Please helppp due todayyy

Cost of Goods Manufactured is an accounting term used to describe the total cost of producing and manufacturing goods. It includes all direct and indirect costs of production, including labor, materials, overhead, and other expenses. Below are the five components of the cost of goods manufactured.

Direct Materials: It includes the cost of raw materials used in manufacturing a product.

Direct Labor: It includes the wages paid to workers who directly worked on the production line or in manufacturing a product.

Factory Overhead: It includes all indirect costs of manufacturing a product such as depreciation on equipment, rent, insurance, utilities, etc. Work-in-Process

Inventory: It includes the cost of materials, labor, and overhead that has been incurred but has not yet been completed. Finished Goods Inventory: It includes the cost of goods that have been fully manufactured but have not yet been sold.

To calculate the cost of goods manufactured, the sum of all these five components is calculated. It helps manufacturers to determine the total cost of goods manufactured and the cost per unit of production. Cost of goods manufactured is essential in determining the pricing strategy for a product as it helps to ensure that the product is profitable.

To know more about costs of production visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15235684

#SPJ11

Answer:

-6/5

Step-by-step explanation:

it is also -1.2 as a decimal

Hey there!

(0 + -3) * (-1 + 5) / (12 + -2)

= (0 - 3) * (-1 + 5) / (12 - 2)

= -3(4) / 10

= -12 / 10

= -12 ÷ 2 / 10 ÷ 2

= -6 / 5

≈ - 1 1/5

≈ -1.2

Therefore, your answer is: -6/5 or -1 1/5

{EITHER OF THOSE SHOULD WORK BECAUSE THEY ARE EQUIVALENT TO EACH OTHER}

Good luck on your assignment & enjoy your day!

~Amphitrite1040:)

To determine the financial advantage or disadvantage of discontinuing the beta product line, more information would be needed regarding the costs and revenues associated with the beta product. Without specific data on costs and revenues, an exact financial advantage or disadvantage can nor be determined.

To determine the financial impact, you would typically compare the revenues generated by the beta product line with the costs associated with producing and selling it. Here are some key considerations:

Revenues: Calculate the total revenue generated by selling 55,000 betas per year. This would require knowing the selling price of each beta unit and multiplying it by the quantity sold.

Costs: Determine the various costs associated with the beta product line, which may include production costs, labor costs, marketing expenses, distribution costs, and any other costs specific to the production and sale of betas. Add up these costs to obtain the total cost of producing and selling 55,000 betas per year.

Compare Revenues and Costs: Subtract the total costs from the total revenues to obtain the net profit (or loss) associated with the beta product line. This calculation will help you understand the financial advantage or disadvantage of continuing the product line.

If the net profit is positive, discontinuing the beta product line would result in a financial disadvantage, as it would eliminate a source of profit. On the other hand, if the net profit is negative, discontinuing the beta product line could lead to a financial advantage by reducing losses.

Learn more about financial advantages and disadvantage here:

https://brainly.com/question/20483291

#SPJ11

\(P = l + l + b + b\)

\(P = 2(2a + 3) + 2(8a - 12)\)

\(\boxed{\sf{P=20a-18}}\)

\(P = 20(3) - 18\)

\(P = 60 - 18\)

\(\boxed{\sf{P = 42 cm}}\)

\(P = (3b + 7) + (7b - 2) + (7b - 2)\)\(\boxed{\sf{P = 17b+3}}\)

\(P = 17(6) + 3\)

\(P = 102 + 3\)

\(\boxed{\sf{P = 105 \: m}}\)

The formula for the P(x) is :

P(x) = 1/10 x(x-4)²(x+4)

Given:

the polynomial of degree 4, P(x) has a root of multiplicity 2 at x=4 and roots of multiplicity 1 at x=0 and x=-4.

it goes through the point (5,4.5)

we are asked to find P(x) = ?

If the polynomial has a root of multiplicity 2 at x=4, then (x-4)² is a factor.

Multiplicity 1 at x=0, then x is a factor.

Multiplicity 1 at x=-4, then (x+4) is a factor.

so P(x) = Ax(x-4)²(x+4)

As it passes through (5.4.5)

4.5 = A.5(5-4)²(5+4)

4.5 = 5A(9)

4.5 = 45A

A = 4.5/45

A = 45/450

A = 1/10

The polynomial is P(x) = 1/10 x(x-4)²(x+4)

Hence we get the required polynomial.

Learn more about Polynomials here:

brainly.com/question/24662212

#SPJ9

Answer:

x = 3 and y = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

y = x+2

3x+2(x+2)=19

3x+2x+4=19

5x+4=19

    -4   -4

5x=15

x=3

y=x+2

y=(3)+2

y=5

Answer:

x=3 and y=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Less than 1 is the eccentricity of an infinitely long ellipse.

The ratio of the focus's distance from the ellipse's centre and the ellipse's distance from one of its ends is called the eccentricity of an ellipse.

It is easy to understand how circular an ellipse is in relation to a circle when we assume its eccentricity. It also estimates the ovalness of the ellipse, and eccentricity close to 1 directs to the high degree of ovalness.

The eccentricity of an ellipse is always < 1, i.e. e < 1. The formula of the eccentricity of an ellipse is as follows:

Eccentricity = Distance from Focus/Distance from Directrix

Which can be written as

=> e = c/a.    

Where

e = Eccentricity of the ellipse

c = Distance of the focus from the centre of the ellipse

a = Distance of the endpoint of an ellipse from its centre

As we know, the eccentricity of an ellipse is always less than 1, So we can conclude that the eccentricity of an infinitely long ellipse is less than 1.

Therefore, less than 1 is the eccentricity of an infinitely long ellipse.

To know more about eccentricity, here

https://brainly.com/question/22105866

#SPJ4

Answer:

y = 3 - 5x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4y+20x−12=0

4y−12=−20x

4y=−20x+12

4y=12−20x

4/4y = 12−20x / 4

y= 12−20x / 4

y=3−5x

​

​

Answer:

150 + 1.5d

Step-by-step explanation:

increase 120 by d%

d% = d/100

So, increasing 120 by d % means

120 + (d/100 * 120)

= 120 + 1.2d

Then increase this by 25%

= (120 + 1.2d) + 25/100(120 + 1.2d)

= 120 + 1.2d + (120+1.2d)/4

= 120 + 1.2d + 30 + 0.3d

= 120 + 30 + 1.2d + 0.3d

= 150 + 1.5d

Answer:

D) x = -70

Step-by-step explanation:

You can do the opposite to find out what x equals. The opposite of division is multiplication. So, -7 · 10 = -70.

Check your answer by plugging in -70 for x. So -70/10 = -7. This is correct which means x = -70

(a) The probability that the entire system works is  0.3136

(b) The probability that the component a is not working is 0.3

Probability is a scale between 0 and 1 that represents the possibility of an event happening. An event with probability 1 is guaranteed to happen, while an event with probability 0 is impossible. The number of favorable outcomes divided by the total number of potential outcomes in the sample space yields the probability of an event A, commonly denoted as P(A). The sample space, for a fair six-sided die, is the set of all potential outcomes, such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The probability of rolling a 4 is 1/6. Numerous disciplines employ probability to make predictions, deduce conclusions, and make judgments in the face of uncertainty.

(a) To find the probability that the entire system works, we need to find the product of the probabilities of the individual components working.

For the components connected in series, A and B, the probability that both work is equal to the product of their individual probabilities:

P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B) = 0.7 * 0.8 = 0.56

For the components connected in series-parallel, C, D, and E, the probability that all three work is equal to the product of their individual probabilities:

P(C and D and E) = P(C) * P(D) * P(E) = 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.9 = 0.576

To find the probability of the entire system working, we need to find the product of the probability of A and B working and the probability of C, D, and E working:

P(system works) = P(A and B) * P(C and D and E) = 0.56 * 0.576 = 0.3136

(b) Given that the system works, the probability that component A is not working would be equal to 1 minus the probability that component A is working:

P(A not working | system works) = 1 - P(A working | system works) = 1 - 0.7 = 0.3

To know more about outcomes visit:

brainly.com/question/19916581

#SPJ4

The complete question is

Answer:

s=60+12t and t=3.5, s=18

Step-by-step explanation:

this is for A, I do rsm too lol so I had this question. I forget how to do it cuz I solved it a while back.

Answer:

x2+10x+24

Step-by-step explanation:

The expanded expression in standard form is: \(x^2 - 10x + 24\)

To expand the expression (x - 4)(x - 6), you can use the distributive property to multiply each term in the first parentheses by each term in the second parentheses. Let's do that step by step:

(x - 4)(x - 6)

Step 1: Multiply x from the first parentheses by both terms in the second parentheses:

\(x * x = x^2\\x * -6 = -6x\)

Step 2: Multiply -4 from the first parentheses by both terms in the second parentheses:

-4 * x = -4x

-4 * -6 = 24

Now, put everything together: (x - 4)(x - 6) = \(x^2 - 6x - 4x + 24\)

Combine like terms: \(x^2 - 10x + 24\)

So, the expanded expression in standard form is:

\(x^2 - 10x + 24\)

To know more about standard form here

https://brainly.com/question/19169731

#SPJ2

Answer:

sin²x+2cos y is approximately 1.328.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the value of sin²x+2cos y, we first need to know the values of sin(x) and cos(y).

Given x = 34°, we can use a calculator to find that sin(x) is approximately 0.5592. Given y = 51°, we can use a calculator to find that cos(y) is approximately 0.6235.

Now we can substitute these values into the expression sin²x+2cos y to get:

sin²x+2cos y = (0.5592)^2 + 2(0.6235) ≈ 1.328

Therefore, sin²x+2cos y is approximately 1.328.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Alright so we are going to be simplifying here

-6 + x = 4x Flip sides

x-6=4x

After that,

x-6=4x  Subtract 4x from both sides

-3x-6=0

Step 3

-3x-6=0  Add 6 to the sides

-3x=6

Step 4

-3x=6  Divide the sides by 3

-2

So therefore,

Your answer would be x=-2

Answer:

13 adults; 6 children

Step-by-step explanation:

Let a = number of adults.

Let c = number of children

a + c = 19;

9a + 5.5c = 150

Let's use substitution. Solve the first equation for a.

a = 19 - c

Now substitute 19 - c for a in the second equation and solve for c.

9(19 - c) + 5.5c = 150

171 - 9c + 5.5c = 150

-3.5c = -21

c = 6

Now substitute 6 for c in a = 19 - c and solve for a.

a = 19 - c

a = 13

Answer: 13 adults; 6 children

Given the inequality:

This mean that 3a is less than 39.

The problem that could be solved using the inequality above is:

Three equal priced shirts came to under $39

Where a represents the shirt.

ANSWER:

B) Three equal priced shirts came to under $39

Based on the given statements cannot conclude that quadrilateral ABCD is a rectangle using the Law of Detachment alone.

The confusion in my previous response.

I made an error in applying the Law of Detachment.

Let's correct that:

The Law of Detachment is a valid logical principle used in deductive reasoning.

It states that if a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is also true.

We have two statements:

If a figure is a rectangle, then it has four sides.

Quadrilateral ABCD has four sides.

The Law of Detachment cannot be directly applied here because statement 2 only provides information about the number of sides of quadrilateral ABCD and it does not explicitly state that ABCD is a rectangle.

It is true that a rectangle has four sides, having four sides does not necessarily mean that the figure is a rectangle.

There are other types of quadrilaterals, such as parallelograms or trapezoids, that can also have four sides.

Based on the given statements cannot conclude that quadrilateral ABCD is a rectangle using the Law of Detachment alone.

Further information or properties specific to rectangles would be required to make that conclusion.

The earlier mistake and any confusion it may have caused.

For similar questions on Law of Detachment

https://brainly.com/question/27871009

#SPJ11

Answer:

The mass of the chocolate will be between 2.42 ounces and 2.58 ounces, the absolute value inequality is:  \(|mass - 2.5| < 0.08\)

Step-by-step explanation:

The ideal mass of the chocolate is 2.5 ounces, although it can vary by 0.08 ounces, this variation can occur for greater masses and lesser ones. Therefore the actual mass of the each chocolate will sit between the ideal mass minus 0.08 and the ideal mass plus 0.08. Therefore we can construct the following inequality:

\(-0.08 < mass + 2.58 <0.08\\ |mass - 2.5|< 0.08\\\)

The mass of the chocolate will be between 2.42 ounces and 2.58 ounces, the absolute value inequality is:  \(|mass - 2.5| < 0.08\)

9A:

The problem says 35% of the 3560 applications are from boys who lived in other states.

This can be expressed as:

3560*35% = 3560*0.35 = 1246 applications.

9B:

The problem says applications to the university (3560 applications) represented 40% of all applications.

This can be expressed as:

3560 = 40% * A, where A = number of applications received in all.

To find how many applications received in all, just solve for A.

A = 3560 / 0.4 = 8900 applications.

The key to these types of problems is that "of" signals multiplication. For example, 40% of all applications is 40% * all applications.

The engineer measuring the western rod with a sample size of 20 is expected to have a more precise (narrower) confidence interval compared to the engineer measuring the eastern rod with a sample size of 25.

The engineer who measures the length of the western rod 20 times and calculates the average is expected to have a more precise (narrower) confidence interval compared to the engineer who measures the length of the eastern rod 25 times.

In statistical terms, the precision of a confidence interval is influenced by the sample size. The larger the sample size, the more precise the estimate tends to be. In this case, the engineer measuring the western rod has a sample size of 20, while the engineer measuring the eastern rod has a sample size of 25. Since the sample size of the western rod is smaller, it is expected to have a narrower confidence interval and therefore a more precise estimate of the true length of the rod.

A larger sample size provides more information and reduces the variability in the estimates. It allows for a more accurate estimation of the population parameter. Therefore, the engineer with a larger sample size is likely to have a more precise interval.

Learn more about confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

Answer: The answer is D: 1 (Vote me brainliest)

Answer:

y=1

Step-by-step explanation:

0.3y-0.3=0.4-0.4y

+0.4y

0.7y-0.3=0.4

               +0.3

0.7y=0.7

        -----

        0.7

y=1

(a) The probability that the concentration exceeds 0.70 is approximately 0.0668. (b) The probability that the concentration is at most 0.40 is approximately 0.1587. (c) The concentration value above which the largest 5% of all concentration values lie is approximately 0.623.

To calculate the probabilities, we can use the standard normal distribution and convert the given values to z-scores. The z-score is calculated by subtracting the mean from the given value and dividing it by the standard deviation.

(a) To find the probability that the concentration exceeds 0.70, we need to calculate the area under the standard normal curve to the right of the z-score corresponding to 0.70. Using a z-table or a statistical software, we find that the z-score for 0.70 is (0.70 - 0.50) / 0.09 = 2.22. The probability is then obtained by finding the area under the curve to the right of 2.22, which is approximately 0.0668.

(b) To find the probability that the concentration is at most 0.40, we need to calculate the area under the standard normal curve to the left of the z-score corresponding to 0.40. The z-score for 0.40 is (0.40 - 0.50) / 0.09 = -1.11. By finding the area under the curve to the left of -1.11, we get a probability of approximately 0.1587.

(c) To find the concentration value above which the largest 5% of all concentration values lie, we need to find the z-score that corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.95 (1 - 0.05). Using the z-table or a statistical software, we find that the z-score for a cumulative probability of 0.95 is approximately 1.645. We can then calculate the concentration value by solving the z-score formula: (x - 0.50) / 0.09 = 1.645. Solving for x, we find x ≈ 0.623.

Therefore, the probability that the concentration exceeds 0.70 is approximately 0.0668, the probability that the concentration is at most 0.40 is approximately 0.1587, and the concentration value above which the largest 5% of all concentration values lie is approximately 0.623 mg/cm³.

To learn more about cumulative probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30076315

#SPJ11

Answer:

i do not no

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, the rate of the canoe in still water is 4 miles per hour.

Distance is a measure of the length between two points, usually measured in units such as miles, kilometers, meters, or feet. It is the amount of space that an object or person has covered in a particular direction, and it is a scalar quantity, which means it has magnitude but no direction. Distance is an important concept in physics, as it is often used to calculate other quantities such as velocity, acceleration, and displacement.

Given by the question.

Let's denote the rate of the canoe in still water by "r" and the rate of the river's current by "c". We can use the formula:

distance = rate x time

to set up two equations based on the information given. For the downstream trip, the distance covered is 12 miles and the time taken is 2 hours. So, we have:

12 = (r + c) x 2

Simplifying this equation, we get:

r + c = 6

For the upstream trip, the distance covered is also 12 miles, but the time taken is 6 hours. So, we have:

12 = (r - c) x 6

Simplifying this equation, we get:

r - c = 2

Now we can solve these two equations simultaneously by adding them:

(r + c) + (r - c) = 6 + 2

2r = 8

r = 4

To learn more about equation:

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ1

The linear equation be 2lw + 2lh + 2wh + lb and total area is 2200 square feet.

Assume that,

l is the length of the pool (40 feet),

w is the width of the pool (30 feet),

h is the height of the pool (5 feet),

And b is the depth of the pool (also 5 feet).

To determine the total area of the pool liner needed to line the rectangular pool on all sides and the bottom, Mr. Vern can use the following equation:

Total area = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh + lb,

Plugging in the values, we get:

Total area = 2(40)(5) + 2(30)(5) + 2(30)(5) + (40)(30) Total area = 400 + 300 + 300 + 1200 Total area = 2200

Therefore, Mr. Vern would need to cover a total area of 2200 square feet with pool liner to line his rectangular pool on all sides and the bottom.

To learn more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ1

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope is "rise over run", so in this case, you would find the difference between the y-values and then set it as the numerator for the slope:

12-8 = 4

and then you would find the difference between the x-values and set that as the denominator for the slope:

12-8 = 4

Thus, the slope is \(\frac{4}{4}\) = 1

Statement 1- No satyrs are goats.

Statement 2- All satyrs are animals.

A representation of logical or mathematical sets as closed curves or circles within a rectangle (the universal set), with the crossings of the circles denoting the elements that are shared by all the sets.  is called venn diagram.

As some animals are satyrs, and satyrs cannot be goats, this implies that not all animals are goats. Therefore, if statements 1 and 2 are accurate, then assertion 3 must also be accurate.

However, the mythological divinity known as the Satyr is really shown as a human with certain animal parts, making the premise false. However, phrase 1 and 2 logically imply sentence 3.

To know more about venn diagram, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28060706

#SPJ1

Venn diagram attached below,

Statistics computed for larger random samples tend to be less variable compared to statistics computed for smaller random samples.

This statement is based on the concept of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) in statistics. According to the CLT, as the sample size increases, the distribution of the sample mean approaches a normal distribution regardless of the shape of the population distribution. This means that the variability of the sample mean decreases as the sample size increases.

The variability of a statistic is commonly measured by its standard deviation or variance. When working with larger random samples, the individual observations have less impact on the overall variability of the statistic. As more data points are included in the sample, the effects of outliers or extreme values tend to diminish, resulting in a more stable and less variable estimate.

In practical terms, this implies that estimates or conclusions based on larger random samples are generally considered more reliable and accurate. Researchers and statisticians often strive to obtain larger sample sizes to reduce the variability of their results and increase the precision of their statistical inferences.

Learn more about random samples here:

brainly.com/question/14397009

#SPJ11