Judicial activism is one approach to interpreting the constitution that leaves room for changing society, changing conditions, statutory interpretation and penumbras.
A judicial theory known as judicial activism maintains that the courts can and should consider wider societal ramifications of their judgements in addition to the relevant law. It's occasionally used as the opposite of judicial restraint. The phrase typically means that judges deviate from precedent and rely their decisions more on personal convictions. Political controversies surround the concept of judicial activism as well as specific activist judgements. Judiciary interpretation, statutory interpretation and the separation of powers are all issues that are directly tied to the matter of judicial activism. An analysis of judicial review in practice over the past three decades reveals that judicial activism has occasionally been a feature of Supreme Court rulings.
To know more about judicial activism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
Difference between negotiation and mediation
Explanation:
In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.
does law of large numbers apply to accidents on aeroplane
Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.
The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.
Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.
The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.
In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.
Know more about statistical principle here:
https://brainly.com/question/30592795
#SPJ11
1. The case caption says that Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff are the plaintiffs in the case and that the City of Milwaukie is the Defendant. Why is the City of Milwaukie a party in the case? Why did the City of Milwaukie fail to appear (file any documents with) the Court of Appeals?
Answer:
I'm very low at mathematics
The City of Milwaukie is a party in the case because it is being sued by the plaintiffs, Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff.
It is named as the defendant because it is the party being accused of some wrongdoing.The City of Milwaukie failed to appear or file any documents with the Court of Appeals because it might have decided not to contest the lawsuit or decided not to pursue any further legal action regarding the case. This may be due to various reasons, such as a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs or an acknowledgment of the plaintiffs' claims. As a result, the Court of Appeals may have made a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
Learn more about plaintiffs here:
https://brainly.com/question/30714126
#SPJ2
Think of a role model whom you believe embodies the qualities that are vital to being ethical. This does not have to be a famous person. Say who this person is and why you look up to him/her for ethical guidance
We are required to discuss about a role model who embodies the qualities that are vital to being ethical.
Mrs Ngozi Okonjo Iweala is my role model, she is currently the director general (DG) of world trade organization (WTO). She has once contested to be the Director general of world bank.She is a woman of high value. She wasn't discouraged with the fact that she is a woman and from Africa. She always aims to impact and influence lives at the international level.Dr (Mrs) Ngozi despite her position in the international community is still a responsible wife and mother. She is worthy of emulation.Read more:
https://brainly.com/question/11873482
1. Which one of the following is the highest court in England?
A. The Court of Appeal.
B. The Supreme Court (House of Lords).
C. The High Court
D. The Crown Court
2. Consideration need not be adequate but must be:
A. Money
B. Sufficient
C. Of equivalent value to the goods.
D. Accepted.
3. In the event of a breach of contract, what is the purpose of damages?
1. To punish the contract breaker.
II. To compensate the innocent party.
III. To put the innocent party in the same position as if the contract had been carrie
out correctly.
A. (1) only.
B. (ll) and (III) only.
C. (III) only.
D. (). (II) and (III).
4. Which one of the following is not an essential element of the tort of negligence?
A. A duty of care owed to the claimant.
B. A breach of the duty of care.
C. An intention to cause loss or injury.
D. Loss or injury caused by the defendant's breach.
Answer:
1) Supreme Court
2)sufficient
3) to compensate innocent party
4) an intention to cause loss or injury
There are different kinds and levels of court. The answers are given below.
The highest court in England is the Supreme Court.The need not be adequate but must be: sufficient.In the event of a breach of contract, The purpose of damages is compensate innocent party.The option that is not an essential element of the tort of negligence is an intention to cause loss or injury.Why is Consideration vital?Consideration is known to be a key vital elements that must be in place with the intent of making a contract binding.
The fact remains that, consideration must be sufficient but it may not be adequate. It shows that consideration must be having some kind of values.
Learn more about highest court from
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
You are working to design a map each area you are designing will take up to 10 hours to make how many hours will it take you to design 7 areas
Answer:
It would take 70 hours to design 7 areas
Explanation:
7 × 10
Define resiliency and what it means to you
is a voting system in which state governments run elections and provide voters the option of choosing candidates from multiple parties; also known as being called the secret ballot.
A voting system in which state governments run elections and provide voters with the option of choosing candidates from multiple parties is known as a pluralistic electoral system. This system promotes diversity and competition among political parties, allowing citizens to select their preferred candidates based on their policies and ideologies.
The secret ballot, an integral part of this system, ensures that voters can cast their votes confidentially without fear of coercion or retribution. In a pluralistic electoral system, state governments are responsible for organizing and conducting elections, which includes managing voter registration, setting up polling stations, and overseeing the vote-counting process. This delegation of responsibilities ensures that the electoral process is fair, transparent, and efficiently managed.
The secret ballot, also referred to as the Australian ballot, is a key feature of this voting system. It protects the privacy of voters by requiring them to mark their choices on a private, unmarked ballot. This process safeguards the democratic principle of one person, one vote, and prevents undue influence or voter intimidation.
In summary, a pluralistic electoral system managed by state governments allows voters to choose from multiple parties and candidates, fostering healthy political competition and providing a broad range of policy options. The secret ballot further strengthens this system by ensuring voter confidentiality and promoting fair and unbiased elections.
To know more about the Voting System visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29791217
#SPJ11
Situation: A wanted to injure B. However, B died. Is a criminality liable?
If a minor purchases alcohols his or her license plate can be suspended under Texas Zero Tolerance policy .
Answer: The answer is yes or true.
Explanation:
Under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 106.06 the judge can direct the Department of Public Safety to suspend the driver's license or permit of the defendant, to deny the issuance of a driver's license or permit of the defendant for 180 days.
India is blessed with a vibrant wildlife and ecosystem, which is often subject to
indiscriminate exploitation by unscrupulous elements of society including business organizations. Briefly explain any 5 (five) legislations that are related to environment protection or conservation
match the impacts of passing laws that criminalize drug use with their descriptions.symbolic impactssymbolic impacts drop zone empty.instrumental impactsinstrumental impacts drop zone empty.these refer to the consequences to those affected by the implementation of such laws, including those who are arrested and their families, and those whose livelihood depend upon the implementation of these laws.these cause people who promote such laws to gain immediate social status by being identified with political power and as supporting goodness, morality, and decency.
The impacts can be categorised as Symbolic impacts and Instrumental impacts.
To match the terms in one column with another, do the following task. There are two columns of mixed-up terms or sentences that match the next activity. In the exercise, participants must first determine how the concepts/phrases in the first column relate to one another before matching the terms in the second column. In the given question, the statements can be matched as -
Symbolic impacts: These impacts cause people who promote such laws to gain immediate social status by being identified with political power and as supporting goodness, morality, and decency
Instrumental impacts: These impacts refer to the consequences to those affected by the implementation of such laws, including those who are arrested and their families, and those whose livelihoods depend upon the implementation of those laws
Read more about impacts on:
https://brainly.com/question/28831302
#SPJ4
what is article 15 military
Answer:
Non-Judicial Punishment
Explanation:
Article 15 in the U.S military is a punishment you receive as a member of the armed forces. Comparable to a violation as a civilian, however Article 15 imposes suspension with/without pay depending on your rank.
In 1954, the government of bolivia began taking land from francisco loza, a bolivian citizen and resident, for public projects, including an international airport. The government directed the payment of compensation in exchange for at least some of his land, but the government never paid the full amount. In 1993, the bolivian government acknowledged that debt, which was approximately $250 million, but still did not pay. Because mr. Loza had passed away, his heirs, genoveva and marcel loza, who were both u. S. Citizens, filed a suit in a federal district court in the united states against the government of bolivia, seeking damages for the taking. Can the court exercise jurisdiction?.
The United States court cannot exercise jurisdiction over the case because the injury of confiscation did not occur in the United States, and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act exempts the Bolivian government from being sued in the United States.
What is the injury of confiscation?The injury of confiscation or forfeiture refers to the seizure of property without compensation.
Legally, governments may decide to take private property for public purposes, like building an airport.
In this case, the Bolivian government took Loza's property without full payment, it did not refuse to compensate Francisco Loza, and since it has taken steps to pay Loza partly, both Genoveva and Marcel Loza can sue the Bolivian government in Bolivia to make good the balance.
What is the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act?The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act exempts foreign nations from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts unless the Bolivian confiscation of the property occurred in the United States or the case had a commercial impact on the United States.
Thus, the United States court cannot exercise jurisdiction over the case under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act because the Bolivian government did not commit a tort in the United States or violate international law.
Learn more about the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act at https://brainly.com/question/14185506
#SPJ1
Imagine that Eva is involved in a property dispute with her town. When she files a case in the district court, the court rules in the town's favor. She then appeals to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court uses the Rule of Four to determine if Eva's case is deserving of review. Once the case is found deserving of review, the Court issues a request to the district court to submit a record of the entire case. In this scenario, this request is known as a writ of
Answer:
Explanation:
certiorari. A writ of certiorari is a request made by a higher court, such as the Supreme Court, to a lower court to obtain the records of a case it has previously tried. This is done to review the case and determine whether there have been any errors of law or procedure made in the lower court. In this scenario, the Supreme Court is requesting the record of the entire case from the district court to review the decision made by that court. If the Supreme Court finds that the district court made an error, it can reverse the decision and send the case back to the lower court for further proceedings, or it can make a final decision on the case.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
In this scenario, the request made by the Supreme Court to the district court is known as a writ of certiorari.
This writ is a legal order that requests a lower court to send its records of a case for review by a higher court. The Rule of Four is a practice that the Supreme Court follows to determine if a case should be reviewed.
It requires that at least four justices must agree to review a case before it can be heard by the Supreme Court.
If the Court decides to review the case, the writ of certiorari is issued, and the district court is required to send the complete record of the case for the Supreme Court to review.
Eva's case will now be reviewed by the Supreme Court, and a final decision will be made.
To know more about writ of certiorari refer here: https://brainly.com/question/11741023#
#SPJ11
which legal concept is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law?
The legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.
What is the concept of law?We need to understand that the law refers to the discipline and profession concerned with the customs, practices, and rules of conduct of a community that are recognized as binding by the community. In essence, the enforcement of the body of rules is through a controlling authority known as the police etc.
Basically, the primary aim of law is to protect all human interests by regulating the conduct of individuals in the society. In conclusion, the legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.
Read more about concept of law
brainly.com/question/4384
#SPJ1
Refer to attachment
Professional ethics and the living
Since she is scare of donating her kidneys, I will go through the process with her again, tell her the pros and cons of the process and give her a lot of example of those who have undergone the process and are not scared. If after that she is still scared, i will advise her to do what she wants.
What are the response to the other cases?2. I will tell the Newspaper and the newsmen of the family's will and the matter should not be expanded and they should give the family some space and when all have been done. Their questions will be answered but for the moment they need to give the family some space.
3. Based on ethnics, i will advice the person on how the process it and it is not wise for the person to undergo it because he or she may face health challenges in future which may put his or her life in danger and if he or she is donating based on close family relation who needs it is a different case and money should not be a reason to sell your organ.
4. Since my friend wants to be a surrogate mother. I will link the both parties involved and explain the process to both parties.
5. I will explain the reason for the hospital behavior to the Wife and that her husband was not neglected and his case is still been handled.
6. Yes I am in agreement and will willingly submit to the test.
Learn more about Kidney donation from
https://brainly.com/question/15060409
#SPJ1
Given that almost half of all property crimes are committed by juveniles who have previous arrests and convictions, it is likely that the juvenile justice system _____.is successful at the goal of rehabilitating juvenile offendersis successful at the goal of rehabilitating juvenile offendersis an overall successis an overall successis successful at keeping the community safeis successful at keeping the community safeis not a successful modelis not a successful model
Given that almost half of all property crimes are committed by juveniles who have previous arrests and convictions, it is likely that the juvenile justice system is not a successful model.
How successful has the juvenile justice system been ?The success of the juvenile justice system is a highly debated topic and can be evaluated from various perspectives.
The high rate of recidivism among juveniles with previous arrests and convictions suggests that the system has not been successful in addressing the root causes of juvenile crime. In order to improve the success of the juvenile justice system, ongoing evaluation and refinement of policies and practices are needed.
Find out more on the juvenile justice system at https://brainly.com/question/11399114
#SPJ1
Make sure that you have read and studied all of Chapter 5. Excluding vision, which body sense do you think is most important? Explain why and provide at least 2 examples. Note: You must include textbook data on your chosen sense in your response and cite appropriately
The body sense that is most important, excluding vision, is the sense of touch. Touch allows us to gather information about our environment, perceive textures, and feel sensations such as pain or pressure.
Firstly, touch is important for our safety and protection. For example, when we touch a hot stove, our sense of touch immediately alerts us to the danger, allowing us to quickly remove our hand and avoid injury. This quick response is due to specialized nerve endings called nociceptors, which detect harmful stimuli and send signals to our brain to initiate a protective reflex.
Secondly, touch plays a crucial role in social interactions. It enables us to communicate emotions and establish connections through physical contact. Hugs, handshakes, and pats on the back are all examples of how touch can convey affection, support, or congratulations. In fact, research has shown that touch can have a positive impact on our well-being and can even reduce stress levels.
According to our textbook data from Chapter 5, touch is mediated by specialized receptors in the skin called mechanoreceptors. These receptors respond to different types of mechanical stimuli, such as pressure, vibration, or stretching. They transmit signals through nerve fibers to the somatosensory cortex in the brain, where the information is processed and interpreted.
In conclusion, touch is the most important body sense after excluding vision. It serves vital functions in ensuring our safety and facilitating social interactions. Through specialized receptors in the skin, touch allows us to perceive the world around us and connect with others. So, in a nutshell, touch is a fundamental sense that helps us navigate our environment and interact with the world.
Learn more about sensations here:
https://brainly.com/question/33419969
#SPJ11
Took marks can be individualized by what?
Answer: A toolmark is defined as the impression left by the contact of a tool (or a similar object) onto a surface. When the tool or object contacts the surface with sufficient force to create an indentation, the pattern of the tool is permanently reproduced onto that surface. Toolmarks examination is an important discipline of criminalistics . Its goal is to establish a link between a toolmark and the tool that created it. Such links are crucial in forensic sciences, as tools are often used in criminal activities, particularly in burglaries, and can help to identify a criminal. For example, when a burglar uses a pry bar to force entry into a house, the marks left by the tool on the door frame are direct evidence of the presence of that tool for that particular use at the crime scene. If the tool is found with, or near, a suspect, it permits the establishment of a link between the suspect and the crime scene. Thus, the recognition and collection of toolmarks at the crime scene and their examination at the laboratory are paramount.
Explanation:
which decision is an example of a corrections official exercising discretion? group of answer choices deciding whether to bring criminal charges against an arrestee deciding whether to grant a convicted criminal early release on parole deciding whether to deny bail deciding whether to stop, search, or arrest someone
An example of a corrections official exercising discretion is deciding whether to grant a convicted criminal early release on parole. To used discretion in an areas where it is deciding that whether to release, sanctions to be imposed.
Excercising discretion is important with the ideal objectives that gives a way to individual personal judgment, both in an organizational as well as in a collective sense. It can be exercised even if the recommendation or decision that is reviewed at a higher level.
The independent judgment and exercise of discretion implies that referred to one that has authority to make a supervision or free from immediate direction and an independent choice. Discretion begins with the decision to label certain acts that is followed by a series of subsequent decisions made by judges, prosecutors and police officers.
Learn more about exercising discretion click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/5742484
#SPJ4
Which of the following explains why the Federal Aviation Administration and the United States Maritime Administration work closely with the U.S. Customs Agency?
Responses
to create specific regulations for weight loads on air and sea transports
to design entry and exit points out of the country to control air and sea flow
to prevent oil spills and other environmental disasters
to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To know more about Crime Prevention:
brainly.com/question/14495855
#SPJ1
Answer: The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
Explanation: This answer has been confirmed correct.
Please dont report. A few kids in my grade said they are gonna jump me. Ive been carrying a knife. What would happen if they attacked me and i defended myself with the knife?
Answer:
/
Explanation:
I don't think it would be best to have a knife for advice but if they're gonna jump you, you really gotta defend yourself.
list the eight basic consumer rights that are stated in the consumer bill of rights.
Answer: 1. The right to safety 2. The right to be informed 3. The right to choose 4. The right to be heard 5. The right to redress 6. The right to consumer 7. The right to a healthy environment
the attorney explained that she had been so busy that she had been unable to depose key witnesses or discuss settlement options with her client. the defendant objected to the extension on the ground that there had been ample time to prepare and that the delay would result in increased costs. is the court likely to grant the motion?
The likelihood of the court granting the motion for an extension in this scenario depends on various factors.
The court might not grant an extension if the attorney's justification of being too busy isn't compelling enough, particularly if the court was aware of the duties' due date beforehand.
Increased costs cited by the defendant in opposition to the extension could also work against the request. The delay's cause, its potential effects on the other party, and the interests of justice will all be taken into account by the court.
The court may be more likely to grant an extension if the lawyer can show that unforeseen circumstances led to the delay.
The court may also grant the request if it won't unfairly harm the defendant or significantly impair the objectives of justice.
In the end, the judge's discretion will determine whether or not to consider the various circumstances and grant the motion for an extension of time.
To know more about a lawyer,
https://brainly.com/question/24718712
#SPJ1
Types of jurisdiction include which of the following?
In personam
In rem
Subject matter
Original and appellate
All of these choices are correct.
Answer:
All of these choices are correct.
Explanation:
- In Personam Jurisdiction
In personam jurisdiction (or personal jurisdiction) refers to courts' authority over particular entities, and their liabilities & rights.
- In Rem Jurisdiction
In rem jurisdiction refers to courts' authority over property within a county, district, or state.
- Original and Appellate Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review a case, and appellate jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review decisions adjudicated by lower courts.
How does the government of a traditional new England small town differ from the government of a large modern city
Are u brainless or are u smart
Answer:
Idrk depends
Explanation:
Is there an answer you need help on?
Answer:
i am brainless.
Thx for the free pts, have a wonderful day/night, stay safe, happy holidays, and merry christmas!
What type of congressional legislation provides for the funding of
government programs?
O A. A decree
B. An amendment
C. An appropriation
O D. A resolution
Answer:
C. An appropriation
Explanation:
Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;
I. Representative democracy.
II. Direct democracy.
Generally, the type of government in which legislators such as senators or house of representative members are found is known as a democracy and they are saddled with the responsibility of enacting or making laws, amending or ratifying laws, appropriation of budget, passage of bills, etc.
An appropriation is a type of congressional legislation which provides for the funding of government programs. It comprises of proposed law by the legislature that gives the government of a particular country the authority to fund certain projects with a concise description of what the funds are to be used for.
Who sets bail for criminal offenses
Answer:
The judge has the power to determine the quantity of bail based upon factors on the severity of an alleged criminal offense, the possibility of the defendant will escape the jurisdiction prior to trial, and the likelihood of the defendant will commit more crimes following their release.