The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.
The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.
The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.
The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.
To learn more about competency examinations, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31646918
#SPJ4
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________
n davis v. baugh industrial contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. in reviewing such a case, the washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how:
The Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how: (B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
4 Alan's daughter Tami Davis, who is also his estate's personal representative, brought this negligence claim against Baugh and other defendants. The completion and acceptance doctrine absolved Baugh of culpability for negligence once the work was finished and accepted by the property owner, according to the summary judgment that the trial court awarded Baugh. Additionally, the trial court partially invalidated an expert declaration for Davis. Davis contends that the trial court erred in his direct appeal from the superior court. We both agree and switch. NORMS OF REVIEW
To know more about Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/5000868
#SPJ4
Complete Questions:
In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. In reviewing such a case, the Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. This is an example of how:
(A) modern day values are changing
(B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
(C) common law never changes
(D) courts can never go against a precedent set in previous cases
(E) none of the other choices
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
63. drivers who are under 21 years old with a bac of .02 or above may lose their license due to which law?
Answer:
Explanation:
The law that applies to this situation varies depending on the country or state you are in.
In the United States, most states have a zero-tolerance policy for drivers under the age of 21 who are found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. This is typically referred to as a "zero tolerance law." Under this law, drivers under 21 years old with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .02 or above can face penalties such as license suspension or revocation, fines, and mandatory alcohol education programs.
It's important to note that the specific penalties for violating this law can vary by state, and the legal drinking age is also different in some countries. It's always best to check your local laws to ensure you understand the specific regulations and penalties that apply to your situation.
According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, drivers who are under 21 years old with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of .02 or above may lose their license.
The Zero Tolerance Law was designed to protect underage drivers from the dangers of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. When a driver under the age of 21 is found to have a BAC of .02 or higher, their license will be automatically suspended for a certain amount of time. This law was put in place to discourage underage drivers from drinking and driving, as the consequences for doing so are much more serious than for adults.
Here you can learn more about zero tolerance law https://brainly.com/question/30706389
#SPJ11
Helena, the purchasing agent for Cassadine Inc., contacts five different suppliers to obtain price quotes for office supplies she needs to order. The price for the identical office supplies ranges from a high of $855 to a low of $500, including shipping and handling charges. As purchasing agent, Helena has complete autonomy on selecting suppliers and on placing orders up to $5,000; before placing orders in excess of $5,000, she must get signed authorization from the company’s comptroller.
A. If Helena purchases the supplies from the most expensive supplier because she is angry at her employer for turning down her recent request for a raise, what duty of an agent has she breached? What are Cassadine’s remedies?
B. Helena purchases a $20,000 computer system from Alpha Inc., a dealer she has never ordered from, but who knows Helena is the purchasing agent for Cassadine. If Cassadine refuses to accept the system when it arrives, what argument will Alpha make for Cassadine’s liability? What will be Cassadine’s defense?
Answer:
A. If Helena purchases the supplies from the most expensive supplier because she is angry at her employer for turning down her recent request for a raise, she would be in breach of her duty of loyalty as an agent. Under agency law, agents are required to act in the best interests of the principal, and to make decisions that are not influenced by personal interests or emotions. In this case, Helena's decision to purchase from the most expensive supplier is not in the best interest of Cassadine, as it would result in additional costs, and is influenced by her personal feelings.
Cassadine's remedy would be to seek damages from Helena for any additional costs incurred as a result of her breach of duty. They can also terminate her agency agreement and seek legal action against her.
B. In this case, Alpha Inc. will argue that Cassadine is liable for the purchase as Helena, as the purchasing agent for Cassadine, had the apparent authority to make the purchase. Apparent authority is a legal concept that arises when a principal, through its conduct, causes a third party to reasonably believe that an agent has the authority to act on its behalf. Additionally, Alpha may also argue that Cassadine should have known that Helena had the authority to make the purchase and that the company should have provided clearer guidelines or instructions on how to place orders.
Cassadine's defense would be that Helena exceeded her actual authority as a purchasing agent by purchasing a computer system that exceeded the $5,000 limit without obtaining signed authorization from the comptroller. Additionally, Cassadine could argue that they did not have an established business relationship with Alpha Inc. and that they did not intend to enter into a contract with them, thereby claiming that there was no apparent authority.
"This answer provides an in-depth legal analysis of the situation and cites relevant legal principles such as the duty of loyalty of an agent, the concept of actual and apparent authority, and the principle of contractual liability. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal issues at play and would be appropriate for a law student or a legal professional".
what’s the definition for the word vocabulary?
By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly expressed intention c. adjust their speech to fit the age of their listeners d. adjust their speech to fit the social status of their listeners
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because you cant expect a baby to talk to you face-to-face, and they won't do c or d either.
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Older workers are generally undependable and operate like free agents.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
alot of older men and women work witt the same determination as younger generations, like my grandfather
one rigorous study showed that a prison-based treatment program for high-risk sex offenders led to a reduction in sex offense ________.
One rigorous study showed that a prison-based treatment program for high-risk sex offenders led to a reduction in sex offense recidivism.
Recidivism refers to the tendency of individuals to engage in criminal behavior again after being convicted or serving a sentence for a previous offense. In the given context, the study found that the prison-based treatment program aimed at addressing the needs and risks of high-risk sex offenders resulted in a decrease in the likelihood of these individuals committing further sex offenses.
The program likely provided intervention, therapy, and support to help offenders address underlying issues and develop skills to prevent reoffending. By reducing sex offense recidivism, such treatment programs contribute to public safety and the rehabilitation of offenders.
You can learn more about recidivism at
https://brainly.com/question/5835251
#SPJ11
There should not bullies because there is no reason to bully.So, If you are a bully(IF),Gust do not do things you support and respect your victims and be people not animals.OK?!
Answer:
so true
Explanation:
1st Amendment Violation Help
Rodney is a crime scene investigator. He has completed a thorough search of the crime scene and collected and recorded the evidence. What are his final two steps?
Answer:
final walkthrough, releases the crime scene
Explanation:
Rodney is a crime scene investigator. The final two steps are the final walkthrough and release of the crime scene.
To be considered legitimate, evidence at a crime scene must be maintained and recorded in its original state to the greatest extent feasible.
Failure to safeguard a crime scene or to appropriately document information may result in the destruction of evidence or impede the hunt for the offender.
Keeping the crime scene as secure as feasible. The perimeter has been cordoned off, and if necessary, guards have been stationed at the crime scene's entrance.
The crime scene is closed to public and unauthorized individuals.
Therefore, the final steps were the final walkthrough and release of the crime scene.
To know more about the crime scene, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1329009
#SPJ2
Why should citizens volunteer?
Answer:
Yes, we should all help out in somewhere or another
Explanation:
How can you be beneficial to others
Answer:
I think by helping them in what they love most
being there for them always as ur mom thus
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
Which law provides legal recourse to people who purchase animals from pet dealers which are later found to have a disease or defect?.
The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.
This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.
A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.
Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645
#SPJ4
how many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much.
please answer this question
Answer:
There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.
Explanation:
If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.
arraignment is where the defendant explains to the judge exactly what he or she did and why. True Or False
Answer:
Explanation:
False. Arraignment is a legal proceeding in which a defendant is formally charged with a crime and enters a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. During arraignment, the charges against the defendant are read out loud, and the defendant is asked to enter a plea. The defendant may also be informed of their rights, such as the right to an attorney and the right to a trial by jury. The purpose of arraignment is not for the defendant to explain what they did or why, but rather to formally begin the legal process and establish the defendant's plea.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
What is the use of force continuum? Legally does it help or hurt an officer when he has to justify his actions in court.
The use of force continuum guides officers but can be both helpful and detrimental when justifying their actions in court.
utilizing force Law enforcement personnel are guided by the continuum framework when determining how much force is necessary in various circumstances. If an officer is defending their actions in court, it might help or hurt them. On the one hand it offers a consistent framework to show that the officer adhered to protocol and applied appropriate force. This can help them prove that they were following the law.
But it is also possible to examine the continuum, especially if excessive force is alleged. The officer may have violated the continuum or overused force, according to critics. The effectiveness of the continuum in court ultimately depends on the particular facts, the evidence at hand and the officer's capacity to defend their actions within its bounds.
Learn more about force continuum at:
brainly.com/question/30636540
#SPJ4
the purpose of competition policy
how do voter attitudes serve as a barrier to minor parties in government?
Minor parties often find it difficult to gain seats in government due to several factors, including voter attitudes. These attitudes can serve as a barrier to minor parties in government because many voters feel that they have to vote for one of the major parties to be able to make a difference.
However, many voters also feel that the major parties are too similar and do not offer enough diversity in their views or policies. This can lead to a situation where minor parties are seen as being too far outside of the mainstream to be taken seriously by voters, or where voters simply do not know enough about minor parties to feel comfortable voting for them. Another factor that can work against minor parties is the way that election campaigns are funded.
Major parties often have access to far greater amounts of money than minor parties do, and this can make it difficult for minor parties to compete effectively in the political arena. Voter attitudes can also serve as a barrier to minor parties in government because many voters do not want to waste their vote on a candidate who is unlikely to win. This means that they are more likely to vote for a major party candidate, even if they do not agree with that candidate's policies or views.
Learn more about Minor parties https://brainly.com/question/13460412
#SPJ11
Minor parties are politically crucial, and they are believed to provide a voice for people who feel ignored by the major parties. However, the attitude of voters serves as a barrier to minor parties in government. Voters who belong to minor parties are frequently viewed with skepticism by other voters and even by mainstream political analysts. In addition, voting systems that use the first-past-the-post system affect the ability of minor parties to win seats in government.
Minor parties may find it difficult to get into government, but their attitude is crucial. It is because the minor party's attitude can be perceived as extreme or incompatible with the majority of the people. This attitude causes them to lose votes, and in a first-past-the-post electoral system, it may be a significant barrier to their gaining seats in government. This, in turn, makes it challenging for minor parties to make a significant impact on government policy. In addition, voter attitudes serve as a barrier to minor parties in government due to the underfunding of minor parties by the government.
Minor parties have less access to media and fewer financial resources to run campaigns, which restricts their ability to promote their policies effectively and gain widespread support. As a result, minor parties face difficulties in being elected into government, even when they are representing a significant percentage of the population.
Learn more about Minor Parties in government at: https://brainly.com/question/26842224
#SPJ11
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
Is the study of politics scientific
Politics and power have long been studied, but political science as a field is relatively young. Political scientists conduct their research objectively, logically, and methodically, just like other social scientists do. This is known as a "scientific" approach.
Which South African act or law should be removed?
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT
a. businesses sell goods and services in the product market
b. individuals supply resources in the resource market
c. the government buys goods and services in the product market
d. businesses sell resources in the product market
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.
What is the circular flow model?The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.
Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.
The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the circular flow model, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11324259
#SPJ2
letter of credit a good or service ?
Answer:
Good
Explanation:
because service is just the thing ir place attending you and good is when someone is givibg a good credit
kyle is being deployed to the middle east and will be gone for one year. kyle asks delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone. in this arrangement between kyle and delilah:_____.
In the arrangement between Kyle and Delilah, where Kyle is being deployed to the Middle East for one year and asks Delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone: Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent. The correct option is A.
In this scenario, Kyle, as the principal, is the person who authorizes Delilah to act on his behalf in selling the house. Delilah, as the agent, is the person who is given the authority by Kyle to carry out the specific task of selling the house.
The relationship between the principal (Kyle) and the agent (Delilah) is based on trust, as the principal relies on the agent to represent their interests and carry out their instructions.
In summary, the correct answer is option a: Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent. This is because Kyle has given Delilah the authority to sell his house while he is deployed, making him the principal and Delilah the agent in this arrangement.
To know more about principal, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30393128#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Kyle is being deployed to the Middle East and will be gone for one year. Kyle asks Delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone. In this arrangement between Kyle and Delilah:
a. Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent.
b. Delilah is the principal and Kyle is the agent.
c. Kyle and Delilah are both principals.
d. Kyle and Delilah are both agents.
If a vacancy to a public office falls while the senate is in recess and the president fills that vacancy, how long should that officer’s term last?.
officer’s term should last till End of their next session
In several nations, there is a type of academic appointment known as tenure. A tenured position is an indefinite academic appointment that can only be dismissed for good reason or in unusual situations, including program discontinuance or financial hardship. The concept of academic freedom, which contends that allowing researchers to hold and consider a diversity of viewpoints is advantageous for society in the long term, is supported by tenure. At the collegiate level, tenured professors enjoy full-time, secure positions. Tenured academics often hold titles like assistant professor, associate professor, and full professor and enter the academic employment market after attaining the highest degree in their discipline, typically a Ph. D.
To know more about officer’s term refer to https://brainly.com/question/28489336
#SPJ4
in geczi v. lifetime fitness, where geczi suffered an injury when a treadmill at lifetime malfunctioned but a jury held lifetime not to be negligent, the appeals court held that lifetime was not liable because:
The machine was broken, according to lifetime staff, but no sign had been put on it. Lifetime was sued by Geczi for negligence and willful misconduct.
What does defendant liability in a negligence lawsuit entail?If the action was (a) purposeful, as in the case of a crime; or (b) unintentional but negligent, as in the instance where the defendant failed to uphold his duty of care to the plaintiff, the defendant may be found accountable to the plaintiff for committing a tort.
What is the negligence theory?Before you may hold a person or business legally accountable for the harm you experienced, the legal principle of negligence must be established. In the majority of lawsuits arising from accidents or injuries, such as incidents of "slip and fall" or auto accidents.
To know more about negligence visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20373662
#SPJ1