Magda, David, and Rashida have been friends since the sixth grade. One of their favorite activities is to go to the mall and look around in the stores. Sometimes they make purchases and sometimes they are just window-shopping. There are lots of young people who do this, and it is fun to see people and hang out.

Recently, a number of stores at the mall have experienced an increase in shoplifting and vandalism. As a result, the stores have made a policy that no one under 16 years of age can enter without a parent or guardian. The new rules also state that if you are between the ages of 16 and 18 you cannot enter the store in groups larger than two. Other teens have to wait outside until each pair leaves. Store owners have threatened to call the police if the young people give them any trouble about the new policies.

This policy makes Magda, David, and Rashida angry. They believe it is unfair. After all, they are paying customers and spend money in these stores. Why is the rule directed only at young people? They do not want to get into trouble with the police, but they do not understand why they have to be treated as troublemakers when they have not done anything wrong.

The manager of the shopping mall, along with one of the store owners, has agreed to meet with two of the teens and a mediator to try to find some workable solutions.

Problem 4. 2

In preparation for the mediation session, the disputants should consider the following issues:

a. What are your concerns? How would you state the issue in the dispute?
b. What is your starting position (demand)? What are your underlying interests (what do you really want)?
c. What is the best conceivable outcome from your perspective?
d. What do you think the starting position and underlying interests of the other side will be?​

The sequencial effects from an increasing BAC is mostly linked to the amount of alcohol in a person's bloodstream.

BAC means the blood alcohol concentration used by drinking of alcoholic content.

Generally, as the BAC increases in the blood, someone might experience a severe increases in your heart rate, irregular breathing, loss of bladder control etc

The effects from an increasing BAC is linked to the amount of alcohol in a person's bloodstream because the higher the content of alcohol, the higher the BAC.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about BAC

brainly.com/question/1638426

Answer:

dang, thanks for free points tho

Explanation:

Answer:

Free answer dude-

Explanation:

the distance around the edge of a shape

In "The Crucible: Act III" Danforth states that if Mary Warren is lying in her deposition, her punishment will be sentenced to jail.

In Act III of "The Crucible," Mary Warren, a character in the play, is called upon to testify against Abigail Williams and the other girls who have been involved in the witchcraft accusations. Danforth, the deputy governor overseeing the trials, questions Mary Warren's credibility and warns her of the consequences if she is found to be lying.

He asserts that if her deposition is proven false, she will be sentenced to jail for perjury. This statement reflects the serious nature of the trials and the importance of truth and honesty in the proceedings. It also serves as a deterrent to discourage individuals from providing false or misleading testimony, as they would face severe repercussions.

To know more about Mary Warren, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/32224729

#SPJ4

------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"In "The Crucible: Act III" Danforth states that if Mary Warren is lying in her deposition, her punishment will be _____________."-------------

Answer:

B, C, A, D

Explanation:

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

The correct answers to these open questions are the following.

The government agency that regulates advertising of consumer products such as bottled water is the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration.

What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising?

The purpose is that companies really and truthfully inform American consumers over the components of the food or medicines they are about to take. It is of the utmost importance that the American people are informed and protected when they are consuming food or medicines, so they know what they are having.

What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations around consumer products and services?

FDA has the power to enforce its regulations nationwide. If companies do not comply, the FDA can enforce the regulations and companies have to pay fines from 100,000 to more than 250,000 dollars.

What recommendations would you offer that complies with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?

My recommendation is that companies are honest when making advertisements to promote their products. Many times, companies lie to attract more consumers to defeat their competitors, cheating the people on some benefits that are not true.

That is not honest or ethical.

Clear communication and honesty is my best advice.

Answer:

The bay of pigs invasion

Explanation:

The Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 was a failed attack launched by the CIA during ... Bay of Pigs: President Kennedy and the Cold War ... with the Soviet Union, and the United States responded by prohibiting the ... In 1962, the Cuban missile crisis inflamed American-Cuban-Soviet tensions even further.

State laws that preempt HIPAA privacy provisions usually cover the following types of information, except for cardiac.

When new federal laws were approved in 1996, there were no clear HIPAA exceptions for emergency cases. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a bulletin in 2014 to make clear how protected health information (PHI) might be utilized in emergency scenarios without breaking the law in response to public health emergencies across the world. Except for therapeutic reasons, the amount of information disclosed must always be "minimum required," and all reasonable steps must be taken to prevent unauthorised use of the patient's information.

Hospitals are exempt from the sanctions and fines usually associated with HIPAA violations, such as using PHI to speak with a patient's family member without authorization, provide a patient with a copy of the entity's privacy notice, or safeguard the patient's complete privacy or confidentiality, for a brief but defined period in the event of a declared public health emergency.

To learn more about HIPAA here,

https://brainly.com/question/11277705

#SPJ1

Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).

Explanation:

Answer:

Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.

Explanation:

The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.

Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.

Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4748133

#SPJ2

The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?

Farm Supplies may be liable for hostile environment harassment if it knew of the harassment and did not take steps to prevent it.

When coworkers, customers, contractors, or anybody else the victim meets with at work behaves in an undesirable way and makes the workplace frightening, aggressive, or insulting, it creates a hostile environment. A hostile workplace claim must often be supported by evidence that you were harassed because of a protected trait. It was inappropriate to be harassed.

The harassment was serious enough or pervasive enough to make the workplace hostile. To determine whether an environment is "hostile," courts must consider the entirety of the circumstances, and they should take into account the non-exclusive list of factors below: (1) the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; (2) its seriousness; and (3) whether it is physically threatening or humiliating.

To learn more about harassment, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15277267

#SPJ1

A legislature is a deliberative assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country or city. Legislatures form important parts of most governments; in the separation of powers model, they are often contrasted with the executive and judicial branches of parliamentary government.

Laws enacted by legislatures are usually known as primary legislation. In addition, legislatures may observe and steer governing actions, with authority to amend the budget involved.

The members of a legislature are called legislators. In a democracy, legislators are most commonly popularly elected, although indirect election and appointment by the executive are also used, particularly for bicameral legislatures featuring an upper chamber.

The executive is the branch of government exercising authority in and holding responsibility for the governance of a state. The executive executes and enforces law.

In political systems based on the principle of separation of powers, authority is distributed among several branches —an attempt to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single group of people. In such a system, the executive does not pass laws  or interpret them . Instead, the executive enforces the law as written by the legislature and interpreted by the judiciary. The executive can be the source of certain types of law, such as a decree or executive order

The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law  or enforce law, but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.

In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.

A legislative body is responsible for the ongoing power to enact laws for a political unit, such as a nation or city. Usually referred to as primary legislation, laws passed by legislatures.

The legislative branch can approve presidential appointments, manage the budget, impeach the president, and force him or her to resign from office by using their power and authority.

The ability to veto laws that the legislative branch adopts belongs to the executive branch and the president. The judicial branch has the power to invalidate legislation that the legislative branch has passed.

When state laws and regulations are found to be incompatible with a higher standard, such as primary legislation, courts having judicial review authority may revoke those laws and regulations.

Learn more about the legislative branch, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8338696

#SPJ3

Answer:

this is very true I have like 33 missing assignments!

Answer:

give out some questions..we will answer them.. we can help u

Explanation:

Pre-clearance refers to a process in the United States that required certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting practices to obtain federal approval or "pre-clearance" before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures.

The purpose of pre-clearance was to prevent discriminatory voting practices and protect the voting rights of minority communities.

The pre-clearance requirement was established under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). The VRA was a landmark federal law that aimed to overcome barriers to voting faced by African Americans and other minority groups.

The Supreme Court case that undermined pre-clearance and required congressional action to allow it to operate was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).

Learn more about Pre-clearance here:

https://brainly.com/question/31446528

#SPJ4

A Proposition of Policy Speech makes a persuasive argument about a course of action regarding a controversial topic of social or public concern.

While the proposition is based on some value premise, the focus of the discussion is not necessarily on this underlying premise, but more on the desirability and ability to act.

Policies are a set of general guidelines. They outline your organization's plan for tackling certain issues. The purpose of policies is to communicate an organization’s values, philosophy, and culture.

The term may apply to government, public sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals, Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law.

Learn more about Policies here,

https://brainly.com/question/3521988

#SPJ1

The criteria for assessing whether a president's first 100 days are successful is that it takes aggressive action to address perceived problems.

The first hundred days are vital for a president's because they could assess whether they not only present what type of leader the president is but also serve as a period in which the president has more space to take aggressive action to address perceived problems. The first 100 days of the presidency often indicate the beginning of a leading politician's term in office. Listening and formulating an informed strategy, gaining key stakeholder buy-in, and then they roll out the strategy in a thoughtful way, so the right audiences are reached at the right time and with the right message.

To know more about the President:

https://brainly.com/question/2409724

#SPJ4

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

Despite the fact that Zootopia is a family-friendly picture, it subtly teaches young children about how societal concerns exist in the real world today. This video addresses issues such as sexism, racism, and political corruption, as well as discussion on how to combat them.

Zootopia's animal kingdom stereotypes establish divisions between usually predatory and prey species, as well as between diverse mammals. Rabbits are regarded as being mainly employed as carrot farmers, whereas foxes are characterized as being untrustworthy and cunning.

In the film Zootopia, Nick Wilde is drowning in stereotypes since he is a fox, which is renowned for being a nasty predator, aggressive, and clever. Although Nick is a cunning, cunning fox, he has a tender side that he never shows. He always covers his emotions because he is meant to be sly and deceitful as a fox.

Learn more about Societal Concerns:
https://brainly.com/question/5105464
#SPJ1

Answer:9/11 has changed the policy by showing the world that we need more protection in the world and now the world and airports are a lot more alert than they were years ago

Explanation:

When a bailment is voluntary and mutually beneficial for both the bailor and the bailee, the bailee owes a duty of care and reasonable diligence to the bailor. The bailee is responsible for taking reasonable precautions to protect the bailed property and prevent any damage or loss. This includes exercising proper care, skill, and caution in handling and preserving the property.

The bailee must ensure that the property is returned in the same condition as when it was received, or in the condition agreed upon between the parties. They are expected to use the property only within the scope of the agreement and not to exceed the agreed-upon terms.

The level of responsibility or duty of care may vary depending on the nature of the bailment and any specific agreements made between the parties. However, in a voluntary bailment that benefits both parties, the bailee's responsibility is to act in a manner that safeguards the bailor's interests and ensures the safekeeping of the property entrusted to them.

In a voluntary bailment that benefits both the bailor and the bailee, the bailee owes a duty of care and reasonable diligence to the bailor. This means that the bailee must take reasonable precautions to protect the bailed property, exercise proper care and skill in handling it, and ensure its safekeeping. The bailee is responsible for returning the property in the same condition it was received, or as agreed upon between the parties, and must not exceed the authorized use of the property.

To know more about reasonable diligence.

https://brainly.com/question/7005428

#SPJ11

Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon

Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?

Let's consider all the choices:

Answer: Resources

Hope that helps!

#LearnwithBrainly

Answer:

Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.

An offense of possession of stolen goods is likely to be committed when an individual bought a 55'' screen TV for $50.

This means a condition whereby someone handles a stolen goods knowingly or unknowingly whether they are stolen.

Someone who bought a stolen goods is also an offender.

In conclusion, an offense of possession of stolen goods is likely to be committed when an individual bought a 55'' screen TV for $50.

Read more about stolen good

brainly.com/question/590967

Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is available for "non-character purposes," such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident.

brainliest? (❁´◡`❁)

Answer:

B. Asking a series of indirect questions.

Explanation:

The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.

Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.

Some of the several reasons why the prison population of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has increased over the past few years includes:

Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the prosecution of federal crimes, leading to more people being sentenced to federal prison. We is also a trend toward longer prison sentences for federal crimes, particularly for drug offenses. This has led to an increase in the length of time that individuals spend in federal prison.

The BOP has reduced its use of parole, which allows prisoners to be released early under certain conditions. This has led to more prisoners serving their full sentences in federal prison. It also houses individuals who are in the country illegally and have been convicted of federal crimes. In recent years, there has been an increase in immigration enforcement, which has led to more individuals being detained in federal prisons.

Read more about prison population

brainly.com/question/10436583

#SPJ1

It is not appropriate for a Loss Prevention Officer to physically restrain or handcuff a child (5-13) to protect store property, as it should only be used in situations where there is an imminent threat to safety.

A Loss Prevention Officer is an employee of a business who is responsible for preventing theft and other losses within the store.

A Loss Prevention Officer should not physically restrain or handcuff a child (aged 5-13) to protect store property. The use of physical force or restraints should only be used in situations where there is a clear and imminent threat to the safety of the public or the officer, and where it is necessary to prevent harm.

The use of force on a child should be a last resort and must be proportionate to the situation. Additionally, many jurisdictions have laws and regulations in place that prohibit the use of physical force or restraints on minors, except in extreme cases of danger.

Learn more about Loss Prevention Officer on:

https://brainly.com/question/30214543

#SPJ1