simplify:
3х + 5y-x+ 2y
&
3g + 5h +4g - 2h​

Answer:

x = -1, 2

Step-by-step explanation:

√3x+3  - 1 = x

√3x + 3 = x + 1

3x + 3 = x^2 + 2x + 1

x^2 - x - 2

( x - 2 )( x + 1 )

x = -1, 2

Hopefully this helps!

Brainliest please?

Answer:

it is actually 70

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

x + ( x + 2 ) + ( x + 4 ) = 210

3x + 6 = 210

3x = 204

x = 68

Remember that x is the smallest, so we have to add 4 to 68 to get the largest of the 3 consecutive even integers: 68 + 4 = 72.

Arial's claim that the graphs of the two lines will be parallel if the coefficients are equal.

If the coefficients of the y-terms are equal and the coefficients of the x-terms are equal, the two lines represented by the equations will be parallel. Parallel lines have the same slope and do not intersect, meaning that their graphs will never cross.

To prove Arial's claim, here is an example:

y = 2x + 1 and y = 2x + 3

The coefficients of the y-terms are equal in both equations, since they both have a coefficient of 2 in front of the x-term. The coefficients of the x - terms are also equal, since they both have a coefficient of 1 in front of the constant term thereby making them parallel.

Find out more on parallel lines at https://brainly.com/question/1439696

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the probability of obtaining x = 116 or fewer individuals with the characteristic, we need to use the normal distribution. We can use the sample proportion p-hat and the population proportion p to find the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of p-hat.

We are given that n = 200 and p-hat = 0.58. The population proportion p is not given, so we will assume it to be 0.5 (which is a common assumption when the population proportion is unknown).

The mean of the sampling distribution of p-hat is:

μp-hat = p = 0.5

The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of p-hat is:

σp-hat = sqrt[p(1-p)/n] = sqrt[(0.5)(0.5)/200] = 0.0354

Now we can standardize the value of x using the formula:

z = (x - μp-hat) / σp-hat

For x = 116, we have:

z = (116 - 100*0.58) / 0.0354 = 1.69

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability of obtaining z ≤ 1.69 to be 0.9535. Therefore, the probability of obtaining x = 116 or fewer individuals with the characteristic is approximately 0.9535 (rounded to four decimal places).

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply each side by the denominator

The conditions required for the normal approximation to the binomial are met. The test statistic is -2.26. The critical value is z = ±1.28. There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

The normal approximation to the binomial can be used if the conditions are met. In this case, the conditions are met since both np^ and n(1 - p^) are greater than 10, where n is the sample size and p^ is the sample proportion. Therefore, the normal approximation can be used.

To calculate the test statistic, we need to find the z-score. The formula for the z-score is (p^ - p) / sqrt(p(1 - p) / n), where p is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis. Substituting the given values, we have (0.775 - 0.85) / sqrt(0.85(1 - 0.85) / 120) ≈ -2.26.

To determine the critical value(s) for the hypothesis test, we need to find the z-score corresponding to the significance level α. Since α = 0.2, the critical value is z = ±1.28.

Based on the test statistic of -2.26, we can see that it falls in the rejection region beyond the critical value of -1.28. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.

In summary, the test statistic is approximately -2.26, the critical value is ±1.28, and we reject the null hypothesis at the given level of significance.

Learn more about normal approximation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31186669

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

so, what are we supposed to do with that ?

you forgot to tell us that.

adding them ?

transforming then into expressions of x and y ?

... ?

The magnitude of the projection of f1 onto the line of action of f2 is 5.55.

The magnitude of the projection of f1 onto the line of action of f2 can be calculated using the dot product of the two vectors. The dot product is given by the formula:

f1 • f2 = |f1| |f2| cos θ

Where f1 • f2 is the dot product of f1 and f2, |f1| and |f2| are the magnitudes of f1 and f2 respectively, and θ is the angle between the two vectors.

To find the magnitude of the projection, we need to find the dot product of f1 and f2 and divide it by the magnitude of f2. The magnitude of the projection is given by:

Magnitude of the projection = (f1 • f2) / |f2|

Let's calculate it step by step:

Step 1: Calculate the dot product of f1 and f2:
f1 • f2 = (3.8 * 9.3) + (6.3 * 3.0) = 35.34 + 18.9 = 54.24

Step 2: Calculate the magnitude of f2:
|f2| = √(9.3^2 + 3.0^2) = √(86.49 + 9) = √95.49 = 9.772

Step 3: Calculate the magnitude of the projection:
Magnitude of the projection = (f1 • f2) / |f2| = 54.24 / 9.772 = 5.55

Therefore, the magnitude of the projection of f1 onto the line of action of f2 is 5.55.

To know more about projection refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32619127

#SPJ11

Approximate value of y when x=1 is 2 (based on the given model and parameter estimates). Therefore, the answer is option b.

To predict the value of the y variable when x=1 using the given model and parameter estimates, we substitute the values into the equation:

y = β + β ln(x) + u

Given parameter estimates:

β1 = 2

β2 = 1

Substituting x=1 into the equation:

y = 2 + 2 ln(1) + u

Since ln(1) is equal to 0, the equation simplifies to:

y = 2 + 0 + u

y = 2 + u

As we don't have information about the value of the error term u, we can't provide an exact value for y when x=1. However, we can say that the approximate value of y when x=1 is 2, based on the given model and parameter estimates. Therefore, the answer is option b.

Learn more about variable here: https://brainly.com/question/16906863

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hope that answers your question, good luck in the future

Answer:

492.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

----------------------

General equation for inverse variation is:

Find the value of k by substituting values of x and y:

Substitute the value of k to get the equation:

Answer:

it needed your to focus on school work , homework and work hard to make yourself feel ready

The surface area of the cuboid is 3.286 cm²

A cuboid is a solid shape or a three-dimensional shape.

Surface area is the amount of space covering the outside of a three-dimensional shape.

The surface area of a cuboid is expressed as;

SA = 2( lb + lh + bh)

length = 1 2/5 = 7/5

breadth = 5/8

height = 3/8

lb = 7/5 × 5/8 = 7/8

bh = 5/8 × 3/8 = 15/64

lh = 7/5 × 3/8 = 21/40

surface area =2( 7/8 + 15/64+21/40)

= 2( 0.875 + 0.234 + 0.525)

= 2( 1.634)

= 3.268 cm²

The surface area of the cuboid is 3.268 cm²

learn more about surface area of cuboid from

https://brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

Answer:

y = 3/4x + 9/4

Step-by-step explanation:

(1,3) and (-3,0)

to find the slope of the line we use the formula of finding the difference of the y-values over the difference of the x-values

slope ('m') = \(\frac{(3-0)}{(1-(-3))}\)

m = 3/4

now we can use the slope-intercept form of a line to find the y-intercept:

y = mx + b

'x' and 'y' are values from a given point, 'm' is the slope, and 'b' is the y-intercept

3 = 3/4(1) + b

3 - 3/4 = b

2 1/4 = b  Always put slope in a/b form

9/4 = b

The greatest common factor (MFC) of 12 and 16 is 4. By both the prime factorization method and the common divisors method.

To find the greatest common factor (MFC) of 12 and 16, we can use different methods, such as the prime factorization method or the common divisors method.

Decomposition into prime factors:

First, we break the numbers 12 and 16 into prime factors:

12 = 2*2*3

16 = 2*2*2*2

Then, we look for the common factors in both decompositions:

Common factors: 2 * 2 = 4

Therefore, the MFC of 12 and 16 is 4.

Common Divisors Method:

Another method to find the MFC of 12 and 16 is to identify the common divisors and select the largest one.

Divisors of 12: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12

Divisors of 16: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16

We note that the common divisors are 1, 2, and 4. The largest of these is 4.

Therefore, the MFC of 12 and 16 is 4.

In summary, the greatest common factor (MFC) of 12 and 16 is 4. By both the prime factorization method and the common divisors method, we find that the number 4 is the greatest factor that both numbers have in common.

for more such question on factorization visit

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ8

The equilibrium steady-state solution is T = 72. This means that when the temperature is 72 degrees Fahrenheit, there is no change over time (T' = 0).

I can describe how to sketch the direction field for Newton's Law of Cooling and state the equilibrium steady-state solution.

To sketch the direction field for Newton's Law of Cooling, which is given by the differential equation T'(t) = -0.04(T - 72), you can follow these steps:

1. Choose a range for the values of T. For example, you can choose T values from 50 to 100.

2. Choose a range for the values of t. For example, you can choose t values from 0 to 10.

3. Divide the range of T values into a grid with horizontal lines representing different T values.

4. Divide the range of t values into a grid with vertical lines representing different t values.

5. At each intersection point of the grid lines, calculate the value of T'(t) using the given differential equation.

6. Draw a small line segment with an arrowhead at each intersection point. The direction of the line segment represents the direction of T'(t) at that point. If T'(t) is positive, the line segment points upward; if T'(t) is negative, the line segment points downward.

7. Repeat this process for each intersection point on the grid, covering the entire range of T and t values.

The equilibrium steady-state solution occurs when the temperature T remains constant over time, meaning that T'(t) = 0. In this case, we can set the right-hand side of the differential equation equal to zero:

-0.04(T - 72) = 0

Solving this equation, we find:

T - 72 = 0

T = 72

Therefore, the equilibrium steady-state solution is T = 72. This means that when the temperature is 72 degrees Fahrenheit, there is no change over time (T' = 0).

Learn more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/32538700

#SPJ11

Answer:

9√5 or ≈ 20.12

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the Pythagorean Theorem, which states that c² = a² + b², you can plug in values where x is c or the hypotenuse.

x² = 18² + 9²

x² = 324 + 81

x² = 405

Then, square root to find x.

x = √81 * 5

Take out the 9

x = 9√5 (≈ 20.12)

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Answer is 3.398

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve by putting into calculator.

For each of the given models, we will calculate the long-run effect of a one-time, one unit jump in xt​ on y.

a) The long-run effect of xt​ on y in Model 3a is 1.2.

b) The long-run effect of xt​ on y in Model 3b is 0.6.

c) The long-run effect of xt​ on y in Model 3c is not directly identifiable.

In Model 3a, the coefficient of xt​ is 1.2. This means that a one unit increase in xt​ leads to a 1.2 unit increase in y in the long run. The coefficient represents the long-run effect because it captures the average change in y when xt​ changes by one unit, holding other variables constant.

In Model 3b, the coefficient of xt​ is 0.6. This means that a one unit increase in xt​ leads to a 0.6 unit increase in y in the long run. The presence of the lagged variable xt−1​ suggests that there might be some dynamics at play, but in the long run, the effect of the current value of xt​ on y is 0.6.

In Model 3c, there is a feedback loop as yt−1​ appears on the right-hand side. This makes it difficult to isolate the direct long-run effect of xt​ on y. The coefficient of xt​, which is 0.6, represents the contemporaneous effect, but it does not capture the long-run effect alone. To quantify the long-run effect, additional techniques such as dynamic simulations or instrumental variable approaches may be required.

To know more about long-run effect, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32026982#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The inequality 7x < 50 can be used to answer questions that involve finding the maximum value of x that satisfies the inequality. Specifically, we can solve this inequality to find the largest value of x such that 7x is less than 50.

For example, if x represents the number of hours you can work in a week and you are paid $7 per hour, then 7x represents your weekly earnings. If you want to earn less than $50 per week, the inequality 7x < 50 would be relevant. Solving this inequality would tell you the maximum number of hours you can work per week to earn less than $50.

Another example could be finding the maximum number of items you can purchase if each item costs $7 or less and you have $50 to spend. In this case, x would represent the number of items you can purchase, and 7x represents the total cost of the items. Solving the inequality 7x < 50 would give you the maximum number of items you can purchase while spending less than $50.

So, the question that can be answered by solving the inequality 7x < 50 depends on the context in which it is being used.

Learn more about Inequalities here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

Answer:

-5/2

Step-by-step explanation:

it not any of the rest if you have more questions just comment

The solutions to the equations are

1. x = 4

2. x = -12

3. x = 0 and x = 4

The solutions to the inequalities are

4. -5 < x < 1

5. x ≤ -3 and x ≥ 4

From the question, we have the following equations

1. 4x + 6 = 8x - 10

2. -3/4x - 2 = -1/2x + 1

3. |4 - 2x| + 5 = 9

Next, we split the equations to 2

So, we have

1. y = 4x + 6 and y = 8x - 10

2. y = -3/4x - 2 and y = -1/2x + 1

3. y = |4 - 2x| + 5 and y = 9

Next, we plot the system of equations (see attachment) and write out the solutions

The solutions are

1. x = 4

2. x = -12

3. x = 0 and x = 4

From the question, we have the following inequalities

4. x² + 4x - 5 < 0

5. x² - x - 12 ≥ 0

Next, we plot the system of inequalities (see attachment) and write out the solutions

The solutions are

4. -5 < x < 1

5. x ≤ -3 and x ≥ 4

Read more about equations at

https://brainly.com/question/148035

#SPJ4

The unit m/s represents the speed of light. Therefore, the units of the right-hand side of the equation prove that the speed of light is represented in the equation.

The equation mentioned in the question is as follows; The SI units of magnetic permeability and permittivity of free space are Henry/meter and farad/meter respectively. In order to prove that the units given by the right-hand side of the equation are m/s, we need to perform the following steps: Substitute the values of magnetic permeability and permittivity of free space in the equation. Let's substitute µ0 and ε0 values in the above equation, we get; In order to perform this step, we need to know the units of each component in the equation. A unit of force is Newton, and a unit of charge is Coulomb. A magnetic field has the unit Tesla. Let's find out the units of the right-hand side component of the above equation. We can now rearrange the equation to make it simpler.!)

The unit m/s represents the speed of light. Therefore, the units of the right-hand side of the equation prove that the speed of light is represented in the equation.

To know more about equation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Answer:

10% is the answer to this question

7 workstations will be needed to complete the 24 separate tasks.To determine the number of workstations needed, we can divide the total task time by the cycle time.

In this case, the total task time is 14 minutes and the cycle time is 2 minutes.
Number of workstations needed = Total task time / Cycle time
Substituting the given values:

Number of workstations needed = 14 minutes / 2 minutes
This simplifies to:
Number of workstations needed = 7

To know more about workstations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13085870

#SPJ11

Answer:

Three points determine a plane.

:)

Answer:

Three

Step-by-step explanation:

In ridge regression, the penalty strength parameter, represented by \lambda», controls the trade-off between fitting the training data well and keeping the model coefficients small.

When a very large penalty strength is chosen, it results in a higher degree of shrinkage of the regression coefficients towards zero. This means that the model becomes less complex and less likely to overfit the training data. However, it also means that the model may become too biased towards the null hypothesis, leading to underfitting and decreased predictive power. Therefore, choosing the right value of \lambdaλ is crucial for achieving optimal performance in ridge regression.
In ridge regression, choosing a very large λ (lambda) penalty strength results in a higher regularization effect, which helps to reduce overfitting by shrinking the coefficients of the independent variables towards zero. This helps to create a more generalized model by controlling the complexity of the model. However, choosing a λ value that is too large can also result in underfitting, as the model may become too simple to capture the underlying relationships in the data effectively.

Visit here to learn more about ridge regression:

brainly.com/question/31436095

#SPJ11

Among the options presented, working for a good cause can be considered a non-monetary benefit, as it provides personal satisfaction and a sense of purpose.

So, the correct answer is C.

A 401(k) plan (D) is a clear monetary benefit, as it offers a retirement savings plan with tax advantages.

An hourly wage gap (A) is not a benefit, but rather a potential issue in income inequality.

While an office in a great neighborhood (B) may contribute to overall job satisfaction, it is not directly considered a job benefit in the traditional sense.

Hence the answer of the question is C.

Learn more about job benefits at

https://brainly.com/question/1975438

#SPJ11