If the following data were transformed and points with the coordinates
(x, log()) were plotted, what points would be plotted? Round log(y) to three
decimal places.
X
1
2
3
y
15
104
728
A. (0, 1.176), (0.301, 2.017), (0.477,2.862)
B. (1.176, 15), (2.017, 104), (2.862, 728)
C. (1, 1.176), (2, 2.017), (3, 2.862)
O D. (1,0.067), (2, 0.010), (3, 0.014)

Answer:

50

Step-by-step explanation:

4,500÷90=50

and to check

90×50=4500

Answer:

The triangles are similar.

Step-by-step explanation:

They are similar because they have the same angles. They may be the same size, but it would be best to refer to whatever definition you were given.

The correct descriptions from the list accurately describe the relationship between QRS and TUV is,

⇒ Similar

A triangle is a three sided polygon, which has three vertices and three angles which has the sum 180 degrees.

We have to given that;

Two triangles are shown in figure.

Here, All the corresponding angles are same in both triangles.

And, The ratio of their corresponding sides are,

In triangle TUV;

⇒ 90 / 108 = 30 / 36

In triangle QRS;

⇒ 30 / 36

Hence, The correct descriptions from the list accurately describe the relationship between QRS and TUV is,

⇒ Similar

Learn more about the triangle visit;

brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ7

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  a) 3, 8, 63, 3968

  b) some other kind

  c) continue to evaluate terms sequentially

Step-by-step explanation:

a) To find the first four terms, use the recurrence relation:

  t(1) = 3 . . . given

  t(2) = t(1)^2 - 1 = 3^2 -1 = 9 -1 = 8

  t(3) = 8^2 -1 = 64 -1 = 63

  t(4) = 63^2 -1 = 3969 -1 = 3968

The first 4 terms are 3, 8, 63, 3968.

__

b) The terms have no common difference or ratio, so the sequence is some other kind of sequence. The ratios of terms form a sequence that is approximately exponential.

__

c) Colin can find the 10th term by evaluating successive terms using the recursion relation. (It is approximately 2.0351×10^230.)

Answer:

...

Step-by-step explanation:

The coefficient used to assess the internal consistency of a measure typically refers to Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

The coefficient used to assess the internal consistency of a measure typically refers to Cronbach's alpha coefficient. This coefficient is a statistic that quantifies the internal consistency reliability of a scale or measure, specifically for measures with multiple items or indicators that are intended to measure the same underlying construct.

The coefficient ranges between 0 and 1, with higher values indicating greater internal consistency. Cronbach's alpha measures the extent to which the items in a scale or measure correlate with each other. It assesses how well the items are measuring the same underlying construct or concept.

In other words, the coefficient represents the proportion of variance in the observed scores that can be attributed to the true score, rather than measurement error or other extraneous factors. It indicates the degree to which the items in the measure are interrelated or consistent with each other, with higher values suggesting stronger internal consistency.

Researchers often use Cronbach's alpha to assess the reliability of scales in various fields, such as psychology, education, and social sciences, to ensure that the measure is measuring the construct consistently and accurately.

Learn more about coefficient on:

https://brainly.com/question/1038771

#SPJ4

Ratios be 2x and 3x

\(\\ \rm\longmapsto 2x+3x=840\)

\(\\ \rm\longmapsto 5x=840\)

\(\\ \rm\longmapsto x=\dfrac{840}{5}\)

\(\\ \rm\longmapsto x=168\)

Now

Answer:

\(2 : 3 \\ 336 : 504\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the ratio be x

So we can write 2:3 as,

\(2x : 3x\)

when we add them,

\(2x + 3x = 5x\)

There altogether 5

So, now we can divide 840 by 5

\(5x = 840 \\ \frac{5x}{5} = \frac{840}{5} \\ x = 168\)

So, x = 168

And now we can find the number of shares corresponding to a ratio of 2:3

\(168 \times 2 =33 6\)

\(168 \times 3 =50 4\)

So, the final answer is,

\(2 : 3 \\ 336 : 504\)

hope this helps you

Let me know if you have another questions:-)

a) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is reflexive and symmetric, but not transitive is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2)}.

b) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,2), (2,3), (1,3)}.

c) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is transitive and symmetric, but not reflexive is {(1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2), (3,4), (4,3)}.

d) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is not transitive, symmetric, or reflexive is {(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)}.

(a) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is reflexive and symmetric, but not transitive is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2)}. This relation is reflexive because each element is related to itself, and symmetric because if (a,b) is in the relation, then (b,a) is also in the relation. However, it is not transitive because (1,2) and (2,3) are in the relation, but (1,3) is not.

(b) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,2), (2,3), (1,3)}. This relation is reflexive because each element is related to itself, and transitive because if (a,b) and (b,c) are in the relation, then (a,c) is also in the relation. However, it is not symmetric because (1,2) is in the relation, but (2,1) is not.

(c) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is transitive and symmetric, but not reflexive is {(1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2), (3,4), (4,3)}. This relation is transitive because if (a,b) and (b,c) are in the relation, then (a,c) is also in the relation, and symmetric because if (a,b) is in the relation, then (b,a) is also in the relation. However, it is not reflexive because there are no elements related to themselves in the relation.

(d) One example of a relation on the set {1,2,3,4} that is not transitive, symmetric, or reflexive is {(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)}. This relation is not reflexive because there are no elements related to themselves, not symmetric because (1,2) is in the relation, but (2,1) is not, and not transitive because (1,2) and (2,3) are in the relation, but (1,3) is not.

Learn more about "relation": https://brainly.com/question/4082048

#SPJ11

If a car gets 13 kilometers per liter of gasoline,  miles per gallon of gasoline would it get is 40 miles.

if a car gets 13 kilometers per liter of gasoline,

We need to find the number of miles per gallon of gasoline would it get

1 gallon of gasoline = 3.78541 liters of gasoline

In 1 liters of gasoline car travels = 13 kilometers

In 3.78541 liters of gasoline, the car travels 13 x 3.785 = 49.2kilometers

1,60934 kilometer = 1 mile

49.2 kilometers = (1/1.60934) x 49.2 = 40 miles

Therefore, if a car gets 13 kilometers per liter of gasoline,  miles per gallon of gasoline would it get is 40 miles.

To learn more about unitary method refer here

https://brainly.com/question/24587372

#SPJ4

Answer: Options 1 and 2

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\frac{1}{3}x+2x-\frac{5}{3}x+\frac{1}{3}x-5\\\\=x-5\\\\=4x-5-3x\)

So the radius of the circle at that instant is 1.

Let's call the radius of the circle at that instant "r."

The formula for the area of a circle is A = pi * r^2 and the formula for the circumference of a circle is C = 2 * pi * r.

If the rate of increase in the area of the circle is numerically equal to twice the rate of increase in its circumference, we can set up the following equation:

2 * (2 * pi * r) = (pi * r^2)

Solving this equation for r, we find that the radius of the circle at that instant is r = 1.

So the radius of the circle at that instant is 1.

To learn more about circle,

visit; brainly.com/question/17357009

#SPJ4

Answer:

The angle of a straight line is 180 degrees.

180 degrees-71 degrees=109 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Please find attached the drawing of the angle ∠SRU (m∠SRU = 120°), constructed with MS Word, which is the supplementary angle to ∠SRT which measures 60°

Supplementary angles are angles that have a sum of 180°.

Let x represent the measure of the angle ∠SRT

The measure of the supplementary angle to angle ∠SRT = 2·x

Therefore; x + 2·x = 180° (Definition of supplementary angles)

3·x = 180°

x = 180°/3 = 60°

The measure of angle ∠SRT = 60°

The steps to construct the 60° angle ∠SRT is as follows;

The angle ∠SRT is a 60° angle and the supplementary angle to the angle ∠SRT is 2  × 60° = 120°, which is obtained by extending the ray TR to the left.

Learn more about geometric construction here:

https://brainly.com/question/29291065

#SPJ1

The velocity of the top of the ladder is 20.62 feet per second.

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to relate the distance between the wall and the base of the ladder to the height of the ladder. Let h be the height of the ladder, then we have:

h² + 7² = 25²

h² = 576

h = 24 feet

We can then use the chain rule to find the velocity of the top of the ladder. Let v be the velocity of the base of the ladder, then we have:

h² + (dx/dt)² = 25²

2h (dh/dt) + 2(dx/dt)(d²x/dt²) = 0

Simplifying and plugging in h = 24 and dx/dt = -2, we get:

(24)(dh/dt) - 2(d²x/dt²) = 0

Solving for (d²x/dt²), we get:

(d²x/dt²) = (12)(dh/dt)

We can find (dh/dt) using the Pythagorean theorem and the fact that the ladder is sliding down the wall at a rate of 2 feet per second:

h² + (dx/dt)² = 25²

2h(dh/dt) + 2(dx/dt)(d²x/dt²) = 0

Substituting h = 24, dx/dt = -2, and solving for (dh/dt), we get:

(dh/dt) = -15/8

Finally, we can find (d²x/dt²) by plugging in (dh/dt) and solving:

(d²x/dt²) = (12)(dh/dt) = (12)(-15/8) = -45/2

Therefore, the velocity of the top of the ladder is 20.62 feet per second.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here: brainly.com/question/28361847

#SPJ4

Answer:

length is 19 width is 15

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of the classroom floor in the scale drawing is 247 square inches.

The area of Rectangle is length times of width.

We need to find the scale of the drawing, which is the ratio of the length in the drawing to the actual length:

19 inches / 38 feet = 0.5 inches/foot

Now we can use the scale to find the dimensions of the classroom floor in the scale drawing:

Length in scale drawing = Actual length ×  Scale

Width in scale drawing = Actual width ×  Scale

Length in scale drawing = 38 feet ×  0.5 inches/foot = 19 inches

Width in scale drawing = 26 feet ×  0.5 inches/foot = 13 inches

So the dimensions of the classroom floor in the scale drawing are 19 inches by 13 inches.

To find the area in square inches, we can multiply the length by the width:

Area in scale drawing = Length in scale drawing × Width in scale drawing

= 19 inches× 13 inches

= 247 square inches

Therefore, the area of the classroom floor in the scale drawing is 247 square inches.

To learn more on Rectangle click:

https://brainly.com/question/20693059

#SPJ2

(a) To prove Statement A, we need to show that if x² - 20x + 96 is greater than or equal to 0, then x is less than or equal to 8 or x is greater than or equal to 12.

We can factor the quadratic expression as (x-8)(x-12) ≥ 0. If both factors are positive or negative, then the product is positive and if one factor is zero, then the product is zero. Therefore, x is either less than or equal to 8 or greater than or equal to 12. This completes the proof of Statement A.

(b) The converse of Statement A is: For every real number x, if x ≤ 8 or x ≥ 12, then x² - 20x + 96 ≥ 0.

(c) The converse of Statement A is false. To see this, consider the value x = 10. This value satisfies the condition in the converse statement (i.e., x is between 8 and 12), but it does not satisfy the condition in the original statement (i.e., x² - 20x + 96 is negative). Therefore, the converse statement is false.

Alternatively, we can also disprove the converse statement algebraically. If we plug in x = 10 into the quadratic expression, we get:

x² - 20x + 96 = 100 - 200 + 96 = -4

This shows that x = 10 is a counterexample to the converse statement, since the quadratic expression is negative even though x is between 8 and 12.

Learn more about converse  here:

vhttps://brainly.com/question/31918837

#SPJ11

Answer:

6, y = 2(x - 5), 0

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  To find f(2), substitute 2 for x:  f(2) = 2/2 + 5 = 6

b) Let's find the inverse function of f(x).  1) replace f(x) with y:  y = x/2 + 5

   2) interchange x and y:  x = y/2 + 5

   3) Solve this result for y:  y/2 = x - 5, or y = 2(x - 5)   This is the inverse of f

(c) the inverse of f at x = 5 is y = 2(5 - 5) = 0

Answer:

6

2(x - 5)

0

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x/2 + 5

a) f(2) = 2/2 + 5

= 6

b) \(f^{-1} (x)\)

we will replace f(x) with y

y = x/2 + 5

now we replace x with y and y with x

x = y/2 + 5

x - 5 = y/2

2(x - 5) = y

now replace y with \(f^{-1} (x)\)

so \(f^{-1}(x) =\) 2(x - 5)

c) \(f^{-1} (5)\) = 2 (5 - 5)

= 0

Answer:

(4, 5) Midpoint

Step-by-step explanation:

Need- What is a midpoint of the line segment?

Solution:

77.9 inches is equal to 197.866 cm.

Now, we know:

Then,

Therefore, 77.9 inches is equal to 197.866 cm.

To know more about inches please visit:

brainly.com/question/16311877

#SPJ4

The system of equations that can be used to find the number of black and white copies and color copies is b + c = 68  , 0.08b + 0.15c = 6.00    .

In the question ,

it is given that

the total amount paid by the customer at the print shop = $6.00

total number of copies that the customer made = 68

the cost for printing 1 black and white copy = $0.08

the cost of printing 1 color copy = $0.15

let the number of black and white copies be "b"

let the number of color copies be "c" .

So ,

b + c = 68  

and

the cost of b black and white copies is = 0.08b

the cost of c color copies is = 0.15c

the total cost = cost of b black and white copies + cost of c color copies

6.00 = 0.08b + 0.15c

0.08b + 0.15c = 6.00

Therefore , The system of equations that can be used to find the number of black and white copies and color copies is b + c = 68  , 0.08b + 0.15c = 6.00   , the correct option is (d) .

Learn more about Equations here

https://brainly.com/question/27911202

#SPJ1

To maximize the seating area while using 45π + 60 meters of light strips, the radius of the semicircular stage should be approximately 29π/3 - 5 meters.

To maximize the seating area, we need to determine the dimensions of the rectangular auditorium that will give us the largest possible area while using the given length of light strips.

Let the length of the rectangular auditorium be L, and its width be W.

The seating area consists of the rectangular portion minus the semicircular stage. So, the seating area's length is L - 2r (subtracting the semicircle's diameter) and the seating area's width is W - 2r.

The perimeter of the seating area is the sum of the lengths of its four sides, excluding the semicircular stage. The perimeter is given as 45π + 60 meters.

Perimeter = 2(L - 2r) + 2(W - 2r) + πr = 45π + 60

Simplifying: 2L + 2W - 8r + πr = 45π + 60

Rearranging: 2L + 2W = 8r + 44π + 60

The area of the seating area is given by A = (L - 2r)(W - 2r).

We want to maximize A, so we need to express it in terms of a single variable. Since we have an equation with two variables (L and W), we can rewrite one of the variables in terms of the other.

Rearranging the perimeter equation: 2L + 2W = 8r + 44π + 60

Solving for L: L = (8r + 44π + 60 - 2W) / 2

Substituting L in terms of W into the area equation: A = [(8r + 44π + 60 - 2W) / 2 - 2r] (W - 2r)

Simplifying: A = (4r + 22π + 30 - W) (W - 2r)

Now we have the area equation in terms of a single variable, W. To maximize A, we can take the derivative of A with respect to W, set it equal to zero, and solve for W.

dA/dW = 2(4r + 22π + 30 - W) - (W - 2r) = 0

Solving for W: 8r + 44π + 60 - W = W - 2r

Simplifying: 10r + 44π + 60 = 2W

W = 5r + 22π + 30

Now that we have W in terms of r, we can substitute this expression back into the area equation to get the area in terms of r only.

A = (4r + 22π + 30 - (5r + 22π + 30)) ((5r + 22π + 30) - 2r)

Simplifying: A = (r - 22π) (3r + 22π + 30)

Expanding: A = 3r² + 8rπ + 30r - 66πr - 660π

Now, to find the maximum area, we can take the derivative of A with respect to r, set it equal to zero, and solve for r.

dA/dr = 6r + 8π + 30 - 66π = 0

Simplifying: 6r - 58π + 30 = 0

6r = 58π - 30

r = (58π - 30) / 6

r ≈ 29π/3 - 5

Therefore, to maximize the seating area while using 45π + 60 meters of light strips, the radius of the semicircular stage should be approximately 29π/3 - 5 meters.

Learn more about maximum area click;

https://brainly.com/question/29635164

#SPJ12

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 + 6z - 15 = 6z - 11

2(3z -4) = 6z - 8

Here's the tricky part. You are only taking 8 away from 6z

The result is going to be larger than when you take away 11 from 6x

Try it

suppose z = 7

6*7 - 8 = 42 - 8 = 34

6*7 - 11 = 42 - 11 = 31

34>31

Answer:

7x+2y<2 will have a shaded area below the boundary line

Customer Service, when implemented well, can minimize the ordering cost aspect of the total cost of ownership(d).

Effective customer service can lead to faster and more accurate order processing, reducing the need for costly rework and additional communication.

By providing customers with accurate and up-to-date information about product availability, pricing, and delivery times, they are more likely to make informed purchasing decisions and reduce the risk of returns or cancellations.

Additionally, a strong customer service team can address customer concerns and complaints promptly, reducing the likelihood of disputes and improving customer loyalty.

Therefore, investing in customer service training, technology, and processes can lead to lower ordering costs and ultimately contribute to a more efficient and cost-effective supply chain.

For more questions like Ordering costs click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18520039

#SPJ11

Tertiary treatment is highly effective in the removal of Total Nitrogen from water. The correct answer is c) >99%. Option C is correct.

Tertiary treatment refers to the advanced treatment processes that are implemented after primary and secondary treatments. These processes are designed to further remove any remaining pollutants, including Total Nitrogen, from the water. Tertiary treatment methods commonly used for nitrogen removal include biological nitrogen removal, denitrification, and chemical precipitation.

Biological nitrogen removal involves the use of microorganisms to convert nitrogen compounds into harmless nitrogen gas. Denitrification is a process where bacteria convert nitrates and nitrites into nitrogen gas. Chemical precipitation, on the other hand, involves adding chemicals to the water to form insoluble compounds that can be removed.

These methods, when combined with primary and secondary treatments, can achieve a removal efficiency of over 99%. This means that more than 99% of the total nitrogen present in the water can be effectively removed, resulting in cleaner and safer water.

Overall, tertiary treatment plays a crucial role in the removal of Total Nitrogen from water, ensuring that the water meets quality standards and is suitable for various purposes, such as drinking water supply and environmental protection.

Know more about Nitrogen here:

https://brainly.com/question/16711904

#SPJ11

The pieces of cloth are beyond the standard at 0.05 level of significance.

We can use a one-sample t-test to determine if the mean length of the 35 pieces of cloth is significantly different from the standard length of 3.25 meters.

The null hypothesis is that the mean length of the cloth pieces is equal to the standard length:

H0: μ = 3.25

The alternative hypothesis is that the mean length of the cloth pieces is greater than the standard length:

Ha: μ > 3.25

We can calculate the test statistic as:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean length, μ is the population mean length (3.25 meters), s is the sample standard deviation (0.52 meters), and n is the sample size (35).

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (3.52 - 3.25) / (0.52 / √35) = 3.81

Using a t-table with 34 degrees of freedom (n-1), and a significance level of 0.05 (one-tailed test), the critical t-value is 1.690.

Since our calculated t-value (3.81) is greater than the critical t-value (1.690), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean length of the 35 pieces of cloth is significantly greater than the standard length at the 0.05 level of significance.

Know more about level of significance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30542688

#SPJ11

The actual cost to see the game is $150, as that is the amount you paid for the ticket. The cost in this scenario can be considered an opportunity cost. By choosing to attend the game instead of selling the ticket for $400, you forgo the opportunity to earn that additional $400.

In this scenario, the cost of attending the game refers to the actual amount of money you spent on the ticket, which is $150. This is the out-of-pocket expense that directly affects your financial resources.

On the other hand, the opportunity cost is the potential benefit or value that you give up by choosing one option over another. In this case, if you had sold the ticket for $400, you would have received a higher amount of money, which represents the opportunity cost of attending the game. By deciding to go to the game, you forego the opportunity to earn that additional $400.

Opportunity cost is a concept in economics that emphasizes the value of the next best alternative forgone when making a decision. It helps assess the trade-offs involved in different choices and helps in evaluating the true cost of a decision beyond the immediate financial expenses.

To know more about actual cost,

https://brainly.com/question/30552529

#SPJ11

That be 148 green peppers if I have my math right.

Step-by-step explanation:

because its 4 times as much, and altogether equals 185, the equation is 5x=185, so x is equal to 37, which is how many yellow peppers she sold. multiply that by 4, and you get 148 green peppers. I hope this helps