Answers
Yes, it is correct that a potential security violation refers to any circumstance, capability, action, or event that has potential to breach the security and cause harm.
What is a security violation?A security violation refers to any action that compromises the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a computer system or its data. Such violations can be intentional or unintentional and can occur through a variety of means, such as hacking, malware, phishing, or physical theft. The consequences of security violations can range from minor inconvenience to major financial loss, reputational damage, or even legal action. To prevent security violations, organizations typically implement various security measures, including access controls, encryption, firewalls, and regular security audits. Additionally, employees are often trained on how to identify and report potential security threats, as human error and negligence can also contribute to security violations.
To learn more about security, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13145131
#SPJ4
Related Questions
How would limiting awards affect medical malpractice lawsuits?
Answers
Answer: Supporters say caps on medical malpractice awards discourage frivolous lawsuits and reduce the cost of health care because providers no longer need to practice defensive medicine. Yet research shows that costs from medical liability make up just 2 to 2.5 percent of total health care spending
Explanation:
The probation officer has no choice but to impose only standard conditions on probations that he or she recommends.
True or False
Answers
Answer: true
Explanation:
NCR Corp. v. Korala Associates, Ltd. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, 512 F.3d 807 (2008). COMPANY PROFILE In 1884, John H. Patterson founded the National Cash Register Company (NCR), maker of the first mechanical cash registers. In 1906, NCR created a cash register run by an electric motor. By 1914, the company had developed one of the first automated credit systems. By the 1950s, NCR had branched out into transistorized business computers, and later it expanded into liquid crystal displays and data warehousing. Today, NCR is a worldwide provider of automated teller machines (ATMs), integrated hardware and software systems, and related maintenance and support services. More than 300,000 NCR ATMs are installed throughout the world. BACKGROUND AND FACTS To upgrade the security of its ATMs, NCR developed a software solution to install in all of its machines. At the same time, Korala Associates, Ltd. (KAL), claimed to have developed a similar security upgrade for NCR's ATMs. Indeed, KAL had entered into a contract with NCR in 1998 (the "1998 Agreement") to develop such software. To facilitate that process, NCR had loaned to KAL a proprietary ATM that contained copyrighted software called APTRA XFS. NCR alleged that KAL had "obtained access to, made unauthorized use of, and engaged in unauthorized copying of the APTRA XFS software." NCR further claimed that KAL had developed its version of the security upgrade only by engaging in this unauthorized activity. When NCR brought a suit claiming copyright infringement, KAL moved to compel arbitration under the terms of the 1998 Agreement. At trial, KAL prevailed. NCR appealed the order compelling arbitration. IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE COURT Chief Justice BATCHELDER delivered the opinion of the court. The arbitration clause contained within the 1998 Agreement provides that: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitrator shall be appointed upon the mutual agreement of both parties failing which both parties will agree to be subject to any arbitrator that shall be chosen by the President of the Law Society. The parties do not dispute that a valid agreement to arbitrate exists; rather the issue of contention is whether NCR's claims fall within the substantive scope of the agreement. As a matter of federal law, any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration. Despite this strong presumption in favor of arbitration, "arbitration is a matter of contract between the parties, and one cannot be required to submit to arbitration a dispute which it has not agreed to submit to arbitration." When faced with a broad arbitration clause, such as one covering any dispute arising out of an agreement, a court should follow the presumption of arbitration and resolve doubts in favor of arbitration. Indeed, in such a case, only an express provision excluding a specific dispute, or the most forceful evidence of a purpose to exclude the claim from arbitration, will remove the dispute from consideration by the arbitrators. [Emphasis added.] ⋆∗∗ It is sufficient that a court would have to reference the 1998 Agreement for part of NCR's direct [copyright] infringement claim. Under these circumstances, we find that the copyright infringement claim as to APTRA XFS falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement. DECISION AND REMEDY The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the part of the district court's decision compelling arbitration of NCR's claims of direct copyright infringement relating to the APTRAXFS software. THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT DIMENSION Why did NCR not want its claims decided by arbitration? THE ETHICAL DIMENSION Could NCR have a claim that KAL engaged in unfair competition because KAL engaged in unethical business practices? (Hint: Unfair competition may occur when one party deceives the public into believing that its goods are the goods of another.) Why or why not?Please follow the outline:
Issue
Rule of Law
Analysis
Conclusion
Answers
NCR did not want its claims decided by arbitration because it believed that KAL engaged in copyright infringement, and arbitration may not provide the same level of legal protection and remedies as a court proceeding.
NCR did not want its claims decided by arbitration because it believed that KAL engaged in copyright infringement. The court mentioned that arbitration is a matter of contract between the parties, and one cannot be required to submit to arbitration a dispute which it has not agreed to submit to arbitration.
However, in this case, the court found that the copyright infringement claim as to APTRA XFS fell within the scope of the arbitration agreement because a court would have to reference the 1998 Agreement for part of NCR's direct copyright infringement claim.
Arbitration proceedings may not provide the same level of legal protection and remedies as a court proceeding. NCR may have preferred a court proceeding to ensure that its copyright infringement claims are thoroughly examined and that appropriate legal remedies, such as damages and injunctions, can be awarded.
Additionally, court proceedings generally offer a more formal and structured process, with established rules of evidence and legal precedents, which could benefit NCR's case.
Learn more about Arbitration
brainly.com/question/33251883
#SPJ11
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
which jurisdiction(s) could prosecute andrew for the kidnapping and murder of
Answers
The jurisdiction(s) that could prosecute Andrew for the kidnapping and murder of a person would depend on where the crime was committed and where the victim was from.
If the crime was committed in one state, but the victim was from another state, both states could have jurisdiction to prosecute Andrew. Additionally, if the crime crossed state lines, the federal government could also have jurisdiction to prosecute Andrew.
In general, jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. In criminal cases, jurisdiction is typically determined by the location where the crime was committed.
However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as when a crime is committed across state lines or when the victim is from another state. In these cases, multiple jurisdictions may have the authority to prosecute the offender.
Therefore, the specific jurisdiction(s) that could prosecute Andrew for the kidnapping and murder of a person would depend on the specific facts of the case. However, it is possible that multiple jurisdictions could have the authority to prosecute him, including the state where the crime was committed, the state where the victim was from, and the federal government.
To know more about jurisdictions, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714#
#SPJ11
Shirley and Bob are married, receive Social Security benefits and file a joint tax return. What is the base amount with which ½ of their net Social Security benefits plus other income must be compared to determine the amount includible in income?
Answers
Answer:
$32,000
Explanation:
The 1983 amendments require beneficiaries to pay income tax on their benefits if their modified adjusted gross income ( AGI )—which includes one-half of Social Security benefit income—is greater than $25,000 for single beneficiaries and $32,000 for married couples (Table 1).
In this question, we apply the "adjusted gross income" in which Wages, dividends, investment income, total income, pension distributions, and other income sources are all included in gross income.
Educator costs, college loan interest, divorce payments, even contributions to a retirement plan are all examples of revenue changes.The 1983 revisions required recipients to pay tax on their monthly benefits when their altered total income (AGI). It includes one of their state pension benefits, which exceeds $25,000 for single people or $32,000 for married people. Learn more:brainly.com/question/25811632
I am taking a test tomorrow and my teacher needs a paragraph about 28th amendment, explaining why it is important and how it would benefit our society and why congress must ratify it can someone help me with this?
Answers
Answer:
The 28th Amendment is important because it is a key to fixing the system that makes high-dollar donors more powerful than every other American. The amendment offers lasting, structural reform to ensure an equal voice for every American.
Explanation:
that little paragraph is just about why it is important, i cant help you with the rest because i don't know the answer to the last two questions, i hope this still helped in some way, remember that this paragraph that is above only explains why the 28th amendment is important. your welcome, have a great rest of your day :)
Which of the following was a major reason the Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the Constitution?
Answers
Answer:they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties,
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. constition,given the absence of a bill of rights.
Describe two ways in which the Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 protects citizens against human trafficking
Answers
Answer:
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000 established methods of prosecuting traffickers, preventing human trafficking, and protecting victims and survivors of trafficking. The act establishes human trafficking and related offenses as federal crimes.
Explanation:
The two ways in which Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 :
By establishing program to protect the victims.By providing grant program.Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005Trafficking victims law reathourized act of 2005 play an important roles by making use of preventive measure that will help to reduce and stop the high rate of human trafficking.
The law founded a program that will help protect underage or minors who are victims of trafficking by rescuing them and to as well provide grant that will help the law enforcement agency to reduce human trafficking.
Therefore the ways in which Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 is: By establishing program to protect the victims.
Learn more about Trafficking victims here:https://brainly.com/question/1163922
#SPJ5
why do people rob and leave clues and they know the policeis going to find them
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Can you sue someone for urinating on your wife?
Answers
Answer:
Yes!
Explanation:
You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.
Please answer quickly
Answers
Answer:
Quickly
Explanation: its A
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answers
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
example of special crime investigation
Answers
Answer:
it concentrates more physical evidence its collection handing identification
1. When stuck on a railroad track and the vehicle cannot move forward or back with a train encroaching, what should you do?
a) Exit the vehicle immediately and go in the direction of the oncoming train
b) Honk your horn so the train knows you are on the track
c) Call 911 and wait for help
d) None of the above
Answers
Answer:
Get out of the vehicle. Go in the direction of the ongoing train. Not on the track. Off to the side of the track. This is so that when the train hits the vehicle you will be behind the path of the vehicle when it becomes a flying billiard ball.
Explanation:
what type of damages are recoverable when the defendant's tortious conduct is accompanied by fraud, malice, or willful or wanton conduct
Answers
Punitive damages are recoverable when the defendant's tortious conduct is accompanied by fraud, malice, or willful or wanton conduct.
Unliquidated damages are paid in cases of torts depending on the harm caused by the unlawful act or right infringement since a tort is an wrongful act or an infringement of rights that cannot be foreseen. punitive damages in a tort action; in an action for deceit alone, punitive damages are properly recoverable if the fraud is egregious or if there are circumstances that unmistakably show malice and willfulness, such as a deliberate intent to harm the plaintiff.
Examples of this would be unconscious driving or distracted driving. In both situations, the defendant would have made a deliberate choice to act in a way that could cause significant harm to another person.
Learn more about Punitive damages at:
brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
what is considered the most important counterterrorism law ever passed by congress? the privacy act
Answers
The most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress is the USA PATRIOT Act.
The USA PATRIOT Act is a law that was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The full name of the Act is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001."The USA PATRIOT Act is the most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress. It significantly expanded the power of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prevent terrorist activities. Some of the key provisions of the Act include Authorization for law enforcement to conduct surveillance of suspected terrorists. Authorization for law enforcement to access business records and other documents. Authorization for law enforcement to use wiretaps and other electronic surveillance measures.
Authorization for law enforcement to detain and deport suspected terrorists. Immunity for law enforcement and private citizens who provide information about suspected terrorists. The USA PATRIOT Act has been controversial, with some critics arguing that it infringes on civil liberties and gives too much power to law enforcement. However, supporters of the Act argue that it is necessary to protect national security and prevent future terrorist attacks.
You can learn more about counterterrorism law at: https://brainly.com/question/509519
#SPJ11
While most Americans agree that the environment is important to protect and preserve, there is little ______ over how best to achieve these policy goals.
Answers
While most Americans agree that the environment is important to protect and preserve, there is little consensus over how best to achieve these policy goals.
There are a few reasons why there is a lack of agreement about environmental protection and conservation. First and foremost, the environment is a highly politicized topic. Different political parties often have differing views on how best to protect the environment, and these views can be difficult to reconcile. Furthermore, even within political parties, there can be disagreement over specific environmental policies. For example, some Republicans may support reducing regulations on businesses to promote economic growth, while others may believe that regulations are necessary to protect the environment.
Similarly, some Democrats may support aggressive government intervention to curb pollution, while others may favor more market-based approaches like carbon pricing. Another reason for the lack of consensus on environmental protection is that different groups may have different priorities when it comes to the environment. For example, some people may prioritize protecting endangered species, while others may prioritize reducing carbon emissions to mitigate climate change. These different priorities can lead to disagreements over which policies should be prioritized.
Finally, there may also be disagreements over the science behind environmental policies. While the vast majority of scientists agree that climate change is real and caused by human activity, there are still some people who deny this scientific consensus. This can make it difficult to achieve consensus on policies designed to address climate change.
For more such questions on environment
https://brainly.com/question/24182291
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a FCC principle for EMS related responsibility?
Answers
Answer:
hhhhhkskskskskskisssss
which u.s. supreme court case upheld the principle of implied powers?
Answers
The United States Supreme Court case that upheld the principle of implied powers is McCulloch v. Maryland.
McCulloch v. Maryland, decided in 1819, involved a dispute over the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland's attempt to tax the bank. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing the majority opinion, addressed the issue of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8).
The Supreme Court held that the creation of the Second Bank of the United States was within the scope of Congress's implied powers. Marshall's opinion established the doctrine of implied powers, stating that Congress possesses powers not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as long as they are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.
This landmark decision affirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and solidified the doctrine of implied powers, providing a broad interpretation of federal authority. McCulloch v. Maryland remains an influential case in constitutional law and has shaped the understanding of implied powers in the United States.
To learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/546157
#SPJ11
f arson is suspected, why should firefighters not alter the premises, such as by mopping up or overhauling the scene of the fire, especially at the point of origin?
Answers
Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are
appropriate deceptive plays and which ones should be illegal? Why? Explain and support your answer.
Answers
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
https://brainly.com/question/9321150
https://brainly.com/question/14049478
Less than _____% of all bills introduced become law
Answers
Place these events in chronological order:
A) general election
B) primaries and caucuses
C) national convention
D) Inauguration Day.
Answers
Answer:
B, C, A, D
Explanation:
Advantage of Marketing
Answers
Answer:Having an edge over competitors in the market place by having a superior product, as well as promoting it and distributing it more effectively. Gaining a competitive edge may be a result of correctly recognising customer needs and wants and by creating products which offer superior gratification.
Explanation:
true or false,If the offeree can accept simply by promising to perform, then the contact is unilateral.
Answers
The statement, "If the offeree can accept simply by promising to perform, then the contact is unilateral", is True.
If the offeror promises to perform in exchange for the offeree's promise to perform, and the offeree can accept by simply promising to perform, then the contract is unilateral. This means that only the offeror promises to do something, and the offeree is only required to perform if they choose to accept the offer.
An example of a unilateral contract would be a reward for finding a lost item. The offeror promises to pay a reward to anyone who finds the item and returns it, and the offeree can accept by finding and returning the item. In this case, the offeror has made a promise and is obligated to pay the reward if the offeree performs, but the offeree is not obligated to perform unless they choose to accept the offer.
Overall, the key characteristic of a unilateral contract is that only one party is making a promise, and the other party can accept it by performing the requested action.
To learn more about unilateral contract, visit: https://brainly.com/question/15648341
#SPJ11
What is the prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime? Can a corpus delicti be proven by a confession or admission of a defendant? Explain your response.
Answers
Answer:
The prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime is to provide sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.
According to the EVIDENCE § 640 (11th ed. 1935), corpus delicti cannot be proven by a defendant's confession or admission. It remains the responsibility of the prosecution to provide enough evidence for the commission of a crime. It is only a defendant's voluntary confession that can be admitted as evidence. However, each judge is expected to weigh the confessional evidence.
Explanation:
Corpus delicti refers to a criminal justice principle that requires sufficient facts to be gathered as evidence to prove that a crime had been committed. This implies that corpus delicti is the body of evidence or facts and not a dead body as wrongfully construed sometimes.
Leone Lattes found a way of using a comparison microscope to improve this technique to better match bullets.
Answers
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
It was Calvin Goddard who found a way of using a comparison microscope to improve this technique to better match bullets. Leone Lattes figured out a way to determine blood type from a dried bloodstain.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
I took the test, it was right! :)
which progressive political reform did taft support during his presidency?
Answers
During his presidency, William Howard Taft supported the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which established the federal income tax. The progressive income tax was a key component of the progressive reform movement at the time. The amendment was ratified in 1913, during Taft's presidency, and it allowed the federal government to levy taxes on individual and corporate incomes.
Taft believed that a graduated income tax would help address income inequality and provide a more equitable distribution of the tax burden. The income tax was seen as a way to generate revenue for the government while placing a heavier financial responsibility on those with higher incomes. The Sixteenth Amendment was a significant progressive achievement and a departure from the previous reliance on tariffs as the primary source of federal revenue.
It is worth noting that Taft's support for the progressive income tax distinguished him from his predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt, who had favored a more regressive tax structure. Taft's endorsement of the Sixteenth Amendment reflected his commitment to progressive reform and his willingness to support measures aimed at addressing economic and social concerns.
To read more about William Howard Taft click here
https://brainly.com/question/8598884
#SPJ11
3 contributing factors that lead to the violation of poor service delivery
Answers
Answer:
it's the number of "human rights violations"
Explanation:
I hope this helps