If the police act on a search warrant that they feel is valid but it is later determined that the warrant was
invalid - the evidence can still be used in court based upon:
O a. The Good Faith Exception
O b. The Exclusionary Rule
O c. The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
Od. The Doctrine of Negligible Intent

Answer:

The PDEA is a regular law enforcement and regulatory agency which is responsible for the efficient and effective law enforcement of all provisions on any dangerous drug and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals.

Explanation:

Daryl Atkins and his accomplice abducted Eric Nesbitt, robbed him, forced him to withdraw cash from an ATM, and then shot him eight times. Atkins had a history of felony convictions. During the penalty phase of the trial, Atkins's lawyer presented evidence from a psychologist indicating that Atkins was mildly mentally disabled. The jury imposed the death penalty and the Virginia Supreme Court upheld the sentence. The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Opinion A argues that mentally disabled individuals should be tried and punished for their crimes if they meet the legal requirements of criminal responsibility. Opinion B argues that some states have passed laws exempting mentally disabled defendants from the death penalty, but it argues that not all states have reached a consensus on this issue.

A majority of states have rejected the application of the death penalty to mentally disabled defendants. This aligns with Opinion A, which argues that the Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive punishments and that mentally disabled offenders should be spared from the death sentence. In deciding this case, the court should consider evolving standards of decency and societal consensus.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the Eighth Amendment forbids the imposition of the death penalty for crimes committed while under the age of 18. A 15-year-old sentenced to death in a state that allows such sentences for juveniles would violate the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment for juveniles.

learn more about U.S. Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ1

The statement, "Ezekiel, a prophet in the Old Testament, delivered a message of judgment against Tyre, the capital city of Phoenicia", is True.

The message, which can be found in chapters 26-28 of the book of Ezekiel, predicts Tyre's destruction and the downfall of its ruler. The prophecy describes the city's wealth, trade, and military power but also condemns its pride and arrogance. The message of judgment against Tyre is one of several in the book of Ezekiel that denounce the idolatry and disobedience of neighboring nations.

What is the book of Ezekiel?

The book of Ezekiel in the Bible is a prophetic book that contains the visions and prophecies of the prophet Ezekiel, who lived in the 6th century BC.

To learn more about the Book of Ezekiel, visit: https://brainly.com/question/30764467

#SPJ11

Answer: George Washington

Explanation:

George Washington

On April 30, 1789, George Washington, standing on the balcony of Federal Hall on Wall Street in New York, took his oath of office as the first President of the United States.

Answer: 3. Xây dựng các phương án tư vấn cho tình huống nói trên (dành cho tất cả sinh viên)

Explanation: Cả hai câu trả lời một và hai đều có thể áp dụng được. Do đó, câu trả lời thứ ba là câu trả lời chính xác.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/18468755

If Bobby defaults on the home loan, the lender who holds legal title to the property can initiate the foreclosure process. This means that they can take back the property and sell it to recover the amount owed on the loan.

When Bobby took out the home loan, he agreed to give the lender a security interest in the property as collateral for the loan. The lender holds legal title to the property until Bobby repays the loan in full. However, Bobby has equitable title to the property, which means that he has the right to use and occupy the property while making payments on the loan.  If Bobby defaults on the loan, the lender has the legal right to initiate the foreclosure process and take back the property. The lender may choose to initiate either a judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process depending on the state laws and the terms of the loan agreement. In a judicial foreclosure process, the lender must file a lawsuit against Bobby to obtain a court order allowing them to foreclose on the property. In a non-judicial foreclosure process, the lender can sell the property without going through the court system.   if Bobby defaults on the home loan, the lender can initiate the foreclosure process and take back the property. The specific foreclosure process will depend on the state laws and the terms of the loan agreement.

to know about foreclosure process visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32109364

#SPJ11

Janisha here is prompting a living revocable agreement where the grantor has the right to retain their ownership or revoke the trust during their lifetime.

A living revocable is a formal agreement that enables the grantor to contribute assets to the trust while still alive. During their lifetime, the grantor retains ownership of the assets and has the right to modify or revoke the trust at any time in between the course of agreement`.

In Janisha's situation, setting up a living revocable trust might be a wise move to make sure that her assets are distributed in the manner she desires after her passing. Janisha on the other hand  can make sure that her assets are managed and distributed in accordance with her wishes in a regularized manner, even if she becomes incapacitated or passes away, by putting them into a trust.

Learn more about agreement at:

brainly.com/question/27962135

#SPJ4

Most "federal question" cases present issues concerning the interpretation or application of federal law, including constitutional issues or federal statutes.

Most legal disputes involving "federal question" issues have to do with how federal law is interpreted, applied, or violated. These cases typically involve constitutional law, federal statutes, regulations, treaties or other federal legal provisions and are brought before federal courts. Due to the existence of a federal question which means that the resolution of a federal legal issue is dependent upon the outcome of the case federal courts have jurisdiction over these cases.

In order to ensure consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of federal law across various jurisdictions within the United States, federal question cases are crucial. They are essential in establishing federal legal principles and setting legal precedents.

Learn more about federal question at:

brainly.com/question/28483662

#SPJ4

Answer:

um so get together with the people who have the same number as you then rehearse the section the act it out so just use ur hands to talk and move a little

Explanation:

The reason why the death penalty is constitutional despite the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stating that the government inflicting cruel and unusual punishment is a violation of individual rights is because the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld its constitutionality.

Learn more about U.S. Constitution: https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ11

Answer: canada

Explanation: I got it right on the thing

An illustration of a mixed economy that is distributed similarly between the public authority and the private sector is Canada. In this way, choice (B) is precise response.

Canada's economy is viewed as a mixed economy since it consolidates components of both government intervention and private enterprise. The public authority assumes a critical part in different areas, like medical care, schooling, and social government assistance, guaranteeing a fair conveyance of assets and administrations.

Simultaneously, Canada permits private organizations to work and contend on the lookout, encouraging advancement, business venture, and monetary development.

Accordingly, choice (B) is exact response.

Learn more about mixed economy, from:

brainly.com/question/30334683

#SPJ3

The essay about four vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement is as follows:

Drvnk driving is a serious issue that affects not only the driver but also innocent passengers and other drivers on the road. It is a leading cause of vehicular fatalities and injuries, and it is entirely preventable. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2019, 10,142 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes, accounting for 28% of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

One of the most famous cases of dru.nk driving fatalities is the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, and their driver Henri Paul. In 1997, Henri Paul was driving Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed in Paris when he lost control of the car and crashed into a pillar. The investigation revealed that Paul was under the influence of alcohol and had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level three times over the legal limit in France. This tragedy serves as a reminder of the dangers of dru.nk driving and the catastrophic consequences it can have.

Another example is the case of Ethan Couch, who was driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in 2013 when he crashed his truck into a group of pedestrians, killing four people and injuring several others. Couch was only 16 years old at the time and had a BAC level of 0.24%, which is three times over the legal limit for adults in Texas. He was given a controversial sentence of probation and rehabilitation, which sparked outrage and led to the coining of the term "affluenza."

In 2016, former NFL player Will Smith was killed in a shooting that occurred after a road rage incident with another driver in New Orleans. The shooter, Cardell Hayes, was later found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 25 years in prison. The investigation revealed that both Smith and Hayes were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident. Smith's death serves as a tragic reminder of how alcohol can fuel anger and aggression, leading to deadly consequences.

Lastly, in 2018, a limousine crash in upstate New York killed 20 people, making it the deadliest transportation accident in the US since 2009. The limo driver, who did not have the proper license to operate the vehicle, had a history of drug and alcohol abuse. The investigation revealed that the limo's brakes were not functioning properly, and the driver was unable to stop the vehicle as it went through a stop sign and crashed into a parked car. This tragedy underscores the importance of ensuring that vehicles are in good working condition and that drivers are properly licensed and sober before getting behind the wheel.

In conclusion, dru.nk driving is a serious issue that can have deadly consequences. These examples serve as a reminder of the importance of being responsible and making smart choices when it comes to alcohol and driving. It is vital to never get behind the wheel if you have been drinking, and to make sure that you have a designated driver or alternative transportation if you plan on drinking. By taking these simple steps, we can prevent needless tragedies and keep our roads safe for everyone.

Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement refer to deaths caused by drivers who operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. When drivers consume alcohol, it impairs their ability to operate a vehicle safely, leading to reckless behavior, poor decision-making, and slower reaction times.

As a result, they may cause accidents that result in the loss of life or serious injuries to themselves and others on the road. Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement are entirely preventable and are a significant public safety concern.

It is crucial to raise awareness about the dangers of DUI driving and promote responsible behaviors to reduce the number of deaths caused by this preventable issue.

Learn more about Driving Under the Influence (DUI): https://brainly.com/question/29771200

#SPJ11

Answer:

* Too much discipline makes individuals in the school, college and the offices rebellious.

* Too much discipline generates a feeling of suppression by the superiors.

* Too much discipline may develop hesitation among students and colleges.

Explanation:

Anticipatory Repudiation is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract.

Legally, one birthday party's failure to meet any of its contractual obligations is called a "breach" of the agreement. Relying on the specifics, a breach can occur when a party fails to carry out on time, does not perform in accordance with the terms of the settlement, or does now not carry out in any respect.

Events to the settlement can are seeking special types of remedies in court with a view to mitigating losses stemming from the breach, together with damages (financial repayment) and equitable treatments inclusive of unique overall performance (forcing the breaching party to observe via its obligations).

Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ4

True. Candidates often advocate for state legislatures to enact stiffer penalties for crimes and to limit judges' abilities to reduce sentences for nonviolent crimes of first-time offenders.

These measures are intended to deter crime and provide justice for victims, but they can also lead to issues such as overcrowding in prisons and inequitable sentencing practices. These methods aim to prevent crime and provide victims justice, but they may also result in problems like jail overpopulation and unfair sentencing procedures. Some candidates may push for stricter criminal laws, which might force state legislatures to pass harsher punishments and restrict judges' discretion to commute sentences for first-time offenders who commit nonviolent offences.

To know more about criminal laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30712009

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think the answer for this question is money

The statement "the rules of contract interpretation will give effect to the parties intent as expressed in their contract" is correct.

The courts will typically interpret a contract to give effect to the parties intent as stated in the contract itself when there is a disagreement over the parties intentions or when there are ambiguous terms in the contract. According to the objective meaning of the words used and taking into account the context and circumstances of the contract's formation, the court's job is to interpret and uphold the agreement.

This method makes sure that the contract is interpreted in a way that is consistent with the parties understanding at the time of entering the contract and that the parties original intentions as expressed in the written agreement, are respected.

Learn more about contract interpretation at:

brainly.com/question/32810710

#SPJ4

Answer:

debt is the answer to everything related to college payment

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?

the profession of the victim

the profession of the criminal

the type of crime committed

the area the crime was committed in

Yes, the local law enforcement officers enforce the laws pertaining to alcoholic beverages.

The regulatory and law enforcement agencies have the clear jurisdiction to control and regulate the supply for alcohol and narcotics.

Some more responsibilities of local law enforcement are-

To know more about law enforcement organization, here

brainly.com/question/24324910

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think it's letter C

Explanation:

Law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the court system.

Please vote me as the brainliest answer thanks

The law that governs the reporting of communicable diseases to a state department of health is typically a state-level public health law.

State-level public health laws typically govern the reporting of communicable diseases to state departments of health. These laws may vary from state to state, but generally, healthcare providers and laboratories are required to report certain communicable diseases to their respective state departments of health. The purpose of these laws is to monitor, control, and prevent the spread of communicable diseases. To learn more about the specific law in your state, you can check your state's Department of Health website or reach out to them directly for more information.

Learn more about public health laws:

https://brainly.com/question/8285071

#SPJ11

Answer:

  .

Explanation:

Answer:

neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers

Answer:

Forensic lab.

Explanation:

The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) unit transport evidence to the forensic laboratory for the testing of evidences. The physical evidence is collected by Crime Scene Investigators that may include fingerprints, footprints, hair, fibers and other materials that are found at the crime scene and on the victim's body. These evidences are used by the forensic scientist in order to find out the cause as well as the criminal.