In two paragraphs, explain the significance of katarungan pambarangay in criminal justice system

The correct answer is option C. The real property plus fixtures, improvements, appurtenances, plus inclusions, minus exclusions.

A contract is an agreement that outlines specific, legally binding rights and duties that apply to two or more parties that have reached a consensus. The transfer of commodities, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of those at a later time are common components of contracts.

A contract may be unilateral, bilateral, contingent, voidable, express, implied, executed, or executory, among other sorts. Based on quasi-contract, it can be broadly categorized.

Learn more about Contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ4

Answer:

Another way to say "literal interpretation" is strict interpretation. I believe that the democrats, headed by Jefferson in the early 1800s, followed strict interpretation, even though he followed loose interpretation when he purchased the louisiana territory.

The situation describes a labor surplus. When there is an oversupply of labor, it means that there are more workers than jobs available.

This can lead to high unemployment rates as employers do not need to fill many vacancies, leading to a surplus of laborers. This case describes a situation of labor surplus because the number of job seekers is much greater than the number of available jobs.

In this case, there are a significant number of people looking for jobs, but there aren't many job openings available for them. A labor surplus means that there is more supply than demand for labor. In other words, there are more workers than jobs available.

This can lead to competition among workers, resulting in lower wages. Employers can easily find workers, but employees may struggle to find work. When there is a surplus of labor, it's hard for workers to find jobs, and the unemployment rate increases.

Thus, this case describes a situation of labor surplus, as there are many workers and few job openings available.

For more such question on labor surplus visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31018264

#SPJ8

Answer:

what is that or something

Answer:

Transaction broker

Explanation:

Answer:

What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?

The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.

Explanation:

Answer:

answer of this question is Fifth

Explanation:

May this answer is helpful for you

People who have mental disabilities and head injuries end up in the criminal justice system for committing crimes.

People with mental health problems or developmental disabilities end up in the criminal justice system because they commit criminal acts such as: robbery, murder, attempted murder, damage to private property, among others.

These problems mean that individuals do not have a complete perception of reality, so they tend to interpret reality in a different way and do not have the ability to rationalize the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, on some occasions they act without thinking about the consequences and commit criminal acts.

As we mentioned before, people with mental and cognitive problems are not fully aware of the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, they usually use excessive force and take some situations very personally, which is why they develop feelings of revenge. This makes these people have no control over their feelings and this leads them to act violently towards others.

Learn more about mental problems in: https://brainly.com/question/27700694

#SPJ1

In many societies, high education costs have made it difficult for peasants to attain government positions.

Consequently, the civil service often comprised a class of individuals known as Mandarins. These were well-educated civil servants who held considerable power and control over the government.

The Mandarins often enjoyed significant privileges and were able to exert their influence over decision-making processes. Their education provided them with an advantage over others, and they were seen as the most capable individuals to handle government affairs.

This led to the creation of a new class system where the Mandarins held a prominent position, and their status was often inherited by their descendants.

Learn more about  Mandarins here

https://brainly.com/question/1142347

#SPJ4

TRUE. Both liberals and conservatives on the abortion issue generally agree that murder is wrong and that individuals have a right to life.

The belief that murders is wrong and that individuals have a right to life is a commonly shared value across political ideologies, including liberals and conservatives. While liberals and conservatives may differ in their perspectives on the legality and morality of abortion, they generally agree on the fundamental principle that taking an innocent life through murder is morally unacceptable.

However, the disagreement arises when it comes to defining when life begins, the rights of the fetus, and the role of the government in regulating or restricting abortion. Liberals tend to emphasize a woman's right to choose and advocate for access to safe and legal abortion, considering factors such as bodily autonomy and women's reproductive rights. On the other hand, conservatives often prioritize protecting the rights and potential life of the unborn fetus, supporting stricter regulations or even outright bans on abortion.

While both sides may share a common belief in the value of life and the immorality of murder, their perspectives diverge when it comes to applying these principles to the complex and nuanced issue of abortion.

To learn more about murder: -brainly.com/question/4182900#SPJ11

Answer:

Financial literacy as essential equipment to secure hacking and theft practices

Explanation:

Some of the measures to be taken are there should be the introduction of the use of ATM cards and allied stuffs in connection to financial matters for every individual

Answer:

neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers

The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.

This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.

Learn more about comparative negligence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29829593

#SPJ11

No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.

The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.

Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.

The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.

Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:

https://brainly.com/question/32959753

#SPJ11

Answer:

that's a iffy question

Explanation:

there is so many views on it its like it won't cause you can look at someone and say oh he's bad oh he's good without even knowing then like there are people staring at you looking at your every move even though you have done nothing now I'm not saying it will ever end cause it can if everyone had the same perspective on thing shut we don't so thats what makes it hard

Answer:

no

Explanation:

just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently

When we speak a different language or have a different culture, we seem 'alien' or foreign to those who do not follow the same as us. This makes us view each other differently as we do not have the knowledge to understand what the other person is doing, saying, or even implying.

It is true that language is an important factor in one's identity and belonging. It also determines who we are as a person, and reveals or is indicative of our origin.

When we don't understand a person with a different language, or culture, or language identity, we tend to view them differently because of the feeling of being different, strange in some sort, or even completely unique to us. This 'difference' makes them as 'the other', another type, and being seen as separate or unrelated.

Learn more about language here:

brainly.com/question/19898392

Answer:

Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples

Answer:

This simple could give a close relative to the person, or to the EXACT person, then that is when investigators, checks alibis at the time of the incidence, or check footages in the Area to see if the person appeared on any (I know that they would probably get the footage the day it was called).

Answer:

Please write english I don't understand vietnamese word

Explanation:

Answer:

The transfer of risk is an essential tenant of insurance contracts. When you purchase an insurance policy, the insurance company will agree to indemnify you for a certain amount of loss in exchange for your payment of a set premium

Answer:

Explanation:

In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.

The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are

Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.

The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.

Read more about judge

https://brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ1

The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.

The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.

While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.

To learn more about vote visit:

https://brainly.in/question/20481185

#SPJ13

Answer: owner's policy

Explanation:

Answer: The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people in 1,833 state prisons, 110 federal prisons, 1,772 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,134 local jails, 218 immigration detention facilities, and 80 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric

Explanation:

En banc refers to an appellate hearing with all judges participating.

In the field of law, 'en banc' can be described as a common French phrase that is used in the judiciary when all the judges sit together in order to make a verdict on a legal matter.

The meaning of this French term is 'on the bench' and it inclines that all the judges of a bench make a common decision on a particular legal matter.

An en banc usually occurs in the case of an appellate hearing when a former decision by a judge has been asked for revision such that the whole bench of judges participates to revise that decision.

To learn more about judges, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2533637

#SPJ4

Answer:

Pros: She will learn from her mistake. Cons: It could be difficult to pay the fine and still be able to get essentials.

The plaintiff must prove that the use of a person's name or likeness was knowingly made under a statutorily granted right.

In cases where a person's name or likeness is used without their consent for commercial purposes, the right to control the use of one's own identity is generally protected under privacy laws or statutes. These statutes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but they typically grant individuals certain rights over the commercial use of their name, image, or likeness.

To successfully pursue a legal claim for unauthorized use of their name or likeness, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the use was made in violation of the rights granted by applicable statutes. This requires proving that the use of their name or likeness was intentional and without legal justification or authorization.

Common law rights, which are principles derived from court decisions rather than specific statutes, may also provide some protection in certain cases. However, the statement in question specifically refers to a statutorily granted right, indicating that the plaintiff must rely on statutory provisions rather than common law principles.

Legislative rights, on the other hand, typically refer to rights conferred by legislation or statutes. While legislation may play a role in establishing and clarifying the scope of rights related to the use of one's name or likeness, the specific wording of the statement suggests that the focus is on rights granted through statutes rather than rights established solely through legislative action.

In summary, the correct answer is "c. statutorily granted right." The plaintiff must prove that the use of a person's name or likeness was knowingly made under a statutorily granted right, indicating that their rights to control the use of their identity were violated under applicable privacy laws or statutes.

Learn more about plaintiff here

https://brainly.com/question/30552468

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Employees' right to privacy in the workplace encompass an employee's personal information and activities at work. ( That include private emails)

When deciding whether a statute is constitutional, the court considers the following two factors:

Substantive Due Process: The court will examine whether the statute violates substantive due process, which protects certain fundamental rights and liberties. Under substantive due process, the court evaluates whether the statute infringes on rights that are considered essential to individual autonomy, liberty, or privacy. The court may analyze if the statute impairs a fundamental right without a compelling state interest or if it is arbitrary, irrational, or lacks a reasonable basis.

Rational Basis Test: If the statute does not implicate a fundamental right, the court applies the rational basis test. The court assesses whether the statute is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. In this analysis, the court considers whether there is a reasonable connection between the objective of the law and the means chosen to achieve it. The statute will generally be upheld if there is any conceivable legitimate government interest that the law seeks to advance, even if the court disagrees with the wisdom or efficacy of the statute.

In the given scenario, the court would likely evaluate the Kansas statute based on these factors. If the statute is found to violate substantive due process or fail the rational basis test, it may be deemed unconstitutional. However, the specific analysis and outcome would depend on the arguments presented, the court's interpretation, and relevant legal precedents.

To know more about   constitutional here

https://brainly.com/question/470736

#SPJ11