Owners of a boat rental company that charges customers between $125 and $325 per day have determined that the number of boats rented per day n can be modeled by the linear function n(p)=1300-4p. where p is the daily rental charge. How much should the company charge each customer per day to maximize revenue? Do not include units or a dollar sign in your answer.

(1.1) A matrix equation b = [√11+e, 0, √2, √2]²T 2) a)  Gaussian elimination without pivoting does not provide unique solution. b) Gaussian elimination with scaled partial pivoting cannot provide a unique solution.(c) Basic LU decomposition is x = [0.788, -3.12, 0.167, 4.55]²T.

The given linear system can be written in matrix form as:

A × x = b

where A is the coefficient matrix, x is the column vector of variables (x1, x2, x3, x4), and b is the column vector on the right-hand side.

The coefficient matrix A is:

A = [[0, -e, √2, -√3],

[π², e, -e², 3/7],

[√5, -√6, 1, -√2],

[π³, e², -√7, -1/9]]

The variable vector x is:

x = [x1, x2, x3, x4]²T

The right-hand side vector b is:

b = [√11+e, 0, √2, √2]²T

(1.2) Solving the system using:

(a) Gaussian elimination without pivoting:

To solve the system using Gaussian elimination without pivoting, we perform row operations on the augmented matrix [A | b] until it is in row-echelon form. Then back-substitute to find the values of x.

The augmented matrix [A | b] is:

[0, -e, √2, -√3 | √11+e]

[π², e, -e², 3/7 | 0]

[√5, -√6, 1, -√2 | √2]

[π³, e², -√7, -1/9 | √2]

Performing row operations, the row-echelon form:

[π², e, -e², 3/7 | 0]

[0, -e, √2, -√3 | √11+e]

[0, 0, 0, 0 | 0]

[0, 0, 0, 0 | 0]

From the row-echelon form, that the system is underdetermined, with two free variables. Therefore, Gaussian elimination without pivoting cannot provide a unique solution.

(b) Gaussian elimination with scaled partial pivoting:

To solve the system using Gaussian elimination with scaled partial pivoting, row operations with partial pivoting until the augmented matrix [A | b] is in row-echelon form. Then back-substitute to find the values of x.

The augmented matrix [A | b] is:

[0, -e, √2, -√3 | √11+e]

[π², e, -e², 3/7 | 0]

[√5, -√6, 1, -√2 | √2]

[π³, e², -√7, -1/9 | √2]

Performing row operations with scaled partial pivoting, the row-echelon form:

[π³, e², -√7, -1/9 | √2]

[0, -e, √2, -√3 | √11+e]

[0, 0, -0.03, -1.02 | 0.027]

[0, 0, 0, 0 | 0]

From the row-echelon form that the system is underdetermined, with two free variables. Therefore, Gaussian elimination with scaled partial pivoting cannot provide a unique solution.

(c) Basic LU decomposition:

The system using LU decomposition, factorize the coefficient matrix A into the product of lower triangular matrix L and upper triangular matrix U. Then we solve the equations L × y = b for y using forward substitution, and U × x = y for x using back-substitution.

The coefficient matrix A is:

A = [[0, -e, √2, -√3],

[π², e, -e², 3/7],

[√5, -√6, 1, -√2],

[π³, e², -√7, -1/9]]

Performing LU decomposition,

L = [[1, 0, 0, 0],

[π², 1, 0, 0],

[√5, 0.3128, 1, 0],

[π³, 4.3626, 2.4179, 1]]

U = [[0, -e, √2, -√3],

[0, e + π², -e² + e × π², 3/7 - e × √2],

[0, 0, 0.9693, -0.3651],

[0, 0, 0, -2.2377]]

Solving L × y = b for y using forward substitution:

[1, 0, 0, 0] ×y = √11+e

[π^2, 1, 0, 0] × y = 0

[√5, 0.3128, 1, 0] × y = √2

[π^3, 4.3626, 2.4179, 1] × y = √2

Solving the above equations,

y = [0.788, -3.12, 0.167, 4.55]²T

Now, solving U × x = y for x using back-substitution:

[0, -e, √2, -√3] × x = 0.788

[0, e + π², -e² + e × π², 3/7 - e ×√2]× x = -3.12

[0, 0, 0.9693, -0.3651] ×x = 0.167

[0, 0, 0, -2.2377] ×x = 4.55

Solving the above equations,

x = [0.788, -3.12, 0.167, 4.55]²T

To know more about matrix  here

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ4

The velocity of the top of the ladder is 20.62 feet per second.

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to relate the distance between the wall and the base of the ladder to the height of the ladder. Let h be the height of the ladder, then we have:

h² + 7² = 25²

h² = 576

h = 24 feet

We can then use the chain rule to find the velocity of the top of the ladder. Let v be the velocity of the base of the ladder, then we have:

h² + (dx/dt)² = 25²

2h (dh/dt) + 2(dx/dt)(d²x/dt²) = 0

Simplifying and plugging in h = 24 and dx/dt = -2, we get:

(24)(dh/dt) - 2(d²x/dt²) = 0

Solving for (d²x/dt²), we get:

(d²x/dt²) = (12)(dh/dt)

We can find (dh/dt) using the Pythagorean theorem and the fact that the ladder is sliding down the wall at a rate of 2 feet per second:

h² + (dx/dt)² = 25²

2h(dh/dt) + 2(dx/dt)(d²x/dt²) = 0

Substituting h = 24, dx/dt = -2, and solving for (dh/dt), we get:

(dh/dt) = -15/8

Finally, we can find (d²x/dt²) by plugging in (dh/dt) and solving:

(d²x/dt²) = (12)(dh/dt) = (12)(-15/8) = -45/2

Therefore, the velocity of the top of the ladder is 20.62 feet per second.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here: brainly.com/question/28361847

#SPJ4

The correlation coefficient that represents the strongest relationship between two variables is -0.75.

In correlation coefficients, the absolute value indicates the strength of the relationship between variables. The strength of the association increases with the absolute value's proximity to 1.

The maximum absolute value in this instance is -0.75, which denotes a significant negative correlation. The relevance of the reverse correlation value of -0.75 is demonstrated by the noteworthy unfavorable correlation between the two variables.

To know more about correlation coefficients, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/4219149

#SPJ4

Answer:

200% of 4 = 8.

Of is a keyword for multiply.

200% x 4 = 8.

8 is less than 10.

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope that this answer had helped you to understand your question. If you have any further questions, please put them below.

Have a great rest of your day/night!

The congruence theorem that can be used to prove that the triangles are congruent is F. Not enough information is given to prove that the triangles are congruent

If all three corresponding sides are equal and all three corresponding angles are equal in measure, two triangles are said to be congruent.

According to the Angle-Side-Angle Theorem (ASA), if two angles and their included side are congruent to two angles and their included side, then these two triangles are congruent.

The hypotenuse is always the opposite side of the right angle. The legs of the triangle are the other two sides of a right triangle. Because a right triangle has two legs and a hypotenuse, it is also known as a hypotenuse-leg (or HL) triangle.

In this situation, enough information aren't given about the triangles. Therefore, the correct option is F.

Learn more about triangles on:

https://brainly.com/question/2938476

#SPJ1

The slope of the line that passes through the points (2,-6) and (6,-12) is -3/2

From the question, we have the following points that can be used in our computation:

slop of (2,-6) and (6,-12)

Rewrite the above points properly

So, we have the following ordered pairs

(2, -6)  and (6, -12)

The slope of the line is then calculated using the following slope equation

Slope = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

Where

(x, y) = (2, -6)  and (6, -12)

Substitute the known values in the above equation

So, we have the following equation/representation

Slope = (-12 + 6)/(6 - 2)

Evaluate the difference in the above equation

This gives

Slope = -6/4

Evaluate the quotient in the above equation

This gives

Slope = -3/2

Hence, the slope of the line is -3/2

Read more about slope at

brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ1

If lines a and b are parallel, then aº = 79º = dº = bº.

Multiple questions are included, and the answers vary for each question.

The given paragraph consists of multiple questions related to proof techniques and statements.

The questions ask for selecting the applicable proof techniques or true statements based on constructive proof of existence, plausible first steps in proving a statement, and different proof techniques mentioned in Epp's book.

Each question requires careful reading and understanding of the provided options and statements in order to determine the correct answers.

Learn more about Multiple questions

brainly.com/question/10403578

#SPJ11

Actually, the statement you provided is incorrect. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is not always greater than or equal to the expected value of sample information (EVSI).

The expected value of perfect information represents the additional value gained by having complete and accurate information about an uncertain event before making a decision. It is calculated by comparing the expected value of the decision made with perfect information to the expected value of the decision made without perfect information.

On the other hand, the expected value of sample information represents the value gained by obtaining a sample and using that information to make a decision. It is calculated by comparing the expected value of the decision made with the sample information to the expected value of the decision made without any sample information.

In some cases, the expected value of perfect information may be greater than the expected value of sample information, indicating that having perfect information is more valuable. However, there are situations where the expected value of perfect information may be less than or equal to the expected value of sample information.

The relationship between EVPI and EVSI depends on various factors, including the quality and cost of obtaining perfect information, the sample size and representativeness, and the nature of the decision problem itself. Therefore, it is not accurate to claim that EVPI is always greater than or equal to EVSI.

To learn more about sample : brainly.com/question/32907665

#SPJ11

In the Heads or Tails game, the player pays 50 cents and chooses either heads or tails. After that, the player tosses a fair coin. If the coin matches the player's call, then the player wins a prize. if 100 players play the game, then we can expect that the students will raise $20.00 as the cost of prizes to be given to the winners.

Answer to part (a):

Probability of winning the game = 1/2

Probability of losing the game = 1/2

Expected number of players who would win = Number of players × Probability of winning

= 100 × 1/2= 50

Expected number of players who would lose = Number of players × Probability of losing

= 100 × 1/2= 50

Therefore, we can expect 50 players to win the game.

Answer to part (b):

The cost of each prize is 40 cents. The expected number of players who would win the game is 50.

Therefore, the total cost of prizes would be:

The total cost of prizes = Cost of each prize × Expected number of players who would win

= 40 × 50

= 2000 cents or $20.00

Therefore, if 100 players play the game, then we can expect that the students will raise $20.00 as the cost of prizes to be given to the winners.

To know more about Probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

y = 200x + 7000

Step-by-step explanation:

950x-750x=200x

27,000-20,000=7000

hope this helps

The least accurate measurement among the options provided is 18050 m.Therefore, among the given options, 18050 m is the least accurate measurement due to its higher number of significant figures.

To determine the least accurate measurement, we need to consider the number of significant figures in each measurement. The measurement with the fewest significant figures indicates lower accuracy.

Among the options given:

a. 208 m has three significant figures.

b. 18050 m has five significant figures.

c. 0.08 m has two significant figures.

d. 0.750 m has three significant figures.

e. 12.0 m has three significant figures.

The measurement with the least accurate value is 18050 m because it has the highest number of significant figures among the options. A higher number of significant figures suggests a greater level of precision and accuracy in the measurement.

Significant figures represent the digits in a number that contribute to its precision. They include all the non-zero digits and any zeros that appear between non-zero digits or after a decimal point. In this case, the measurement 18050 m has five significant figures, indicating a high level of precision and accuracy.

On the other hand, measurements with fewer significant figures imply less precision and accuracy. For example, the measurement 0.08 m has only two significant figures, suggesting less certainty in the measurement compared to 18050 m.

To learn more about Significant figures : brainly.com/question/29153641

#SPJ11

The diameter of the given circle with a circumference of 28.6 centimeters is approximately 9.11 cm.

The circumference of a circle is given by the simple formula: C = πd, where C is the circumference, π is the constant pi and d is the diameter of the circle.

Given that the circumference of the circle is 28.6 cm, we can use the formula to find the diameter:

28.6 = πd

d = 28.6/π

Using 3.14 as an approximation for π, we get:

d ≈ 28.6/3.14 ≈ 9.11

Therefore, the diameter of the circle is approximately 9.11 cm.

Learn more about diameter

https://brainly.com/question/28162977

#SPJ4

The solution of the given system of equation is (3, 2).

In the given question we have to find the solution to the system of equations:

y = 4x − 10 and y = 2

We can solve the system of equation using the substitution method.

In substitution method we have to put the the value of one variable from one equation to the other equation.

We have to equations:

y = 4x − 10........................(1)

y = 2...................................(2)

Now putting the value of y from the equation 2 in equation 1

2 = 4x − 10

Add 10 on both side, we get

4x = 12

Divide by 4 on both side, we get

x = 3

Now putting the value of x in equation 1

y = 4(3) − 10

y = 12 − 10

y = 2

Hence, the solution of the given system of equation is (3, 2).

To learn more about substitution method link is here

brainly.com/question/14619835

#SPJ4

The right question is:

What is the solution to the system of equations y = 4x − 10 and y = 2?

Answer:

12,600,008

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps you! :)

A linear programming problem with two decision variables can be solved by a graphical solution method. In this method, the constraints and the objective function of the linear programming problem are graphed on a two-dimensional coordinate plane, and the optimal solution is found at the intersection of the feasible region (the area defined by the constraints) and the level curve of the objective function.

The graphical solution method is a simple and intuitive way to solve linear programming problems with few decision variables, but it becomes impractical as the number of decision variables and constraints increase. In such cases, more complex algorithms, such as the simplex method or interior point methods, are used to find the optimal solution.

To learn more about coordinate : brainly.com/question/22261383

#SPJ11

Answer:

25/3

Step-by-step explanation:

not confident if you know please make me correct

Answer:

\(25/3.\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(if \: x = 5\\ if \: y = 3 \\ then \to \\ {9x}^{2} y {}^{ - 3} = \frac{ {9x}^{2} }{y{}^{3} } = \frac{9 \times {5}^{2} }{ {3}^{3} } \to \\ \\ {9x}^{2} y {}^{ - 3} = {5}^{2}3{}^{ - 1} \\ {9x}^{2} y {}^{ - 3} = \boxed{25/3} \to \: if \: x \: = 5 \: and \: y = 3.\)

♨Rage♨

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

The irrational number is an number under a sqrt

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

28,980

Step-by-step explanation:

The Wronskian of two functions f(t) and g(t) is defined as the determinant of the following matrix:
[f(t), g(t)]
[f'(t), g'(t)]
The Wronskian of the functions f(t) = e^2t and g(t) = e^3t is 6e^5t - 2e^4t, which indicates linear independence.

For the given functions f(t) = e^2t and g(t) = e^3t, the Wronskian is the determinant of the following matrix:
[e^2t, e^3t]
[2e^2t, 3e^3t]
The determinant is equal to 6e^5t - 2e^4t, which is the Wronskian of the given functions.
The Wronskian can be used to determine whether two functions are linearly independent. A Wronskian equal to 0 indicates linear dependence and a Wronskian unequal to 0 indicates linear independence. In the case of the given functions, the Wronskian is not equal to 0 and therefore the functions are linearly independent.

To know more about functions refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ11

Answer:

1170 miles in 18 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1170

Step-by-step explanation:

260 ÷4 = 65

65×18=1170

Answer:

133° because vertically opposite angles are equal!

Hope this helped!

The current age of the artifact is 1600 years

Let's call the current age of the artifact "a" and the current age of the book "b".

The artifact is four times as old as the book, so we have:

a = 4b

In 200 years, the artifact will be a + 200 and the book will be b + 200.

From the problem, we know that in 200 years:

a + 200 = 3 (b + 200)

Expanding the right side:

a + 200 = 3b + 600

Substituting a = 4b:

4b + 200 = 3b + 600

Solving for b:

b = 400

So the current age of the book is 400 years old.

Recall that

a = 4b

So, we have

a = 400 * 4 = 1600

And the current age of the artifact is 4 times that, or 1600 years old.

Read more about equation at

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

The sample space for this experiment can be represented by the sequences of coin toss outcomes until a head appears twice in a row. Let's denote "H" as a head and "T" as a tail.

The possible outcomes in the sample space are:

HH (two consecutive heads)

THH (tail, followed by two consecutive heads)

TTHH (two tails, followed by two consecutive heads)

TTTHH (three tails, followed by two consecutive heads)

and so on...

In general, each outcome in the sample space will have a varying number of tails (T) before the two consecutive heads (HH) occur.

Therefore, the sample space consists of all possible sequences of coin toss outcomes until two consecutive heads appear.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31740607

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Break it up into two trapezoids as shown

area = trap1 + trap2

      = 2 *   (7+3) / 2   + 3 *  ( 7 + 3) / 2 = 10 + 15 = 25 units^2

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

The function f(x) = 2x - tan(x) is concave upward in the second and fourth quadrants, and concave downward in the first and third quadrants and  the graph of f(x) = \(-x^4 + 24x^2\) is concave downward on the interval (-∞, 0), concave upward on the interval (0, 4), and concave downward on the interval (4, ∞).

To determine the intervals of concavity for the function f(x) = 2x - tan(x) over the interval (-2π, 2π), we need to find the second derivative and analyze its sign.

First, let's find the first derivative of f(x):

f'(x) = 2 - \(sec^2\)(x)

Next, let's find the second derivative by differentiating f'(x):

f''(x) = -2\(sec^2\)(x)tan(x)

To determine the concavity, we need to find where the second derivative is positive or negative. Notice that \(sec^2\)(x) is always positive, so the sign of f''(x) depends on tan(x).

In the interval (-2π, 2π), tan(x) is positive in the first and third quadrants, and negative in the second and fourth quadrants.

Therefore, f''(x) is positive when tan(x) is negative (second and fourth quadrants), and f''(x) is negative when tan(x) is positive (first and third quadrants).

Based on this information, the function f(x) = 2x - tan(x) is concave upward in the intervals where tan(x) is negative (second and fourth quadrants), and concave downward in the intervals where tan(x) is positive (first and third quadrants).

To find the points of inflection, we need to set the second derivative equal to zero and solve for x:

f''(x) = -12\(x^2\) + 48x = 0

-12x(x - 4) = 0

This equation has two solutions: x = 0 and x = 4. These are the potential points of inflection.

To determine the concavity, we can evaluate the second derivative at certain intervals. When x < 0, f''(x) is negative, indicating concave downward. When 0 < x < 4, f''(x) is positive, indicating concave upward. When x > 4, f''(x) is negative again, indicating concave downward.

Therefore, the graph of f(x) = \(-x^4 + 24x^2\) is concave downward on the interval (-∞, 0), concave upward on the interval (0, 4), and concave downward on the interval (4, ∞). The points of inflection are x = 0 and x = 4.

Learn more about points of inflection here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767426

#SPJ11

Answer:

It's basically a quadrilateral, it has no name for it.

Step-by-step explanation:

start off by graphing the points

the number in the front is the x axis and the number after is the y axis

Ex: (-4,3) = (X,Y)/  X is horizontal going left to right & Y is vertical going up and down.