Should it be the responsibility of the government to regulate the health and “well being” of its people?
Answers
Answer:
Yes, this is one of many responsibilities of the government.
Explanation:
The government's role in protecting and advancing society's interests includes providing high-quality health care. Due to the fact that the market alone cannot guarantee all Americans access to quality health care, the government needs to fill in gaps and regulate the market when there is inefficiency or unfairness, thus protecting the interests of its citizens.
HOPE this helps!!! :)
Related Questions
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Which term refers to the legitimare writings that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery?
created by the original writer that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery.
Answers
Answer:
exemplar
Explanation:
Exemplars created by the original writer that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery.
How handwriting analysis works?Investigators may consult handwriting specialists to see if there is a match when there is a suspect in a crime and handwritten evidence is present. In rare circumstances, it might be the sole piece of evidence used to charge and ultimately convict a defendant.
Handwriting analysis falls under the category of questioned documents in the domain of forensic analysis, which includes crime scene investigation, DNA testing, fiber analysis, fingerprint analysis, voice identification, and drugs analysis, to name just a few disciplines. In order to establish or rule out authorship (and/or link a document to a specific machine in the case of typing), questioned document examiners (QDEs) evaluate documents for indications of tampering, forgery, and, when sample documents are available, handwriting or typing comparisons.
Learn more about handwriting analysis here:
https://brainly.com/question/10298465
#SPJ2
A changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. True false
Answers
Changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. The statement is True.
Determine the likelihood that a person may require more extensive support, residential placement away from the natural family home or support within the natural home. This is known as the level of risk. A standardized risk assessment tool is used by DDDS to determine the level of risk.
The word "level of risk" refers to how big a risk is when combined with the likelihood of its outcomes. The term "level of risk" refers to the size of a risk as reflected by a risk priority number.
Learn more about the level of risk here:
https://brainly.com/question/14378278
#SPJ1
What is a short order cook vs line cook.
Answers
Short order cooks cook quick meals at a restaurant and prepare many meals simultaneously. Unlike line cooks, they are assigned to specific stations where they complete one part of a meal at a time.
According to the Declaration of Independence, what was an "unalienable right" (God-given rights/born with) that all governments should protect?
Answers
im a lil late but im guessing "the right to social equality"
no cap trust me
1. A statute is
A) a monument meant to help people remember a past event
B) is a law passed only by the United States Congress
C) is a law passed by state, federal and county legislatures
D) the basis of case law
2
Grare decisis means
Answers
Answer:
I believe the answer to 1. is B, and Grare decisis means substantially the same. Basically based on a court's previous decision in a case, that same decision can be carried out and used in any future cases.
Explanation:
How to money easily?
Answers
Answer:
Go To Collage Get A Good Job.
Explanation:
It is often said that since the September 11th attacks in 2001, there has been an increase in the number of public-private law enforcement and security services partnerships because of the “perception of increased risk” in the United States. What does “perception of increased risk” do to the realities of protecting U.S citizens from terrorism and how does that relate to partnerships between law enforcement and private security?
Describe the connection between risk, “perceived risk,” and the level of need for protection. Use evidence to support your statements and opinions.
Answers
The "perception of increased risk" heightens the demand for security measures and fosters partnerships between law enforcement and private security to enhance protection of U.S. citizens from terrorism.
The perception of greater risk has a number of consequences for the realities of defending American citizens from terrorism. For starters, it increases the demand for security measures and creates a greater sense of urgency to avert future assaults. The anxiety and apprehension produced by the assaults drives individuals and organisations to seek security against prospective dangers.
The level of perceived risk impacts the level of protection required. When people believe there is a significant chance of terrorism, they seek increased security measures to offset that risk. This rising demand for security services opens the door to collaboration between law enforcement and private security businesses. These collaborations combine the resources, experience, and skills of both sectors to improve security, intelligence sharing, and incident response.
The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.
The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.
For more questions on law enforcement
https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ8
I need conclusions please and thank you
I will really appreciate it
Answers
Answer:
if nothing changes about this law distracted driving will continue to kill people. its up to us as people to do the right thing and make the right choices. things start to matter when action starts to happen onto whats right and wrong.
Explanation:
its need one more sentance i feel but i feel like the answer itself is soobvious i mean the conclusion should always be abt the whole point of whatever ur writing in the first place, so im kinda confused on how it was hard for u to make one when its litterly abt the concept of the whole essay -_-
BRAINLIEST OMGGG!!!!
Similarites and differences of the Boston Tea Party and the rise of African American activists opposing the Reconstruction policies
Answers
Hope this helps Xx :)
What does The Officer Says when Arresting you
Answers
A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to charging these activities as the crimes they constitute, the activities would also constitute the criminal act of intentional furtherance of the goals of organized crime. Among the enumerated activities was the interstate distribution of cocaine. The statute’s constitutionality has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The defendant was arrested by federal agents after having driven a truck containing cocaine from Florida to Illinois, where he delivered his illicit cargo as directed. At trial, the defendant is convicted of interstate distribution of cocaine in violation of federal law, and convicted of a violation of the federal statute above. How may the defendant be sentenced?
Answers
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
please help with accounting balance sheet
year ends on 28 Feb 2023
Answers
Answer:
Your picture is unclear
What is the process for recalling a sheriff from office?
Answers
The process for recalling a sheriff from office typically involves filing a petition, collecting signatures from registered voters, and holding a recall election.
The process for recalling a sheriff from office varies depending on the specific jurisdiction and the laws in place. However, in general, the process typically involves the following steps:Petition: A group or individual seeking to recall a sheriff must initiate the process by filing a petition. The petition usually needs to state the reasons for the recall and gather a required number of signatures from registered voters within the jurisdiction.Signature Collection: Supporters of the recall campaign must collect the necessary number of valid signatures within a specified timeframe. The required number of signatures is typically apercentage of the total votes cast in the previous election for that office.Verification: The submitted signatures are verified by the appropriate election officials to ensure they meet the eligibility criteria, such as being from registered voters within the jurisdiction.Recall Election: If the petition and signatures meet the requirements, a recall election is scheduled. Registered voters within the jurisdiction then have the opportunity to vote on whether to recall the sheriff from office.Election Outcome: If the majority of voters in the recall election choose to recall the sheriff, they will be removed from office. In some cases, a successor may be appointed or a special election held to fill the vacant position.It is important to note that the specific details and requirements may differ depending on the jurisdiction, so it is crucial to consult the applicable laws and regulations governing the recall process in a particular area.For more such question on recalling
https://brainly.com/question/30617654
#SPJ8
Why is DNA profiling considered a valid means of identification? Describe the structure of DNA. How does DNA relate to genes and chromosomes?
Answers
DNA profiling uses the unique sequences of DNA in an individual's genome to identify them
Why DNA profiling considered a valid means of identificationDNA profiling is considered a valid means of identification because it is based on the fact that every individual has a unique DNA profile, except for identical twins. Therefore, analyzing the DNA present in a biological sample such as blood, saliva, or hair can provide a definitive match to a particular individual, as long as their DNA is in the database.
The structure of DNA is a double helix, consisting of two strands of nucleotides that are twisted around each other. Each nucleotide is composed of a sugar, a phosphate group, and one of four nitrogenous bases: adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), or thymine (T). The nitrogenous bases pair up in a specific way - A with T and C with G - to form the rungs of the DNA ladder.
Therefore, DNA profiling uses the unique sequences of DNA in an individual's genome to identify them. This is possible because of the vast amount of genetic variation present in the human population, which allows for the identification of even minor differences between individuals' DNA profiles.
Learn more about DNA at https://brainly.com/question/21992450
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT a criticism of labeling theory?
Answers
It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime is NOT a criticism of labeling theory. The complete question is c.
One of the main criticisms of labeling theory is that it frequently ignores the structural causes of crime and deviance. Labeling theory is not without its detractors. The underlying societal factors that contribute to deviance may not be sufficiently addressed by labeling theory which focuses on the social process of labeling people as deviant and how this labeling can contribute to further deviant behavior.
Higher rates of crime and deviance can be attributed to structural factors like poverty, inequality and a lack of opportunities. Critics contend that labeling theory overemphasizes individual-level processes and inadequately takes into account the larger social and economic forces that influence deviant behavior. To develop a thorough understanding of deviance and crime, it is crucial to take into account how structural and labeling factors interact.
learn more about labeling theory here
brainly.com/question/31329812
#SPJ2
The complete question is- Which of the following is a criticism of labeling theory? Select one:
a. It doesn't explain impulsive crimes triggered by rage or fear.
b. It doesn't explain why people are deviant before labeling occurs.
c. It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime. d. It doesn't explain why crime rates have declined since 2000 despite poverty.
e. It doesn't explain how labeling increases deviant behavior.
Before we make a plan for alain finaces let's establish 1 or more smart goals for her to pursue in the next 12 months
Answers
Answer:
She needs to pace herself on her money until she gets a paycheck
Explanation:
I do not know if this helps hopes it does
if not sorry
BRAINLIEST!! In at least 4-5 sentences, Explain how has the american model of democracy influenced other countries
Answers
Answer:
The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.
Answer:
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."
Introduction
In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6
This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.
I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.
Explanation:
What is the only situation where you can safely push a pedal with your left foot?
A. if the driver has a cramp in their right foot
B. if the car is an electric vehicle
C. if the car has a clutch
D. if the roads are icy
Answers
Answer:
im going with A
Explanation:
Left-foot braking has long been one of the most hotly contested topics in driving. Detractors claim it makes no difference at best, and is a horrible and dangerous practice at worst. However, you can stop 70ft faster in an emergency situation if you use your left foot properly (more on that number in a second).
The only situation when the individual can safely push a pedal with their left foot is if the driver has a cramp in his right foot.
One of the most contentious aspects of driving has long been left-foot braking. Detractors argue that it makes no difference at best and that at worst, it is a horrible and dangerous practice. In an emergency, however, if you use your left foot properly, you can stop 70 feet faster.
Therefore the correct option is A.
To know more about the situation when an individual can push the pedal with the left foot, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/546440
You can expect to see___.
Answers
Answer:
me <3
Explanation:
Which of the following is equivalent to the addition problem below?
35.54 + 81.94
Answers
Answer:
The answer is 117.48
Explanation:
35.54 + 81.94 = 117.48
Who plays the lead role at the scene of an incident and is the first one to arrive on the scene?
Answers
Answer:fire department //im not shure but i will get back to you if i find something better//
Explanation:
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
Answers
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
The distance between vehicles on a roadway is known as a
Answers
Answer:
add me on snap
Explanation:
During the week, Adonis would buy property at auctions and then sell it to others on weekends at one of his garage sales. As a result of his holding garage sales on 33 consecutive weekends, the city in which he lived claimed he was a merchant and therefore had to pay sales tax.
Is the city correct?
Answers
Yes, the city is correct because he has sold the property bought from auction 33 times so that deems him as merchant.
Describe sales.A sale is a transaction that involves exchanging products or services for a specific sum of money. To put it another way, a sale is any action that involves giving the buyer possession of a thing or commodity in return for payment.
What exactly do sales in company mean?Sales in general business operations refer to any exchanges of money or value for the right to possess a good or get a service. Sales, in the context of accounting, refers to the income generated by a corporation via the selling of goods or services (net sales).
To know more about Sales visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29436143
#SPJ1
I need Helps With this And this Is Intro to Law/Public safety/Corrections
Answers
Answer:
I think it's 5 and if not try 7 also I'm so sorry if I get you this wrong
Is it necessary to have laws in the country? What would happen if there are no laws in the country?
*For extra info
Answers
Answer:
we wouldnt be civil
Explanation:
what questions do i ask about chapter 6 Adler, Freda, Mueller, G., and Laufer, W. Criminology 8th Edition 2010 and the sociology of crime and deviance?
Answers
A Level sociology's Crime and Deviance topic, which is often covered in the second year of the course, focuses on sociological theories of crime, deviance, social order, and social control.
What is crime according to sociological theory?According to sociological theories, a person's experiences in their community, their peer group, and their family all have an impact on their likelihood to commit a crime. are shaped by how individuals move around in their daily lives, both in space and time.
Who is the originator of crime sociology?A founding father of sociology, Emile Durkheim was one of them. In criminology, he is best known for his theories on anomie, which is a crucial component of strain theory, and the notion that some degree of criminal activity is normal.
To know more about sociology visit;-
https://brainly.com/question/30396395
#SPJ1
what is condensation ?
Answers
Condensation is the process in which gas changes into a liquid when it touches a cooler surface. Condensation is an important part of the water cycle. It is the opposite of evaporation
Answer:
water vapour rise high up in the air and cool down to form Tini droplet of water this process is called condensationhope it's helpful thanks
What happens if a state ratifies an amendment after the time frame for it to be ratified passes?
Answers
An original or certified copy of the State action that ratifies a proposed amendment is sent to the Archivist, who then immediately notifies the Director of the Federal Register.
Briefing:-Ratification documents are examined by the OFR to ensure that they are facially valid and have an authenticating signature.
Does the process of ratifying modifications have a deadline?The United States Constitution does not set a deadline for ratifying constitutional changes. In actuality, the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, which forbade instant pay raises for members of Congress, was ratified 203 years after it was first proposed.
Can an amendment be later accepted if a State rejects it?When authorized, it cannot be revoked; it is final approval. Yet, an amendment may be revoked if it turns out to be incorrect later.
To Know more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
If a judge learns that a defendant was abused as a child and committed the crime while under extreme financial pressure, what is the most likely outcome?