Pleas answer this question now in two minutes

Answer: The volume(v) is 438.77.

Explanation: The formula for a right circular cone is in the image.

Answer:

hello

3.32 > 3.18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1) C

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1)

First we have to plot ↓

2x ≥ y + 2

And that looks like Image 1

Step 2)

Second we have to plot ↓

2x - 5y ≤ 10

and that looks like Image 2

She cannot draw an array of 17 counters with three rows.

The given parameters are:

Counter = 17

Rows = 3

An array is represented as:

Array = Rows * Columns

Where Rows and Columns are integers greater than 0

So, we have

3 * Column = 17

Divide by 3

Column = 5.667

Recall that Rows and Columns are integers greater than 0

This means that she cannot draw an array of 17 counters with three rows.

Read more about arrays at:

https://brainly.com/question/16266708

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes, the wire is sufficient for making a cube of volume 2197 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of cube = L³

Volume of the cube = 2197 cm³

Length of the wire = 150 cm

Let's see if the wire is sufficient for making a cube.

Volume of the cube that could be made from the wire is:

V = (L)³

V = (150)³

V = 3,375,000 cm³

So,

The volume of the cube using a 150 cm length wire is much more grater than 2197 cm³.

That is why, the wire is sufficient for making a cube of volume 2197 cm³.

Answer:

i think its A sorry if wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

30.5 ft squared

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the area and shape. If it is a square then you want to divide by four since all sides are equal. So divide 122 by 4 and you get the answer.

Answer:

A is the right anwser and the most reasonable.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: why did u wait till last minute

Step-by-step explanation:

The minimum and maximum heights accepted for NASA astronauts are 62 inches and 75 inches, respectively. These values can be represented by the following equation: 62 <= height <= 75

This equation can be read as "the height must be greater than or equal to 62 inches and less than or equal to 75 inches."

Alternatively, you can represent the minimum and maximum heights using the following inequality:

62 < height < 75

This inequality can be read as "the height must be greater than 62 inches and less than 75 inches."

Either of these equations can be used to represent the minimum and maximum heights accepted for NASA astronauts.

Learn more about equations at

https://brainly.com/question/29657983?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

5-6=1

15-1=14

Answer:

21 or 10

Step-by-step explanation:

I

Need to get myself together, I'm a mess

In Bikini Bottom, I'm with Sandy

Moesha keep on drinkin' all the brandy

Keisha eat the molly like it's candy

Answer:

Service B

Step-by-step explanation:

Beacuse it is taking less money

The calculated number of people that can go kyacking is 6

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Amount spent = $341

Parking = $30

Paddles = $45.20 per person

Represent the number of people with x

So, we have

Paddles = 45.2x

The above means that

Amount = 30 + 45.2x

So, we have

30 + 45.2x = 341

Subtract 30 from both sides

45.2x = 311

Divide both sides by 45.2

x = 6.88

So, we have

x = 6 (remove decimal)

Hence, the number of people that can go kyacking is 6

Read more about linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/30318449

#SPJ4

The ratio of a : b in the given expression is 16:3  .

In the question ,

it is given that

the algebraic expression is (a+3b)/5 = (a-2b)/2

we have to find the ratio of a:b ,

in order to find the ratio,

we cross multiplying ,

On cross multiplying , we get

2 * (a+3b) = 5 * (a-2b)

2a + 6b = 5a - 10b

5a - 2a = 10b + 6b

3a = 16b

dividing both sides by b ,

a/b = 16/3

a:b = 16:3

Therefore , The ratio of a : b in the given expression is 16:3 .

The given question is incomplete , the complete question is

What is the ratio of a:b in the expression (a+3b)/5 = (a-2b)/2  ?

Learn more about Ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/19617266

#SPJ1

The OLS estimator of β1, denoted as βˆ1, is still unbiased. It is calculated using the formula:

βˆ1 = Σ(xi - x)(yi - y) / Σ(xi - x)^2 = Σ(xi - x)yi / Σ(xi - x)^2

Here, xi represents the ith observed value of the regressor x, x is the sample mean of x, yi is the ith observed value of the dependent variable y, and y is the sample mean of y. The expected value of the OLS estimator of β1 is given by:

E(βˆ1) = β1

Therefore, the OLS estimator of β1 remains unbiased.

The variance of the OLS estimator, denoted as Var(βˆ1|x), can be derived as follows:

Var(βˆ1|x) = Var{Σ(xi - x)yi / Σ(xi - x)^2|x} = 1 / Σ(xi - x)^2 * Σ(xi - x)^2 Var(yi|x) = σ^2 / Σ(xi - x)^2

In this problem, there is heteroscedasticity, which means that Var(ui|xi) is not constant.

To address the issue of heteroscedasticity, the Weighted Least Squares (WLS) estimator can be used. The WLS estimator assigns a weight of 1 / xi^2 to each observation i. The formula for the WLS estimator is:

βWLS = Σ(wi xi yi) / Σ(wi xi^2)

Here, wi represents the weight assigned to each observation.

The expected value of the WLS estimator, E(βWLS), is equal to the OLS estimator, βOLS, which means it is also unbiased for β1.

The variance of the WLS estimator, Var(βWLS), is given by:

Var(βWLS) = 1 / Σ(wi xi^2)

where wi = 1 / Var(ui|xi), taking into account the heteroscedasticity.

The WLS estimator is considered more efficient than the OLS estimator because it incorporates information about the heteroscedasticity of the errors.

Learn More about OLS estimator

https://brainly.com/question/13771038

#SPJ11

3.5% of all sold units have been returned so far. The probability that at most 6 units were returned out of 200 sold unit records is 0.7323.

Given that,

For an online store, Stephan is evaluating the data on product returns. 3.5% of all sold units have been returned so far.

We have to find what is the probability that at most 6 units were returned out of 200 sold unit records.

From binomial,

Binomial to normal approximations without continuity factor Sample size ,

n = 200

Probability of an event of interest,  

p = 0.035  

P(0<=n<=2)

=0.7323

Therefore, the probability that at most 6 units were returned out of 200 sold unit records is 0.7323.

To learn more about probability visit: https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The translated triangle is A'B'C', and its vertices are (-3, -1), (-3, -5), and (-1.5, -5). (option b)

To translate the triangle two units to the left, we need to subtract 2 from the x-coordinates of each vertex, while leaving the y-coordinates unchanged. This is because moving the triangle left means we're decreasing its x-values.

So, let's apply this transformation to each point.

The first point, (-1, -1), becomes (-1 - 2, -1), which simplifies to (-3, -1).

The second point, (-1, -5), becomes (-1 - 2, -5), or (-3, -5).

The third point, (0.5, -5), becomes (0.5 - 2, -5), or (-1.5, -5).

These new coordinates give us the vertices of the triangle after it has been translated two units to the left.

Now that we have the new vertices, we can label them A', B', and C' to distinguish them from the original vertices. So, the translated triangle is A'B'C', and its vertices are (-3, -1), (-3, -5), and (-1.5, -5).

This is the second option in the answer choices given.

To know more about triangle here

https://brainly.com/question/8587906

#SPJ1

Answer:0.6

Step-by-step explanation: 4 divided by 5 = 0.6

please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied with my answer is updated

Answer: 3/5 as a decimal is 0.6

Answer: 3/5 as a decimal is 0.6Let us see how to convert 3/5 to a decimal using two methods.

Answer: 3/5 as a decimal is 0.6Let us see how to convert 3/5 to a decimal using two methods.Explanation

Step 1: To convert any fraction to decimal form, we just need to divide its numerator by denominator.

Step 2: Here, the fraction is 3/5 which means we need to perform 3 ÷ 5

Step 3: This gives the answer as 0.6. So, 3/5 as a decimal is 0.6

Step 1: Find a number that we can multiply by the denominator of the fraction to make it 10 or 100 or 1000 and so on. In this case, if we multiply the denominator by 2 it becomes 10. Therefore, we will multiply both the numerator and the denominator by 2 which will make it 3/5 = (3 × 2) / (5 × 2) = 6/10

Step 2: After multiplying both numerator and denominator by that number, we have converted it into its equivalent fraction.

Step 3: Then, we write down just the numerator by putting the decimal point in the correct place, that is, one space to the left starting from the right-hand side for every zero in the denominator. This means 6/10 = 0.6

Step 3: Then, we write down just the numerator by putting the decimal point in the correct place, that is, one space to the left starting from the right-hand side for every zero in the denominator. This means 6/10 = 0.6Irrespective of the methods used, the answer to 3/5 as a decimal number will always remain the same. Therefore, now we know what is 3/5 in decimal form.

Step 3: Then, we write down just the numerator by putting the decimal point in the correct place, that is, one space to the left starting from the right-hand side for every zero in the denominator. This means 6/10 = 0.6Irrespective of the methods used, the answer to 3/5 as a decimal number will always remain the same. Therefore, now we know what is 3/5 in decimal form.Thus, 3/5 as a decimal is 0.6

Therefore, the global minimum of f(x) on S is at \(x = 1/\sqrt{5\)and the global maximum does not exist. And the global minimum of f(x) on S is at x = 2 and the global maximum is at x = 1.

A function is a relationship between a set of inputs (called the domain) and a set of outputs (called the range) with the property that each input is associated with exactly one output. In other words, a function maps each element in the domain to a unique element in the range.

Functions are commonly denoted by a symbol such as f(x), where x is an element of the domain and f(x) is the corresponding output value. The domain and range of a function can be specified explicitly or can be determined by the context in which the function is used.

(i) To find the global maximizers and minimizers of the function f(x) = 4x²+1/4x on the interval S=[1/√5,[infinity]], we first need to find the critical points of f(x) within S.

Taking the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, we get:

f'(x) = 8x - 1/4x²

Setting f'(x) = 0 to find critical points, we get:

8x - 1/4x² = 0

Multiplying both sides by 4x², we get:

32x³ - 1 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 1/∛32 = 1/2∛2

Note that this critical point is not in the interval S, so we need to check the endpoints of S as well as any vertical asymptotes of f(x).

At x = 1/√5, we have:

f(1/√5) = 4(1/5) + 1/(4(1/√5)) = 4/5 + √5/4

At x → ∞, we have:

Lim x→∞ f(x) = ∞

Therefore, the global minimum of f(x) on S is at \(x = 1/\sqrt5\) and the global maximum does not exist.

(ii) To find the global maximizers and minimizers of the function\(f(x) = x^5 - 8x^3\) on the interval S=[1,2], we first need to find the critical points of f(x) within S.

Taking the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, we get:

\(f'(x) = 5x^4 - 24x^2\)

Setting f'(x) = 0 to find critical points, we get:

\(5x^4 - 24x^2 = 0\)

Factoring out \(x^2\), we get:

\(x^2(5x^2 - 24) = 0\)

Solving for x, we get:

\(x = 0 or x =±\sqrt(24/5)\)

Note that none of these critical points are in the interval S, so we need to check the endpoints of S.

At x = 1, we have:

\(f(1) = 1 - 8 = -7\)

At x = 2, we have:

\(f(2) = 32 - 64 = -32\)

Therefore, the global minimum of f(x) on S is at x = 2 and the global maximum is at x = 1.

To know more about vertical asymptotes, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4084552

#SPJ1

Answer:

-------------------------

Each coordinate of the midpoint is the average of endpoints:

Therefore M is (13, 14).

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

y = - \(\frac{3}{4}\) x + 3 ← is in slope- intercept form

with slope m = - \(\frac{3}{4}\)

Given a line with slope m then the slope of a line perpendicular to it is

\(m_{perpendicular}\) = - \(\frac{1}{m}\) = - \(\frac{1}{-\frac{3}{4} }\) = \(\frac{4}{3}\) , then

y = \(\frac{4}{3}\) x + c ← is the partial equation

To find c substitute (3, 7 ) into the partial equation

7 = 4 + c ⇒ c = 7 - 4 = 3

y = \(\frac{4}{3}\) x + 3 ← in slope- intercept form

The equation of a line in point- slope form is

y - b = m(x - a)

where m is the slope and (a, b ) a point on the line

Here m = \(\frac{4}{3}\) and (a, b ) = (3, 7 ) , then

y - 7 = \(\frac{4}{3}\) (x - 3) ← in point- slope form

The possible definitions of f(x) and g(x), considering the composition of the functions, are given as follows:

The composite function of f(x) and g(x) is given by the following rule:

(f ∘ g)(x) = f(g(x)).

It means that the output of the inside function serves as the input for the outside function.

The functions for this problem are defined as follows:

As the composition of the functions is then given as follows:

\(h(x) = f(g(x)) = f(8x + 6) = \sqrt{8x + 6}\)

More can be learned about the composition of functions at https://brainly.com/question/10687170

#SPJ1

Answer:

49.451 this would be the answer

Answer:

4.3700

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:   :} where is the rest of the question

Step-by-step explanation:

If you were not restricted to using just rectangles to fill up the space between the curve and the x-axis, a different geometric shape that might give a more accurate estimate for this area is a trapezoid.

Using trapezoids would likely yield a more accurate result because they can better approximate the curve's shape.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of how using trapezoids can provide a more accurate estimate:

Divide the interval on the x-axis into equal subintervals.

In each subinterval, form a trapezoid by connecting the endpoints of the subinterval to the curve and then closing the shape by drawing a horizontal line from the curve to the x-axis

Calculate the area of each trapezoid using the formula: A = (1/2) * (base1 + base2) * height, where base1 and base2 are the lengths of the parallel sides of the trapezoid (the lengths along the x-axis and the curve), and the height is the length of the vertical line connecting the two bases (the width of the subinterval)

Sum the areas of all trapezoids to approximate the total area between the curve and the x-axis.

The reason trapezoids can provide a more accurate estimate is that they can closely follow the shape of the curve, especially when the curve is not a straight line. Since trapezoids have two different base lengths, they can better accommodate the changes in the curve's slope within each subinterval. This results in a closer fit to the curve compared to using rectangles, which can overestimate or underestimate the area depending on the curve's concavity.

Overall, using trapezoids for estimating the area under a curve can provide more accurate results, especially as the number of subintervals increases.

for more questions on trapezoid

https://brainly.com/question/1463152

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think the answer is d = 1.5t

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

150° and 210°

Step-by-step explanation:

1) to drow a circle with radius=1 in the system of coordinates like in the attached picture;

2) to mark point (-√3/2)≈-0.866 on X-axis (in the picture it is the point M);

3) to graph line AB through point M, the line AB || Y-axis and the points A and B are on the circle with radius=1;

4) to measure the angles ∠ROA and ∠ROB (the points are marked with red colour);

5) finally, m(∠ROA)=150°; m(∠ROB)=210°.