some sense of interaction and choice. However, false dichotomy arguments tend to make one choice a very bad one while the other choice is either good or tolerable.

An example of this would be any time a political leader states "You're either with us or you're against us" usually when it involves some lead up to a war, or a war is already going on. The two sides "with us" and "against us" aren't the only possible options. It's possible to be neutral and not to be involved at all.

Answer:

participant

Explanation:

Other options don't come close to the meaning given.

Answer:

denouement

Explanation:

a story is broken into four parts:

Introduction

rising action

climax

denouement