Answers
only about 61.8% of voting age population within the united states registered to vote in the 2012 presidential election, which supports the statement that political participation in the united states based on voter registration rates falls significantly behind other democracies.
The 57th quadrennial presidential election in the United States took place on Tuesday, November 6, 2012. President Barack Obama, a Democrat in office, and Vice President Joe Biden, also a Democrat, both won second terms. They triumphed against the Massachusetts businessman and former governor Mitt Romney and Wisconsin representative Paul Ryan.
The overall voter turnout in 2012 was 61.8 percent. This research offers a deeper understanding of the socioeconomic and demographic issues that have influenced recent American elections by looking at these overall changes by race and Hispanic origin.
To know more about quadrennial presidential election
https://brainly.com/question/10750361
#SPJ4
Related Questions
In a 1973 book, historian Arthur Schlesinger analyzed whether the president of the United States has become overly powerful and was no longer subject to constitutional checks and balances. Schlesinger made his argument following the Watergate scandal stating, “The expansion and abuse of presidential power constitute the underlying issue, the issue that Watergate has raised to the surface, dramatized, and made politically accessible.” Take a position on whether or not Schlesinger’s argument that the presidency has become too powerful is true today. In your essay,
Articulate a claim or thesis that addresses the issue raised by Schlesinger, and use a line of reasoning to defend it.
Use at least TWO pieces of relevant and accurate evidence to support your claim or thesis.
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the foundational documents listed below:
Constitution of the United States
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 70
Brutus No. 1
Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document listed above or from your study of the American presidency.
Use reasoning to explain why the evidence you provided supports your claim or thesis.
Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing or alternative perspective.
Answers
Answer:
“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington
Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.
During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.
You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
Enter the subject you want to present.Show your argument, that is, your opinion on this subject.Present evidence, taken from the documents and articles you have read, that proves that your argument is correct and true.Show an argument contrary to yours.Present evidence, which proves that this argument is incorrect.Finish the text by reinforcing your argument.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults
Select the correct answer
Harry has been called to be part of a criminal trial as a witness on behalf of the prosecution. The trial concerns first-degree murder. Harry claims
to have seen the defendant, Shawn, near the crime scene. Which type of evidence is this?
OA
real evidence
circumstantial evidence
OC
testimonial evidence
OD
direct evidence
Answers
Option (b), As a witness for the prosecution in a criminal trial, Harry has been asked to testify. There is a first-degree murder trial going on. Harry claimed to have seen Shawn, the accused, close to the crime scene. Circumstantial evidence is what this is.
How does circumstantial evidence apply to this situation?In a case involving circumstantial evidence, the evidence must only support the guilt of the accused, and the Court must carefully analyze each and every circumstantial option that is given to it as proof.
A fingerprint discovered at the crime scene is an example of circumstantial evidence, which relies on an inference to connect it to a finding of fact. Direct evidence provides immediate confirmation of a claim's veracity as opposed to indirect evidence or assumptions, which need to be further supported.
Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact from which the court may infer other facts. If an attack took place there around 6:15 p.m., you may mention in your testimony that you observed the suspect walking down O'Connell Street at that time. In that case, you are offering suppositional evidence to the court.
Learn more about circumstantial evidence: https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ1
In this video, we use the law of conservation of energy. For the systems we consider what?
a.The initial potential energy of the system equals the final potential energy of the system.
b.The initial thermal energy of the system equals the final thermal energy of the system.
c.The initial total energy of the system equals the final total energy of the system.
d.The initial kinetic energy of the system equals the final kinetic energy of the system
Answers
In this video, we use the law of conservation of energy. For the systems we consider the initial total energy of the system equals the final total energy of the system.
What is the law of conservation of energy?
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, according to the rule of conservation of energy. However, it is capable of change from one form to another. An isolated system's total energy is constant regardless of the types of energy present.
For instance, kinetic energy is converted to potential energy when a toy vehicle is rolled down a ramp and collides with a wall.
To know more about law of conservation of energy, click here- brainly.com/question/24772394
#SPJ4
A nephew inherits his uncle's 1,150-acre cattle ranch. The legal term for the nephew in this situation is ____________.
Answers
A nephew inherits his uncle's 1,150-acre cattle ranch. The legal term for the nephew in this situation is beneficiary.
In this case, the nephew is referred to legally as an "heir" or "beneficiary." An heir is a person who is qualified to receive assets or property from the estate of a deceased person. In this instance the nephew is the legal heir to the 1,150-acre cattle ranch that belongs to his uncle.
Upon his uncle's passing, he takes over ownership of the ranch and the associated legal rights as the heir. Depending on the jurisdiction and any applicable will or estate laws that regulate the inheritance process, the specific rights and obligations connected with being an heir can change.
Learn more about beneficiary at:
brainly.com/question/32756759
#SPJ4
a memeber of congess, wo has never had a economics course, has just been places on a money and bakin comitte. the offical needs a brieing prop to the first meeting conering
Answers
The official should keep in mind this when attending the first committee meeting that there is a direct, albeit ambiguous, relationship between the growth of the money supply and the level of prices as well as a direct relationship between the growth of the money supply and GDP growth.
The amount of money in the financial system can be increased or decreased by central banks through a variety of techniques. Monetary policy is the term used to describe these acts. Although the Federal Reserve Board, also known as the Fed, has the authority to manufacture paper money at its discretion in an effort to boost the economy's supply of cash, this is not the method employed, at least not in the United States. All domestic monetary policy is governed by the Federal Reserve Board, which is the organization responsible for overseeing the Federal Reserve System. They are frequently referred to as the American Central Bank. As a result, they are typically held accountable for regulating both short-term and long-term interest rates as well as controlling inflation.
To increase or decrease the amount of money in the economy, central banks employ a variety of techniques known as monetary policy.By decreasing the reserve requirements for banks, which enables them to lend more money, the Fed can expand the money supply.The Fed can reduce the amount of money in circulation by increasing the reserve requirements for banks, on the other hand.By reducing (or increasing) the discount rate that banks pay on short-term loans from the Fed, the Fed can likewise change the short-term interest rates.To learn more about Federal Reserve Board please click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14700070
#SPJ4
Which statement best summarizes the purpose of Article IV of the Constitution?
Article IV outlines the powers given to state governments.
O Article IV outlines the powers given to the federal government.
O Article IV outlines the structure of the federal government.
O Article IV outlines the structure of the state governments.
Answers
Answer: Article IV outlines the structure of the state governments.
Explanation:
Article IV of the constitution describes the state government's organizational structure. Therefore, option D is correct.
What is article IV of the constitution?Article Four of the United States Constitution outlines the ties between the many states and between each State and the federal government of the United States. Additionally, it grants Congress power to oversee federal lands, including the territories, and to admit new states.
Every state is required to give every other state's public records, actions, and judicial decisions full faith and credit. Additionally, the Congress may lay forth in general legislation the conditions under which such activities, records, and procedures must be proved as well as their repercussions.
The advantages and immunities enjoyed by residents of the several states shall be available to each state's citizens.
Any individual who is accused of treason, a felony, or another crime in one state and is caught in another state must, upon demand from the administrative authority of the state from which he fled, turn himself in so that he can be extradited to the state where the offence was committed.
Learn more about article IV of the constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/7018575
#SPJ7
Which of the following is an example of a statutory law? A. IRS regulatory rules and procedures B. A presidential executive order C. A court ruling overturning part of a law D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
Answers
Answer:
D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is best example of statutory law.
Statutory instruments that have been authorized by a legislator, either a state or federal government, are known as statutory laws.
Regulations may mandate particular acts, ban them, serve as statements of purpose, or specify how the government will behave in specific situations.
So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/19769037?referrer=searchResults
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
Answers
Why would a lawyer allow a paralegal to assist defending a client in a criminal trial? (Select all that apply.) To prepare drafts of documents for the lawyer to review. To deal with the client so the lawyer can focus on issues of law. To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial.
Answers
Answer:
I think it's "To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial."
Explanation:
Which of these is based on the current standards or customs of the people? answer choices common law positive law civil law codes
Answers
The answer choice that is based on the current standards or customs of the people is "common law." Common law is a legal system that is primarily based on judicial decisions and precedents established by courts.
It is developed over time through the decisions of judges, rather than being codified in statutes or legislative codes. Common law is derived from the customs and practices of the people, as interpreted and applied by the courts. It reflects the principles and norms that have evolved within a society and is shaped by the judgments and interpretations of the judiciary.
In contrast, positive law refers to laws that are enacted by a legislative body, civil law is a legal system based on codified laws, and codes are systematic compilations of laws. These systems may not necessarily rely on the current standards or customs of the people as the primary source of law.
Learn more about legislative here : brainly.com/question/28855381
#SPJ11
which type of damages are foreseeable damages that result from special facts and circumstances arising outside a contract itself? multiple choice compensatory damages nominal damages equitable damages consequential damages
Answers
Consequential damages are foreseeable damages that result from special facts and circumstances arising outside a contract itself.
What are Consequential damages?
Damages that can be demonstrated to have happened as a result of a party's failure to uphold a contractual commitment, or a breach of contract, are referred to as consequential damages, also known as special damages. Legally speaking, a contract is present when it satisfies the following criteria: it is expressed by a valid offer and acceptance, has sufficient consideration, mutual assent, capability, and legality. Consequential damages cover acts that result from a breach of the contract in addition to the contract itself. The guidelines or computations pertaining to a particular sort of damages can change depending on the type of claim giving rise to the damages, such as whether it is a breach of contract action or a tort claim. As an illustration, consequential damages are one kind of expectation damage that may occur in contract law.
To know more about Consequential damages refer:
https://brainly.com/question/11489978
#SPJ4
Under the "tithing system", groups of 10 families (or a "tithing") would follow three of the principles listed below. Which one does NOT belong?
A: Agree to follow the law
B: Keep the peace in their areas
C: Select one man from each parish as chief peacekeeper
D: Bring law violators to justice
Answers
Under the tithing system, option C, "Select one man from each parish as chief peacekeeper," is not a principle of the system.
The tithing system is a historical practice in medieval England, where communities were divided into groups of ten families or households. These groups were responsible for maintaining law and order in their respective areas, and they followed a set of principles to ensure this.
The three principles that the tithing system followed were: A: Agree to follow the law, B: Keep the peace in their areas, D: Bring law violators to justice
These three principles were crucial in maintaining law and order in medieval England. By agreeing to follow the law, each member of the tithing group acknowledged their responsibility towards the community and committed to upholding the law.
Keeping the peace in their areas was equally important. The tithing groups were responsible for preventing any disturbances, disputes or conflicts within their area. They acted as a support system for each other, ensuring that the community remained peaceful and harmonious.
The third principle, bringing law violators to justice, ensured that anyone who violated the law was held accountable for their actions. This helped deter crime and maintain the rule of law in the community.
However, option C, "Select one man from each parish as chief peacekeeper," is not a principle of the tithing system. The tithing system did not have a chief peacekeeper in each parish.
Instead, each tithing group was responsible for maintaining law and order within their area. They functioned as a self-governing unit and did not require any external authority to oversee their activities.
In conclusion, the tithing system was a vital aspect of medieval English society, and its principles were critical in maintaining law and order. Although the system is no longer in use, its legacy is still visible in modern law enforcement practices.
For more question on "Tithing System" :
https://brainly.com/question/14823008
#SPJ11
Assume instead that, upon witnessing the lovers in each other's arms, Jill departs from the home and drives around in her car for an hour brooding about her husband’s infidelity. She then returns to the home, finds a shotgun in the garage, and then shoots and kills Jack and Sue. What is the offense for which she will now most likely be convicted? Why did you choose this offense? Support your analysis
Answers
Answer:
she will have murder charges and assault charges.
Explanation:
murder charges because she shot and killed both of them assault charges because she assaulted them by shooting them, and since she killed 2 people she will most likely be found guilty and will be in jail for at least 10-20 years.
A owns Blackacre because true owners cannot be tacked together. Thus, the statute of limitations starts in 1994, and B lost possession in 2004.
Why? We'd rather favor the earning principle, than the sleeping.
Answers
In the given case, if A acquired ownership of Blackacre without privity between A and B, then B's period of possession cannot be tacked onto A's period of possession for the purposes of adverse possession.
The principle of adverse possession is based on the notion that a person who uses and maintains property for a certain period of time should be allowed to claim ownership of the property, even if they do not have legal title to it.
This principle is sometimes referred to as the earning principle because adverse possessors are seen to have earned ownership of the property through their use and maintenance of it.
Learn more about adverse possession here:
https://brainly.com/question/29988444
#SPJ4
What tactic did famous crime bosses like Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino MOST likely use to keep order in their organizations?
Answers
An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino
Who is Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino?Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.
An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.
In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.
Read more about organized crime
brainly.com/question/8451608
in the context of life and death decisions, there is a distinction between killing and letting die. which of the following is classified as letting die?
Answers
Removing a patient from life support.
There is a moral difference between murdering and letting die in non-consequentialist ethical theory. Letting someone die entails withholding care, as opposed to killing.
There is a moral difference between euthanasia and letting someone die in the context of medical ethics.
It is reasonable to assume that when an agent kills, she accepts responsibility; yet, when an agent permits a death, she does not.
The moral difference between killing and letting someone die is found there. However, when an agent is already in charge of the surrounding circumstances, the distinction is lost.
According to Winston Nesbitt, he has demonstrated that, in all cases, killing someone is worse than letting them die. However, this conclusion is false.
Nesbitt is right when he says that sometimes killing is worse than letting someone die, but this isn't always the case.
To know more about euthanasia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3378948
#SPJ4
Can someone help me with 10 national laws that all citizens must follow
Answers
Explanation:
What are the 5 most important laws?
#8 – THE US PATRIOT ACT (2001)
#1- Civil Rights Act (1964)
TOP 8 MOST IMPORTANT LAWS.
#6 – THE RECONSTRUCTION ACT (1867)
#2 – NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND (2001)
#4- THE GI BILL OF RIGHTS (1944)
#5 – Morrill Land-Grant Act (1862)
#7 – THE PENDLETON ACT (1883)
Answer:
Rights
Freedom to express yourself.
Freedom to worship as you wish.
Right to a prompt, fair trial by jury.
Right to vote in elections for public officials.
Right to apply for federal employment requiring U.S. citizenship.
Right to run for elected office.
Freedom to pursue “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
Answers
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
What type of ownership interest must be disclosed in writing to all parties?
Property held directly by the licensee only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee or by the licensee's immediate family member only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee, the licensee's immediate family member, the licensee's firm, or a member of the licensee's firm
Answers
According to the real estate law, the property held directly or indirectly by the licensee, the licensee's immediate family member, the licensee's firm, or a member of the licensee's firm must be disclosed in writing to all parties.
Real estate licensees must disclose to all parties any ownership interest held directly or indirectly by themselves or a member of their immediate family or their firm in the property. This is mandated by the law to maintain transparency and prevent fraud and misrepresentation. Thus, real estate licensees must follow these regulations while working with any client or parties involved in a real estate transaction.
To know more about Real estate visit-
brainly.com/question/31179465
#SPJ11
who this man invaded Kuwait?
a.kuwait
b. George H.W Bush
Answers
Answer:
Iraqi forces invaded and annexed Kuwait and Saddam Hussein deposed the Emir of Kuwait, Jaber Al-Sabah, he installed Ali Hassan al-Majid as the new governor of Kuwait. The Iraqi invasion and occupation of Kuwait was unanimously condemned by all major world powers.
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answers
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
State whether each of the following was a result of the Modified Final Judgment of 1984, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, or neither:
a. The FCC was created to watch over interstate telephone systems.
b. AT&T had to sell off its local telephone companies.
c. The LATA was created.
d. Cable television companies could provide local telephone service.
e. Customers could choose between different long-distance telephone providers.
f. AT&T split off its technology division, which became Lucent.
Answers
a. Neither - The FCC was created in 1934 with the passage of the Communications Act.
b. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its local telephone companies, which became known as the Baby Bells.
c. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - The Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) was created as part of the divestiture of AT&T.
d. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act allowed cable television companies to provide local telephone service and compete with traditional telephone companies.
e. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act introduced competition in the long-distance telephone market and allowed customers to choose between different long-distance providers.
f. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its technology division, which became known as Lucent Technologies.
Learn more about FCC here:
https://brainly.com/question/29890205
#SPJ11
the most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the united states was
Answers
Answer:
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States. The development of universal manhood suffrage.
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States was the establishment of the Constitution, which laid the foundation for a democratic government by creating a system of checks and balances, protecting individual rights, and promoting the principle of majority rule.
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States is the fact that the country is governed by a system that places ultimate power in the hands of the people. This is achieved through free and fair elections, where every citizen has the right to vote and express their opinions on the issues that matter to them. The fact that the United States has been able to maintain a stable democracy for over two centuries is a testament to the strength and resilience of this system. Additionally, the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights enshrine the principles of democracy, including the protection of individual rights and freedoms. These documents provide a framework for the government to operate within, and ensure that the voices of the people are heard and respected. Overall, the supremacy of democracy in the United States is evident in the country's political institutions, legal system, and culture.
learn more about democracy
https://brainly.com/question/21256069
#SPJ11
7. When an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or
arrested, it is called
A a warrant
B an affidavit
C probable cause
D search and seize.
Answers
Answer:
C. PROBABLE CAUSE
Explanation:
Probable cause exists when an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or arrested.
Why does Jeff Kluger say: "It's possible that the very steps we're taking to keep society safe and such prisoners in check are achieving just the opposite."
Answers
Answer:
With this phrase Kluger means that the model so well elaborated of some types of prisons promote the mental breakdown of prisoners, that instead of being re-socialized and reinserted in society, they are "made worse" psychologically.
Explanation:
This phrase was said by Kluger when she was demonstrating how prisons called supermaxes work, which are prisons with the highest security standards in the country, where people who have committed very serious crimes are placed and who must be traveled more strongly. Kluger recognizes the need to keep these people in a type of highly qualified control as the supermaxes present, but he questions the capacity of this type of prison to promote the re-socialization of these prisoners.
This is because the objective of keeping a criminal in prison is to remove him from society, where he is a danger, and re-educate him, re-establish him, so that he can act in society again, as a beneficial and advantageous member.
However, supermaxes promote the mental exhaustion of the criminals and the imbalance of their psychological stability, allowing us to question whether the standard of excellence they present is not promoting a disadvantage in society and a result contrary to the criminal.
What is a mortgage? A. a document which makes property security for a debt B. the amount the borrower owes the lender C. the amount owed at the time of foreclosure D. evidence of debt
Answers
Answer:
B The amount the borrower owes to the lender.
why were the men at war in 1651
Answers
They were at war because there were series of disagreements about religion and the way the country should be ruled
Answer:
Image result for why were the men at war in 1651
The English Civil Wars (1642-1651) stemmed from conflict between Charles I and Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The first war was settled with Oliver Cromwell's victory for Parliamentary forces at the 1645 Battle of Naseby.
Explanation:
What is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract?.
Answers
Anticipatory Repudiation is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract.
Legally, one birthday party's failure to meet any of its contractual obligations is called a "breach" of the agreement. Relying on the specifics, a breach can occur when a party fails to carry out on time, does not perform in accordance with the terms of the settlement, or does now not carry out in any respect.
Events to the settlement can are seeking special types of remedies in court with a view to mitigating losses stemming from the breach, together with damages (financial repayment) and equitable treatments inclusive of unique overall performance (forcing the breaching party to observe via its obligations).
Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
in geczi v. lifetime fitness, where geczi suffered an injury when a treadmill at lifetime malfunctioned but a jury held lifetime not to be negligent, the appeals court held that lifetime was not liable because:
Answers
The machine was broken, according to lifetime staff, but no sign had been put on it. Lifetime was sued by Geczi for negligence and willful misconduct.
What does defendant liability in a negligence lawsuit entail?If the action was (a) purposeful, as in the case of a crime; or (b) unintentional but negligent, as in the instance where the defendant failed to uphold his duty of care to the plaintiff, the defendant may be found accountable to the plaintiff for committing a tort.
What is the negligence theory?Before you may hold a person or business legally accountable for the harm you experienced, the legal principle of negligence must be established. In the majority of lawsuits arising from accidents or injuries, such as incidents of "slip and fall" or auto accidents.
To know more about negligence visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20373662
#SPJ1
What do lawsuits related to performance management usually involve?
Answers
Charges of discrimination or unfair termination are frequently included in lawsuits brought against performance management.
What is meant by lawsuits?In a civil court of law, a lawsuit is a legal action brought by one or more persons (the plaintiff or claimant) against one or more other parties (the defendant). The ancient term "suit in law" is present in just a tiny number of laws still in effect today.A $206 billion tobacco settlement was reached in 1998. The largest legal settlement ever reached was the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, which was signed in November 1998. You can seek justice for any losses or harm physical or emotional you may have suffered as a result of the other party's acts by bringing a lawsuit. The party that you are suing will be referred to as the defendant and you as the one who is making the claim will be referred to as the plaintiff.To learn more about lawsuits, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27880380