The proof is probably going to be conceded because it is sensible to accept the vehicle contained proof of the capture.
As indicated by Award choice, Police could make an immediate capture if the suspect has a proceeding with danger to their security presented by anew arrest.
Whenever police answer a solicitation to go into the crime location, the division would furnish them with an overall portrayal of the circumstance, (for example, the depiction of potential culprits or how hazardous the circumstance is)
The handgun moved by the looters in this present circumstance is considered as something that has a proceeding with danger to their security. Accordingly, the actual proof recuperated would doubtlessly be conceded.
Learn more about patrol:
https://brainly.com/question/29636822
#SPJ4
should the United state adopt a declaratory nuclear policy of no first use
Answer:
The Benefits of No First Use
First, it would enhance crisis stability. A credible NFU policy would help decrease an opponent's trepidations about a U.S. first strike, thereby reducing the possibility that nuclear weapons are used accidentally, inadvertently, or deliberately in a severe crisis.
Explanation:
Define personal characteristics
Answer:
it is how you characterize your self
Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination?
Select all that apply.
A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.
D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.
Answer:
B C & D
Explanation:
All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess
Answer:
A- The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?
Answer: This relates to the idea of realism
Explanation:
Less trade deals= economic conflict
Less foreign aid=politcal conflict
Less international work equals cold relationships with other countries could damage vital relationships especially with those the U.S. needs for resources such as Saudi Arabia for oil.
______ is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
The power of judicial review is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in line with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution;[1] it is also the status of a legislation, a procedure, or an act being in conformity with those laws or provisions. They are unconstitutional when policies, practices, or actions directly contravene the constitution. Unless a government has a system in place for declaring legislation unlawful, all other laws are regarded as constitutional.
A measure passed as law by the national legislature or a lower-level legislature, like the legislature of a state or province, may be ruled to be unconstitutional. The constitution, which is the document that defines the government, also contains laws that must be upheld by governments.
Learn more about judicial branch here
https://brainly.com/question/9696040
#SPJ4
Are you in favor or against the Reproductive Health Law, Explain Why or Why not?
50 words
Answer:
Since 40 years have passed since the Supreme Court granted women the legal right to an abortion in its landmark case Roe v. Wade, the issue is still roiled in controversy, as antiabortion groups and state legislatures attempt to chip away at a woman’s right to choose. Over the past two years, 135 new state-level abortion restrictions were enacted. Additionally, 20 states are allowing insurers or employers to deny women affordable contraception by refusing to comply with Obamacare’s birth-control mandate.
In spite of those hurdles, pro-choice advocates have not given up in their fight for reproductive justice. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, for example, was certainly a victory for those who want to make family-planning tools accessible to all women because it increased health insurance coverage for women while lowering their health costs. Thanks to the health care reform law, millions of more women of color have access to contraception starting in August 2012.
Yet, as the following facts show, there’s still work to be done to ensure that all women especially women of color can access their legal right to decide when and whether to be a parent. Below are the top 10 reasons why women of color have a particularly significant stake in the conversation on abortion and reproductive rights.
Hope this helps, have a nice day! :D
folkways are blank multiple choice norms governing everyday social behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern. made by a government for a society, interpreted by the courts, and backed by the power of the state. deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society. norms that are written down and specify strict punishment for violators.
Folkways are informal norms guiding everyday social behavior with minor consequences for violation, while rules are formal norms backed by authority and carry more serious consequences when violated.
Folkways are the customary behaviors, social practices, and norms that develop within a specific cultural or social group. They are the traditional, everyday habits, customs, and expectations that guide social interactions and behavior. Folkways are norms governing everyday social behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern. This means that these norms are not considered serious and there are no strict punishments for their violation. They are simply customs that are followed by a particular society.
Laws are deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society, and they are written down and specify strict punishment for violators.
Read more about folkways here:
https://brainly.com/question/9044207
#SPJ11
which is an accepted form of id for consuming or purchasing alcohol
Answer:Drivers license or identification card
Explanation:
Lily has suffered severe injuries from a car accident. She would like to sue for compensation, but does not have enough funds on hand to retain an attorney on her own. What is the best type of fee arrangement for lily?.
The contingency fee is the best type of fee arrangement for lily as she would like to sue for compensation, but does not have enough funds on hand to retain an attorney on her own.
What is a contingency fee?Contingent fees, often called contingency fees or conditional fees, are any fees for services provided that are only paid if a favorable outcome occurs. Despite the fact that this allegation can be used in a variety of professions, it is most usually associated with the practice of law.
A contingent fee is a cost associated with legal services that are only charged if a lawsuit is won or a favorable settlement is reached. Contingent fees are sometimes represented as a percentage of the settlement amount that the client receives. Contingent fees may make it easier for people with less financial resources to seek their civil rights because one must be wealthy enough to start such litigation in the first place in order to sue someone for a tort. Although there are risks involved with taking cases on a contingency basis, attorneys won't do so unless they believe there is merit to the case.
To know more about contingency fees visit:- brainly.com/question/13447810
#SPJ4
Please use caucion when entering this area as the floor can be slippary.
Is print and selling postage stamps a state or congress power?
Answer:
The constitution expressly gives the feds the power to make post offices, but it doesn't give the power to print postage stamps. Postage stamps are necessary and proper for a post office to run.
Explanation:
Who is in charge of the Senate in the absence of the President of the Senate?
Vice President
President of the United States
Speaker of the House
President Pro Tempore
The Start of Mexican American Gangs in LA', it is revealed that many Mexican immigrants had assimilated to American culture after the two World Wars. What did those who found it difficult to adapt call themselves?
In the context of Mexican American gangs in Los Angeles, those who found it difficult to adapt to American culture often referred to themselves as "pachucos" or "zoot suiters."
Pachucos were a subculture of Mexican American youth in the 1940s and 1950s who developed their own distinctive style, including wearing oversized zoot suits with wide-brimmed hats and flamboyant accessories.
The pachuco culture was seen as a way for young Mexican Americans to express their identity and assert their presence in a society that marginalized them. The term "pachuco" was later adopted by Mexican American gang members as a source of pride and camaraderie.
Learn more about American culture https://brainly.com/question/13720219
#SPJ11
according to chief justice burger, why was the crèche display constitutional? the government has the right to promote religion under the first amendment. the first amendment only applies to federal government, not city governments. no one is forced to look at the crèche. the crèche depicts the origins of christmas but does not promote religion.
Chief Justice Burger served on the Supreme Court from 1969 to 1986, and during his tenure, the Court decided several cases related to the display of religious symbols on public property.
The Court's rulings have been nuanced and varied over the years, considering factors such as the purpose, context, and effect of the display in question.
To accurately determine Chief Justice Burger's reasoning, it would be necessary to refer to a specific case or statement made by him on the subject.
Learn more about Nuanced
https://brainly.com/question/30165601
#SPJ11
HELP ME PLEASE
1. If you are a bystander, should you be charged with committing a crime if you did nothing to help? Why?
2. If someone tries to be a Good Samaritan but actually makes the situation worse, should they be charged with a crime? Why?
Answer:
depends on if "helping " resulted in doing something illegal, then yes. commit a crime, despite the reason, you should be charged
Explanation:
Answer:
Well honestly it depends on the situation.
Explanation:
You shouldn't be charged with committing a crime if you are just standing there cause you could make it worse, and could be tried for obstruction.
2. No they shouldn't be charged cause they had good intentions. But that's for a jury to decide and the evidence.
Greg invites his supervisor (Leslie) and two other colleagues (Wanda and Eileen) to go fishing on his boat. While fishing, they have some beers. Eileen gets so drunk that she falls overboard. Greg, Leslie and Wanda rescue Eileen with the help of the harbor police. Leslie reports the incident to the management of the company, which opens an investigation. Greg refuses to cooperate and is disciplined.
a. Greg has a privacy right to keep silent because the incident happened at a social occasion and away from the work place.
b. Greg has a 5thAmendment right not to cooperate because the information that he provides might be used against him by the company in a disciplinary proceeding.
c. Greg's rights have not been violated because the company has legitimate business reasons for seeking information about the fishing incident.
d. Although Greg's right to privacy has been violated, the company can discipline him based on the information that it gets from Leslie, Wanda and Eileen.
The validity of a piece of evidence is called:
implicit bias
O liability
objectivity
directness
admissibility
O
reliability
LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin. While visiting Six Flags Over Georgia in Atlanta, she was criminally assaulted by Hans, a Minnesota resident. Ordinarily, venue in this criminal case would originally be in _____________.
As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be Georgia.
Why would the venue be Georgia?The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.
Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.
Find out more on original venues at https://brainly.com/question/342388.
Because cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus, experienced a bottleneck event about ten thousand years ago, living cheetahs exhibit very little genetic variation compared to other living species of large cats.
Which of the following principles best justifies a claim that cheetahs, compared to other large cats, have a relatively low resilience to environmental perturbations?
The bottleneck effect best justifies a claim that cheetahs, compared to other large cats, have a relatively low resilience to environmental perturbations.
What is the bottleneck effect?A population bottleneck is an incident in which a population's size is significantly decreased for a brief period of time due to a catastrophic event such as disease, drought, or floods. This is sometimes known as the bottleneck effect.
When a population goes through a bottleneck, the genetic diversity of the population is substantially decreased, resulting in a small number of survivors becoming the progenitors of future generations.This typically leads to a reduction in the population's genetic diversity.
Genetic variation is a population's ability to respond to changes in the environment. Genetic diversity is the range of genetic characteristics inside and between populations. A low level of genetic diversity indicates that the species is less adaptable to new environments, whereas a high level of genetic diversity indicates that the species can handle a wide range of environmental changes.
Learn more about bottleneck effect at
https://brainly.com/question/30517113
#SPJ11
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
100
20
10
50
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.
The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.
It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.
The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.
To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/27878011
#SPJ4
Correct question:
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
a) 100
b) 20
c) 10
d) 50
brainliest for brainliest anyone down for trade u make the question
essential elements of the crime of terrorism do not include ________.
The essential elements of the crime of terrorism do not include any specific motive or political ideology. Rather, the essential elements of the crime of terrorism generally involve the intentional use of violence or the threat of violence to instill fear and intimidate a population or government.
Additionally, terrorism typically involves the targeting of civilians or non-combatants in order to achieve its aims. Other important elements may include the use of weapons or explosives, coordination or planning, and a desire to create a widespread impact beyond the immediate victims of the attack.
While terrorism is often associated with political or religious extremism, these factors are not essential to the definition of the crime itself. Instead, terrorism is typically defined by the violent means and the impact it seeks to achieve.
To know more about political ideology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23081489
#SPJ11
What does a traffic control officer do
Answer:
Summary of Duties: A Traffic Officer patrols an assigned area on foot, bicycle, or in a vehicle to enforce motor vehicle parking regulations; issues warnings or citations for illegal parking by entering information into a hand-held computer; impounds vehicles; and directs vehicular and pedestrian traffic at a specific
Explanation:
Answer:
they control traffic
Explanation:
they tell when the cars go and when the stop
Happy Law Offices has total assets of $880 million. Its total liabilities are $293 million and its revenue is $112 million. Calculate the debt ratio in decimal format to 2 places; for example, 19.5% would be .20).
The debt ratio for Happy Law Offices is approximately 0.33.
The debt ratio is a financial metric that measures the proportion of a company's total assets that are financed by debt. It is a measure of the company's leverage or the extent to which it relies on borrowed funds to finance its operations.
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
Total Assets = $880 million
Total Liabilities = $293 million
Debt Ratio = $293 million / $880 million
Debt Ratio = 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
Learn more about debt ratio at:
brainly.com/question/11249578
#SPJ4
American libel law was radically changed when William Brennan led the Supreme Court to give First Amendment protection to people _____.
American libel law was radically changed when William Brennan, as a Supreme Court justice, led the Court to give First Amendment protection to people who are the subject of defamation lawsuits brought by public officials or public figures. This landmark decision came in the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan in 1964.
Before this decision, defamation laws placed a heavy burden on defendants to prove the truth of their statements when criticizing public officials. However, Brennan and the Court recognized the importance of protecting robust public debate and the free flow of information. They ruled that in order for public officials or public figures to successfully bring a defamation lawsuit, they must prove that the statements made against them were not only false but also made with "actual malice" – meaning with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.
This ruling expanded the protection of free speech under the First Amendment and set a higher bar for defamation claims involving public figures. It emphasized the importance of open criticism, public accountability, and the free exchange of ideas in a democratic society.
To know more about defamation laws, please visit
https://brainly.com/question/30255645
#SPJ11
A young woman goes missing in the area around a state park. Years later, two fishermen happen upon what looks like a human bone sticking out of the riverbank. Investigators immediately think of the young woman, but they need an expert to tell them if the bone is connected to their case. What forensic expert would the investigators call for help in this situation?
Answer: An Anthropologist because they study bones
Explanation: Make sure to add the questions so we know how to answer
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
which of the following parties enter a property with the possessor's consent, but for his/her own purpose?
The party that enters a property with the possessor's consent, but for their own purpose, is known as a Licensee.
A person who enters another person's property with the owner's or possessor's consent but for their own advantage or goal is known as a licensee. They typically reside on the property for their own convenience or to further their own interests and have few legal rights. The owner of the property authorizes the licensee's entry, but the licensee is not accorded the same rights and security as an invitee or a tenant.
It's significant to note that, depending on the jurisdiction and relevant laws, the precise legal definitions and classifications of people entering a property may change. Therefore, for accurate information in a specific context, it is advised to consult the pertinent local laws or seek legal counsel.
Learn more about Licensee at:
brainly.com/question/28212009
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which of the following parties enter a property with the possessor's consent, but for his/her own purpose? Attendee Licensee Invitee O Trespasser"
with reference to the hierarchy of sources of law, case law prevails over local ordinances. group of answer choices true false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Which of these is an example of government corruption?
Answer:
Cronyism.
Explanation:
Answer:
cryonislism or however its spelt
Explanation: