Over time Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause has used the to apply the specifics of the bill of rights to the states.
What do you mean by 14th amendment?
No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection of the laws.The Fourteenth Amendment, which was approved by the Senate on June 8, 1866, and ratified two years later on July 9, 1868, gave citizenship to all people "born or naturalized in the United States," including people who had previously been in slavery. It also guaranteed all citizens "equal protection under the laws."To know more about Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/29792582
#SPJ1
In an essay of no fewer than 250-words, explain why you think Congress ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution following the Civil
War.
Answer:
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and establish civil and legal rights for Black Americans, it would become the basis for many landmark Supreme Court decisions over the years.
Question 1
0 / 0.5 pts
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is generally
covered by a state's "open records" law and all of the
documentation from ADR proceedings are therefore
public records.
True
False
What sort of case would be held first at a state court?
Select one:
a. Video game pirating
b. Child custody argument
c. Treason
d. Bankruptcy declaration
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Treason is very illegal and betraying for a country, and should be dealt with first.
Answer:
The Correct Answer is C. Treason.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!
MARK ME BRAINLEAST!!!
Vhich of these powers is considered an implied power?
raising taxes
regulating trade
creating a national bank
declaring war
This bracelet CONSTRICTS my arm. CONSTRICTS also mean:relievespainssqueezesprevents
Constricts also means squeezes.
The other words do not fit the proper meaning, and squeezes best fits the context in this sentence.
I hope this helps! :)
Kelly has listed a property that is being sold in part, because a homicide occurred on the property.
Answer: is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.
Explanation:
Homicide simply means when someone is killed by another person. While some homicides are justifiable, others aren't.
If a homicide occurs on a particular property and due to this reason, the property will be sold, it's not legally required for the person selling the house to tell the potential buyers that a homicide occured there.
Therefore, Kelly is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.
Question 1: (15 Marks)
Jim owns and operates a garden shop and landscaping business. In January 2023, he manages to procure a large number of old railway
sleepers. These sleepers are highly coveted by many gardeners for use as decorative retaining walls, borders, and garden steps. As part of a
marketing plan intending to increase customer loyalty, Jim sends a pamphlet to his regular customers telling them a special price for the
sleepers.
Special Offer!
Top quality railway sleepers for sale. Ideal for retaining walls, borders, and garden
steps. Special price of $100 for 5, while stocks last.
The weather, however, stays very mild for the time of year and Jim's landscaping business sales soar. By March sales are still high. Sam
negotiates with his supplier for another load of sleepers. Due to high demand, these sleepers are more expensive.
Jim must sell them for $100 for 3 to make the same profit. Jim does not send out a pamphlet this time; instead, he places a sign on the
sleepers in his yard that tells of the new price.
Prabal and Sonia, a newlywed couple have been saving up for landscaping their garden. They intend to enter a contest for the TV show "Home
and Garden". They relied for their budget on Jim's pamphlet. When they arrive at Jim's yard and find a sign for the new price of the sleepers
they are upset. The price would not allow them to finish their project in time for the contest. Prabal and Sonia show their pamphlet to Jim and
demand the sleepers at a lower price, that is, $100 for 15.
Required: Relying on your knowledge of the law of contract, advise Jim as to whether he is bound by the lower price. Refer to
relevant case laws, if any, in support of your answer. You do not need to consider Australian Consumer Law to form your advice.
Answer:
Based on the information provided, it appears that Jim’s pamphlet may be considered an invitation to treat rather than a legally binding offer. An invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to negotiate and invites others to make an offer. In this case, Jim’s pamphlet could be seen as an invitation for customers to come to his shop and make an offer to purchase the railway sleepers at the special price.
In the case of Partridge v Crittenden [1968], it was held that advertisements are generally considered invitations to treat rather than offers. Similarly, in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953], it was held that displaying goods with a price tag in a self-service store is also considered an invitation to treat.
Therefore, Jim may not be legally bound to sell the railway sleepers at the lower price stated in the pamphlet. However, this is just general information and should not be taken as legal advice. It is recommended that Jim consults a lawyer for specific legal advice on this matter.
Explanation:
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
What methods are used to collect evidence from immovable objects?
Collecting prove from immovable objects ordinarily includes a combination of visual assessment, photography, and forensics strategies.
How to Collect Evidence from Immovable Objects?A few common strategies utilized to gather prove from undaunted objects incorporate:
Photography: Taking high-quality photos from numerous points and separations can give important prove that can be utilized in court.Forensic investigation: Specialists in scientific science may be called upon to analyze physical prove, such as DNA, fingerprints, or strands, to decide their significance to the case.Sampling: In some cases, tests may got to be taken from undaunted objects to be tried for chemical or natural prove. This will include taking swabs, scratching tests, or cutting out little pieces of material.Preservation: Steadfast objects which will contain prove ought to be protected and ensured until they can be legitimately analyzed. This may include fixing off an region or placing protective boundaries around the question to avoid contamination.X-ray and other imaging methods: Imaging methods can be utilized to recognize covered up prove or damage which will not be obvious to the bare eye.It is critical to note that the specific strategies utilized to gather evidence from immovable objects can shift depending on the sort of protest and the nature of the case. It is continuously best allude to">to allude to with an master in legal science to decide the most excellent approach for a specific circumstance.
Learn more about evidence here: https://brainly.com/question/20840904
#SPJ1
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
Question #4
Multiple Choice
Key computer issues addressed by the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) include all of the following except
how to increase the amount of "cookies"
how to avoid "malware"
how to protect kids online
O how to prevent "scammers," "hackers," and identity theft
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) addresses key computer issues such as avoiding malware, protecting kids online, and preventing scammers, hackers, and identity theft. However, it does not specifically focus on increasing the amount of "cookies."
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) is an agency that works to protect consumers from various issues related to computer and online activities. It provides resources and information to help individuals navigate the digital landscape safely. Some of the key computer issues addressed by the BCP include educating consumers on how to avoid malware, which refers to malicious software that can harm computers and compromise data security. The BCP also emphasizes the importance of protecting children online, promoting awareness about the potential risks and offering guidance to parents and caregivers.
Additionally, the BCP plays a crucial role in raising awareness about scams, hackers, and identity theft, aiming to help consumers prevent and respond to these threats effectively. However, increasing the amount of "cookies," which are small text files stored on a computer to track website activity, is not a specific issue addressed by the BCP. While the BCP may provide general information about online privacy and data collection, its primary focus is on protecting consumers from potential harm and fraudulent activities rather than addressing technical aspects like increasing the number of "cookies."
Learn more about Bureau of Consumer Protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/15216453
#SPJ11
In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated
perjury.
O True
O False
The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.
What happens when a witness does not answer a question in Texan courts?In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.
Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181
#SPJ1
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Why would parties in a civil case want to pursue Alternative Dispute Resolution? (in your own words)
Civil case would want to pursue Alternative Dispute Resolution because of Cost-Effectiveness, Confidentiality, Flexibility, Relationship Preservation etc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to the various processes used in resolving disputes outside the courtroom setting. The different types of ADR include mediation, arbitration, negotiation, and collaborative law.
Here is why parties in a civil case would want to pursue Alternative Dispute Resolution:
1. Cost-Effective -: Alternative Dispute Resolution is usually less expensive than litigation. In mediation, for instance, parties can agree to split the mediator's fee, and the cost of a trial lawyer is often higher.
2. Confidentiality -: ADR is more private and confidential than court proceedings. Parties to a dispute may not want their disagreement or dispute in the public record or to be seen as winners or losers.
3. Control Parties are more in control of the process in ADR than they are in court proceedings. They can choose a mediator or arbitrator and agree to the ground rules, the decision-making method, and the timelines.
4. Flexibility -: ADR offers more flexibility than litigation. It can take place at any time, any place, and with the participation of anyone. The parties can agree to a schedule, the process, the type of mediator or arbitrator, and the result.
5. Relationship Preservation -: ADR is designed to promote relationship preservation. It can help parties find common ground and resolve their differences. Litigation can be adversarial, and parties may never speak to one another again.
6. Efficiency -: ADR is faster than court proceedings. Cases can take years to get to trial, whereas mediation can take a day or two, and arbitration can be completed in a matter of weeks. The longer a case takes, the more expensive it becomes.
To know more about Civil case, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32761281#
#SPJ11
Which of the following would be an example of Civil Law?
A driver who was caught speeding
A divorcing couple arguing about child custody
A person who has not paid income taxes for 5 years
An illegal immigrant facing deportation
Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
What is the South African law that is unjust
Answer:
The South African Law of Unjustified Enrichment provides a comprehensive, systematic exposition of the principles of the law of unjustified enrichment. It sets out the general requirements for enrichment liability, differentiates between the main types of situations in
Explanation:
hope this helps...
Jill's home was sold in a foreclosure sale. After the mortgage was satisfied and all the fees were paid, there was a $ 6,000 surplus. The $6,000 will go to Jill. T/F
True. When a property is sold in a foreclosure sale, the proceeds are typically used to satisfy the outstanding mortgage and pay off any associated fees and expenses.
If there is any surplus remaining after these obligations are met, it generally belongs to the homeowner, in this case, Jill.
Foreclosure is a legal process in which a lender takes possession of a property due to the homeowner's failure to make mortgage payments. It is usually a last resort for the lender to recover their investment. Once the property is sold at a foreclosure auction, the proceeds are first used to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance. This ensures that the lender recovers the amount owed to them.
In Jill's case, once the mortgage is satisfied, meaning the remaining balance on the loan has been paid off, and all the fees and expenses related to the foreclosure sale have been settled, any surplus funds are typically returned to the homeowner. The $6,000 surplus mentioned in the statement would therefore go to Jill.
It's important to note that foreclosure laws and procedures can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and there may be specific rules governing the distribution of surplus funds. However, in many cases, the homeowner is entitled to any surplus remaining after satisfying the mortgage and other obligations.
In summary, it is true that when Jill's home is sold in a foreclosure sale, and after the mortgage is satisfied and all fees are paid, the $6,000 surplus would go to Jill. This is because the surplus represents funds that exceed the amount necessary to satisfy the mortgage and associated expenses, and as the homeowner, Jill is entitled to any remaining funds.
Learn more about mortgage here
https://brainly.com/question/29981765
#SPJ11
. State law requires that no person shall drive a vehicle on a roadway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. This is referred to as the __________________.
State law requires that no person shall drive a vehicle on a roadway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. This is referred to as the "Basic Speed Law."
The Basic Speed Law emphasizes the importance of driving at a safe speed, taking into account factors such as traffic, road conditions, and visibility.
It aims to minimize the risk of accidents and protect both the driver and other road users.
To adhere to this law, drivers must continuously assess their surroundings and adjust their speed accordingly, ensuring they do not exceed a reasonable and prudent speed for the given conditions.
To know more about State law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12469633#
#SPJ11
What did the Antifederalists argue that the powers of government should be limited by?
Answer: Judge judy
Explanation:
The Antifederalists contended that a written constitution and the preservation of individual rights like freedom of speech, religion, and property should restrict the powers of the government. They feared that these rights would be threatened by an overly powerful central authority.
Who are the Antifederalists?When the federal Constitution was being ratified in the United States in the late 18th century, a political movement known as the Antifederalists opposed it. They said the proposed Constitution endangered the sovereignty of the states and the rights of individuals to their individual liberty and gave the federal government too much authority. In order to protect personal liberties including the right to free speech, religion, and property, antifederalists argued for the establishment of a bill of rights. They wanted the federal government to be more constrained. Even though they objected, the Constitution was approved in 1788, and the Antifederalist views influenced the decision to include the Bill of Rights in the Constitution in 1791.
To learn more about antifederalists visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/13838143
#SPJ4
Workers also have the right to refuse to do a job if they believe in blank faith that they are exposed to an imminent danger.
Workers have a right to refuse a job if they believe in good faith that the job exposes them to danger.
What is the concept of good faith?The concept of good faith tells us that the worker has had reasonable grounds to believe in the existent of danger.
They have the right to refuse any job that they consider to be dangerous and they are covered from any forms of reprisals for doing such.
Read more on good faith here:
https://brainly.com/question/24725464
How much influence does the media have on your beliefs regarding controversial topics?
A higher minimum age for a corrections agency helps ensure _____. better understanding of the challenges faced by the offender population longer employment terms a more mature, responsible workforce better salaries
Answer:
A more mature, responsible workforce
Explanation:
Answer:
a more mature, responsible workforce
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
Pros and cons of the death penalty
Answer:
cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
pros: no prison
Explanation:
what causes the object that moves along a surface to slow down and eventually stop
Ms. Ramos is not so much interested in simply meeting targets, she wants a fully-diversified organization. This parallels our text discussion of the distinction between law and ethics. If the firm's leadership had a goal to meet the targets, what term does our book have for this approach
Answer:
The options are
A. Minimum acceptable behavior
B. Unethical behavior
C. Code of conduct
D. Corporate social responsibility
E. Generally accepted principle
The answer is A. Minimum acceptable standard
Explanation:
The term which the book has for the approach is having a minimum acceptable standard which is defined as the least accepted quality of a product or service.This is because of the approach being acceptable within the jurisdiction of the law.
Ms Ramos may however be unsure about the ethical standard of the approach used in this context.
Rights specifically granted to Congress by the federal Constitution is what
Answer: Express powers
Explanation:
Express powers powers are specifically granted to the federal government in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.
______a set of laws in the south that enforced racial segregation
The judiciary act of 1789 allowed state court decisions to be appealed to a federal court when.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed state court decisions to be appealed to a federal court when a federal question was involved. The federal question refers to cases that involve the Constitution or federal laws.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal judiciary system in the United States. It was signed into law by President George Washington. The act established the Supreme Court of the United States, which was composed of one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. Additionally, it established the lower federal court system, with district and circuit courts.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the federal court system in the United States. It helped to establish a uniform system of justice throughout the country by creating federal courts with jurisdiction over certain types of cases. The act also provided for the appointment of federal judges by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 also allowed for the appeal of state court decisions to a federal court when a federal question was involved. This helped to resolve disputes involving the Constitution or federal laws. It provided a way for citizens to have their cases heard in a neutral court that was not influenced by state laws or politics.
Learn more about Justice
https://brainly.com/question/32393997
#SPJ11
The Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed state court decisions to be appealed to a federal court when there was a federal question involved or when the decision was based on a state law that was claimed to violate the U.S. Constitution or federal laws.
The Judiciary Act of 1789, passed by the first U.S. Congress, established the federal court system and defined its jurisdiction. One of the provisions of the act was the ability to appeal state court decisions to federal courts. This was permitted when there was a federal question involved, meaning a constitutional or federal law issue, or when the state court decision was based on a state law claimed to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution or federal laws.
To know more about federal laws, visit
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11