Please help me Evaluate -9 - (-4)

The statement is true.

An orthogonal set with the same dimension as the initial collection of vectors is created by the Gram-Schmidt process.

Given that,

From a linearly independent collection of {x₁, x₂,..., xp}, the gram-Schmidt process creates an orthogonal set of {v₁, v₂,..., vp} with the feature that for each k, the vectors v₁...vk span the same subspace as that spanned by x₁...xk.

Whether the claim is true or false must be determined.

The statement is true.

An orthogonal set with the same dimension as the initial collection of vectors is created by the Gram-Schmidt process. An orthogonal set is further linearly independent. The orthogonal set produced by the Gram-Schmidt process and the original set will cover the same subspace if their dimensions are the same.

To learn more about orthogonal visit: https://brainly.com/question/2292926

#SPJ4

Answer:

its option 2

step-by-step explanation:

The correct description is that moon is waxing.

The theory used in this question is the lunar cycle, which is the process by which the moon changes its shape and illumination over the course of a month.

The waxing phase of the lunar cycle is when the moon is gradually getting bigger and more illuminated.

The waning phase is when the moon is gradually getting smaller and less illuminated.

The moon is waxing:

This is an accurate description because when the moon changes from a new moon to a full moon, it is said to be waxing.

This means that the moon is gradually getting bigger, and its illuminated side is increasing.

This process is called the waxing phase of the moon's cycle.

To learn more about lunar cycle, visit

brainly.com/question/6014360

#SPJ1

\(\begin{cases} x = \cfrac{1}{2} \implies 2x=1&\implies 2x-1=0\\[1em] x = -\cfrac{1}{3}\implies 3x=-1&\implies 3x +1=0\\ \end{cases} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{original~polynomial}{a ( 2x -1 )( 3x +1 ) = \stackrel{0}{y}}\hspace{3em}\stackrel{\textit{now, we're assuming that}}{a=1}\qquad 1( 2x -1 )( 3x +1 ) =y \\\\\\ \stackrel{ F~O~I~L }{( 2x -1 )( 3x +1 )} =y\implies \boxed{6x^2-x-1=y}\)

The solution to the equation 3.3 + 4x = -6.9x + 6.6, rounded to the nearest tenth, is x ≈ 0.3.

To solve the equation 3.3 + 4x = -6.9x + 6.6, we need to isolate the variable x on one side of the equation.

First, let's simplify the equation by combining like terms:

3.3 + 4x = -6.9x + 6.6

Next, let's move the variable terms (4x and -6.9x) to one side and the constant terms (3.3 and 6.6) to the other side:

4x + 6.9x = 6.6 - 3.3

Combine the x terms on the left side:

10.9x = 3.3

Now, divide both sides of the equation by 10.9 to solve for x:

x = 3.3 / 10.9

Using a calculator, we can find the decimal approximation of x:

x ≈ 0.3028

Rounding to the nearest tenth, the solution to the equation is x ≈ 0.3.

In summary, the solution to the equation 3.3 + 4x = -6.9x + 6.6, rounded to the nearest tenth, is x ≈ 0.3.

To learn more about the equation;

https://brainly.com/question/12788590

#SPJ1

Answer:

The price of the oven, including tax, before the discount is applied is $336.46. This is calculated by taking the sale price of $251.85 and multiplying that by 1.25 (which is 100% + 25% discount).

Check the picture below.

so the pebble will hit the ground when h(t) = 0.

It's noteworthy that the pebble is falliing off a cliff, so it was at rest, so its initial velocity is 0, so in essence is falling as fast as gravity can drop it.

\(~~~~~~\textit{initial velocity in feet} \\\\ h(t) = -16t^2+v_ot+h_o \quad \begin{cases} v_o=\textit{initial velocity}&0\\ \qquad \textit{of the object}\\ h_o=\textit{initial height}&256\\ \qquad \textit{of the object}\\ h=\textit{object's height}&\\ \qquad \textit{at "t" seconds} \end{cases} \\\\\\ h(t)=-16t^2+256\implies 0=-16t^2+256\implies 16t^2=256 \\\\\\ t^2=\cfrac{256}{16}\implies t^2=16\implies t=\sqrt{16}\implies t=4 ~~ seconds\)

When testing the null hypothesis, the confidence interval helps us to determine how certain we can be about the population mean or proportion.

The confidence interval (CI) represents the range of values that we are reasonably certain contains the population parameter. When we compute a 95% CI, we have a degree of confidence that the parameter lies in the range of values represented by the interval. We are given that we are testing the null hypothesis that there is no linear relationship between two variables, X and Y. From the sample of n = 18, we determine that b1 = 4.8 and Sb1 = 1.2.

Now, we need to construct a 95% confidence interval. Here's how we can do it:Let us assume the level of significance as α = 0.05 which implies a confidence level of 95%.The formula for the confidence interval is given as,

b1 ± tα/2.Sb1/√n

Here, the degrees of freedom

(df) = n - 2 = 18 - 2 = 16

The value of tα/2 with

df = 16 at 0.05

level of significance is 2.120.Using the formula, the 95% confidence interval for b1 can be calculated as follows:

b1 ± tα/2.Sb1/√n= 4.8 ± 2.120 × 1.2 / √18= 4.8 ± 1.27.

To know more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32562440

#SPJ11

Answer:

$82.00

Step-by-step explanation:

24 times 8 = 192 - 110 = 82

Answer:

191.9

Step-by-step explanation:

24.00 * 8= 192

192- 0.1= 191.9

The required heat equation is u(x, t) = (A×cos(λx) + B×sin(λx)) × exp(-λ²t)

To solve the heat equation in the given interval [-6, 0], we can use the separation of variables method. Let's denote the dependent variable as u(x, t), where x represents the spatial variable and t represents the temporal variable.

The heat equation in one dimension is given by:

∂u/∂t = α ∂²u/∂x²,

where α is the thermal diffusivity constant.

To solve this equation, we assume that the solution can be represented as a product of two functions, each depending on a single variable:

u(x, t) = X(x)T(t).

Substituting this into the heat equation, we have:

X(x)T'(t) = αX''(x)T(t),

where prime (') denotes differentiation with respect to the variable.

Dividing both sides by αX(x)T(t), we get:

T'(t)/T(t) = αX''(x)/X(x).

Since the left side depends only on t and the right side depends only on x, both sides must be equal to a constant, which we'll denote as -λ²:

T'(t)/T(t) = -λ² = αX''(x)/X(x).

Now, let's solve the temporal part of the equation:

T'(t)/T(t) = -λ²

This is a separable ordinary differential equation (ODE), and its general solution is given by:

T(t) = exp(-λ²t).

Next, let's solve the spatial part of the equation:

αX''(x)/X(x) = -λ².

This is also a separable ODE, and its general solution is given by:

X(x) = A×cos(λx) + B×sin(λx),

where A and B are arbitrary constants.

Therefore, the general solution to the heat equation is:

u(x, t) = (A×cos(λx) + B×sin(λx)) × exp(-λ²t).

Since we have the given interval [-6, 0], we can apply appropriate boundary conditions to determine the values of A, B, and λ that satisfy the problem.

To learn more about heat equation: https://brainly.com/question/13415835

#SPJ11

Your question has been heard loud and clear.

3[-x + (2 x + 1)] = X – 1

= 3[-x+2x+1]= x-1

= 3 [ x+1] = x-1

= 3x+ 3 = x-1

3x-x = -3-1

2x= -4

so , x = -4/2 = -2

Therefore , x = -2

Thank you

Answer:

3x+3=x-1

3x-x=-1-3

2x=-4

x=-2

No the results did not deviate significantly from what would be expected due to chance.

The standard deviation is a statistic that expresses how much variance or dispersion there is in a group of numbers. While a high standard deviation suggests that the values are dispersed throughout a larger range, a low standard deviation suggests that the values tend to be near to the established mean. The term "standard deviation" (or "") refers to a measurement of the data's dispersion from the mean. A low standard deviation implies that the data are grouped around the mean, whereas a large standard deviation shows that the data are more dispersed.

To know more about standard deviation,

https://brainly.com/question/14747159

#SPJ4

The balance of the unsubsidized loan at the time of graduation is $3,691.10.

Given:

Principal amount = $2,560

Interest rate = 6.8% = 0.068

Time period = 6 months

We can use the formula for compound interest to calculate the future value:

\(Future\; Value = P (1 + \dfrac{Interest Rate}{Number of Periods}) ^{(Periods * Time )\)

Substituting the value back into the formula as

Future Value = \($2,560 (1 + \dfrac{0.068}{12} )^{(12 * 6)\)

                      = \($2,560 (1 + 0.00566667)^{(72)\)

                      = \($2,560 (1.00566667)^{(72)\)

                      = $2,560 * 1.44044291

                       = $3,691.10

Therefore, the balance is $3,691.10.

Learn more about unsubsidized loan here:

https://brainly.com/question/30280583

#SPJ12

The length of the path described by the parametric equations

 is 3/2units.

We can find the length of the path described by the parametric equations x=cos³t and y=sin³t by using the arc length formula.

The arc length formula for a parametric curve given by:

x=f(t) and y=g(t) is given by:

L = ∫[a,b] √[f'(t)² + g'(t)²] dt

where f'(t) and g'(t) are the derivatives of f(t) and g(t), respectively.

In this case, we have:

x = cos³t, so x' = -3cos²t sin t

y = sin³t, so y' = 3sin²t cos t

Therefore,

f'(t)² + g'(t)² = (-3cos²t sin t)² + (3sin²t cos t)²

= 9(cos⁴t sin²t + sin⁴t cos²t)

= 9(cos²t sin²t)(cos²t + sin²t)

= 9(cos²t sin²t)

Thus, we have:

L = ∫[0,2π] √[f'(t)² + g'(t)²] dt

= ∫[0,2π] √[9(cos²t sin²t)] dt

= 3∫[0,2π] sin t cos t dt

Using the identity sin 2t = 2sin t cos t, we can rewrite the integral as:

L = 3/2 ∫[0,2π] sin 2t dt

Integrating, we get:

L = 3/2 [-1/2 cos 2t] from 0 to 2π

= 3/4 (cos 0 - cos 4π)

= 3/2

Therefore, the length of the path described by the parametric equations x=cos³t and y=sin³t is 3/2 units.

Learn more about Parametric curves

brainly.com/question/15585522

#SPJ11

are you sure about this question my mind blowed after seeing this question

Here Is your answer!!!!

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Jamari's slope value = 2/3

Mia's slope value = 4/6

Even though the points used to calculate the slope aren't given, the problem is still solvable.

Slope = Rise / Run.

The value of slope calculated by Jamari and Mia is the same from the result given, with the only notable difference being that;

Jamari reduced his solution to it's simplest form while, Mia did not

The next step Mia should take is :

Reduce 4/6, tomits lowest term

Find a number which can divide both until. Both aren't designed visible by the same number.

4/6 = 2/3 [Dividing both by 2]

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, because its graph represents a straight line

Answer:

A function's zeros can be determined by setting each linear factor equal to 0 and solving.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because in finding the zero's of a quadratic function, we factorize the quadratic function to obtain its linear factors. Then, each linear factor is then equated to zero to solve for the zeros of the quadratic function.

The solution of the equating to zero of the linear factors give the zeros of the quadratic function.

Answer:

∠ KLM = 27°

Step-by-step explanation:

∠ KLM + ∠ NLM = 90 , that is

3x + 7x = 90

10x = 90 ( divide both sides by 10 )

x = 9

Thus

∠ KLM = 3x = 3 × 9 = 27°

The actual weight is 0.0042 pounds lighter than the labeled weight.

The actual weight of the chocolates is 0.3798 pounds, while the label on the bag states it should weigh 0.384 pounds. To determine how much lighter the actual weight is, we can calculate the difference between the two weights.

Subtracting the actual weight from the labeled weight, we get:

0.384 pounds - 0.3798 pounds = 0.0042 pounds.

Therefore, the actual weight is 0.0042 pounds lighter than the labeled weight.

It's important to note that this difference may seem small, but it can be significant depending on the context. Accuracy in labeling is crucial for various reasons, such as complying with regulations, providing precise information to consumers, and ensuring fair trade practices. Even minor discrepancies can impact trust and customer satisfaction.

For more information on actual weight visit: brainly.com/question/31170036

#SPJ11

The flow rate of 5 MGD is equivalent to 7.73615 cfs

To convert million gallons per day (MGD) to cubic feet per second (cfs), we need to use the conversion factor between the two units. The conversion factor is 1 MGD = 1.54723 cfs.

Therefore, to convert MGD to cfs, we can multiply the given value of MGD by the conversion factor. For example, if we have a flow rate of 5 MGD, we can convert it to cfs as follows:

5 MGD x 1.54723 cfs/MGD = 7.73615 cfs

So, the flow rate of 5 MGD is equivalent to 7.73615 cfs. Similarly, we can convert any given flow rate in MGD to cfs by using the same conversion factor.

It is important to note that these units are commonly used in the context of water supply and distribution systems, where flow rates are a crucial factor in the design and operation of such systems. Therefore, knowing how to convert between different flow rate units is essential for engineers and technicians working in this field.

Know more about conversion factor  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30567263

#SPJ11

Answer: Each bow needs 4.67 yards of ribbon.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that each roll has 20 yd.

She used 3 + 1/2 rolls, then the total length used will be (3 + 1/2) times the length of each roll, this is:

(3 + 1/2)*20 yd = (6/2 + 1/2)*20yd = (7/2)*20yd = 70 yd.

With tose 70 yards of ribbon, she made 15 bows, then the length of ribbon used in each bow will be equal to the quotient between the total length used and the number of ribbons made with it, this is:

70yd/15 = 4.67 yards

Each bow needs 4.67 yards of ribbon.

Answer:

5.k=3

7.p=4

Step-by-step explanation:

5.7=2k+1

7=2k+1 subtract 1 on both sides

6=2k divide by 2 on both sides

k=3

7. 11=4p-5

11=4p-5 add 5 to both sides

16=4p divide by 4 on both sides

p=4

Answer:

5: k=3  

7: p=4

Step-by-step explanation:

5: sub 1 from each side divde by 2

7: add 5 to both sides  divide each side into 4

Answer:

54 marbles

Step-by-step explanation:

7+2=9(amount Eric had in all)

9×6=54

so in all, he bought 54 marbles which he shared among his friends and brother.

ANS:54 marbles

it's approximately 2.5...i hope this helps

The value of the x-coordinate of point D is,

⇒ 2.5

A pair of numbers which describe the exact position of a point on a cartesian plane by using the horizontal and vertical lines is called the coordinates.

We have to given that;

Graph of a function is shown.

And, A point D is shown in graph.

Now, By graph we get;

Coordinate of D is,

D = (2.5, - 1.5)

Hence, We get;

x - coordinate of D = 2.5

y - coordinate of D = - 1.5

Thus, The value of the x-coordinate of point D is,

⇒ 2.5

Learn more about the coordinate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24394007

#SPJ7

Answer:

m∠ABC = 60°

The distance from C to AB = 3 cm

The distance from l to AB = 1.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The median of ΔABC = BM

The length of MC = 3 cm

Type of triangle given as ΔBMC  = Equilateral triangle

Line MN is parallel to AB and passes through M intersecting CB at N

Given that BM is a median, we have;

MC = AM = 3 cm

BM  = MC = CB = 3 cm, from ΔBMC  = Equilateral triangle

CN = NB by midpoint theorem

∴ CB = CN + NB = 2·CN = 3 cm

The distance from C to AB = CB = 3 cm

The distance from C to AB = 3 cm

CN = 3/2 = 1.5

CN = NB = 1.5

The distance from l to AB = CN = 1.5 cm

The distance from l to AB = 1.5 cm

m∠ABC = m∠BMC = m∠MBC = 60° Interior angles of an equilateral triangle.

m∠ABC = 60°

Answer:

43 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Not sure how you got 114, but SRU is equal to 70, and TRV is equal to 44, so if you do 180-70-44, you will get X which is 66

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.{2,8}

Step-by-step explanation:

that's my answer

Answer :

1. { 2, 8 }

x² - 10x + 16 = 0

x² - 2x - 8x + 16 = 0

x ( x - 2 ) - 8 ( x - 2 ) = 0

( x - 2 ) ( x - 8 ) = 0

x - 2 = 0

x = 2

x - 8 = 0

x = 8

Therefore,

the solution to the equation x² - 10x + 16 = 0 is { 2, 8 }.

Answer:

5$

Step-by-step explanation: