Answer:
It was in Argentina
Explanation:
Question 3
2 pts
Michael owns a bowling alley. The bowling alley serves pizza and
beer in the restaurant area only. Although workers try to keep the
equipment and bowling lane area clean, some patrons still get them
dirty with their greasy fingers. Patron Tammy breaks her big toe
when she loses grip on greasy bowling ball and drops it on her big
toe. Will the bowling alley be held liable for Tammy's broken toe?
eld liable because a patron made the
O No, the bowling alley will not be
bowling ball greasy.
Match tasks to the specific job area. security staff medical staff food service staff administrative staff The option "provide daily meals to inmates" (4 of 4) has been grabbed. Press tab to choose where to drop it. Drop it by pressing the spacebar key. Cancel the operation by pressing escape. Mark
Answer:
security staff/monitoring inmates especially between facility's
medical staff/nurses docters ect...
food service staff/ provide meals
Explanation:
Security staff - monitoring inmates especially between facility's.
Medical staff - nurses docters act.
food service staff - provide meals.
Administrative staff - provide administrative and secretarial support.
What is Staff?A staff is a collection of individuals who work for a manager inside an organization or for an organization, frequently for a specific purpose:
They assist the department's administrative and secretarial needs as the administrative team. They typically handle payroll, paperwork, and report writing. They organize departmental weekly meetings, set up conference calls, and deal with questions and problems pertaining to administration.
An administrator, also known as an administrative assistant, handles clerical tasks to keep an office organized and productive. They are responsible for returning calls and emails, guiding office visitors to the appropriate conference rooms, and creating spreadsheets or presentations for the executive team.
Therefore, Match the column is stated above.
Learn more about Staff, here;
https://brainly.com/question/751338
#SPJ5
the ________ requires general partners to adhere to the provisions of the partnership agreement and the decisions of the partnership.
The partnership agreement requires general partners to adhere to its provisions and the partnership's decisions.
In a partnership, the relationship between the partners is governed by a legal document known as the partnership agreement. This agreement outlines the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the partners involved. It serves as a roadmap for how the partnership will operate and helps ensure that all partners are on the same page.
One crucial aspect of the partnership agreement is the requirement for general partners to adhere to its provisions. This means that the partners must follow the rules and guidelines set forth in the agreement. These provisions may include details about profit-sharing, decision-making processes, capital contributions, and more.
Additionally, the partnership agreement also necessitates that general partners abide by the decisions made by the partnership as a whole. This implies that when a decision is made collectively by the partners, all general partners are expected to respect and comply with that decision. It promotes unity, fairness, and consistency within the partnership structure.
Learn more about the partnership agreement
brainly.com/question/29317759
#SPJ11
The law requiring that toys and infant products be tested before sale is called the:
a. Child Safety Act.
b. Strong Product Safety Bill.
c. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.
d. Uniform Safety Testing Bill.
answer: c. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.
The law requiring that toys and infant products be tested before sale is called Consumer Product correct option is Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission was established by Congress in 1972 with the aim of ensuring that customers are sufficiently protected against unreasonably high injury risks connected with all categories of consumer products.Any consumer product's problem must be reported within 24 hours of its discovery, according to reasonable guidelines. Failure to abide by the law regarding consumer product safety has consequences.The standardised safety testing bill is the legislation mandating that toys and newborn items be evaluated before being sold. By offering a discount on an item that is "highly priced," consumers.
To know more about Consumers product visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29341541
#SPJ4
How did the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influence his ruling in the mcculloch case?.
Federalists like a strong central government. This ruling strengthened the central government. He wanted more power in the federal government the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influenced his ruling in the McCulloch case.
The State of Maryland has made one of its most important decisions regarding the expansion of federal authority to Secretary John Marshall. The case concerned Congress' power to establish banks and raised the broader issue of the separation of powers between state and federal governments.
McCulloch's case went to the Supreme Court. As a sovereign state, Maryland claimed it had the power to tax any business within its borders. McCulloch's attorneys argued that a national bank was "necessary and appropriate" for Congress to exercise its enumerated powers.
Learn more about McCulloch's case at
https://brainly.com/question/12575161
#SPJ4
Which of these early amendments to the Constitution guarantees the government will provide just compensation for private property that it takes?
a. Second
b. Fifth
c. Eighth
d. First
The Constitution's Fifth Amendment assures that the government would compensate private property owners fairly, hence option B is the best choice.
In the US, the federal government has long used its eminent domain power to take property for the common good. Eminent domain is a right that every autonomous government has. It is a trait of sovereignty and doesn't need to be acknowledged in writing.
Yet, the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids taking private property without providing just compensation. Hence, whenever the United States acquires a property through adverse occupation, it is required by the Constitution to pay the owner a fair compensation equal to the property's fair market value.
To learn more about Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30631909
#SPJ4
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
The maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor is.
That's the least I can do after letting the patron leave the bar so drunk last night. The statement that the patron was drunk when he left the bar on the night of the accident is:_______
Answer:
We're waiting every night to finally roam and invite
Newcomers to play with us
For many years we've been all alone
We're forced to be still
And play the same songs we've known since that day
An imposter took our life away
Now we're stuck here to decay
Please let us get in
Don't lock us away
We're not like what you're thinking
We are poor little souls
Who have lost all control
And we're forced here to take that role
We've been all alone
Stuck in our little zone since 1987
Join us, be our friend
Or just be stuck and defend
After all you only got
Five Nights at Freddy's
Is this where you wanna be?
I just don't get it
Why do you want to stay?
Five Nights at Freddy's
Is this where you wanna be?
I just don't get it
Why do you want to stay?
Five Nights at Freddy's
We're really quite surprised
That we get to see you another night
You should have looked for another job
You should have said to this place good-bye
It's like there's so much more
Maybe you've been in this place before
We remember a face like yours
You seem acquainted with those doors
Please let us get in
Don't lock us away
We're not like what you're thinking
We are poor little souls
Who have lost all control
And we're forced here to take that role
We've been all alone
Stuck in our little zone since 1987
Join us, be our friend
Or just be stuck and defend
After all you only got
Five Nights at Freddy's
Is this where you wanna be?
I just don't get it
Why do you want to stay?
Five Nights at Freddy's
Is this where you wanna be?
I just don't get it
Why do you want to stay?
Five Nights at Freddy's
"ucc 2–207(1)" is a citation to uniform commercial code section 2–207, subsection 1. T/F
It is TRUE that "UCC 2–207(1)" is a citation to uniform commercial code section 2–207, subsection 1.
The citation "UCC 2–207(1)" refers to Section 2-207, subsection (1) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This section governs the additional terms and conditions that are proposed in a contract between merchants, where one merchant provides an offer to sell goods to another merchant. The UCC is a set of standardized laws that regulate commercial transactions in the United States, and it has been adopted, with some variations, by all 50 states. The citation format is commonly used to reference specific sections of the UCC in legal documents and court cases.
To know more about Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
brainly.com/question/20235251
#SPJ11
How do existing US laws differ from the GDPR? How do consumers
and businesses view the GDPR? Are there differing views?
Existing US laws differ from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in several ways. The GDPR is a comprehensive data protection law that was implemented by the European Union (EU) in 2018, while the US does not have a single federal law that provides the same level of data protection. Instead, the US has multiple sector-specific laws, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for healthcare data and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for personal information of California residents.
1. Scope: The GDPR has a broad scope and applies to all EU member states, as well as any company outside the EU that processes the data of EU residents. In contrast, US laws generally focus on specific sectors or jurisdictions, resulting in a more fragmented approach to data protection.
2. Consent: The GDPR places a stronger emphasis on obtaining clear and affirmative consent from individuals before processing their personal data. In the US, consent requirements vary depending on the applicable law, but they generally tend to be less stringent.
3. Rights of Individuals: The GDPR grants individuals various rights, such as the right to access, rectify, and erase their personal data. US laws provide similar rights, but they may differ in their specifics and the extent of enforcement.
Regarding how consumers and businesses view the GDPR, there are differing views. Some consumers appreciate the increased control over their personal data and the transparency requirements imposed on businesses. They feel that the GDPR enhances their privacy rights and gives them more confidence in how their data is handled.
On the other hand, some businesses have concerns about the compliance burden and associated costs of implementing the GDPR's requirements. They may find it challenging to navigate the complex regulations and adapt their processes to ensure compliance. However, businesses that operate globally or have a significant presence in the EU often view the GDPR as an opportunity to improve their data protection practices and build trust with their customers.
In summary, while the US laws differ from the GDPR in their approach to data protection, consumers and businesses may have varying views on the GDPR. Some consumers appreciate the increased privacy rights, while businesses may have concerns about compliance.
To know more about California Consumer Privacy Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30311333
#SPJ11
a motion for a(n) blank verdict, made by defense at the close of the plaintiff's case, asks a judge to enter verdict for the defendant before the defendant presents any evidence because there is no blank basis for the plaintiff's claim.
A motion for a(n) direct verdict, made by defense at the close of the plaintiff's case, asks a judge to enter verdict for the defendant before the defendant presents any evidence because there is no blank basis for the plaintiff's claim.
This motion asserts that even if the jury were to accept all the evidence presented by the plaintiff as true, it would not be sufficient to establish a valid claim or cause of action.
The purpose of this motion is to challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff's evidence and to argue that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff has failed to meet their burden of proof. It is typically made when the defense believes that the plaintiff has not presented enough credible evidence or has failed to establish all the necessary elements of the claim.
In considering the motion, the judge reviews the evidence presented by the plaintiff and determines whether, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, it could reasonably support a verdict in their favor. If the judge concludes that no reasonable jury could find in favor of the plaintiff based on the evidence presented, the judge may grant the motion for a directed verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of the defendant without the need for the defense to present its own evidence.
To know more about plaintiff's claim here
https://brainly.com/question/31945719
#SPJ4
IF ANOTHER DRIVER "CUTS" IN FRONT OF YOU, IT WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU:
A. Take your foot off the gas
B. Brake suddenly
C. Accelerate to avoid being cut off
B. Brake suddenly
I think its the answer, otherwise we'll crash
Brake suddenly is the better way, if another driver cuts in front of the person, as it stop the chances of accident.
What are the major reason of accident on road?Excessive speeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, failing to read the signs, being tired, and drinking. Pedestrian: Ignorance, errant crossing, moving on the carriageway, jaywalkers, and carelessness.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about major reason of accident on road, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15113880
#SPJ2
If a life insurance policy is purchased by someone who has no
insurable interest in the insured, it is considered
Answer:
hi hello where are u from i am sorry because i cant give your answer
how can class evidence become individual evidence.
Answer:
Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.
Explanation:
I hope it helps you
Michael was the main suspect of a murder that took place on Halloween night. Three rookie police officers parked in front of Michael's house for two hours and proceeded to knock on the front door. No one answered. The officers proceeded to go to the back yard and go up on the porch to knock on the door. Michael finally opened and the police walked in without being invited. The walked to the living room and proceeded to ask questions. Not satisfied with Michael's initial responses, each officer took turns to ask the similar questions while the other
two stood in the way of the two exits in hopes of getting an incriminating response. The encounter lasted for over an hour. Michael finally admitted to the crime and was charged with murder. Michael argues that his Miranda rights were violated. Do you agree? Why or why not?
Michael's Miranda rights were violated. This is because a part of the Miranda rights is the right to remain silent. When Michael stayed silent, the police officers forced their way into his home without consent. (which also violates his rights as this can only be done under specific circumstances)
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
thanks po sa points. God bless po
A recession causes the demand for jelly beans to fall. What happens to equilibrium price
and equilibrium quantity of jelly beans?
O Price Increases and Quantity Decreases
O Price Decreases and Quantity Increases
O Price and Quantity Decrease
Price and Quantity Increase
As a result of the recession causing the demand for jelly beans to fall, the effect on the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity is Price and Quantity Decrease.
When demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
The reason this happens is that as less people demand the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
What is the equilibrium price?The equilibrium price in a market refers to the price of goods and services where the quantity supplied in the market is equal to the quantity demanded.
If demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
This is as a result of less people demanding the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
Find out more on the effect of a fall in demand at https://brainly.com/question/24087897
#SPJ1
How does the concept of asset forfeiture reflect the 8th amendment? 5-7 sentences.
i swear to god if one more of you gives me something unhelpful i will personally insert your catheter.
The concept of asset forfeiture can raise concerns regarding its compatibility with the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
Asset forfeiture involves the seizure of property by law enforcement agencies, often in connection with criminal activity. Some argue that certain practices of asset forfeiture, such as excessive fines or disproportionate seizures, may violate the principles of proportionality and fairness outlined in the 8th Amendment.
The 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and is intended to ensure that punishments fit the crime. When examining the concept of asset forfeiture, questions arise regarding its alignment with this constitutional principle. Critics argue that the seizure of property, particularly in cases where the value of the assets exceeds the alleged offense, can be seen as excessive and disproportionate.
While asset forfeiture aims to combat illegal activities and disrupt criminal networks, concerns are raised when innocent individuals or individuals with minimal involvement in criminal activity experience significant financial losses. Critics argue that such practices can create a punitive impact that goes beyond what is considered just or proportionate.
The compatibility of asset forfeiture with the 8th Amendment is an ongoing subject of debate and legal scrutiny. Courts have grappled with determining when asset forfeiture practices cross the line into being excessive or constitute a violation of constitutional rights. Balancing the need for law enforcement tools against the rights of individuals is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration and ongoing evaluation to ensure compliance with the principles of the 8th Amendment.
Learn more about asset forfeiture here:
https://brainly.com/question/32217803
#SPJ11
QUESTION 2 Read the following scenarios and identify whether the contract described in each is valid, void or voidable. In each instance, also indicate which factor (potentially) influences consensus: 2.1 John buys two tickets to a movie from Andile. John is under the impression that he is buying the tickets from a woman named "Ayanda". (2) 2.2 Tshidi kidnaps Rabelani's daughter and uses this as leverage to force Rabelani to sell his house to Tshidi at a ridiculously low price. (2) 2.3 Maggie tries to convince Lelo to buy her three-year-old fridge. Maggie lies to Lelo and tells her that the fridge was bought last month and that it was only used for two days. Based on this false information, Lelo buys the fridge from Maggie. (2) [6] 1
............................
The contracts in scenarios 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are voidable, void, and voidable respectively.
In scenario 2.1, the contract between John and Andile is voidable. The factor that influences consensus is the false impression that John had about the seller. In scenario 2.2, the contract between Tshidi and Rabelani is void because it was entered into under duress. Kidnapping is illegal and therefore renders the contract invalid. In scenario 2.3, the contract between Maggie and Lelo is voidable. The false information provided by Maggie influenced Lelo's decision to buy the fridge.
Learn more about Contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/34698330
#SPJ2
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Why would the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes within city limits?
The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:
The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are wearing high-heeled shoes.
What is an ordinance?An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.
The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.
Learn more about California from
https://brainly.com/question/26015261
best way to write a letter for Long-Term disability appeal
The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.
What is a long-term disability appeal?Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.
While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.
Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27571970
#SPJ1
Annie is a citizen of Texas. She will soon file a lawsuit against Bonnie (a resident of Maine), Carla (a resident of Tennessee), and David (a resident of Texas). Her lawsuit does not involve any federal question. If Annie wishes to sue in a federal court, will the court have subject matter jurisdiction over the case
Based on the information provided, it appears that there is no federal question involved in Annie's lawsuit. Subject matter jurisdiction in federal courts is typically based on federal law, diversity of citizenship, or federal question jurisdiction.
In this case, diversity jurisdiction could potentially be the basis for subject matter jurisdiction in a federal court if certain requirements are met. Diversity jurisdiction allows a federal court to hear cases between citizens of different states if the amount in controversy exceeds a certain threshold (currently $75,000). In Annie's case, she is a citizen of Texas, and the defendants Bonnie and David are also residents of Texas, so diversity jurisdiction would not apply for these defendants.
However, if Carla, the resident of Tennessee, is a co-defendant along with Bonnie and David, and the amount in controversy exceeds the threshold, diversity jurisdiction may be available for Annie to sue in a federal court. This assumes that there are no other factors or legal issues that would affect the court's jurisdiction.
It's important to consult with a legal professional to get accurate advice tailored to the specific details of the case, as jurisdictional rules can be complex and vary depending on the circumstances.
Learn more about jurisdiction Here-
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ11
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates _____.
Answer:
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates improves the chances of being released from prison.
What is the final step in the naturalization process? A) Passing a citizenship exam B) Demonstrating good character C) Pledging an oath of allegiance D) Filing a Declaration of Intention
Answer:
C) Pledging an oath of allegiance
Explanation:
Answer:
C) Pledging an oath of allegiance
Explanation:
Who is the sinner in a scenario involving usury according to
Aquinas?
A.The judge
B.The ruler
C.The lender
D.The borrower
According to Aquinas, the sinner in a scenario involving usury would be the lender, option C.
Aquinas, a prominent medieval philosopher and theologian, held a strong moral opposition to usury, which refers to the charging of interest on loans. He considered it immoral because it involved making a profit from the necessity or desperation of others, rather than from productive activities that contribute to the common good.
Aquinas believed that money should only be used as a medium of exchange and not as a means of generating income. Therefore, the lender who charges interest on a loan, exploiting the borrower's need for funds, is seen as engaging in an unethical practice. Aquinas considered usury to be a violation of justice and charity, emphasizing the importance of fairness and compassion in economic transactions. Correct option (c)
Learn more about philosopher
https://brainly.com/question/715989
#SPJ11
One person’s consumption of a product reducing the amount available for other people is a characteristic of a __________ good.
A.
public
B.
private
C.
positive
D.
negative
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
They only one person’s consumption of a product reducing the amount available for other people is a characteristic of a private good. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is product?
The thing being sold is called a “product.” A product and service market foundation. Items are divided into two categories: industrial products and consumer products.
The extrudability, rivalry, and rejectability of private commodities are their fundamental qualities. There is less of a good left over for others to use or buy when it is used or purchased by one person.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on product, here:
https://brainly.com/question/22852400
#SPJ5
Words like to, two, too and lean, lien are examples of
1. Antonyms
2. Synonyms
3. Homonyms
4. None of the above
Answer: I think its synonyms
Explanation:
These factors are used in the formation of moral standard except-
a. We accept as part of our upbringing
b. Values passed on to us through heritage and legacy.
c. The religious values that you have imbibed from childhood.
d. None of the above.
Answer:
:)
Explanation: