Select all the correct responses. if you are a military personnel and you knowingly leaked classified information to an unauthorized user, what sanctions might be imposed on you?

Answer:

No, Senator Thompson can not do this as all matters dealing with money must start in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Explanation:

The rule comes from the U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.  If the bill was drafted in the U.S. House and passed the U.S. House Subcommittee, then passed by the full U.S. House, Senator Thompson could go around and ask other Senators to vote for the Bill, but he could not have written the Bill and have it start in the U.S. Senate.

Answer:

Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.

Explanation:

Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.

Answer:

Explanation;:

Answer:

a search and seizure allows police officers to examine your vehicle or residence for evidence, illegal weapons, or substances. In comparison, a frisk only lets officers pat down someone in order to detect weapons like guns or knives.

Explanation:

Unlike a full search, a frisk is limited to a patting down of the outer clothing. If the officer feels what seems to be a weapon, the officer may then reach inside the person's clothing. If no weapon is felt, the search may not intrude further than the outer clothing.

By federal law, women can elect to have an abortion without legal restrictions during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Federal law includes acts of Congress, presidential executive orders, and judgements of federal courts rendered in accordance with the Constitution. The Supreme Court has the authority to issue final determinations about federal laws in certain instances that are brought before them through the system of checks and balances.

The Supreme Court has the authority to issue final determinations about federal laws in certain instances that are brought before them through the system of checks and balances. In 1819, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in McCulloch v. Maryland that forbade state legislatures from taxing federal institutions. This was a pivotal event for federalism in the United States because it established the superior connection between federal laws and competing State laws. The United States Code contains a codification of federal legislation.

According to a theory put forth by Professor Scott Dodson, American federal law affects state law in some discernible ways. He likens this gravitational force—which is not "inexorable"—to a gravitational force that encourages state actors to draught legislation that is in line with, or at least closely parallels, federal legislation.

To know more about federal law :

https://brainly.com/question/14867447

#SPJ11

In this case, Alli, a resident of Alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against Karson, who is a resident of Kentucky. This means that the court in Alabama has ruled in favor of Alli and issued a judgment against Karson.

To enforce this judgment, Alli may need to take additional legal steps in Kentucky, where Karson resides. The exact steps will depend on the laws of Kentucky and the case's specific details. A judgment is a court's official decision in a lawsuit. Once a judgment has been entered, the winning party (in this case, Alli) can enforce their rights and collect what is owed to them.

To enforce a judgment in Kentucky, Alli may need to register the Alabama judgment in Kentucky and then take further steps to collect what is owed, such as garnishing wages, seizing bank accounts, or selling assets. The exact steps will depend on Kentucky's specific laws and procedures and the specific details of the case.

To learn more about Karson, visit here.

https://brainly.com/question/14084465

#SPJ4

Yes I believe that bullying should be punishable as a felony

This is due to the fact that it has the ability of causing grave effects to the victims.

In Anglo-American law, criminal actions are classified as felonies or misdemeanors depending on how serious they are.

Legal systems in the United States often distinguish between felonies and misdemeanors. It is also acknowledged that there is a category of infractions that might be classified as quasi-crimes or small offenses. Sometimes local ordinances or regulatory statutes generate these most recent offenses, in which case the necessity of a jury trial is not applicable.

Preventing bullying is a goal shared by all educators, parents, and students. One preventive measure that can alter societal norms is the enactment of anti-bullying laws. There were not many anti-bullying legislation and practices when American researchers first started looking into bullying in the early 1990s.

An effective anti-bullying policy might also specify what constitutes bullying and what does not.

Read more on felony here: https://brainly.com/question/28657230

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Correct Answer Actually is :

It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training.

Explanation:

Just took the test 100%

The purpose of Sotomayor's speech to persuade listeners to agree that it is very  important to have more diverse judges to instruct students on the steps that is needed to become a judge.

Sonia Sotomayor used evocative diction, comparison and contrast in her speech. And also added colourful imagery to convey her audience what it means for her to be a Latina-American. The main purpose of Sotomayor's speech is that ethnic diversity is very important to America. Sotomayor consistently cites the major importance of her diverse upbringing, showing a clear love for her cultural identity.

Sotomayor's philosophy of judiciary was  "fidelity to the law'', which means "The task of a judge is not to make law, but is to apply the law."

To know more about Sonia Sotomayor refer to-

brainly.com/question/27870689#

#SPJ4

Answer:

"Legal personality" means to be capable of having legal rights.

Explanation:

"Legal personality" means to be capable of having legal rights within a specific legal system such as to enter into contracts, sue, and be sued. Legal personality is a condition or requirement to legal capacity, the ability of any legal person to change rights and obligations. Example of legal personality is that how a law is applied if one is a home owner versus a renter.

When travelling on a one-way street, passing is permitted on the right. a hill is in view. There is just one traffic lane heading your way. The road you are on is one-way. The car in front of you is moving at the posted

A road style that only permits one direction of traffic movement is known as a one-way road. By preventing head-on accidents, these roadways are intended to improve safety and lessen confusion. One-way roads are usually broader and feature fewer intersections than two-way roads, which makes them simpler for cars to negotiate. One-way roads also have smoother, faster-moving traffic, which eases congestion and enhances traffic flow. To guarantee the safety of you and other vehicles, it is crucial to pay attention to traffic signs and abide by the laws of the road when driving on a one-way street. On a one-way street, it is forbidden to go against the flow of traffic

Learn more about one-way here:

https://brainly.com/question/17120498

#SPJ4

Answer:

He's representing the United States.

Explanation:

When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.

Answer:

definitaly thought process but serching process to

Explanation:

Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.

While driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.

Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.

One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.

There are several types of parking maneuvers :

Passing a vehicle requires a good judgement.

Learn more about "driving" here :

https://brainly.com/question/21945861

The intention that John Smith would have for saying that if a man did not work, he would not eat is for everyone to be hardworking and to thrive in the economy. He wanted all to be committed to the success of the new colony.

Captain John Smith was a soldier, explorer, adventurer, and writer. We may follow the growth of a man who played a major role in Jamestown's eventual success and the establishing of its reputation as the first permanent English settlement in North America through the narrative of his early life.

Because he wanted everyone at Jamestown, Virginia, to dedicate themselves to the success of that first colony established in 1607, John Smith established a "no work, no food" policy. With that kind of weather and the challenging circumstances of starting over in a new place, Jhon Smith knew how difficult it would be to flourish. He therefore did not want anyone to adopt a "free ride" mentality. He said that at that time.

Read more on John Smith here: https://brainly.com/question/17837412

#SPJ1

Explanation: Gradpoint

There are many types of cases that could potentially be heard in federal court, but I'll focus on two common examples. The first example is a case involving a violation of federal law. If a person or business has been accused of violating a federal law, such as tax fraud, drug trafficking, or copyright infringement.

Another example of a case that might be heard in federal court is a dispute between parties from different states, known as a diversity case. In a diversity case, the parties involved are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds a certain threshold set by federal law. For example, if a person in California sues a person in New York for damages resulting from a car accident, and the amount in question is over $75,000, the case could be heard in federal court.

In summary, federal courts are responsible for hearing cases that involve violations of federal law and disputes between parties from different states that meet certain criteria. These are just two examples of cases that could potentially be heard in federal court, but there are many other types of cases that may fall under federal jurisdiction as well.

To know more about Federal visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28338029

#SPJ11

Answer:

LEOKA

Explanation:

Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Program. Through the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Data Collection, the FBI provides data and training that helps keep law enforcement officers safe as they protect the nation's communities.

LEOKA is the part of the Uniform Crime Report might contain useful data for Ilan to share with the mayor. Hence, option D is correct.

For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting Program produces accurate information. Additionally, it offers information to the general public, the media, scholars, and criminal justice students. Since 1930, the program has been producing crime statistics.

The FBI's Uniform Crime Report "murder and nonnegligent manslaughter" data are so gravely erroneous that the only information they can give criminologists is the number of deaths that have been investigated by police as possibly being criminal homicides and the statistics on weapon use that have been reported by the UCR and the National Crime Survey.

A record of crimes reported to law enforcement agencies is kept in the Uniform Crime Report. The F.B.I. is in charge of data collection. compared to crimes that have not been solved.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about Uniform Crime Report, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14450134

#SPJ2

In general, taxes are regressive, resulting in less redistribution than could be anticipated.

About Taxes

There are different federal, state, & municipal governments in the United States, and taxes are levied at many levels. Income, wages, property, sales, dividends, imports, estates, gifts, and a variety of other items are all subject to taxation. Federal, state, & local governments collected 25.5% of GDP in taxes in 2020, less than the OECD avg of 33.5% of GDP. In terms of tax income to GDP, the United States ranked seventh lowest among OECD nations in 2020, having a higher ratio than México, Columbia, Chile, Ireland, Costa Rica, & Turkey.

Labor income is taxed significantly more harshly than capital income. Indirect taxation of certain activities over others can also take the shape of various subsidies and taxes for various sources of income and spending.

To know more about taxes:

brainly.com/question/28444752

#SPJ4

Todd's §481 adjustment for this year would be $356,000.

The §481 adjustment for Todd's uncollected sales on account would be the difference between his actual revenue for the year and the revenue he would have recognized if all of his sales had been collected. To calculate this adjustment, we need to subtract the uncollected amount from the total sales on account: $420,000 - $64,000 = $356,000

Revenue in accounting refers to the entire amount of money made through the sale of products and services that are essential to the company's core activities. Sales or turnover are other terms used to describe commercial revenue. Some businesses get money via royalties, interest, or other fees.

To know more about revenue

https://brainly.com/question/27325673
#SPJ11

According to English and colonial law: a. Only a divorced woman could be a deputy husband.

The Deputy Husband law was a legal device used in early America that permitted a woman to act as her husband's representative when he was absent from the colony.

If the woman's husband was away, and if she had creditors to satisfy, contracts to sign, or lawsuits to file, she could appoint a "deputy husband" to act in her spouse's name.b. A relict was real property or heirlooms listed in an estate. Relict refers to the spouse of a deceased person.

To know more about  colonial law. here

https://brainly.com/question/5760874

#SPJ11

To calculate the marginal cost, we need to find the change in total cost for each additional bike produced. We can do this by finding the difference in total cost between the current quantity and the previous quantity.

Using the provided table, we can calculate the marginal cost of each of the given quantities of bikes:

The marginal cost of the first bike is $30, since it is the only bike and has a total cost of $30.

The marginal cost of the fourth bike is $30, since the total cost of producing four bikes is $100 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27), and the total cost of producing three bikes is $70 ($30 + $3 + $40). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the fourth bike is $100 - $70 = $30.

The marginal cost of the sixth bike is $20, since the total cost of producing six bikes is $250 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100), and the total cost of producing five bikes is $160 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the sixth bike is $250 - $160 = $90.

The marginal cost of the seventh bike is $10, since the total cost of producing seven bikes is $330 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100 + $80), and the total cost of producing six bikes is $250 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the seventh bike is $330 - $250 = $80.

So the marginal cost for each quantity of bikes are as follows:

The marginal cost of the first bike: $30

The marginal cost of the fourth bike: $30

The marginal cost of the sixth bike: $20

The marginal cost of the seventh bike: $10

To know more about marginal cost:

https://brainly.com/question/30260452

#SPJ4

Answer:

firefighters

Explanation:

For a firefighter, thermal imaging cameras can literally be a lifesaver.

False. Courts do have the power to invalidate a federal statute if it conflicts with the US Constitution. The principle of judicial review allows courts to declare laws unconstitutional and nullify them, ensuring the supremacy of the Constitution over legislative acts passed by Congress. Therefore, option b is correct.

Courts are institutions within the judicial system that have the authority to adjudicate legal disputes and administer justice. They are responsible for interpreting and applying the law to resolve conflicts between individuals, organizations, or the government.

Courts provide a forum for parties to present their cases, and judges or justices make decisions based on the facts, evidence, and applicable laws. Courts ensure due process, protect individual rights, and uphold the rule of law. They play a vital role in maintaining order, resolving disputes, and safeguarding justice in a fair and impartial manner.

Learn more about judicial system here:

https://brainly.com/question/1145536

#SPJ4

After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.

Stealing from another person's person or immediate vicinity while using force or the threat of force with the purpose to steal aggravated robbery. The unjustifiable taking of someone else's property by using force or threatening to use force in order to instill fear.

Heists are defined as the theft of cash or valuable objects like artwork, jewellery, or silver. Under English and Welsh law, a robbery differs from a burglary in that a robbery entails the use of force which means that some of the heists commonly known as robberies were actually burglaries.

After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.

Thus, After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order.

For more details about concept of the statement, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/25976833

#SPJ2

Angel Maturino Resendiz is the person who is also referred to as the killer of the railroads.

The railroads have been an integral part of the European transportation systems as well as the trade connectivity between different routes. Moreover, the railroads have provided immense economic growth to the European part of the world. However, Angel Maturino Resendiz stepped in to amend policies that led to the end of the railroads across the region, and is, thus, recalled as the railroad killer by many.

Learn more about railroad here:

https://brainly.com/question/28943383

#SPJ4

Answer:

Provides citizens with benefits for following a policy: Incentive

calls on citizens' morality or decency to obey a policy: Hortatory

creates stiff penalties/fines to force citizens to adjust to policy: Authoritative

grants training to citizens who want to follow a policy but can't: Capacity

Hope this helps!!

One way Liu Bang sought to stabilize his rule as the first Han Emperor was by implementing a system of centralized bureaucracy and governance, known as the "Three Excellencies."

Upon ascending to power as the first Han Emperor, Liu Bang implemented the system of the "Three Excellencies" to consolidate and stabilize his rule.

The Three Excellencies consisted of three high-ranking officials appointed by the emperor to oversee different aspects of governance: the Chancellor, who managed domestic affairs and served as the chief executive;

the Imperial Counselor, responsible for advising the emperor on policy matters; and the General-in-Chief, who commanded the military forces. This system allowed Liu Bang to establish a centralized bureaucracy, ensuring effective governance, clear lines of authority, and the ability to maintain control over his vast empire.

The Three Excellencies helped to institutionalize the Han dynasty's governance structure, providing stability and longevity to Liu Bang's rule and laying the foundation for the Han dynasty's subsequent success.

Learn more about governance here: brainly.com/question/4160287

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is b and c

Explanation:

Just took the test

The outcome of the case will depend on the specific facts of the case, the state's laws of comparative negligence laws and contributory negligence laws, and how the court interprets and applies those laws.

The outcome of the case will depend on the state's laws regarding comparative negligence and seat belt laws. In some states, comparative negligence laws allow for the reduction of damages awarded to a plaintiff who was partially at fault for their injuries.

In other states, failure to wear a seat belt may be considered contributory negligence, which could result in the plaintiff being barred from recovering damages.

If the state follows comparative negligence laws, the court may apportion fault between Joe and Mary and reduce Mary's damages accordingly. For example, if Mary was found to be 20% at fault for her injuries due to her failure to wear a seat belt, her damages may be reduced by 20%.

If the state follows contributory negligence laws, Mary may be barred from recovering any damages if her failure to wear a seat belt is deemed to have contributed to her injuries.

To know more about comparative negligence laws:

https://brainly.com/question/29829593

#SPJ4