Answer:
I would say D) because it seems the most like what you would call "formal."
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
King Lear
What happens to Cordelia? O She is killed by Reagan
O She is killed by Goneril
O She is killed by the soldiers O She runs away O None of the above
In the tragedy King Lear, Cordelia dies as a result of variable costs hanging in prison. She is the youngest and beloved daughter of King Lear. The correct answer is b. She is killed by Goneril.
Who does not fall for her father's flattery in her conversation and her actions towards her father. Cordelia is the one who truly loves her father and cares for him more than her siblings do.
In Act IV of King Lear, Cordelia is captured and imprisoned by her older sister Goneril after the Battle of Dover. She is then ordered to be executed in prison, which takes place off-screen. As Cordelia is the only daughter who remains loyal to her father, her death serves as the emotional climax of the play. The correct answer is b. She is killed by Goneril.
To know more about Variable cost visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29753902
#SPJ11
In they story The man in the well how to the children’s interactions with the man in the well reveal the theme of the text ? Use at least two pieces of evidence in your response
well... first off, the theme is obviously a man in a well. we dont know why but he is in that well. that man eats, sleeps, and dreams about this random well that he is in because he is in it. he only know the well. as far as hes concerned, he is that well and will always be that well.
i did the best i could with the info i had
write a debate against the motion that democracy is the best way of governance
The assignment wants to know your writing and argumentation skills. For this reason, I cannot write your argument for the debate, but I will show you how to do it.
Argument structurePresent a strong opinion on why democracy is not the best form of government.Present the defects of democracy, reinforcing your opinion.Present evidence that democracy is not the best government by comparing it with other more efficient forms of government.You will need to make a statement against advocating democracy as the best form of government, therefore you will need to express the flaws and shortcomings that make democracy controversial and negative.
For that, you'll need to search for articles and experts that can present all aspects of democracy to you, as well as allow you to gather evidence for your argument.
Learn more about debates:
https://brainly.com/question/4076151
#SPJ1
what is still lennie's biggest fear in the Of Mice And Men?
How does Goldman’s tone shift in the final paragraph?
Goldman’s tone shift in the final paragraph is C. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is sarcastic; but in the last paragraph it is serious and respectful.
In the final paragraph, Emma Goldman's tone shifts from a sarcastic and somewhat mocking tone to a serious and respectful one. In the first two paragraphs, she uses words like "comedy," "ludicrous," and "tempest in a teapot" to convey her disbelief and derision towards the actions of the prosecution and the court proceedings. Her tone in these paragraphs is filled with sarcasm and a sense of irony.
However, in the last paragraph, Goldman takes a more serious and respectful tone. She addresses the jury as "Gentlemen" and acknowledges that her co-defendant has already presented a thorough analysis of the evidence. Instead of continuing with the sarcastic and mocking tone, she shifts to a more straightforward and respectful approach, emphasizing the failure of the prosecution to prove their charges and referring to it as an insult to human intelligence.
The tone in this paragraph is serious as she appeals to the reason and intelligence of the jury, aiming to make her case effectively. Therefore, the correct answer is C. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is sarcastic, but in the last paragraph, it is serious and respectful. Therefore, Option C is correct.
The question was incomplete. find the full content below:
Address to the Jury by Emma Goldman
Emma Goldman was a well-known anarchist, meaning someone who believed voluntary organizations should replace governments. In 1917, Goldman and fellow anarchist Alexander Berkman were put on trial for conspiring against the US government by publishing anarchist
magazines. In the following speech, Goldman defends herself and Berkman.
The stage having been appropriately set for the three-act comedy, and the first act successfully played by carrying off the villains in a madly dashing automobile-which broke every traffic regulation and barely escaped crushing everyone in its way-the second act proved even more ludicrous. Fifty thousand dollars bail was demanded, and real estate refused when offered by a man whose property is valued at three hundred thousand dollars-and that after the District Attorney had... promised to accept the property for one of the defendants, Alexander Berkman, thus breaking every right guaranteed even to the most heinous criminal.
Finally, the third act, played by the Government in this court during the last week. The pity of it is that the prosecution knows so little of dramatic construction, otherwise it would have equipped itself with better dramatic material to sustain the continuity of the play. As it was, the third act fell flat, utterly, and presents the question, Why such a tempest in a teapot?
Gentlemen of the jury, my comrade and co-defendant having carefully and thoroughly gone into the evidence presented by the prosecution, and having demonstrated its entire failure to prove the charge of conspiracy or any overt acts to carry out that conspiracy¹, I shall not impose upon your patience by going over the same ground, except to emphasize a few points. To charge people with having conspired to do something which they have been engaged in doing most of their lives-namely their campaign against war, militarism and conscription as contrary to the best interests of humanity-is an insult to human intelligence.
How does Goldman’s tone shift in the final paragraph?
A. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is carefree; but in the last paragraph she is seething with anger.
B. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is enthusiastic; but in the last paragraph, she is pessimistic
C. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is sarcastic; but in the last paragraph it is serious and respectful.
D. In the first two paragraphs, her tone is objective; but in the last paragraph it is subjective and biased.
Know more about Goldman’s tone shift here:
https://brainly.com/question/22319447
#SPJ8
Which word best completes this analogy?
comedy: laughter as tragedy:
O A. tears
O B. drama
O C. happiness
O D. Shakespeare
Answer:
A. tears
Explanation:
Tears and laughter are reactions to tragedy and comedy respectively.
Answer:
tears
Explanation:
Athena’s suppleness allowed her to cross her ankles behind her head. Would you describe Athena as flexible?
Answer:
I would, most people wouldn't be flexible enough.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, she is flexible, since suppleness implies flexibility.
Explanation:
The Necklace by:
Guy de Maupassant
to _____________ is to state a claim and support it with reasons and evidence
5. How do paragraphs 37-38 contribute to the overall
story?
O A. They suggest that Yevgeny and Seryozha do not
have a close relationship as father and son, and
Yevgeny is realizing the emotional distance.
O B. They show how Seryozha is too young to
comprehend the seriousness of Yevgeny's points
and his attempts at discipline are fruitless.
O C. They reveal that Seryozh is pretending not to
understand his father's argument, so as to have
an excuse to continue his negative behavior.
D. They emphasize the irony of the
miscommunication between Yevgeny and his son,
as Yevgeny assumes Seryozha "does not regard...
[his] arguments as serious."
The option A . states that Paragraphs 37-38 suggest that Yevgeny and Seryozha do not have a close relationship as father and son, and Yevgeny is realizing the emotional distance.
The paragraphs show the father's frustration and realization of the emotional distance he has with his son. The paragraph points out the difficulty faced by the father, who wants to discipline his son but is unable to do so due to the father-son relationship's emotional distance. Yevgeny believes that he has communicated his thoughts to his son correctly but in reality, he has not communicated his thoughts effectively, and that is where the root of the problem lies.
The paragraphs explain the father-son relationship's underlying tension and the father's struggle to connect with his son. They contribute to the story's overall message that relationships are complex, and communication is essential to maintain a strong bond. The father's realization about the relationship's emotional distance is the turning point in the story and leads to a path of resolution. Therefore the correct option is A
Know more about emotional distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/29787912
#SPJ8
(9) How did God work out Mr. Pudaite's problem with hay fever?
(10) What "news struck Hmar land like lightning announcing the end of a long drought"?
(11) How many children did the Lord give to the Pudaites? What are their names?
(12) Briefly review two attempts on Mr. Pudaite's life as a result of the influence of Communism.
After the authorities had gotten things under control, what was Mr. Pudaite's counsel to the
Hmar people concerning these enemies?
(13) When did Mr. Young Man die?
(14) How did God use Mawii and other circumstances to show Ro that he was not to file as a
candidate for Parliament? God had a purpose in this disappointment. What was it?
(15) What phrase did God put in Mr. Pudaite's mind to reveal to him the ministry of Bibles for
the World?
(16) Explain how the ministry of
Bibles for the World works.
3 children the Lord gives to the Pudaite's.
Dr. Pudaite was a truthful, risk-free, charitable, and charming leader who is survived by his wife and three kids. His remains will be transported by air to Churanchandpur, Manipur, where he was born, where he would be laid to rest in the designated courtyard of his home.
Rochunga Pudaite was an Indian minister of Hmar ancestry who lived from 4 December 1927 to 10 October 2015. He established Bibles for the World and translated the Bible into the Hmar tongue. He was an evangelist and well-known speaker. His organization, Bibles for the World, has made it possible for the Christian Bible to be distributed to millions of people worldwide by sending them Bibles in many languages.
To learn more about Bibles visit: https://brainly.com/question/23570286
#SPJ9
In the last three lines, the tone of the poem
shifts from -
O I bleak to playful
O strident to optimistic
O hopeful to apprehensive
O objective to moralistic
Answer:
Bleak to playful
Explanation:
I just did it
As per the given lines, the tone of the poem is clearly shifted from hopeful to apprehensive. Hence, Option C is correct.
What is tone?Tone is nothing but just a casual way of stating something. All it involves is expression or emotions that one carries while conveying any kind of message.
There are various kinds of tones that have been used by a person so that they can convey their message easily and smile to another person.
Some of the tones which are used in the case of any poem are student optimistic, hopeful, apprehensive, objective, moralistic, and many more in the given lines
The tone of that poem shifts from hopeful to apprehensive because of the terms that are used by the other writer while writing the lines.
Therefore, Option C is correct.
Learn more about tone from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1416982
#SPJ2
The complete question has been attached in text form:
Read Trust by Susan Kinsolving
In the last two lines, the tone of the poem shifts from –Richard Bleak to optimistic Playful to depressing Idolizing to solemn. In the last three lines, the tone of the poem shifts from -
O I bleak to playful
O strident to optimistic
O hopeful to apprehensive
O objective to moralistic
what is the V2 and V3 forms of hear??
Answer:
V2 heard V3 heard
hope it helps..
Answer:
heard V2
heard V3 this is your answer
How do you show empathy?
Answer:
To show empathy you can ask if they are ok and say that you care. You can help them or make them feel better. Showing empathy isn't about making yourself look good its about making sure everything is ok.
Explanation:
Showing empathy involves understanding and acknowledging another person's emotions, perspectives, and experiences, and demonstrating that you care about their well-being. Here are some ways to show empathy:
Active Listening: Give the person speaking your undivided attention, and concentrate on comprehending their emotions and thoughts. Use verbal and behavioural signs to demonstrate that you are actively participating in the conversation, such as maintaining eye contact and nodding.
Reflective Responses: Affirm the other person's feelings by repeating what they say. To demonstrate that you understand and sympathise with their feelings, repeat or paraphrase their statements. You may remark something like, "It sounds like you're feeling frustrated and overwhelmed."
Learn more about empathy here:
brainly.com/question/7745697
#SPJ2
advance merryChristmas hohohoho
Explanation:
advanced happy new year teehee
Clover _____ strong belief or confidence in someone or something. Faith _____ the things that happen to a person by chance: the accidental form of things happening without being planned. I hope ______ want something to happen or be true and think it could happen or be true. Luck ______ a small green plant that usually has three leaves on each stem and usually has round flowers that are white, red or purple
Answer:
Clover : A small green plant that usually has three leaves on each steam and usually has round flowers that are white, red or purple.
Faith: strong belief or confidence in someone or something
Luck: things that happen to a person by chance: the accidental form of things happening without being planned.
I hope: want something to happen or be true and think it could happen or be true
Explanation:
Finding definitions and knowing basic context of each word
Mercutio: No, 'tis not so deep as a well, nor so wide as a
church door; but 'tis enough, 'twill serve. Ask for me
tomorrow, and you shall find me a grave man.
a
soliloquy
b
aside
c
dramatic irony
d
pun
This question seems to be incomplete. However, there is enough information to find the right answer.
Answer: d. pun
Explanation:
In "Romeo and Juliet," by William Shakespeare, when Romeo asks about his wound, Mercutio uses a pun when he claims that he will soon be found a “grave man.” He uses the word "grave" as an adjective that characterizes his mood the next day as serious because he won't be laughing anymore due to his wound. But the same word also means ’s the place where the coffin of a dead body is placed, meaning that Mercutio knows that he´s going to die.
What grade level is the wall street journal written at?
Answer: 10th to 12th grade.
Explanation:
THIS IS FOR PAYNELOVE19!!!
Read the excerpt from the poem "Queen of the Cats":
Old Polly was a cat of unusual grace,
With wide, yellow eyes and thin stripes on her face.
My wife took her in on a cold, autumn night,
While the north wind played the weather vane foul.
The old iron rooster screeched at the slight.
What is the meaning of the phrase the old iron rooster screeched at the slight?
The old iron rooster is announcing the dawn.
The old iron rooster is being moved by the wind.
The old iron rooster is screaming in anger.
The old iron rooster is welcoming the north wind
Answer:
The old iron rooster is announcing the dawn.
How does Madame Loisel interact with Madame Forestier after seeing her for the first time in 10 years?
Answer:
When Madame Loisel saw Madame Forestier after 10 years, she became very emotional and moved.
Explanation:
When Madame Loisel saw Madame Forestier after 10 years, she became very emotional and moved. She went before her and greeted her. Madame Forestier was shocked to see Madame Loisel and at first, found it difficult to recognize her. She was astonished about the fall in her personality and she inquired about the same. Madame Loisel narrated the story of the lost necklace and the hardships the couple went through to repay for it. She told her that in order to pay the debts, they had to work very hard for the complete ten years. After listening to the story, Madame Forestier disclosed the fact that the necklace was not an original piece and was not something of great value.
Think of two classes you are taking now or have taken in the past, one in which you felt very comfortable learning new knowledge and one in which you found it difficult to absorb new knowledge. Describe each class in terms of the subject matter, the textbooks or other materials used, the kinds of interaction you engaged in (lecture, lab work, group discussions, etc.), how the instructor taught each class, and anything else that might help explain why you found one class comfortable and the other highly challenging.
Describe the aspects of your personal learning style that might have contributed to your experiences in these two classes.
Class I: Comfortable Learning
Subject Matter: English Literature
Textbooks/Materials: We used various novels, poems, and plays as our course material.
Interaction: The class was mostly comprised of lectures, with occasional group discussions about the literary works.
Instructor: The instructor was very engaging and made sure to explain the material in a comprehensive way. He was also open to any questions or discussion from the students.
Personal Learning Style: I am a visual learner, and the instructor used a lot of visuals, such as slides and diagrams, to explain the material. I also prefer a more interactive class environment, which this class provided.
What are classes?Class II: Difficult Learning
Subject Matter: Calculus
Textbooks/Materials: We used a calculus textbook, as well as various online resources.
Interaction: The class was mostly lecture-based, with occasional group discussions about the material.
Instructor: The instructor was not very engaging, and often went through the material at a very fast pace. He was not open to discussion from the students.
Personal Learning Style: I am an auditory learner, and the instructor’s lectures were quite challenging to follow. I also prefer a more interactive class environment, which this class did not provide.
Read more about classes
https://brainly.com/question/29597692
#SPJ1
8.As two characters are talking in a living room, one of them removes a small box from the bookshelf while the other is not looking, and slips it into his pocket. How does this scene use
foreshadowing to create suspense?
A)The removal of the small box tells the reader something about the characters' history and their relationship to each other.
B)The removal of the small box hints at a secret or hidden act that one character may commit later, thus creating anxiety about what will happen.
C)Because the scene takes place in a living room, the author is hinting that the box may be a small metal case.
D)Because the character takes the box when the other is not looking, the reader knows the second character cannot be trusted.
Answer: The answer is B. The removal of the small box hints at a secret or hidden act that one character my commit later, thus creating anxiety about what will happen.
Explanation:
A Makes absolutely no sense in any way.
C Doesn't make any sense either, because why would the small box be metal, just because they were in a living room?
D doesn't quite add up either because since we don't know what is in the box, or why the character took the box we don't know that it's for some evil reason. The character who took the box might know that there is something in the box that will hurt the other character, but because they did it in secret, it might indicate the character can't be trusted. So it might be D, but it's less likely than B, I think.
Suspense is created by telling the audience something that the main character, or a secondary character doesn't know, so now you, the audience, has information that a certain character does not -- you know that the other character took the box off the self, but the looking away character does not know that. Now suspense is forming as you wonder why the character took the box, what's in the box, and why they took it in secret.
I hope this helps! Have a great weekend!
Answer: The removal of the small box hints at a secret or hidden act that one character may commit later, thus creating anxiety about what will happen.
How does repetition of the words mirth and mirthful in "inchcape rock" influence the description of sir ralph the rover?.
The line "the Rover's mirth was wickedness" could be referring to Sir Ralph's evil plans. The Rover's act of cutting the bell from the Inchcape Rock caused his ship to collide with the rock, eventually sinking with the Rover.
This could be a reference to Sir Ralph's evil plans. In other words, Sir Ralph appears to be most happy when he is planning some evil deed; his main goal in life appears to be to bring suffering and sorrow to everyone he meets. I felt the cheering power of spring," said Sir Ralph the Rover. The nice weather lifts his spirits, and he's content to spend a sunny day on the seas. In fact, Sir Ralph is so pleased with the spring weather that he begins to whistle and sing. However, we are warned that this mirth is of a devilish nature. The line "the Rover's mirth was wickedness" could be referring to Sir Ralph's evil plans. To put it another way.
To learn more about Sir Ralph's evil plans please click on below link
https://brainly.com/question/18336853
#SPJ4
all of the following are considered main goals for ceremonial speeches except . a. praising b. celebrating c. inspiring d. legislating
Except for legislating, all of the following are regarded as primary objectives for ceremonial addresses. Here option D is the correct answer.
Ceremonial speeches are a type of speeches that are delivered during events or ceremonies to commemorate a special occasion or to honor a particular person or group of people. These speeches are typically meant to be entertaining and engaging, and they serve a variety of purposes, including inspiring, celebrating, and praising individuals or groups.
The main goals of ceremonial speeches include praising, celebrating, and inspiring, as these are the primary reasons for delivering a speech at a ceremony or event. Praise is often given to honor the accomplishments or achievements of individuals or groups, while the celebration is meant to mark a special occasion or milestone. Inspiration is intended to motivate and encourage individuals to continue working towards their goals and aspirations.
On the other hand, legislating is not considered a main goal of ceremonial speeches. Legislation refers to the process of enacting laws or regulations, which is a function of the government and typically involves a formal legislative process. Ceremonial speeches are not designed to create or enact laws, but rather to provide encouragement, inspiration, and recognition to individuals or groups. Therefore, while ceremonial speeches may touch on political or legal issues, their primary focus is on the individuals or groups being honored or celebrated.
To learn more about legislating
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ4
About Romeo and Juliet, the critic F.M. Dickey maitains, “love overshadows hate dramaticlly,since it is the passion of the protaganist and since Shakespeare has lavished his most moving poetry upon the love scenes.” Do you agree?
Answer:
Personally, I disagree and agree.
Explanation:
"Love overshadows hate dramatically, since it is the passion of the protaganist and since Shakespeare has lavished his most moving poetry upon the love scenes."
Basically, what he's saying here is that love is more powerful than hate because Juliet/Romeo are so passionate about it. Furthermore, Shakespeare's most famous lines often come from the love scenes in Romeo and Juliet.
Love is not more powerful than hate. In fact, these two emotions are about the same level of intensity. They both require focus on a person/multiple people, they both require energy, and they both are in general, just powerful feelings that have been demonstrated through history. One can be stronger than the other. It just depends on the situation.
Secondly, his reasoning makes sense. Love, in this instance, overcomes the family feud that the two protagionists' families have. So, love does overpower hate in this story. However, take that with a grain of salt, because the love that happens ends in a tragedy. Both protaganists die because they, arguably, loved a little too much.
Thirdly, I don't agree with the statement "and since Shakespeare has lavished his most moving poetry upon the love scenes." Sure, his most famous lines are from these scenes, but that shouldn't be a reason to why love overpowers hate. It should just be an example of what Shakespeare wanted to achieve. He wanted to show that in this instance, love can be more powerful than hate. Does that mean it is in every situation? No.
Those are my ways of seeing it, I hope you get a good grade and I hope you understand Shakespeare, because it is really hard to. Good luck!
give example of complete paragraph with essential parts
Sure! Here's an example of a complete paragraph with essential parts:
The Sultan, as the highest-ranking ruler in Alam Melayu, holds a position of high honor and authority. The title of Sultan signifies a ruler of a large and sovereign state, commanding respect and power. Underneath the Sultan, rulers use other titles. For instance, the Raja, though holding a slightly lower rank, still wields significant influence within their respective smaller or more limited territories. Another title, the Yang di-Pertuan Besar, is bestowed upon rulers who may have a smaller domain but play a more ceremonial role, symbolizing their higher position in the hierarchy. Similarly, the Yamtuan Besar and the Yang di-Pertuan Muda are titles used by rulers in Malaysia's eastern states, representing their authority and standing within their specific regions. These various titles honor the rulers in the kingdom of Alam Melayu. They indicate their status, power, and responsibilities in the governance and social fabric of Malay society.
This paragraph includes an introductory sentence and a discussion of different titles used by the rulers in the kingdom of Alam Melayu. It also includes a conclusion that highlights the significance of these titles in Malay society's governance and social structure.
Use the drop-down menus to select the pronoun that correctly completes each sentence.
I don't think
wanted to get out of bed this morning.
wanted more juice, so I put the carton back in the refrigerator.
Let’s go to the park
has a baseball field.
The author,
books are very popular, is speaking at our sch
Answer:
1. Anybody
2. Nobody
3. That
4. Whose
Explanation:
Correct answers
Answer:
1. I don't think anybody wanted to get out of bed this morning.
2. Nobody wanted more juice, so I put the carton back in the refrigerator.
3. Let’s go to the park that has a baseball field.
4. The author, whose books are very popular, is speaking at our school.
How is the Scarlet Plague and The Shroud Similar? 3 paragraphs 100 points
Answer:
Theyu're similar because Scarlet PLague s bixesual and Shroud SIMlar is gay.
Explanation:
when should you use an informal writing style for your report? when the report addresses complex information
An informal writing style should be used for reports when the report is short and routine. (Option B)
When writing a report or other documents, the decision to use formal or informal writing style depends on the assignment itself, its subject, purpose, and audience. Informal writing comprises of short sentences and is used in more relaxed situations than formal writing. Generally, within the organizational context an informal report is a short document that is routinely shared to keep employees informed about important information and policies. Informal reports can include memos, letters, web postings, and emails. Hence, an informal report is used when the content is short and routine.
Note: The question is missing options which are a) When the report addresses complex information. b) When the report is short and routine. c) When the report addresses controversial topics.
Learn more about Informal writing style:
https://brainly.com/question/18187334
#SPJ4
Fill in the blanks
A sentence used to talk about general truths or facts that have an "if" clause and a main
clause is a _______
Which of these inferences about "black inferiority" is best supported by the following passage (paragraph 11)?
The lack of human dignity experienced by Africans is the direct result of the policy of white supremacy. White supremacy implies black inferiority.
Legislation designed to preserve white supremacy entrenches this notion. Menial tasks in South Africa are invariably performed by Africans. When
anything has to be carried or cleaned the white man will look around for an African to do it for him, whether the African is employed by him or not.
Because of this sort of attitude, whites tend to regard Africans as a separate breed. They do not look upon them as people with families of their own;
they do not realise that we have emotions-that we fall in love like white people do; that we want to be with our wives and children like white people want
to be with theirs; that we want to earn money, enough money to support our families properly, to feed and clothe them and send them to school. And
what 'house-boy or 'garden-boy or labourer can ever hope to do this?
A. "Black inferiority" refers to Africans' low view of themselves in comparison to white people.
B. The vast majority of Africans at this time were only qualified for unskilled jobs.
C. The roles and jobs given to Africans further promote dehumanization.
D. Discrimination of blacks is not supported by the African government.
The inference about "black inferiority" that is best supported by the passage is:
C. The roles and jobs given to Africans further promote dehumanization.
The passage describes how Africans in South Africa are often assigned menial tasks and treated as a separate breed by white individuals. This treatment reinforces the notion that Africans are inferior and perpetuates dehumanization. The passage highlights how whites do not see Africans as equals, failing to recognize their emotions, family connections, and aspirations for a better life. This pattern of assigning low-status jobs and treating Africans as subordinates contributes to the dehumanization and perceived inferiority of black individuals.
\(\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}\)
♥️ \(\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}\)