Answers
Answer:
The Constitution is a flexible document because of its custom, usage, tradition, broad framework, and elastic clause. ... Usage refers to the government, “using certain pieces of legislation to alter the Constitution” (Flexibility).
Related Questions
Philosophy
How does determinism apply to our perception of the self?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answers
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are commonly known as "local content laws" or "local ownership requirements."
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
Which of the following would likely be considered only an infraction?
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
B. A violent crime under the aggravating circumstances of having
been provoked
C. An act of arson that led to the destruction of property, but not to
the physical harm of any person
D. A first act of shoplifting merchandise with a value of a few
hundred dollars
Answers
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Choices B-D are either criminal charges, or a misdemeanor. Someone with no previous record is likely to receive a warning (not even a citation/infraction).
Answer:
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
Of the following, which is the least affected by legislation? Common Law Statutes Professional Codes Regulations Morallity
Answers
Common Law is the least affect-ed by legislation. Common law is the body of law created by jud-ges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by vir-tue of being stated in writ-ten opinions.
The Common law ref-ers to law and the correspond-ing legal sys-tem developed through deci-sions of courts and similar tri-bunals, rather than through legis-lative statutes or exe-cutive action. Common law, also kno-wn as case law, is a body of un-written laws based on legal prece-dents esta-blished by the courts. Common law draws from institution-alized opinions and inter-pretations from judicial author-ities and public juries. Common laws some-times prove the inspiration for new legis-lation to be enacted.
To know more about common law click below:
brainly.com/question/13610284
#SPJ4
Which of the following would disqualify an act from being considered fraud?
A. There was no force or threat of force used in the act.
O B. The individual accused of fraud knew that his statements were
false.
C. No loss was suffered nor intended.
D. The deception took place via mail rather than in person.
Answers
Answer:
The deception took place via rather than in person.
Answer:
C. No loss was suffered nor intended
Explanation:
What effects could a lack of voter participation have?
Answers
Still, low turnouts can lead to unequal representation among various parts of the population. In developed countries, non-voters tend to be concentrated in particular demographic and socioeconomic groups, especially the young and the poor.
Answer:
Still, low turnouts can lead to unequal representation among various parts of the population. In developed countries, non-voters tend to be concentrated in particular demographic and socioeconomic groups, especially the young and the poor.
Hey guys just wanted to know if Yall can help me to know something, so I was on a soccer game and a kid pushed me on purpose and posed to fight Me but I trowed a punch and knocked him out, he has a purple mark on the face, what the max thing I can get in trouble, can I go to jail? I'm 17 years old by the way, help me out with you guys knowledge
Answers
Answer:
ok don't worry, first i dont think youll go to jail and if you do its probably overnight unless you did something worse, then it'll be longer depending on what you did. But i doubt youll go to jail for one punch, maybe get yelled at but you'll be fine
Explanation:
Many people in an area have lost their jobs and are about to lose their homes because they cannot make their monthly mortgage payments Jane , a lawyer , writes to all of these people saying she is willing to represent them to prevent the loss of their homes . Should she allowed to do this ?
PLEASE HELP!!!
Answers
Answer:
It's up to her.
Explanation:
I'm no lawyer but I think that they get to pick and choose if they want to accept any cases or not. I think that if she wants to take the risk to represent them, then she should be allowed to.
Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of weeks after he gets released from the hospital, Jay receives a bill from the hospital for $10,000 for his medical care. If this went to court, the judge would probably describe this situation as:________.
a. a bilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
b. a unilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
d. no contract at all. Jay should not have to pay anything.
Answers
Answer: c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
Explanation:
An Implied contracts is usually between physician and a patient this contracts do not state the course of action or payment at the start or inception of the service. Example, a medical examination usually takes place the moment a patient's request for it, this tests are usually either at the patients home or at the medical facility where the doctor practices. After the examination a course of action or payment is decided. Same applies to Jay after been treated and discharged from the hospital a course of action or payment may be made.
Reading Test Bank 7
Name
Florida Test Prep Workbook
6. Which is the best summary of the section titled "Federal Reserve System" in Passage 2?
You can think of the Federal Reserve System as a watchdog because it watches our buy
money supply, interest rates, and pricing.
B Another name for the Federal Reserve System is the Fed. It is a difficult system to
understand, but Congress knows all about it.
The Federal Reserve System is not easy to understand. It has lots of parts. It is not
owned by the government. Its main job is to protect the money system in our country.
The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States. Congress receives reports
from the Fed, but the government does not own it. Its main job is to keep the U.S.
money system secure.
Answers
Answer: Your welcome!
Explanation:
The best summary of the section titled "Federal Reserve System" in Passage 2 is: The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States. Congress receives reports from the Fed, but the government does not own it. Its main job is to keep the U.S. money system secure. This accurately summarizes the main points of the section which includes the Federal Reserve System being the central bank of the United States, the government not owning it, and the main job of the Fed being to keep the money system secure.
Describe the characteristics that make organized crime a unique type of criminality. Explain why defining organized crime is difficult. Explain and discuss the organizational structure of an organized crime group. Discuss the basic qualifications for membership in an organized crime group. What are the advantages and disadvantages of membership in an organized crime group?
Answers
Organized crime is a unique form of criminality characterized by a structured, hierarchical, and coordinated approach to illegal activities. The key characteristics that make organized crime distinct: Structure and Hierarchy, Coordinated Criminal Activities, Longevity and Permanence etc.
What are the responses to other questions?Below are the characteristics of an organized crime:
1. Structure and Hierarchy: Organized crime groups have a well-defined organizational structure with clear lines of authority and division of labor.
2. Coordinated Criminal Activities: These activities are carried out strategically and often span multiple jurisdictions.
3. Longevity and Permanence: Organized crime groups aim for long-term survival and establish durable criminal enterprises.
B Defining organized crime is challenging due to several reasons:
1. Complexity and Adaptability.
2. Global Nature
3. Lack of Uniformity.
The organizational structure of an organized crime group typically follows a hierarchical model, similar to a corporation which include:
1. Boss/Leader: The highest-ranking individual who holds ultimate authority and makes critical decisions for the group.
2. Underboss: The second-in-command who assists the boss and takes over in their absence.
3. Capos/Captains: These individuals are in charge of smaller units or factions within the organization.
4. Soldiers/Associates: They often report to the capos and follow their orders.
Membership in an organized crime group typically requires specific qualifications:
1. Criminal Skills and Experience:
2. Loyalty and Trustworthiness:
3. Networking and Connections
Advantages of membership in an organized crime group:
1. Financial Gain
2. Power and Influence
Disadvantages of membership in an organized crime group:
1. Legal Consequences
2. Internal Rivalries and Violence
3. Limited Exit Options
It is crucial to note that the disadvantages and risks associated with organized crime far outweigh the potential benefits.
learn more about Organized crime: https://brainly.com/question/30457855
#SPJ1
is it possible for a plaintiff who has not filed a libel suit within the statute of limitations in their home state to file an action in another state that has a longer statute of limitations? quizlet
Answers
Yes, it is conceivable for a plaintiff to file a lawsuit in a jurisdiction with a lengthier statute of limitations if they have not yet filed a libel suit inside the limitations period in their home state.
In contrast to the defendant, who is the subject of a lawsuit, the plaintiff is the party who initiates or is named in one. In civil and equity law, as well as admiralty, the term is equivalent lengthier statute to petitioner and libelant, respectively. The equity petitioner is typically included as well, especially in places where law and equity are combined.
The legal fiction of adoption was used in ancient Rome to make up for the plaintiff absence of male heirs, which lengthier statute was a need for every household. In England, the Court of Queen's (or King's) Bench, a criminal court, might help ease the load when civil courts were overloaded by feigning that the defendant in a straightforward civil dispute had been detained and was in custody.
Learn more about plaintiff here
https://brainly.com/question/6708758
#SPJ4
jeremy owes the utility company for a past due account. the past due account became an issue when jeremy went to apply for a car loan. the utility company had put the past due account on jeremy's credit report. jeremy has offered to settle the bill with the utility company by paying them fifty percent of his balance due. the payment would actually constitute consideration because the statute of limitations has run and jeremy has no legal duty to pay the utility company. which of the following terms best describes the agreement between jeremy and the utility company if they reduce it in writing and jeremy is acting in good faith?
Answers
The term that best describes the agreement between Jeremy and the utility company, if they reduce it in writing and Jeremy is acting in good faith, is an "Accord and Satisfaction."
This is when a debtor offers to pay a lesser amount than the full amount owed, and the creditor accepts this offer in full settlement of the debt. In this case, Jeremy offers to pay fifty percent of the balance due, and the utility company agrees, creating an accord and satisfaction of the past due account.
What is accord and satisfaction means?
The terms "accord and satisfaction" refer to both the initial agreement (accord) between two contracting parties to accept alternative performance in order to fulfil a prior obligation and the actual fulfilment of that agreement (satisfaction). The new show is referred to as the accord.
For more such question on Accord and Satisfaction
https://brainly.com/question/30826918
#SPJ11
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back of the pickup is covered with a camper shell. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Answers
Answer:
C. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Explanation:
Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.
One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.
Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
When can a person ride in a pickup?The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.
For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.
Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
Answers
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
You are examining evidence from an old crime scene. You have a blood sample, but you believe that the sample may be too degraded to get DNA from. You decide to try to retrieve mtDNA from the sample and compare it to a sample from your suspect. What information could this sample give you?
Answers
Answer:
This simple could give a close relative to the person, or to the EXACT person, then that is when investigators, checks alibis at the time of the incidence, or check footages in the Area to see if the person appeared on any (I know that they would probably get the footage the day it was called).
What kinds of reforms would make the bureaucracy more accountable to the public
Answers
Answer:
Bureaucratic reform in the United States was a major issue in the late nineteenth century at the national level and in the early twentieth century at the state level. Proponents denounced the distribution of office by the winners of elections to their supporters as corrupt and inefficient. They demanded nonpartisan scientific methods and credentials be used to select civil servants. The five important civil service reforms were the two Tenure of Office Acts of 1820 and 1867, the Pendleton Act of 1883, the Hatch Acts (1939 and 1940), and the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) of 1978.
In 1801, President Thomas Jefferson, alarmed that Federalists dominated the civil service and the army, identified the party affiliation of office holders, and systematically appointed Republicans. President Andrew Jackson in 1829 began the systematic rotation of office holders after four years, replacing them with his own partisans. By the 1830s, the “spoils system” referred to the systematic replacement of office holders every time the government changed party hands.
The Civil Service Reform Act (the Pendleton Act) is an 1883 federal law that established the United States Civil Service Commission. It eventually placed most federal employees on the merit system and marked the end of the so-called “spoils system. ” Drafted during the Chester A. Arthur administration, the Pendleton Act served as a response to President James Garfield’s assassination by a disappointed office seeker.
when government agents are lawfully executing a warrant they:
Answers
When government agents are lawfully executing a warrant they must strictly adhere to the terms of the warrant.
What is a warrant?A warrant is a document issued by a court that authorizes government officials to perform certain actions. Warrants are typically granted to enable searches, seizures, or arrests in criminal cases.The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. Law enforcement officials must, therefore, obtain a warrant in order to search or seize any person, place, or object, unless an exception to the warrant requirement exists.Therefore, it is important for government agents to strictly adhere to the terms of the warrant when lawfully executing a warrant to protect the constitutional rights of individuals.
To know more about warrant visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33239116
#SPJ11
What power output is required of a motor that needs to lift a 450 kg elevator car 12 meters in 8.0 seconds?\
Answers
Answer:
\(Power = 6.62kw\)
Explanation:
Given
\(Mass = 450kg\)
\(Height = 12m\)
\(Time = 8s\)
Required
Determine the power output required
First, we calculate the energy used to lift the object.
To do this, we make use of potential energy formula:
\(Energy = mgh\)
Where
\(g = 9.81m/s^2\)
So, we have:
\(Energy = 450 * 9.81 * 12\)
\(Energy = 52974J\)
The power output is then calculated as:
\(Power = \frac{Energy}{Time}\)
\(Power = \frac{52974}{8}\)
\(Power = 6621.75W\)
Convert to kilowatt
\(Power = \frac{6621.75kW}{1000}\)
\(Power = 6.62175kW\)
\(Power = 6.62kw\) --- approximated
Hence, the power output is 6.62kw
Using the power formula, the required power output needed to lift the load is 6.615 Kw
Given the Parameters :
Mass of car = 450 kg Distance = 12 meters Time taken = 8 secondsRecall :
Power = (Workdone ÷ Δtime) Workdone = Force × Distance ; Force = mg ; g = Acceleration due the gravity, = 9.8 m/s²Hence,
Power = [(mgh ÷ t)]
Power = [(450×9.8×12) ÷ 8]
Power = 52920 ÷ 8
Power = 6615 watt
Hence, the power output required is 6615 watts = 6.615 Kw
Learn more :https://brainly.com/question/17081810
which type of indigent defense involves the use of full-time salaried state employees? assigned counsel public defender programs contract attorney programs private counsel programs
Answers
Both salaried government employees (public defenders) and hourly-paid private attorneys are used in the federal indigent defense system (CJA panel attorneys).
The Criminal Justice Act (CJA), which was passed in 1964, marked the beginning of the federal indigent defense system, which was created to guarantee that everyone, regardless of wealth, had legal representation to ensure a fair trial.
States and municipalities make sure that defendants have access to indigent defense—legal services for people who cannot afford to hire an attorney—through a variety of means, including public defender programs.
The most popular system for assigning defense counsel to a defendant is Assigned Counsel Systems.
To know more about federal indigent defense system: https://brainly.com/question/12757244
#SPJ4
a(n) contract is illegal from the beginning and may not be enforced by either party; a(n) contract is legal but permits one party to escape, if he or she so wishes.
Answers
A voidable contract is lawful but allows one party to leave if they so choose. A void contract is illegal from the start and cannot be enforced by any side.
A void contract is one that was never intended to be legally binding in the first place. A void contract cannot be ratified, even if both void and voidable contracts are void. A void contract is viewed legally as if it never existed and loses its ability to be enforced in court.
A written agreement between two parties that is voidable might become unenforceable for a variety of legal reasons, such as failure to reveal a crucial truth by one or both parties. A blunder, false statement, or fraud.
To learn more about the contract
https://brainly.com/question/4272013
#SPJ4
In the past, what events served as threats to America’s national identity? Explain why.
Answers
Answer: I recommend reading a book named ‘The Challenges to America's National Identity’ is a treatise by political scientist and historian Samuel P. Huntington. The book attempts to understand the nature of American identity and the challenges it will face in the future.
Under article i, how many years is the term for a representative in the house?.
Answers
Under Article I, the term for a representative in the House is 2 years. Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution establishes that the term of office of a member of the House of Representatives is two years.
Members of the House of Representatives serve terms of two years and are not subject to term limits. The Senate has six-year terms and is also not subject to term limits, while the President has a four-year term and may be elected to a maximum of two terms.The Constitution specifies that members of the House of Representatives serve for two-year terms.
This implies that the entire House of Representatives is up for election every two years. Every state is guaranteed at least one member of the House of Representatives, and the number of representatives for each state is determined by population. Therefore, as the population grows, the number of House members increases, but the term of office remains the same, two years.
To know more about House of Representatives visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29391300
#SPJ11
The term for a representative in the House of Representatives is two years.
In the United States, the term for a representative in the House of Representatives is specified in Article I of the Constitution. According to Article I, Section 2, representatives are elected every two years. This means that the term for a representative in the House is two years.
Learn more about House of Representatives here:https://brainly.com/question/33993125
#SPJ12
Which factor is a reason for persistent delinquent behavior according to life course theory?
A stable marriage
A permanent residence
Unemployment
Good upbringing
Answers
What is the significance of the 2010 supreme court decision citizens united v. Federal election commission?.
Answers
Answer:
Citizens United v. FEC
Article Talk
Language
Watch
Edit
"Citizens United" redirects here. For the political organization, see Citizens United (organization). For other uses, see Citizens United (disambiguation).
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The court held 5-4 that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. FEC that corporations are people and abolished sensible political donation caps, allowing a select few wealthy donors and special interests to utilize dark money to sway elections.
Why was the Federal Election Commission created?For the purpose of overseeing and upholding the Federal Election Campaign Act, the Federal Election Commission was founded in 1975. The sources and sums of contributions that can be used to support federal elections are restricted by this law, and it also mandates that the sources and use of all contributions be made public.
The Federal Election Commission ruled that companies could be prohibited from using political advertisements. For independent expenditures and electioneering communications, the Court affirmed the reporting and disclaimer requirements. The prohibition on corporate contributions was unaffected by the Court's decision.
Learn more about the united v. Federal election commission here:
https://brainly.com/question/20364118
#SPJ4
in which of the following scenarios is a court likely to order reformation of a contract? select 3 answers.
Answers
The scenarios where a court is likely to order reformation of a contract are clerical error in the contract, fraud by one of the parties, and mutual mistake by the parties.
Reformation in contract law refers to a legal remedy in which the contract is rewritten by the court to ensure both parties' true intentions are reflected. It is a court's equitable power to alter a contract to reflect the parties' true intent when some error has been committed. It is an alternative to equitable remedies, such as monetary damages. Reformation may be granted by the court for purposeful as well as accidental misrepresentation. It is also granted for bilateral error. However, if only one party made an error, reformation can be granted only if the other party was unaware of the other. The elements that must be satisfied for a contract to be eligible for reformation are the existence of a valid contract, a valid reason to rewrite the contract, and unavailability of defenses. A contract cannot be reformed if doing so will cause future harm to either party or lead to an illegal or one-sided contract.
Note: The question is incomplete as it is missing options which are A) clerical error in the contract, B) unjust enrichment C) fraud by one of the parties D) mutual mistake by the parties E) economic damage to the parties.
Learn more about Reformation:
https://brainly.com/question/14601601
#SPJ4
summarize the most important factors establishing and ending the "Hands Off Doctrine" I need help
Answers
Answer:
Establishing factor is fear of violations and ending factor is prisoner's right movement.
Explanation:
The most important factors that is responsible for establishing the "Hands Off Doctrine" are fear of violations and to avoid collision between arms of government. Courts feared that separation of powers and federalism would be violated if courts intervened in the work of institutions related to the state. The hands-off doctrine ended of two factors i.e. the prisoner's right movement and activism of federal judges. The hands-off doctrine formally ended with two decisions taken by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s.
PAY ATTENTION Which of the following case types does small claims court NOT hear? O Breach of contract O Divorce proceedings 0 Unpaid rent O Customer complaints
Answers
Answer: O Breach of contract
Explanation:
Breach of contract is a case type does small claims courts not hear. Therefore option A is correct?
What is a Breach of Contract?When two or more parties enter into a deal, a breach of contract occurs when at least one of the parties fails to fulfill their obligations by failing to comply with the terms of the contract without a valid justification.
Typical instances of contract violations include:
Not finishing a job by the deadline
Not making a timely payment
Failing to adhere to the requirements outlined in the contract
Not completing the project according to the terms of the agreement.
Different things can go wrong in a contract breach. Recognizing a breach of contract can be made easier if you are aware of its various forms. Anticipatory, real, significant, and minor breaches of contract are the four primary categories.
Hence, Breach of contract is a case type does small claims courts not hear.
To know more about Breach of Contract follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/28689269
#SPJ6
Joseph has decided to build a fence around his property to prevent his neighbor's dog from destroying his yard. Joseph's neighbor realized the fence is crossing onto his property. He asked Joseph to move the fence, but Joseph refused. The neighbor decided to take this to court. What type of law does this represent? criminal, Ocivil, constitutional, juvenile, military
Answers
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.