Answer:
It should be left to state control because, its at a state level. a state level such as your local police , fire fighters , mayors etc. if it was brought to national control it would be chaos as national control is every state in the US.
sorry im kinda busy so i cant answer as good as i want to but it should be left to state control.
Why do you think it's important that law enforcement agencies have limited authority.
Answer:
so that it deducts the number of cases in the country
Who has the power in the united states to declare war?.
Answer: Congress.
Explanation:
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. Congress has declared war on 11 occasions, including its first declaration of war with Great Britain in 1812.
Summarize the Torress v. Texas Department of Public Safety Supreme Court case.
Answer:
Texas Department of Public Safety. In Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, the Supreme Court considered whether the states, by ratifying the Constitution, gave Congress the power to authorize suits against states using its constitutional war powers.
Explanation:
Which is an example of Quid Pro Quo?
Your manager constantly makes innuendos that you
find very uncomfortable.
Your manager threatens to get you fired if you
withhold sexual favors.
An example of Quid Pro Quo is your manager threatens to get you fired if you
withhold sexual favors
What is Quid Pro Quo?This is a favor someone enjoyed became he or she had been good to the person.
It can be called a compensation for doing goods at a time.
Therefore, An example of Quid Pro Quo is your manager threatens to get you fired if you
withhold sexual favors
Learn more on favor below
https://brainly.com/question/543079
#SPJ1
The concept that crime prevention can be achieved by reducing the opportunities individuals have to commit crime is called:
Answer: situational crime prevention
Explanation:
situational crime prevention suggests that crime prevention can be achieved by reducing the opportunities people have to commit particular crimes.
What will happen the first time you get caught reckless driving?
Review the chart for reckless driving penalties
Select one:
O a. You will have to pay a fine up to $500, and you could go to jail for up to 90 days.
O b. You will be charged with a Second-Degree Misdemeanor.
O c. You will have community service for up to 50 hours.
O d. Your license will be suspended for up to 14 days.
Answer: B
Explanation: its actually a class b misdemeanor, meaning you could face a year of license suspension, up to 180 days in jail, and up to $1,000 in fines.
The first time you get caught reckless driving is a. You will have to pay a fine up to $500, and you could go to jail for up to 90 days.
When caught for reckless driving, the penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the offense. However, in many places, reckless driving is considered a serious traffic violation, warranting significant penalties to deter dangerous driving behavior.The penalty outlined in option a is a common consequence for reckless driving. It involves imposing a fine of up to $500, which serves as a financial penalty for the offense committed. Additionally, the possibility of going to jail for up to 90 days indicates the severity of the offense and the potential consequences for endangering public safety.It's important to note that reckless driving penalties can differ across jurisdictions. The specific laws and regulations governing traffic offenses may vary, leading to variations in fines, jail time, and additional consequences such as license suspension or mandatory defensive driving courses.If you find yourself facing a reckless driving charge, it is crucial to consult with a legal professional in your jurisdiction who can provide guidance specific to your situation and help you understand the applicable penalties and potential courses of action.The correct option is a. You will have to pay a fine up to $500, and you could go to jail for up to 90 days.
For more such questions on Reckless driving
https://brainly.com/question/16960622
#SPJ8
Write a brief paragraph summarizing the civil rights guaranteed by each amendment, a list of 3-5 situations in which a police officer would need knowledge of each amendment to do his or her job properly, and a short paragraph describing why this amendment is important to police work.
Answer:
First Amendment - Freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition.
Second Amendment - Right to bear arms.
Third Amendment - Citizens do not have to house soldiers.
Fourth Amendment - No unreasonable search or arrest.
Fifth Amendment - No double jeopardy or no witness against yourself.
Sixth Amendment - Rights of accused in criminal cases to fair trial
Seventh Amendment - Trial by jury.
Eighth Amendment - No excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishment.
Ninth Amendment - People get rights not listed in Constitution.
Tenth Amendment - Any rights not given to federal government are given to the states and people.
4th Amendment
A police officer would need to have knowledge of this amendment in order to not get a case thrown out if it were to be taken to court. Violating the 4th amendment consists of such things as searching someone’s personal possessions or homes without probable cause, consent, or a warrant. Defense lawyers would be able to argue that the accused 4th amendment rights were violated. This amendment is crucial in order to avoid being sued, as well as providing a fair way to get information, seeing it as if they were granted a warrant, then anything they may find will not be thrown out in court because of police error.
5th Amendment
The 5th amendment includes Miranda Rights that are read to you if you are being put under arrest. If an officer fails to read you your Miranda Rights or messes up while stating them to you, their case will be fractured and your defense can use that against your charges by stating that your 5th amendment rights were violated, and you weren’t informed properly. This amendment is important to provide a sense of security in that no information is being concluded unlawfully, which could lead to false conclusions.
6th Amendment
The 6th amendment is crucial for an officer to be informed of. This amendment gives you a right to a jury trial, a speedy trial, and other court procedurals. In a situation that an officer fails to be knowledgeable of this amendment, and chooses to interrogate you themselves, once again, the prosecution will be severely damaged, and the defense can counter this by stating that your 6th amendment rights were violated. This amendment is important to be fair, and provide a reasonable account of justice to be served.
Explanation:
A police officer would need to be aware of this amendment in order to avoid having a case dismissed in court. Violations of the fourth amendment include searches of people's personal belongings or homes without probable cause, consent, or a warrant.
What are civil rights?The right to equality, the right to use public facilities, the right to government services such as public education and healthcare, and the right to a fair trial are all examples of civil rights.
The First Amendment guarantees freedom of expression, press, religion, assembly, and petition. The Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. Citizens are not required to house soldiers under the Third Amendment. No unreasonable search or arrest under the Fourth Amendment.
Fifth Amendment - No double jeopardy or self-incrimination. Sixth Amendment - Rights of criminal defendants to a fair trial. The Seventh Amendment provides for a jury trial. No excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishment is permitted under the Eighth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment grants people rights not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Tenth Amendment - Any rights that are not granted to the federal government are granted to the states and people.
Therefore, civil rights are summarized.
Learn more about Civil rights, here;
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ5
What are three arguments in made in the masterpiece cakeshop v. colorado civil rights commission?
Explanation:
The opinion stated that although a baker, in his capacity as the owner of a business serving the public, "might have his right to the free exercise of his religion limited by generally applicable laws", a State decision in an adjudication “in which religious hostility on the part of the State itself” is a factor
hope this helps you
have a nice day:)
Domestic violence may increase the likelihood of homelessness for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT
O A
OB.
O C
O D.
the danger forces people to leave their current home.
the victims often cannot afford separate housing.
the shelters designated for victims are often full.
the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
The correct answer is option (d) the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
Domestic violence is a complex issue that can significantly increase the likelihood of homelessness for its victims. Here are the explanations for the other three options:
a. The danger forces people to leave their current home: Domestic violence often involves physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, creating an unsafe environment for the victims. To protect themselves and their children, victims may be forced to flee their homes and seek safety elsewhere, sometimes without adequate resources or support networks.
b. The victims often cannot afford separate housing: Many victims of domestic violence face financial limitations, as their abusers may exert control over financial resources or prevent them from working. This financial dependency makes it challenging for victims to secure separate housing and maintain their independence.
c. The shelters designated for victims are often full: Domestic violence shelters provide temporary refuge for victims seeking safety and support. Unfortunately, due to the prevalence of domestic violence, these shelters often operate at full capacity, leaving many victims without immediate access to a safe place to stay.
d. The abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction: This statement does not directly contribute to an increased likelihood of homelessness for victims of domestic violence. While substance abuse can be a factor in some cases of domestic violence, it does not directly impact the likelihood of homelessness for the victims themselves.
It is important to recognize the complexities of domestic violence and its impact on homelessness. By understanding the reasons behind homelessness resulting from domestic violence, we can work towards developing comprehensive support systems and interventions to help victims rebuild their lives and secure safe and stable housing. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about Domestic violence here:
https://brainly.com/question/31836260
#SPJ8
Explain how the Federal System helps the States retain power over themselves while still allowing the Federal government and Constitution to make national laws. Why do you think the Founding Fathers wanted to make sure the Federal government wasn't making rules for the States?
The Federal System grants powers to states while reserving some for the federal government, protecting states' rights and preventing centralized control.
The Federal System in the United States is a form of government that divides powers between the national government and state governments. This division of powers helps states retain their autonomy while still allowing the federal government to make national laws. Under this system, certain powers are delegated to the federal government, while others are reserved for the states.
The Founding Fathers established this system to protect states' rights and ensure a balance of power between the federal government and the states. They believed that a strong centralized government could potentially infringe upon the rights and interests of individual states. By granting specific powers to the federal government through the Constitution while reserving other powers for the states, the Founding Fathers sought to prevent the federal government from making excessive rules and regulations that could undermine the sovereignty and autonomy of the states.This division of powers between the federal government and the states, known as federalism, serves as a safeguard against tyranny and allows for local governance that is responsive to the diverse needs and preferences of different states. It also fosters innovation and experimentation, as states have the freedom to enact their laws and policies within their respective jurisdictions.Ultimately, the Founding Fathers aimed to strike a balance between a strong national government and the preservation of states' rights, ensuring that both levels of government could coexist and function in harmony.
For more questions on the Federal System
https://brainly.com/question/13038482
#SPJ8
County and city governments have no direct control over this part
of their budget, as it is a requirement of law.
The part of the budget that county and city governments have no direct control over as it is a requirement of law is: the debt service.
What is debt service?The repayment of the principal and interest on any loans or outstanding obligations that the government has undertaken is referred to as debt service. These debts are frequently issued to fund capital investments like public buildings or infrastructure projects.
Therefore, county and municipal governments are required by law to set aside a specific amount of their budget for debt service payments, and they have little leeway to change or lower those payments.
Learn more about debt service here:https://brainly.com/question/31325359
#SPJ1
If the heating curve is reversed, what would best describe the boiling point?
A.
point of condensation
B.
melting point
C.
freezing point
D.
sublimation point
Answer:
Freezing point.
Explanation:
I got it right on plato/edmentum. :)
what is inter personal relationship
According to the Supreme Court in the case of Morrissey v. Brewer, procedural safeguards are required at ________.
I believe the answer is Parole revocation hearings
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
Extra points!!!
Have a good Monday everyone.
Answer:
thxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Explanation:
Answer:
tysm
you too
Explanation:
1. What are some similarities between the JonBenet Ramsey Case and the Lizzie Borden case?
Answer:
Both were shocking murders sensationalized by the media, ensuring the cases would be well known outside of Fall River and Boulder, and over time. Both remain unsolved, with theories involving different perpetrators. Andrew and Abby were murdered in their home with two other members of the house known to be present, Lizzie and the maid, Bridget Sullivan. Like the Ramseys, Lizzie has been thought to be guilty by a majority of people. And like the Ramseys, an unknown intruder has been offered as a defense.
Explanation:
Who appoints the Attorney General?
Answer:
by the governor.
Explanation:
Attorneys general are the top legal officers of their state or territory. They advise and represent their legislature and state agencies and act as the “People's Lawyer” for the citizens. Most are elected, though a few are appointed by the governor.
by the governor
Explanation:
Attorneys General are the top legal officers of their territory they advised chain represent their legislature and the state agencies and act as "people's Lawyer" for the citizens.
It's impossible to pick out a drunk driver until it is too late.
A. True
B. False
Did you know anything about Gerrymandering? Was any of this information surprising to you? Why or why not?
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.
I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.
This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.
Learn more about Gerrymandering:
https://brainly.com/question/29553293
#SPJ1
What is the stop and frisk exception ?
what impact will south Africa being grey listed have on foreign investment
Being grey-listed can reduce investor confidence, limit access to global financial markets, increase compliance costs, and have negative economic effects, leading to a potential decline in foreign investment in South Africa.
If South Africa were to be grey-listed, it would likely have significant impacts on foreign investment. The grey-listing status, which indicates deficiencies in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing frameworks, can erode investor confidence in the country's financial system and regulatory environment. This loss of confidence can result in a decrease in foreign investment as investors become more cautious about potential risks.Additionally, being grey-listed can restrict South Africa's access to international financial markets. This limitation can make it more challenging for businesses to secure financing, engage in cross-border transactions, or attract foreign investors. The enhanced regulatory requirements and increased compliance costs associated with grey-listing can further deter foreign investment by creating additional burdens for businesses operating in the country.Overall, the grey-listing of South Africa can have a negative impact on foreign investment, leading to reduced capital inflows, slower economic growth, and potentially hampering the country's competitiveness in the global investment landscape.For more such question on foreign investment
https://brainly.com/question/14525125
#SPJ8
Answer:
Grey-listing by the Financial Action Task Force ("FATF") has major implications for countries and companies alike. These implications include reputational damage, economic consequences, and increased compliance costs, which can lead to restricted foreign investment and reduced capital inflows.
Why do the members of East Jesus in Slab City want to obtain grants from the county and state? A. They want to be connected to the power grid. B. There is an influx of trash in their community. C. Recognition as a formal city would bring in revenue from tourists. D. They are in need of sewage services.
The members of East Jesus in Slab City want to obtain grants from the county and state as there is an influx of trash in their community. Thus the correct answer is B.
What is a country?A country refers to a large geographical area that is highly populated and consists of various states and territories having their own constitution which applied legislation as a whole.
Some of those regional rituals may be introduced into the Slabs by East Jesus. As per Iskaki, he is attempting to obtain state and county grants so that trash can be delivered to Slab municipality to assist with the city's growing generated waste.
Therefore, option B There is an influx of trash in their community is appropriate.
Learn more about State, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9697483
#SPJ1
In a criminal case who has the burden of proof.
Answer : In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Explanation: hope that helps
Answer:
In Both Civil and Criminal; the burden of proof is on the People / Prosecutor / or the Planktif, the reason for this is that people are innocents until proven guilty, said by Law, Constitution and even amendment.
if I pass 33 percent in all subjects can i take commerce with maths
It is best to check the specific admission requirements of the institution you are interested in to determine if you meet their eligibility criteria for admission to the commerce stream with mathematics.
How do you determine your eligibility?The eligibility criteria for taking commerce with mathematics may vary depending on the educational institution or university you wish to apply to.
In general, most universities and educational institutions require a minimum percentage of marks in the qualifying examination for admission to the commerce stream with mathematics.
If you have passed all subjects with a score of 33 percent, it may not be sufficient to meet the eligibility criteria for admission to the commerce stream with mathematics in most universities.
However, it is best to check the specific admission requirements of the institution you are interested in to determine if you meet their eligibility criteria for admission to the commerce stream with mathematics.
learn more about admission requirements: https://brainly.com/question/13363950
#SPJ1
One of the central points in the case of U. S. V Nixon was the issue of Double Jeopardy. Question 2 options: True False.
One of the central points in the case of U. S. V Nixon was the
issue of Double Jeopardy was False.
What is Double Jeopardy clause?This is part of the US constitution that prohibits anyone from
being prosecuted twice for substantially the same crime.
U.S.V Nixon was the President of the United States and was
also subject to impeachment during his rule and his case wasn't
the issue of Double Jeopardy as he hadn't been tried for the
same offence before.
He wanted to exercise his executive rights by not releasing the
tapes but the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Nixon
must turn over the tapes in the Watergate scandal. He later
resigned as he knew if tried he may most likely be impeached.
Read more about President Nixon here https://brainly.com/question/838319
Answer: false
Explanation: I took this test !
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
How does this quote reflect the influence of Enlightenment ideas on the Founding Fathers? A They had reservations about self-government.
B They were concerned with property rights.
C They supported individual liberties.
D They created a limited monarchy.
Benchmark SS.7.C.1.1
please mention at least 20 fundamental human rights in the constitution
Answer:
The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.
The primary role of juvenile courts is to
Arraign
Acquit
Punish
Rehabilitate