Answers
The given statement is False, arrest warrant is not required if the supreme court found that an arrest warrant allows only the search of a suspect's person and the immediate vicinity.
A search warrant is a document signed by a judge or magistrate that permits a police officer to search a certain person, a predetermined location, or a vehicle in search of criminal evidence.
The requirement for a search warrant is typically there to safeguard people's reasonable expectation of privacy against arbitrary government physical trespass or other interference. The U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which guards against unauthorized government searches and seizures, is where this right first appeared.
To learn more about Fourth Amendment please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Fill in the blank with a vocabulary word.
The _______ of flowers smelled good.
bouquet
feathers
flowers
Answers
Answer:
The bouquet of flowers smelled good.
Explanation:
A bouquet is a word used to describe a bunch or group of flowers.
Answer:
bouquet
Explanation:
Which makes most sense...
The FEATHERS of flowers smelled good
The FLOWERS of flowers smelled good
The BOUQUET of flowers smelled good
The only one out of those 3 that makes sense, is BOUQUET
:)
if a prepaid smart card or gift card is lost, then the money that was on that card is
Answers
Answer:
The money in the gift card will be lost aswell if you loose it
What is Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?
Answers
The Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000 is a set of guidelines and procedures for Virginia state agencies and the administrative processes they follow.
The Act outlines the methods for developing, adopting, and implementing regulations, as well as hearing and decision-making procedures.
What is the Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?The Virginia Administrative Process Act is a set of state laws that govern the operations of Virginia's administrative agencies.
The Act establishes the procedures that state agencies must follow in adopting, developing, and implementing rules and regulations. The Act was enacted in 1981 and is designed to ensure that state agencies operate in a fair and open manner.
It outlines the procedures for public participation in the development of regulations, including opportunities for public comment, public hearings, and judicial review.
It also outlines the methods for enforcing agency decisions and appeals to those decisions.
In summary, the Virginia Administrative Process Act provides a structured process for state agencies to follow in conducting their affairs, ensuring that they operate in an open and fair manner that is consistent with the principles of democratic government.
To know more about Virginia Administrative Process refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/20338178#
#SPJ11
What is a 5 judge bench called?.
Answers
The term "full bench" refers to a bench of three or five judges. The word "bench" is a judicial term that refers to the judge's seat in the courtroom.
What is the size of the bench of judges?In order to decide any case "involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation" of the Constitution of India or "for the purpose of hearing any reference" made by the government, the Supreme Court of India will convene benches with at least five judges. These benches are referred to as "Constitution benches."
To know more about bench visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28221733
#SPJ4
What is the conflict perspective when it comes to income inequality?
Answers
Answer:
conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.
Does this help?
analyze how the courts can check the delegated powers of the president (use one or two examples of which you have heard in the news.
Answers
The courts are crucial in making sure that the president's delegated powers stay within the bounds of the Constitution and the law of the nation. Here are two instances of how the judiciary might restrict the
A person, group, or thing has a power if they have an ability or quality that allows them to do an extraordinary action. The capacity to fly, manipulate the weather, or read minds are examples of skills that are frequently connected in popular culture to superheroes or other supernatural creatures.In actuality, powers may relate to a variety of skills, including physical prowess and agility as well as mental and emotional acuity. Additionally, they can be learned through instruction, practise, or experience. However, possessing powers also entails responsibility because individuals who possess them may be able to use their abilities for both good and bad. It is crucial to use caution and
Learn more about powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/29575208
#SPJ4
What has the Supreme Court used the 14th Amendment for?
Answers
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answers
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
which law protect citizen from Human rights violation
Answers
Answer:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 established in the U.S worker's immunity from discrimination on the basis of their race,color,region,sex,or nationality.
I Hope I was able to help.
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
If James kill ruby and the lawyer lie to the law who is repunseble
Answers
Answer:
The lawyer is a trash bec. he is the only one that can keep the evidence and the crime. The lawyer only wants money he didnt want the true investigations...
And btw this app is trash amd the lawyer too
Criminal Justice
1.In your own words, What are the questions feminist criminology attempts to answer?
2.In your own words, Name one of the areas of study engaged in by feminist criminologists. Describe this area of study.
Answers
It should be noted that feminist criminology simply focuses on women offenders and the women that are in the criminal justice system do that they'll be able to understand the causes and results of female criminality.
Feminist criminology is important as it helps to improve the understanding of the reasons why women commit crimes in order for policies to be enacted to reduce the crime.
It focuses on the issues that relate to women and crime such as explanations of crime, the responses to female offending, and the special needs of women prisoners.
Learn more about feminism on:
https://brainly.com/question/1092730
The ___________________ rule demands that any items or evidence gathered during an illegal search of a person's private property be excluded as evidence against the defendant at the time of trial.
Answers
Answer:
The exclusionary rule
Explanation:
the decision in Mappy v. Ohio declared that evidence that is obtained through an illegal search or seizure can not be used as evidence and must be excluded. This means that if an officer finds evidence of a crime on you but does not announce Miranda rights before searching you, then the evidence found from your crime can not be used against you in a court.
The purpose of the first juvenile courts was to step in when _____ failed.
A.diversion
B.parents
C.rehabilitation
D.Society
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
society sucks
Define and describe the human right violation
Answers
Answer:
A human right explanation is the act in which people's basic rights are infringed.
Explanation:
Such as:
Lack of Freedom of SpeechLack of a fair trial Unlawful ExecutionsSo much more.What can be the maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court.
Answers
The maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific consumer protection laws of the country.
In India, for instance, the maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court is Rs. 20 lakh (20,00,000 Indian Rupees). This means that consumers can file complaints seeking compensation up to this specified limit for any grievances related to goods or services.
It's important to note that the maximum claim amount can differ in different countries or regions, so it's advisable to consult the specific consumer protection laws and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction in question.
Learn more about Jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
Probation officers primarily work with
a. victims of crime
b. offenders
c. legal and court officials
d. law enforcement officials
Answers
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Answers
A small amount of alcohol leaves the body through the skin, in the breath and in urine.
The amount of alcohol in the blood at any time varies depending on the amount, the strength and how quickly the alcohol is consumed. Individual factors also contribute, such as body type, age, gender and how well the liver can break down alcohol to use for energy.
Sasha was bank employee with 21 years’ service whose IT role entitled her to virtually unlimited access to confidential documents. One day Sasha decided to access sensitive information concerning priority parking, without permission, to satisfy her curiosity about where she was on the list of the most prized parking stops. As soon as the employer found out about this action, it dismissed Sasha for just cause. Sasha sued the employer for wrongful dismissal, arguing that as a long-service employee with an unblemished work record, dismissing her for just cause for a single, isolated act was a disproportionate response.1. Did the employer have just cause in your view?2. If the employer did not have just cause how many weeks’ notice of termination is Sasha entitled to under the ESA? Explain your answer.3. If the employer did not have cause what do you think that Sasha is entitled to under the common law?
Answers
The employer had just cause to dismiss Sasha for accessing sensitive information without permission, considering the breach of trust and violation of her role. If the employer did not have just cause, Sasha would be entitled to notice of termination under the Employment Standards Act (ESA), and under common law, she may be entitled to reasonable notice or pay in lieu of notice based on factors such as length of service and position.
However, the specific entitlement would depend on jurisdiction and should be determined through consultation with relevant laws or legal professionals.
In my view, the employer had just cause to dismiss Sasha for accessing sensitive information without permission. Sasha's unauthorized access to confidential documents demonstrates a breach of trust and a violation of her role as an IT employee with unlimited access.
It is reasonable for the employer to consider such actions as a serious offense, as it compromises the confidentiality and security of sensitive information. Sasha's curiosity about her parking priority does not justify her unauthorized access, and her long-service and unblemished work record may not be sufficient to outweigh the severity of the breach.
If the employer did not have just cause, Sasha would be entitled to notice of termination under the Employment Standards Act (ESA) in accordance with the length of her service. The specific number of weeks would depend on the jurisdiction and the length of her employment. It is advisable to consult the ESA or relevant employment laws in the specific jurisdiction to determine the exact entitlement.
If the employer did not have just cause, under common law, Sasha may be entitled to reasonable notice or pay in lieu of notice. Common law factors include length of service, age, position, and availability of similar employment.
In this case, Sasha's 21 years of service and unblemished work record may be considered in determining a reasonable notice period. It is important to note that common law notice periods can vary, and it would be advisable to consult an employment lawyer or refer to relevant case law to determine the specific entitlement in this scenario.
To know more about sensitive information refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30123744
#SPJ11
There should not bullies because there is no reason to bully.So, If you are a bully(IF),Gust do not do things you support and respect your victims and be people not animals.OK?!
Answers
Answer:
so true
Explanation:
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
Answers
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11
8. Sometimes court relies on decisions made by other judges in other cases that are relevant to the matter at hand. O True O False 9. Each provincial and territorial system of courts has only one basic level that is final appeal. O True O False
Answers
True. Sometimes courts rely on decisions made by other judges in previous cases, especially those that are relevant and similar to the matter at hand.
This practice is known as "precedent" or "stare decisis" and is commonly employed in common law systems.
False. Each provincial and territorial system of courts typically has multiple levels. There are usually multiple levels of courts, including trial courts, appellate courts, and in some cases, a final court of appeal. The final court of appeal is the highest level in the judicial hierarchy and is responsible for reviewing and deciding on appeals from lower courts.
Learn more about decisions here:
https://brainly.com/question/29104188
#SPJ11
a temporary committee that is formed when the two chambers of congress pass differing versions of the same bill. the conference committee consists of members from the house and the senate who work out a compromise bill.
Answers
conference committee a temporary committee that is formed when the two chambers of congress pass differing versions of the same bill.
In order to resolve disagreements in legislation that has passed both chambers, a conference committee is a temporary, ad hoc panel made up of House and Senate conferees. Conference committees are typically established to settle bicameral disagreements on significant or contentious legislation. A conference committee made up of representatives from each house convenes to resolve the disagreements. The committee is often composed of senior members who are chosen by the chairpersons of the committee that first reviewed the bill. Each house's representatives endeavor to keep their version of the bill current.
Know more about the conference committee at: https://brainly.com/question/28741720
#SPJ4
CIVICS (question in photo below)
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil
Explanation:
The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.
with reference to the company act in Kenya ,describe the capacity of a company to enter into a binding contract.
Answers
Answer:
To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner
How does collateral affect the interest rate on a bond
Answers
The presence of collateral can affect the interest rate on a bond in the following ways:
1. Collateral can lower the interest rate on a bond: When collateral is provided, the risk associated with the bond decreases. This means that the investor's investment is secured by the collateral in the event that the issuer defaults on the bond. This reduction in risk may lead to a lower interest rate on the bond.
2. Collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: On the other hand, if the collateral is of low quality, it may not be as valuable in the event of a default. In this case, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
3. No collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: When there is no collateral backing a bond, the bond is considered to be unsecured. This means that the investor's investment is not secured by any assets.
As a result, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
In New Jersey, the public is protected by a notice of discontinuance when a policy is discontinued for nonpayment of premiums. When a policy is discontinued all the following are required Ceasing to collect premium payments from group participants unless the group policyholder remains fully responsible
- written notice to the policy holder
A reminder of the date of discontinuance
Answers
When a policy is discontinued for nonpayment of premiums in New Jersey, the public is protected by a notice of discontinuance.
Ceasing to collect premium payments from group participants unless the group policyholder remains fully responsible. A Notice of Discontinuance is a document that serves as a notice to the policyholder that their policy is going to be discontinued. When a policy is discontinued, the public is protected in New Jersey by a notice of discontinuance. This notice is used to inform the policyholder that their policy is being terminated due to a lack of payment or other reasons. In New Jersey, the following are required when a policy is discontinued for nonpayment of premiums: Ceasing to collect premium payments from group participants unless the group policyholder remains fully responsible. Written notice to the policyholder.
Learn more about discontinuance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30901480
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements about government policy and unemployment are true?
(Select all that apply. Hint: There are two correct answers.)
A. Average unemployment benefits are equal to about one-half of the wage that the person earned in his or her previous job.
B. The federal government requires tax collection on the first $7,000 in wages paid to each worker.
C. An individual has to collect unemployment benefits to be classified as unemployed.
D. The funding for unemployment insurance is a federal tax collected from employers.
Answers
The following statements about government policy and unemployment are true The federal government requires tax collection on the first $7,000 in wages paid to each worker.
What impact does unemployment have on the government?Both the federal government's ability to collect revenue and economic activity are negatively impacted by unemployment. Less people are taxing the government when unemployment is high. Yet, unemployment also means that fewer people have extra money to spend on goods and services.
What could make you ineligible for unemployment benefits in Texas?If you were fired for an issue other than wrongdoing, you can be qualified for benefits. Instances of misconduct that could result in you losing your eligibility include breaking corporate rules, breaking the law, failing to properly manage your position, or failing to complete your work when you are capable of doing so.
To Know more about corporate rules,
https://brainly.com/question/7283950
#SPJ1
A married couple has been seeing a marriage therapist for three months because they were often fighting with each other. The counselor determines that an addiction to alcohol is one of the main causes that triggers fights. Therefore, the therapist recommends that the couple should see another counselor. What kind of counselor would the marriage therapist most likely recommend? Substance Abuse Counselor Religious Counselor Rehabilitation Counselor Mental Health Counselor
Answers
Answer:
Substance Abuse Councler
Explanation:
The substance abuse counselor is a mental health counselor specializing in treating patients who have a chemical dependency on drugs or alcohol. A substance abuse counselor works with their client to help them overcome their dependency and become self-sufficient. The substance abuse counselor may also work closely with the family of the client as substance abuse inevitably affects the loved ones of the chemically dependent person.
Substance Abuse Counselor kind of counselor would the marriage therapist most likely recommend. Thus, option (A) is correct.
What is a Counselor?Counselors assist clients dealing with a wide range of emotional and psychological issues in making lasting changes and/or improving their wellness. Clients may be struggling to manage their lives due to problems including depression, anxiety, stress, loss, and relationship problems.
The mental health counselor who specializes in treating people with chemical dependencies on drugs or alcohol is known as a substance misuse counselor. A drug abuse counselor assists their client in overcoming reliance and achieving independence.
Therefore, Thus, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about Counselor here:
https://brainly.com/question/28191007
#SPJ5
Which party was held responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson?
Group of answer choices
a) Ms. Donoghue's friend who bought her the bottle of ginger beer.
b) The manufacturer of the ginger beer.
c)The retailer who sold the bottle of ginger beer to Ms. Donoghue's friend.
d)The party which placed the snail into the bottle of ginger beer.
Answers
The party held responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson was the manufacturer of the ginger beer.
In the Donoghue v Stevenson case, Ms. Donoghue consumed a bottle of ginger beer that was manufactured by the defendant, Stevenson. Unbeknownst to Ms. Donoghue, there was a decomposed snail in the bottle, which caused her to suffer from gastro-enteritis. Ms. Donoghue claimed that the manufacturer was negligent in producing a contaminated product, leading to her illness.
The House of Lords, in its landmark ruling, established the principle of "neighbour principle" which expanded the duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers. The court held that the manufacturer had a duty to ensure that their products were safe for consumption, and they could be held liable for any harm caused by their defective products. This ruling set a precedent for product liability cases and extended the scope of liability beyond contractual relationships.
Therefore, in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, it was determined that the manufacturer of the ginger beer was responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis due to their failure to ensure the product's safety.
Learn more about Stevenson here
https://brainly.com/question/30983683
#SPJ11