Answer:
true. they can be charged with Vehicular Manslaughter
Most people in the developing world use which of the following resources for fuel
Answer:
theres no options?
Explanation:
What does a traffic control officer do
Answer:
Summary of Duties: A Traffic Officer patrols an assigned area on foot, bicycle, or in a vehicle to enforce motor vehicle parking regulations; issues warnings or citations for illegal parking by entering information into a hand-held computer; impounds vehicles; and directs vehicular and pedestrian traffic at a specific
Explanation:
Answer:
they control traffic
Explanation:
they tell when the cars go and when the stop
when the executive branch and its agencies translate laws into routine procedures and practices, this is called
Answer: Federal administrative law
Explanation:
According to the Constitution's 1st Amendment:
a) secular activities cannot be regulated
b) criminal behavior that is deemed "religious in nature" is protected
c) Congress cannot create an official government sponsored religion
d) all of the above
D) All of the above
The first amendment enables everyone to practice or not practice religion, without an form of government intervention involved. Religiose beliefs are further protected under the Equality Act and several other laws. "Separation between Church and State," was built upon later in the 14th amendment as well.
I hope this helps! :)
what is the first part of police discretion used in decision-making, according to george kelling?
According to George Kelling, the first part of police discretion used in decision-making is whether or not to take any action.
George Kelling, a renowned criminologist, highlighted the importance of police discretion in shaping law enforcement responses. He identified the initial step of police discretion as determining whether or not to take any action in a given situation. This decision-making process occurs when police officers encounter various situations during their daily duties and are faced with choices regarding the appropriate course of action.
Police officers have the authority to exercise discretion in deciding how to handle a particular incident or situation. Factors such as the severity of the offense, available resources, potential risks to public safety, community impact, and the officer's training and experience may all influence the decision to take action or not.
It's crucial to note that the exercise of police discretion involves balancing competing interests, including enforcing the law, maintaining public safety, protecting individual rights, and considering the best interests of the community. Officers must assess the circumstances, evaluate the potential consequences of their actions, and make informed decisions based on their professional judgment.
The discretion utilized by police officers during the decision-making process can significantly impact the outcomes of interactions with the public. It plays a role in shaping the overall approach to law enforcement, community relations, and the perception of fairness and justice.
In summary, according to George Kelling, the first part of police discretion used in decision-making is whether or not to take any action. This initial step involves the evaluation of various factors and considerations to determine the appropriate response to a given situation while ensuring the promotion of public safety and the fair application of the law.
Learn more about police discretion here
https://brainly.com/question/28231972
#SPJ11
the franchisee follows the business model set out by the parent company, such as orangetheory fitness or chick-fil-a in which category of franchise:
Franchises like Orangetheory Fitness or Chick-fil-A fall under the category of business format franchising since the franchisee adheres to the business model established by the parent company.
What is the franchising business model?Enterprise Format The type that is most recognizable is franchising. In a franchise for a business model, the franchisor offers the franchisee not just its brand name, goods, and services, but also a full system for running the enterprise.
What distinguishes franchising of company models?In this kind of franchising, the franchisor grants the franchisee access to his designs, quality assurance, accounting systems, operational procedures, group advertising and promotions, and training.
Why is the greatest business format franchise?As a result, a franchise company frequently has stronger branding and advertising than a typical company. Additionally, since all franchisees in a franchise business split any advertising or sales costs, the overall cost of sales is cheaper in the franchise model.
Learn more about franchise: https://brainly.com/question/3558684
#SPJ4
which of the following statements is not true regarding a presentence investigation (psi)?
The following statement is not true regarding a presentence investigation (PSI).
A presentence investigation (PSI) is a comprehensive assessment conducted by probation officers or other authorized individuals to gather information about an offender before sentencing. It is used to provide the court with relevant information to make an informed decision regarding the appropriate sentence for the convicted individual. The PSI report typically includes details about the offender's personal and criminal history, social and family background, employment and education, substance abuse history, and any other relevant factors.
Based on this understanding, the statement "The PSI is conducted after the sentencing decision has been made" is not true. In reality, a PSI is conducted before the sentencing decision. The purpose of the PSI is to assist the court in making an appropriate and fair sentencing decision by providing a comprehensive understanding of the offender's background and circumstances. It is an essential step in the sentencing process that helps ensure that the punishment fits the crime and considers the individual's specific circumstances.
To learn more about PSI visit:
brainly.com/question/32062309
#SPJ11
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
Discuss the basic legal aspects of Actuarial investigation.
Actuarial investigation is a process used to assess and manage the financial risks associated with a particular business or organization. Here are some basic legal aspects of Actuarial investigation:
Independence: Actuaries must be independent and impartial in their investigations. They must not be influenced by any external factors or biases that may affect the accuracy of their findings.
Professional Standards: Actuaries must adhere to professional standards and guidelines established by professional organizations such as the Society of Actuaries (SOA) and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA). These standards set out the ethical and technical requirements for conducting Actuarial investigations.
Data Privacy: Actuaries must ensure that any personal or sensitive data they collect and use during an investigation is handled in compliance with data privacy laws and regulations.
Reporting, Actuaries must provide clear and concise reports that accurately reflect their findings and recommendations. They must also ensure that their reports are accurate, unbiased, and not misleading.
Liability, Actuaries may be held liable for any errors, omissions, or negligence in their investigations. They must take reasonable care to ensure that their findings are accurate and that any recommendations they make are sound.
Overall, Actuarial investigation is a complex and technical process that requires a high level of professionalism and expertise. Actuaries must adhere to strict standards of independence.
Learn more about Actuarial investigation visit: brainly.com/question/26875137
#SPJ11
The U.S. policy toward energy supply and demand has included all of the following EXCEPT __________.
a preventing the free market from determining which energy sources to use
b providing subsidies for oil
c seeking to increase fuel supplies
d adopting some policies to reduce energy demands
The U.S. policy toward energy supply and demand has included all of the following except (A) preventing the free market from determining which energy sources to use.
The U.S. energy policy has historically been geared towards increasing the availability of energy supplies, with a particular emphasis on oil, which has resulted in policies such as providing subsidies for oil.
However, in recent years, the U.S. has also adopted some policies to reduce energy demands, such as promoting energy efficiency and encouraging the use of renewable energy sources.
Despite this, the U.S. has not sought to prevent the free market from determining which energy sources to use.
The government has generally allowed market forces to dictate the mix of energy sources used in the country.
Know more about supply and demand here:
https://brainly.com/question/1222851
#SPJ11
What are some reasons that harsh sentences actually increase the likelihood of future crime? Select all that apply.
Criminals may believe the likelihood of getting caught twice for the same crime is remote.
The imprisonment binge is simply unsustainable.
Punishment may bring defiance.
The stigma labels people.
Some laws that are neutral on their face can disparately impact minority communities.
Truth-in-sentencing laws are a get-tough measure designed to fight a rising crime rate.
Answer: Prisonment timing expand
Explanation: because of going to jail one time it is most likely death but some do not tolerate that so expand timing in prison.
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
All of the following are fixed expenses except: A) A mortgage or rent payment. B) An installment loan payment. C) A monthly train ticket for commuting to work. D) A monthly allocation for life insurance. E) Utilities.
The only option that is not a fixed expense is E) Utilities. A fixed expense is a regular payment that is the same amount each time and is necessary to maintain a certain standard of living. A) Mortgage or rent payment, B) installment loan payment, C) monthly train ticket for commuting to work, and D) monthly allocation for life insurance are all examples of fixed expenses as they are necessary payments that are made on a regular basis. However, utilities such as electricity, water, and gas bills can vary from month to month and are not always considered fixed expenses.
While utilities are not typically considered fixed expenses, they can still be a regular and necessary expense for many individuals or households. In some cases, utilities may be included in a fixed expense category if they are billed at a set rate each month. However, because utility bills can vary based on usage and other factors, they are not always classified as fixed expenses. It is important to budget for both fixed and variable expenses in order to manage finances effectively.
Learn more about variable expenses: https://brainly.com/question/29617511
#SPJ11
HELP
Gun control: Should we limit gun rights??
Health care: should all Americans have a right to health care??
Answer:
1. Yes we should limit gun control because with all these event going on with police killing innocent people and others using guns unwisely we should limited gun rights and who should have and who should not have one.
2. Yes all Americans should have right to heath care
The us superior court is
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court system of the United States.
The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and disputes originating under the US Constitution and other US laws. Supreme Court has final court of appeal jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving an argument of federal law.
As the ultimate authority of the law, the Supreme Court is tasked with assuring the American people of the commitment of equal justice under law, and thus serves as the Constitution's guardian and interpreter.
Learn more on Supreme Court -
https://brainly.com/question/14411708
#SPJ9
With reference to decided cases, distinguish:-
i. Offer from invitation to treat;
ii. Condition from Warranty;
iii Void contract from voidable contract
i. Offer from invitation to treat:
An offer is a definite proposal made by one party to another, indicating a willingness to enter into a contract. On the other hand, an invitation to treat is an invitation for others to make an offer to enter into a contract.
An offer is a clear and specific statement that demonstrates an intention to be bound by the terms of the contract. It is made by the party who wants to enter into the contract. Once the offer is accepted, it forms a legally binding agreement. On the other hand, an invitation to treat is not a definite proposal but an invitation for others to make an offer. It is typically seen in advertisements, displays of goods, or auction bids.
ii. Condition from Warranty:
A condition is an essential contract term that must be fulfilled to be valid. On the other hand, a warranty is a second term that does not go to the root of the contract.
A condition is an absolute term crucial to the contract's performance. The innocent party can terminate the contract and claim damages if a condition is breached. On the other hand, a warranty is a less critical term that does not affect the core obligations of the contract. If a warranty is breached, the innocent party can only claim damages and not terminate the contract.
iii. Void contract from voidable contract:
A void contract is an agreement with no legal effect from the beginning. A voidable contract, on the other hand, is a contract that is initially valid, but one or both parties have the option to either affirm or avoid it.
A contract is considered null and void from the start, meaning it has no legal effect.
It is as if the contract never existed. On the other hand, a voidable contract is a contract that is initially valid but can be avoided or cancelled by one or both parties due to unavoidable circumstances such as misrepresentation, fraud, duress, or undue influence. Depending on the circumstances, the innocent party can affirm the contract or rescind it.
To know more about Void contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33447915
#SPJ11
a deliberate misrepresentation of a material fact with intent to induce another person to enter into a contract -- and on which the person reasonably relies and does enter into a contract that is injurious to that person -- is defined in the legal community as:
Answer: Fraud
Explanation:
Which of the following questions requires investigation and leads to
debatable conclusions?
A. Which surfers did the most to popularize the use of the short board?
B. What was the official government explanation for U.S. involvement in Vietnam?
C. Do police bicycle and foot patrols help reduce neighborhood crime?
D. How does an electric lightbulb work?
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
You can look at the data for neighborhoods with and without to see if there is a difference. Most likely every neighborhood will not be impacted the same but you will see a trend. So it would be researchable and debatable.
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Which U.S. government action is MOST CLOSELY based on this idea?
The federal government passes laws to protect individual liberties.
The Supreme Court votes to approve the appointment of presidential cabinet members.
The Electoral College votes to approve the winner of congressional elections.
The federal government passes laws to regulate businesses.
The U.S. government action that is most closely based on the idea of protecting individual liberties is the first option: the federal government passing laws to protect individual liberties.
This idea is a cornerstone of the American political system and is enshrined in the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which outlines a range of individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press.
The federal government's role in protecting individual liberties is essential to ensure that citizens are not subjected to oppressive government actions or the infringement of their constitutional rights. This responsibility is shared among all three branches of government: the legislative branch passes laws to protect individual liberties, the executive branch enforces those laws, and the judicial branch interprets them and ensures they are constitutional.
While the other options mentioned involve important government actions, they are not as directly related to protecting individual liberties as passing laws for that purpose.
To know more about liberties click here:
brainly.com/question/2375577
#SPJ4
Which of the following ideologies might be expressed by a "left of center populist" in the Democratic Party? a. Lower taxes. b. A demand for single-payer health care. c. An interventionist foreign policy. d. Deregulation
A left of center populist in the Democratic Party might express the ideology of a demand for single-payer health care.
This is because populism often emphasizes the needs and desires of the working class and disadvantaged populations, and a single-payer healthcare system would provide affordable and accessible healthcare to all. Lower taxes and deregulation are more commonly associated with conservative ideologies, while an interventionist foreign policy may or may not be a priority for a left of center populist. A Democratic Party left-of-center populist might advocate single-payer healthcare as part of their philosophy. This is because a single-payer healthcare system would make healthcare accessible and inexpensive to everyone, yet populism frequently emphasises the needs and wishes of the working class and underprivileged communities.
To know more about single-payer health care, Visit -
https://brainly.com/question/32065541
#SPJ11
what arguments does hamilton use to support life tenure for judges?
Secondly, according to Hamilton, judges are immune from political pressure from the executive or legislative branches thanks to life tenures. Judges are able to prevent unconstitutional laws because of this.
.In this Federalist Paper, Alexander Hamilton makes the case for the Constitution's strong executive branch as compared to the Articles of Confederation's feeble administration. He claims that "the dominant characteristic in the notion of excellent governance is vitality in the executive.
Hamilton served as the director of the Treasury Department and was a dependable member of President Washington's first cabinet. He saw an active president in charge of the federal government, a powerful military, and an industrialized economy.
Learn more about hamilton
https://brainly.com/question/12074319
#SPJ4
What if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no
way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or
criminal case?
Appellate Courts play an essential role in the legal system of every country as they are responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts and ensuring that legal errors are corrected.
The legal process would be significantly impacted if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or criminal case. Here's what would happen in such a scenario:Content loadedThe quality of justice would be affected: Appellate Courts offer a second chance at justice for those who feel like they have been wronged in the Trial Courts.
Without Appellate Courts, there would be no way to appeal decisions made in lower courts. This could lead to wrongful convictions and the denial of justice to those who are genuinely innocent.The stability of the law would be affected: Appellate Courts also play a crucial role in ensuring the stability of the law by establishing legal precedents that are binding on lower courts.
The lack of Appellate Courts would mean that there would be no authoritative interpretation of the law. This could result in inconsistent decisions being made by lower courts, which could make it challenging to predict the outcome of legal disputes.The time and expense of litigation would increase: Without Appellate Courts, all legal disputes would have to be settled in the Trial Courts. This would increase the time and expense of litigation significantly. It would also put more pressure on the Trial Courts to make correct decisions. This could lead to long waiting periods, delayed justice, and increased frustration among litigants.
In conclusion, Appellate Courts play an essential role in ensuring the quality of justice, the stability of the law, and the efficiency of the legal system. If they did not exist, the legal process would be impacted significantly, leading to an increase in the time and expense of litigation, inconsistency in the law, and wrongful convictions. Therefore, it is essential that Appellate Courts continue to function as a necessary check on the decisions of lower courts.
To know more about Appellate Courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ11
Please help no has answered this is my 3rd re:ask question I wasted 50 points please someone help
Scenario: A 16 year old student has a party at his house. The student has good grades, a clear driving record and never been in trouble. The student has 7 friends over and everyone is drinking underage. They all leave to go to the store. The student who drove had 6 people inside the truck and 2 in the bed of the truck. The teen is under the influence of alcohol and hits a vehicle that is disabled on the side of the road. The driver loses control and runs over four people standing on the side of the road and kills them all. The truck flips over and injuries everyone that was in the truck.
Pretend you are a judge handling the case. The teen is found guilty of DUI, 4 counts of vehicular manslaughter, and 8 counts DUI accident causing injury. What should the punishment be for the teen? Justify your answer! Your answer must be no less than 4 sentences.
Answer:
Hey, That is a really Good question. AS, a Proscutor, I would argue that the Minor driving and the Minors in the truck knew what they were doing. AS a judge I wouldn't hold back I would give them the Max in Jail depending on there age they will spend some years in Juvinile Jail until they turn 18. Once they turn 18 they will go to the Jail with the rest of the adults. Once they are moved to the other jail they will once again have another court date for the Judge to then decide if he/or she will allow them to have parol or make them finish their Sentance out. Most likely the Judge will give them 3 months for each DUI and 10 years for Each Manslaughter charge.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
associated with water recreation activities.
TRUE
FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because its logic
Double jeopardy is
A putting someone on trial for the same crime in a different state.
B the right of the government to take private property and use it for public use.
C putting someone on trial again for a crime of which he or she was acquitted.
D to formally accuse a person of a crime.
C. Putting someone on trial again for a crime of which he or she was acquitted.
What is crime?Crime is the violation of a law or laws that results in punishment for the offender. It is a broad concept that encompasses a wide range of activities, from minor infractions such as traffic violations to serious offenses such as ra pe or murder. Crime is a social construct that is defined by the laws of a particular jurisdiction. It is an intentional act or omission in violation of criminal law and punishable by the state or other legal authority. Crimes can range from misdemeanors to felonies and carry a variety of punishments.
Double jeopardy is a legal concept that prevents a person from being tried for the same crime twice, after being acquitted or convicted. This is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution.
To learn more about crime
https://brainly.com/question/14933777
#SPJ1
Which statement describes a difference between the legislative producers of the house of representatives and senate.
The difference between the legislative procedures of the house of representatives and the senate is that the house has more complex debate rules than the senate.
The members of the house of representatives are restricted on their speech time. They only have about 10 minutes of talk time. This is then followed up with questions and answers.
The senate house on the other hand has no such restrictions. Senators may speak for as long as they wish to.
Which of the following prizes or awards are subject to income tax?
A) Cash scholarship used to pay tuition
B) New car won on a game show
C) Cash award to a college professor for outstanding teachingB) New car won on a game show
C) Cash award to a college professor for outstanding teaching
Answer:
B) New car won on a game show
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol