Solve the following boundary value problem. If there is no solution, write None for your answer. y" - 3y = 0; y(0) = 6 - 6e³; y(1) = 0

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability that both responses are correct in percentage is found as 8.33%.

A multiple-choice question having three alternative responses can be found in the quiz.

four-option multiple-choice question

In the opening query;

Each of the three options has a 1/3 chance of being selected.

Regarding the second query:

Each of the four options has a 1/4 chance of being selected.

1/4

Calculating the likelihood that both answers are accurate;

1/3* 1/4 =1/12

According to a percentage

1/12 * 100= 8.33%

Thus, the probability that both responses are correct in percentage is found as 8.33%.

Know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The complete question is-

A quick quiz consists of a multiple-choice question with 3 possible answers followed by a multiple-choice question with 4 possible answers. If both questions are answered with random guesses, find the probability that both responses are correct.

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

Horizontal lines have ZERO slope

Vertical lines have 'undefined' slope

for this example  x = 1/2    includes the point and has undiefined slope

Yes, the equation is true for Distributive Property: (x+y)(x' + z)(y+z) = (x+y)(x' + z).

To understand why the equation is true, let's break it down step by step.

The equation contains two sets of parentheses. Applying the distributive property, we can expand the first set of parentheses, (x+y), to get x(x' + z) + y(x' + z). This gives us two terms: the first term is x times (x' + z), and the second term is y times (x' + z).

Now, we need to apply the distributive property again to expand the second set of parentheses, (x' + z), within each term we obtained in Step 1. This results in four terms: (x * x') + (x * z) + (y * x') + (y * z).

Simplifying the equation, we can combine like terms. The terms (x * x') and (y * x') both involve the multiplication of x' (the complement of x), so they can be written as x' and y' respectively.

Similarly, the terms (x * z) and (y * z) both involve the multiplication of z, so they can be written as z. Combining these simplified terms, we get x' + z + y' + z, which can be further simplified as x' + y' + 2z.

Therefore, the simplified equation is (x+y)(x' + z)(y+z) = (x+y)(x' + z) = x' + y' + 2z.

Learn more about  Distributive Property

brainly.com/question/30321732

#SPJ11

Proportion of non-vaccinated individuals = Number not vaccinated / Total number of individuals = 100 / 500 = 0.2

To solve this problem, we need to calculate the proportions of each group based on the total number of individuals.

The total number of individuals in all three groups is given as 500. We can calculate the proportions as follows:

Proportion of vaccinated individuals = Number vaccinated / Total number of individuals = 150 / 500 = 0.3

Proportion of placebo individuals = Number with placebo / Total number of individuals = 180 / 500 = 0.36

Proportion of non-vaccinated individuals = Number not vaccinated / Total number of individuals = 100 / 500 = 0.2

These proportions represent the distribution of individuals across the three groups in the study.

Learn more about Proportion here

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

A researcher wishes to test the effectiveness of a flu vaccination. 150 people are vaccinated, 180 people are vaccinated with a placebo, and 100 people are not vaccinated. The number in each group who later caught the flu was recorded. The results are shown below.

Vaccinated

Placebo

Control

Caught the flu

8

19

21

Did not catch the flu

142

161

79

Find and interpret the relative risk of catching the flu, comparing those who were vaccinated to those in the control group.

Answer:

1.) Scale factor from the actual flower garden to the scale drawing = 20 : 1

2.) Dimensions of the flower garden in the new scale drawing = 7.5 inches × 11.25 inches

3.) Scale factor from the actual flower garden to the new scale drawing = 8:1

Step-by-step explanation:

Given - Penny’s backyard contains a flower garden. The dimensions of the

             actual garden are 5 feet by 7½ feet. A scale drawing of the flower

             garden is 3 inches by 4.5 inches.

To find - 1. What is the scale factor from the actual flower garden to the

                  scale drawing?

              2. If the drawing is enlarged by a scale factor of 5/2, what would    

                  be the dimensions of the flower garden in the new scale

                  drawing?

              3. What is the scale factor from the actual flower garden to the

                   new scale drawing?

Proof -

As we know that,

1 feet = 12 inches

⇒5 feet  = 5×12 = 60 inches

  7½ (= \(\frac{15}{2}\)) feet = \(\frac{15}{2}\)×12 = 90 inches

∴ we get

The dimensions of the actual garden is 60 inches by 90 inches.

1.)

As,

\(\frac{60}{3} = \frac{20}{1} = 20 : 1\)

\(\frac{90}{4.5} = \frac{900}{45} =\frac{20}{1} = 20 : 1\)

So,

Scale factor from the actual flower garden to the scale drawing = 20 : 1

2.)

As given,  If the drawing is enlarged by a scale factor of 5/2

⇒Dimensions of flower garden = 3×\(\frac{5}{2}\) inches by \(4.5 (\frac{5}{2})\) inches

                                                    = 7.5 inches by 11.25 inches

∴ we get

Dimensions of the flower garden in the new scale drawing = 7.5 inches × 11.25 inches

3.)

Scale factor from the actual flower garden to the new scale drawing = \(\frac{60}{7.5}\) = \(\frac{600}{75} = \frac{8}{1} = 8 : 1\)

A consumer loan of $40,000 with a 15.8% interest rate will require monthly payments over a period of 2 years. The total amount to be paid, including both principal and interest, will be approximately $45,380.

To calculate the monthly payments, we need to determine the total amount to be paid over the loan period, including the principal amount and the interest. The formula used for calculating equal monthly installments is:

M = P * (r * (1 + r)^n) / ((1 + r)^n - 1)

Where:

M = Monthly payment

P = Principal amount

r = Monthly interest rate

n = Number of monthly payments

In this case, the principal amount (P) is $40,000, the interest rate (r) is 15.8% per year, and the loan duration (n) is 2 years (24 months).

First, we convert the annual interest rate to a monthly rate by dividing it by 12: 15.8% / 12 = 0.0132.

Next, we substitute the values into the formula:

M = 40,000 * (0.0132 * (1 + 0.0132)^24) / ((1 + 0.0132)^24 - 1)

Calculating this formula gives us the monthly payment (M) of approximately $1,907.42.

To find the total amount to be paid, we multiply the monthly payment by the number of payments: $1,907.42 * 24 = $45,778.08. However, this includes both the principal and the interest. Subtracting the principal amount ($40,000) gives us the total interest paid: $45,778.08 - $40,000 = $5,778.08.

Therefore, the total amount to be paid, including both principal and interest, will be approximately $45,778.08.

To learn more about interest click here: brainly.com/question/30393144

#SPJ11

Answer:

Sure, here are the numbers arranged from greatest to least

Step-by-step explanation:

Order from greatest to least

1.3, 4.5%, 1/3, -4/5, -0.04, -21.5%

Answer:

From the greatest to least

Step-by-step explanation:

1.3, 4.5%, 1/3, -4/5, -0.04, -21.5%

You can identify which number is greater than other by using a number line.

What is a number line?

A number line is what a math student can use to find the answer to addition and subtraction questions. A straight line, theoretically extending to infinity in both positive and negative directions from zero, that shows the relative order of the real numbers.

Hope this helps :)

Pls Brainliest...

Answer: First, we need to convert the capacity of the fish tank from liters to milliliters since the jug size is given in milliliters.

60 liters = 60,000 milliliters

Next, we need to calculate the volume of water that is already in the tank up to the 4cm mark from the top. Let's assume the tank is a rectangular prism with a length of L, width of W, and height of H. Then, the volume of water up to the 4cm mark can be calculated as:

Volume of water = Length x Width x Height of water level

Volume of water = L x W x (H - 4)

Assuming the tank has a uniform cross-section, we can use the fact that the height of the water level is proportional to the volume of water. That is, if the water level is halfway up the tank, then the volume of water is half the total capacity of the tank.

Let's say the water level is at a height of h from the bottom of the tank. Then, the volume of water in the tank is:

Volume of water = (h / H) x 60,000 mL

We want to solve for h, the height of the water level when it is 4cm from the top. We know that the height of the tank is H, so we can set up a proportion:

(h / H) x 60,000 mL = (H - 4 cm) x L x W

Solving for h, we get:

h = [(H - 4 cm) x L x W x 60,000 mL] / [H x L x W]

h = 59,960 / H

Now, we can calculate the amount of water Lily needs to add to the tank to fill it up to the 4cm mark from the top:

Amount of water needed = 60,000 mL - Volume of water up to 4cm mark

Amount of water needed = 60,000 mL - [(H - 4 cm) x L x W]

We can now calculate the number of jugs of water Lily needs to use by dividing the amount of water needed by the capacity of each jug:

Number of jugs needed = Amount of water needed / 2000 mL

Number of jugs needed = [60,000 mL - (H - 4 cm) x L x W] / 2000 mL

Note that the number of jugs needed will depend on the dimensions of the tank and the height of the water level.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Points:

The distance:

Sides of the triangle are 5

Answer:

(5 , 0)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

same

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum of f(x) is 8 because it's written in vertex notation. From the graph, g(x)'s maximum is 8 so the answer is that they have the same maximum.

A. Manager A wants the decision to be 0.4, so they would recommend a decision of 0.4 to the principal.

B. The recommendations in the Nash equilibrium would be rA = 0.4 and rB = 0.7.

(a) If Manager B always truthfully reports the state of the economy (s = 0.7), Manager A would send a recommendation that minimizes their disutility Ua. In this case, Manager A wants the decision to be 0.4, so they would recommend a decision of 0.4 to the principal.

(b) In a Nash equilibrium, both managers strategically make their recommendations based on their own utility. Manager A wants to minimize their disutility Ua, which increases as the decision deviates from 0.4. Manager B wants to minimize their disutility UB, which increases as the decision deviates from 0.7.

To find the Nash equilibrium, we need to consider the recommendations made by both managers simultaneously. Let's denote the recommendations as rA (from Manager A) and rB (from Manager B). The principal's decision, d, would be the average of the recommendations, so d = (rA + rB) / 2.

Given that both managers strategically choose their recommendations, they will aim to minimize their disutility. In this case, Manager A would recommend a decision of 0.4 (as it minimizes Ua), and Manager B would recommend a decision of 0.7 (as it minimizes UB). Therefore, the recommendations in the Nash equilibrium would be rA = 0.4 and rB = 0.7.

Learn more about   Nash equilibrium  from

https://brainly.com/question/34120544

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equation

Solving for x

Let's see what the division method gives

No solution. This method proves to be incorrect.

Answer:2

Step-by-step explana2tion:

AS]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: Find the area of the lot and the house and subtract the area of the house from the area of the lot,

Lot = 50 x 33 = 1650 square m.

House = 25 x 9 = 225 square m.

Left over = 1800 - 279 = 1425 square m.

In total, there are 5 non-congruent triangles with integer sides that have a perimeter of 12.

The number of such non-congruent triangles can be found by considering all possible combinations of sides that add up to 12.

We can start by finding all possible combinations of two sides, and then adding the third side to make the perimeter equal to 12.

For example, for the two sides with lengths 1 and 11, the third side must be equal to 0, which is not allowed in a triangle.

The combinations of two sides are:

(1, 11), (2, 10), (3, 9), (4, 8), (5, 7), (6, 6).

For the combination (1, 11), the third side cannot be greater than 10, so it is not a valid triangle.

For the combination (2, 10), the third side can have lengths 0, 1, or 2, but none of these values result in a valid triangle.

For the combination (3, 9), the third side can have length 0, 1, 2, or 3. The only value that results in a valid triangle is 3, so there is 1 such triangle.

For the combination (4, 8), the third side can have length 0, 1, 2, or 4. The only value that results in a valid triangle is 4, so there is 1 such triangle.

For the combination (5, 7), the third side can have length 0, 1, 2, 3, or 5. The only value that results in a valid triangle is 5, so there is 1 such triangle.

For the combination (6, 6), the third side can have length 0 or 6. The only value that results in a valid triangle is 6, so there is 1 such triangle.

For more questions on Permutation and Combination

https://brainly.com/question/26852614

#SPJ4

Answer:

2.4 bracelets per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

24 bracelet/ 10 hrs

2.4 bracelets per hour

Answer:

2.4 an hour

Step-by-step explanation:

The total weight of 8 people to be more than 1500 pounds less than 20% of the time.

The new science and math building on campus has four elevators each designed to carry a maximum 8 people.

A building safety study has found that the combined weight of 8 people can be modeled by normal distribution with mean of 1400 pounds and a standard deviation of 120 pounds.

Given

mean = 1400

standard deviation = 120

P(X > 1500) = P((x-u)/s > (1500 - 1400)/120)

= P(z > 0.83)

= 0.2032694 [since from z table]

= 0.2033

= 20%

So we would expect the total weight of 8 people to be more than 1500 pounds less than 20% of the time.

Hence the answer is the total weight of 8 people to be more than 1500 pounds less than 20% of the time.

To learn more about weight click here https://brainly.com/question/2335828

#SPJ4

The sketch of the function z = 6 − 2x − 3y is illustrated below graph.

The term in math called function is defined as special relationship where each input has a single output.

Here we have the function as z = 6 − 2x − 3y

Now, we have to plot the function into graph.

In order to plot the graph, first we have to identify the variable in the function here in the function we have 3 variable. then we plot the graph on the 3 dimensional plane.

If you want to understand how to draw 3−D plot, then assume one of the coordinate is zero and draw line of remaining two coordinate,

In a similarly draw for other two coordinates too, you will get purview of

3−D plot of that function that has been look like as follows.

To knw more about function here.

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

\(2,000lb < 1 t\)

Step-by-step explanation:

1 Ton = 2,240 lb

If cholesterol level were changed to being measured in grams instead of milligrams, the correlation between fat content and cholesterol level would not be affected.

This is because correlation is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, and converting the units of measurement does not change the underlying relationship between the variables. So, the correlation coefficient of 0.75 would remain the same whether cholesterol level is measured in milligrams or grams.

The correlation between fat content and cholesterol level for the 20 different brands of American cheese slices is 0.75. If you change the measurement of cholesterol level from milligrams to grams (1 gram = 1000 milligrams), it will not affect the correlation. The correlation coefficient will remain 0.75, as it is unit-less and only represents the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables.

Visit here to learn more about correlation coefficient  : https://brainly.com/question/27226153
#SPJ11

Answer: (-2+√5), (-2-√5)

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Reference the formula: [(-b±(√b^2-4ac))/2a]

2. Plug in the values from the equation: [(-4±(√16+4))/2]

3. Simplify: [(-4±(√20))/2]

4. Simplify the root: [(-4±(2√5))/2]

5. Simplify the fraction: [-2±√5]

6. There's your answer: (-2+√5), (-2-√5)

Answer:

x = 2.25

Step-by-step explanation:

-3x + 10 = 5x - 8

add 3 to 5x, add 8 to 10

18 = 8x

divide 18 by 8

x = 18/8 = 2.25

Answer: Please adjust the 37. The answer would be 40.

Step-by-step explanation:

23 + 17 obviously equals 40.

We have to determine whether the given series converges or diverges. The given series is as follows: `(n+4)! / 4!(n!)` Let's use the ratio test to find out if this series converges or diverges.

The Ratio Test: It is one of the tests that can be used to determine whether a series is convergent or divergent. It compares each term in the series to the term before it. We can use the ratio test to determine the convergence or divergence of series that have positive terms only. Here, a series `Σan` is convergent if and only if the limit of the ratio test is less than one, and it is divergent if and only if the limit of the ratio test is greater than one or infinity. The ratio test is inconclusive if the limit is equal to one. The limit of the ratio test is `lim n→∞ |(an+1)/(an)|` Let's apply the Ratio test to the given series.

`lim n→∞ [(n+5)! / 4!(n+1)!] * [n!(n+1)] / (n+4)!` `lim n→∞ [(n+5)/4] * [1/(n+1)]` `lim n→∞ [(n^2 + 9n + 20) / 4(n^2 + 5n + 4)]` `lim n→∞ (n^2 + 9n + 20) / (4n^2 + 20n + 16)`

As we can see, the limit exists and is equal to 1/4. We can say that the given series converges. The series converges. To determine the convergence of the given series, we use the ratio test. The ratio test is a convergence test for infinite series. It works by computing the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms of a series. A series converges if the limit of this ratio is less than one, and it diverges if the limit is greater than one or does not exist. In the given series `(n+4)! / 4!(n!)`, the ratio test can be applied. Using the ratio test, we get: `

lim n→∞ |(an+1)/(an)| = lim n→∞ [(n+5)! / 4!(n+1)!] * [n!(n+1)] / (n+4)!` `= lim n→∞ [(n+5)/4] * [1/(n+1)]` `= lim n→∞ [(n^2 + 9n + 20) / 4(n^2 + 5n + 4)]` `= 1/4`

Since the limit of the ratio test is less than one, the given series converges.

The series converges to some finite value, which means that it has a sum that can be calculated. Therefore, the answer is a).

To learn more about ratio test visit:

brainly.com/question/31856271

#SPJ11

The equivalent expression is (2x - 1)(3x - 5)

From the information given, we have the quadratic equation written as;

6x² - 13x + 5

Using factorization, we have that;

Find the product of the coefficient of x squared and the constant.

Then, find the pair factor of the product that add up to -13

We have;

6x² - 10x - 3x + 5

Group the expression in pairs, we get;

2x(3x - 5) - 1(3x - 5)

Then, we have the expression, we have;

(2x - 1)(3x - 5)

Learn more about quadratic equation at: https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the first angle = x

Let the second angle = y

They are complementary so

x + y = 90

x = y + 30

Substitute for x

y + 30 + y = 90

2y + 30 = 90             Subtract 30 from each side

2y = 90 - 30

2y = 60                     Divide by 2

2y/2 = 60/2          

y = 30

x = y + 30

x = 30 + 30

x = 60