Privacy rights were essential components to the rulings for a major case involving which subject matter?
abortion access
monopoly-busting
interracial marriage
adoption restrictions
Answers
Privacy rights were essential components to the rulings for a major case involving abortion access. The Option A.
Which subject matter involved privacy rights rulings?Privacy rights were essential components to the rulings for a major case involving abortion access. In the landmark case of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the Supreme Court ruled that a woman's right to choose to have an abortion was protected by the constitutional right to privacy.
The decision established a woman's right to abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy and placed limits on the ability of states to regulate access to abortion. The case remains controversial to this day, with ongoing debates about the balance between individual rights and state interests in regulating access to abortion. Nevertheless, the case is often cited as a critical moment in the development of privacy rights in the United States.
Read more about Privacy rights
brainly.com/question/1189272
#SPJ1
Related Questions
What do you mean by mandamus?
Will mark brainliest ( just have 2 more )
Thank you
Answers
Hey!!!
Here's your answer:
Mandamus :a writ issued by a superior court commanding the performance of a specified official act or duty
Hope it will help you....~Pragya
Answer:
Mandamus is the ordering of person to perform a public or statutory duty.
Mandamus is latin word for "we command".
Who did Plato regard as a “just man”?
“I declare that justice is nothing else than that which advantageous to the stronger. It follows that the just man is he who obeys the laws of the governing group; the unjust man disregards them. But, the subject who obeys hurts himself and promotes the good of others. It pays, therefore, to act unjustly.”
Answers
Answer:
There’s a part of Plato’s Republic (c. 380 BC) which is fascinating because it resembles a prophecy about Jesus. It appears in this dialog by Socrates about the just man, especially in the italicized portion:
And at [the unjust man’s] side let us place the just man in his nobleness and simplicity, wishing, as Aeschylus says, to be and not to seem good. There must be no seeming, for if he seem to be just he will be honoured and rewarded, and then we shall not know whether he is just for the sake of justice or for the sake of honours and rewards; therefore, let him be clothed in justice only, and have no other covering; and he must be imagined in a state of life the opposite of the former. Let him be the best of men, and let him be thought the worst; then he will have been put to the proof; and we shall see whether he will be affected by the fear of infamy and its consequences. And let him continue thus to the hour of death; being just and seeming to be unjust. When both have reached the uttermost extreme, the one of justice and the other of injustice, let judgment be given which of them is the happier of the two.
Which state courts conduct some pretrial activities for more important ones?
Answers
Answer:In some states, the trial court and the appellate court may conduct some pretrial activities for more important cases. For example, the trial court may conduct a pretrial conference or a hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence. The appellate court may conduct a pre-argument conference to discuss the issues and arguments in an appeal before the oral argument.
Explanation:
Could the powders matching be enough to convict? Why or Why not?
Answers
this is why i i hope it helps
If you are approaching an intersection withWith a red light in a law-enforcement officer direct you to go to the intersection without stopping you should
Answers
Answer:
Full Answer below. V
Explanation:
Proceed to go through the intersection without stopping, then come to a complete stop before proceeding. Instructions given by Law Enforcement officers directing traffic override posted traffic signals and signs.
Which is better according to Thomas Jefferson? Giving the
government more energy or giving education to the people?
Explain.
Answers
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson believed in the education of the people more than giving more energy to the government.
Explanation:
In 1776, despite America at war with Britain, Thomas Jefferson's plan of passing into law "A Bill for the More General Diffusion of Knowledge" was a more important task that needed to be done. Being a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, he took it to himself to try to bring a law that will ensure basic education to the people.
Jefferson believed that in educating the people, the government also have a better future. He stated that "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories. And to render even them safe, their minds must be improved to a certain degree". And in his 1787 letter to Uriah Forrest, he wrote "And say, finally, whether peace is best preserved by giving energy to the government or information to the people. This last is the most certain and the most legitimate engine of government. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they will preserve them. And it requires no very high degree of education to convince them of this. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." He was also credited with the system of public education in the American nation that proposed and now put into use the three stages of education- primary, intermediate, and university system of education.
Forensic Science Unit 3 Lab Sue Ellen Miller Case
What questions do you have based on what you observe?
Answers
This is a question that relates to an investigation at a crime scene. The questions that are immediately apparent are: "Where did the blood come from"? "Who could have done this? "What was their motive?" "Did she have a quarrel with anyone?"
What is a crime scene?A crime scene is any site that may be related to a crime that has been committed. Physical evidence from crime scenes is relevant to a criminal inquiry. Crime scene investigators and law enforcement collect this evidence.
Physical evidence recognition, recording, correct collection, packing, preservation, and, lastly, scene reconstruction are the essential crime scene processes.
Learn more about Crime Scenes:
https://brainly.com/question/10702774
#SPJ1
Full Question:
The Crime + Crime Scene:
You walk into the home of Sue Ellen Miller, the victim. Sue Ellen is a middle-aged, unmarried woman who lives alone. She has very long, black hair and is short and petite. She has no pets, children, or roommates. She worked as a museum curator at the local museum.You notice a pool of blood next to her body on the pink rug. The blood looks almost dry, as if it had beensitting there for several hours. You cannot identify any wounds where the blood may be coming from without moving the body. Her body is splayed out in the middle of the living room floor. She is lying on her back, with her arms andlegs bent at awkward angles.All the lights are off in the room; the TV is still on, however the screen is simply black, no picture or menu is showing.As you carefully walk around her body, you notice a thin trail of dirt leading from the back door to her body.You make a mental note to check the yard for soil. You also notice broken glass near her left leg and freshflowers laying on the floor. There is a note on the table indicating that the flowers were a gift. The card is signed, “Your Loving male acquaintance, Ben.”You get closer to the body and notice several short, brown hairs stuck to her pants.On the coffee table, there is a pile of museum comment cards that appear to be only partially read through.The card on the top of the pile catches your eye, as it has large, angry doodles decorating the page. Writtenat the bottom of the page, in big letters is, “I TOLD YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE!”. You note that the card wasfilled out by a Michael Wilcox. You write down his name and wonder if it was his real name.Next to the cards on the table is a pizza delivery box, slightly open, but with an untouched pizza inside. Thereceipt next to the box shows that the pizza was delivered yesterday evening at 5:15pm. Sue Ellen’ssignature is on the receipt.On the sharp corner of the table, there is a bloodstain. It looks dry and is the only apparent bloodstain asidefrom the puddle next to the body.You move away from the body and begin to look around the room. You notice a bloody fingerprint near theback door on the doorframe. You also notice that the lock on the door appears to have been tampered with.
You head outside and examine the backyard. There is a tall wooden fence, a well-tended rose garden with awater fountain in the center, and freshly cut grass.You examine the garden and spot another bloody fingerprint on the water fountain and a footprint in thegarden soil near the fence. Upon closer inspection of the fence, you find one medium length blonde haircaught between the wooden planks.You return to the house and notice a man has arrived on the scene. He identifies himself as Ben, the male friend. He explains that he was on a flight back from a business trip in DC and just arrived home thismorning. He claims to have the plane ticket stub at home to prove it.Moments later, a female neighbor arrives on the scene and claims to have seen a tall, blonde man or teen loitering in the garden yesterday evening when she was walking her dog. She did not speak to the man, buthe was wearing a black jacket and black jeans.You get your Investigative Journal out and start taking notes to make a plan for your investigation.
What questions do you have based on what you observe?
A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to charging these activities as the crimes they constitute, the activities would also constitute the criminal act of intentional furtherance of the goals of organized crime. Among the enumerated activities was the interstate distribution of cocaine. The statute’s constitutionality has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The defendant was arrested by federal agents after having driven a truck containing cocaine from Florida to Illinois, where he delivered his illicit cargo as directed. At trial, the defendant is convicted of interstate distribution of cocaine in violation of federal law, and convicted of a violation of the federal statute above. How may the defendant be sentenced?
Answers
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
Mandatory sentencing guidelines have pros and cons. They may lead to unintended consequences, such as prison crowding or racial bias. Given the importance of crafting fair guidelines:
Who do you think is best qualified to write sentencing guidelines? Consider judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, politicians, researchers, victims, and reformed offenders.
What makes the group you chose the best pick?
Answers
The judges should be the ones that have to carry out the mandatory sentencing of offenders in the law courts.
The judges are the best pick because they would have the power to be able to convict the person based on the gravity of what they have done.
What is mandatory sentencing?For some crimes, usually major and violent ones, mandatory sentencing demands that offenders serve a predetermined amount of time in prison. Judges are constrained by the law; the legislature, not the court system, is the source of these sentences.
They were put in place to speed up the sentencing procedure and reduce the chance that judicial discretion would result in unusual results. Those who are found guilty of certain major, violent offenses that warrant for a jail term generally get mandatory punishments.
The prevalence of mandatory sentencing laws varies among countries; they are more widespread in common law jurisdictions than in civil law jurisdictions, where explicit legislation often set minimum and maximum punishments for every category of offense.
Read more on mandatory sentencing here: https://brainly.com/question/28086943
#SPJ1
Alcohol and other depressant drugs do what to the activity of a person central nervous system
Answers
Answer:
Slow brain activity.
Explanation:
Into what two categories are crimes divided
Answers
Answer:Felonies and misdemeanors
Explanation: most use classification in crimes for most of the states
Answer:
5
Explanation:
1 violent
2 property
3 white collar
4 organized
5 victimless
Monarchy in the UK ()
Read the statement below:
"Due to the recent scandals in the UK with regards to their
monarchy, we need to stop allowing people with royal bloodline
rights to hold power over the affairs of the British citizens. Regular
people should be able to be voted for to become part of the royal
family moving forward, based on their benefit to the country and
social standing
How far do you agree with the statement? Give examples, and
opinions formed from your lessons this term and your wider research
and understanding of the U.K. Monarchy.
Answers
Answer:In a monarchy, a king or queen is Head of State. The British Monarchy is known as a constitutional monarchy. This means that, while The Sovereign is Head of State, the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected Parliament.
Although The Sovereign no longer has a political or executive role, he or she continues to play an important part in the life of the nation.
As Head of State, The Monarch undertakes constitutional and representational duties which have developed over one thousand years of history. In addition to these State duties, The Monarch has a less formal role as 'Head of Nation'. The Sovereign acts as a focus for national identity, unity and pride; gives a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognises success and excellence; and supports the ideal of voluntary service.
What is a migrant worker?
• traveling agriculture worker
• a skilled factory worker
laborer with permission to work in a foreign nation
O a worker in a maquiladora
Answers
Answer:
Labourer With Permission to work in a foreign nation .
Give five examples to help explain how sports and physical education overlaps
Answers
magic
more magick
even more magick
and more magic
A police officer is assigned a work partner. Which of the following interpersonal skills would be important for the police officer to have so that he can work successfully with this partner?
A. Communication skills
B. Cooperation
C. Personal hygiene
D. All of the above
Answers
Answer:
The answer would be A and B
3. The U.S. government is divided into three branches. What is this an example of? (1 point)
Ofederalism
O interpretation
Oseparation of power
Oconfederate system
Answers
Who are the Justices of the Supreme Court!?
Answers
Answer:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ...
Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ...
Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, ...
Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ...
Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ...
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ...
Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice,
More items...
Explanation:
Answer:
justices are the people of the court who give verdicts on cases
i hope its helpful
How do avidar’s values and approaches to humans resources management support Lob’s business success?
Answers
Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management
1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.
2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.
3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.
4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.
By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.
Know more about Human resources management here:
https://brainly.com/question/14419086
#SPJ8
should there be limits on police use of discretion? How can officers exercise discretion while treating all civilians in a fair and impartial manner? Use the readings to support your answer.
Answers
Answer:
The question of whether there should be limits on police use of discretion is a contentious issue. Discretion is an essential part of police work, as officers must be able to use their judgment to determine the appropriate response to a given situation. However, if officers are given too much discretion, there is a risk that they may abuse their power and discriminate against certain individuals or groups.
One way to ensure that officers exercise discretion in a fair and impartial manner is to provide them with proper training and guidance. The training should emphasize the importance of treating all civilians with respect and dignity, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or socioeconomic status. Moreover, officers should be educated on the negative effects of bias and how it can impact their decision-making. This can include unconscious biases that they may not even be aware of.
In addition, the use of technology can also help officers exercise discretion in a fair and impartial manner. For example, body-worn cameras can provide an objective record of police-civilian interactions, which can be reviewed to ensure that officers are following proper procedures and treating civilians with respect.
Finally, it is important to establish clear guidelines and limits on police use of discretion. This can include policies and procedures that outline when and how officers can use force, how they should interact with individuals who are experiencing a mental health crisis, and how they should handle traffic stops.
In conclusion, while discretion is an essential part of police work, it is important to ensure that officers exercise it in a fair and impartial manner. This can be achieved through proper training, the use of technology, and clear guidelines and limits on police use of discretion. By doing so, officers can better serve their communities and promote public trust and confidence in law enforcement.
Explanation:
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answers
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
Which of the following is true of laws governing the actions of IT professionals?
Answers
Answer: HIPAA is an example of a law that protects personal information, which all people, including IT professionals are required to follow.
Explanation:
Answer:
HIPAA is an example of a law that protects personal information, which all people, including IT professionals, are required to follow
Explanation:
are important to process because they can be used in many different jobs and situations
Answers
Transferable skills are important to process because they can be used in many different jobs and situations.
What is a skill?Skill refers to the ability to carry a function efficiently and effectively. In other words, it is the ability to use one's knowledge effectively and readily in execution or performance.
Transferable skill describes any skill or talent that can be taken from one kind of job to another. They are skills and abilities that are relevant and helpful across different areas of life: socially, professionally and at school.
Examples of transferable skills are:
Problem SolvingAnalytical ReasoningCritical ThinkingLeadershipAdaptabilityLearn more about skills here: https://brainly.com/question/1233807
#SPJ1
An amendment applying to a main motion is of the first rank.
A. True
B. False
Answers
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Which statement best explains why the government serves as the plaintiff in a criminal case?
Crime affects society, so it is the government’s responsibility to bring cases against defendants to deal with them as harshly as possible.
Individuals are never directly harmed by violations of the law, so they cannot be plaintiffs in criminal cases.
A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals.
Individual plaintiffs might know the defendant and therefore cannot be impartial in charging them with a crime.
Answers
Explanation:
I think that all the statements are correct. Government are the law makers. They make law and rules for the welfare of human beings. If someone does wrong and violates those rules and law then it is the right and duty of the government to punish the wrong-doers. That is why I think that the statements "Crime affects society, so it is the government’s responsibility to bring cases against defendants to deal with them as harshly as possible",
"Individuals are never directly harmed by violations of the law, so they cannot be plaintiffs in criminal cases"
"A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals" and "Individual plaintiffs might know the defendant and therefore cannot be impartial in charging them with a crime" are right. We are able to live peacefully because of the government. We are able to have rights, feel safe and change the rules and boundaries made by the SOCIETY all thanks to the government. Yes there are some cases where the government's judgement are doubted or are proved wrong. But that doesn't mean that the government in every country does the same and is unfair.
I should have chose one answer as mentioned but I think that each of the statement is right.
Answer:
c:A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals.
Explanation:
Who decides whether a suspect will be tried for an alleged crime?
The law enforcement officer who arrested the suspect
The victim of the crime
The prosecutor
The judge
Will give brainliest
Answers
learn how to speak indian language
Answers
Answer:
are you telling the audience to learn the language or u need help specifically with the language
Hi i need the rest of these questions for 100 points I WANT E. ANSWER AND D. PLEASE .
Problem 12.4
a. Stop and Frisk = “Pat Down” in outside the clothing police can do a pat down to check for weapons
b. “Reasonable expectation of privacy” Cosented! No reasonable expectation of privacy.
c. This wouldn’t break the 4th amendment because he didn’t commit any crime.
d. ?
e. ?
f. No, The roommate can give police permission to search for common areas
Answers
Answer:
D. no it didn't break the 4th amendment because he willingly gave them permission to search his bag E. yes they did break the 4th amendment because they followed her into her personal living space and search it without her permission or a search warrant. :)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the above-given text,
d) In this case, the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure was not violated. The evidence sized can be used in court.
e) In this case, the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure was also not violated. The evidence size can and should be used in court.
What is the explanation for the above assertions?In D above, even if there is no search warrant, a search done with the permission of the suspect is often regarded as legitimate.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution demands that searches be reasonable and that searches done with a suspect's voluntary permission are widely regarded as reasonable. The court must, however, evaluate the voluntariness of the consent. If the court determines that the permission was not freely and willingly granted, the search may be deemed illegal, and any evidence gathered during the search may be declared inadmissible in court.
One may argue that the police looked intimidating and that Terry might have granted permission to be searched due to the "intimidating appearance" of the police. The flaw in such an argument is that it is reasonably expected that the Police would wear guns. The overall character of the police is to protect and to serve, hence this argument will fail if presented in court. Therefore the conclusion given in this case stands correct.
In E, there was no consent, but there were reasonable grounds for Pamela to have been searched because she was caught in the act of theft. It is therefore logical to assume that this may not have been the first time she did such a thing. Should all the goods found in her apartment be sized, they would be admissible in court.
Conclusively, in the cases given in E and D above, as far as the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure is concerned, there were no violations. The evidence sized can and should be used in court without fear of repudiation.
Learn more about Search and Seizures;
https://brainly.com/question/2029952
#SPJ1
What Kind of Special Training or Knowledge do you have to have to be a lawyer?
Answers
To be a lawyer one must possess knowledge of legislation along with degree in Juris Doctor (JD) degree and clearance of the state bar exam.
What is a lawyer?
A lawyer refers as to an individual who occupies his profession in the field of law as an advocate. This individual has knowledge about legal proceedings that took place in court as part of their Job.
In order to become a lawyer, candidates must complete a challenging educational program, pass a licensing exam, and demonstrate excellent communication skills, legal knowledge, protocol knowledge, and a thorough understanding of rules.
Learn more about lawyers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16679161
#SPJ1
I am received in January
You get me if you are not an employee, but were paid by a company
You can also get me for other types of income, such as gains and losses in brokerage accounts, dividend and interest payments, and more
You probably didn’t get taxes withheld if you got me, so you may have a big tax bill coming up
Answers
Nonemployee Compensation is the one that is received in January.
What is tax?A tax is a compulsory fee or economic charge that a government imposes on a person or a business in order to raise money for public projects like building the greatest infrastructure and services. Several public spending programs are then funded with the funds that have been raised.
Treating someone as a self-employed worker, sometimes known as an independent contractor if pay for work you rendered is listed on Form 1099-NEC, Nonemployee Compensation.
The majority of your 1099 forms for the prior year's payments to one should arrive in your mailbox by January 31 year for the taxable income.
Learn more about tax, Here:
brainly.com/question/16423331
#SPJ1
depict the pic in about 100 words regarding social welfare
Answers
A social welfare system offers assistance to individuals and families in need, with such programs as health care assistance, food stamps, and unemployment compensation.
Lesser known parts of a social welfare system include disaster relief and educational assistance.
What is social welfare?Social welfare encompasses help provided to persons in need; activities and resources to enhance or promote the well-being of individuals, families and the larger society; and broad efforts to eliminate or reduce the incidence of social problems.
The history of social welfare is an interdisciplinary study of the evolution of charitable works, organized activities related to social reform movements and non-profit or public social services designed to protect or benefit individuals, families and citizens of the larger society. Charitable efforts have often grown out of religious beliefs — beliefs that inspired reformers to deep compassion, firm ethical convictions, and a strong sense of justice.
The reformers’ faith backgrounds were the foundation of movements such as abolition, temperance, and the establishment of settlement houses.
Learn more about social welfare, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29214791
#SPJ5