Statistics show that drivers who text while driving spend what percentage of time driving in the wrong lane

Answer: A; premium

Explanation: Just did it on A pex

The monthly cost of the receiver's insurance coverage is called a premium. Hence the option A is correct.

A premium is an amount to be paid to the insurance policy and is a sum that isn addd to the ordinary price or change.

The premium is price that is for above and beyound some basic or internsic value. It may be the price to protect form the hazard or loss. The pemium is derived form a latin word that means prize.

Find out more infirmaion about the premium.

brainly.com/question/25280754

In a cause of action for negligence, the plaintiff must establish the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. Next, the plaintiff must show that the defendant has breached the duty of care.

A duty of care is a fiduciary obligation held by corporate directors that calls on them to uphold a particular standard of care. People must make decisions in accordance with this moral and legal obligation while using reasonable prudence. These persons must make business judgments with utmost prudence in order to fulfil their fiduciary obligation.

If the duty of care is not upheld, shareholders or clients may take legal action. The duty of loyalty, which is the other main fiduciary obligation in addition to the duty of care, tries to stop directors from seeking to act against the company's best interests.

Learn more about the duty of care, here:

https://brainly.com/question/24004634

#SPJ1

Answer:

you take from me

ghdhdhdufufuufuf

TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are  Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.

Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.

Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.

It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.

Learn more about  tax loopholes

https://brainly.com/question/7227568

#SPJ11

Answer:

As a policy to reduce racial profiling during parades and frisks, it would create a system whereby the imputation of a certain ethnic minority (African-American, Latino, Asian, etc.) should be carried out with the presence of at least one witness and one member. police belonging to said minority, who can attest that the situation attributed to the person is real. Thus, for example, if a firearm or drugs is found in a routine search carried out on an African American, this situation must be corroborated by a witness and an African American policeman. This would create a framework of legitimacy for police action, since their procedures would not be classified as racial profiling, but would be much more transparent given the presence of people from the same ethnic group corroborating the criminal situation.

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

A contract is a signed agreement between an employer and an employee stating various ground rules as terms of employment. This is a signed and official documentation that holds both parties in an agreement.

An implied contract, on the other hand, is not a written or verbally spoken contract but is based on the actions of the parties involved. It is still legally binding and is a form of agreement between the concerned parties. And so, it can also be a result of any statements found in an employee's handbook or other employment documents.

Thus, the answer is true.

A conditional sentence is a sentence that allows an offender to serve their sentence in the community, rather than in jail.

A sentence is a group of words that expresses a complete thought. It typically contains a subject and a verb and conveys a statement, question, command, or exclamation.

In order to impose a conditional sentence, the sentencing judge must first decide that a jail sentence of less than two years is appropriate for the offence, and then must determine that the sentence can be served in the community in a way that is consistent with the fundamental purpose and principles of sentencing. This two-stage process ensures that an offender is not given a sentence that is too lenient for the offence and that the sentence is in line with the overarching principles of criminal justice.

To learn more about sentence
https://brainly.com/question/28143259
#SPJ1

A.

Since you’re NOT fit to drive, it means it is better to stay off the road according to the law.

Hope this helps and Id love a brainliest :))

An automobile driver is responsible for the handling of the vehicle on the road, and if one is not fit to drive than he may stay off the road.

The driver drives the vehicle at the road and thereby is responsible for the handling of the vehicle along with the safety of the individuals.

A good driver must be disciplined, have the knowledge, skilled, alert, responsible and have mechanical skills to deal with the automobile.

If an individual is not fit to drive he may stay off the road as it may cause harm to others. Thus, option A is correct.

Learn more about driving, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2619161

#SPJ2

Four justices are required for a case to proceed to a hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus, option C is correct.

The supreme court of the United States operates with the Nine justices. These nine justices are selected by the President of the U.S. and they will be confirmed by the Senate of the court. They can serve for their lifetime and they can resign at any time or until removed from court.

In the Supreme Court of the U.S., only four justices are required to grant a writ of certiorari. This writ of certiorari is an order in which Supreme Court reviews all the cases from the lower court and gives the better decision.

To learn more about Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/31146664

#SPJ4

Answer:

i think it is B I'm not sure

Discussion, projects, campaigns, and events provide a supportive base for the victims of GBV by creating awareness and platforms for voicing out grievances.

GBV means gender-based violence.

GBV refers to the physical, s-xual, mental, or economic harm inflicted on a person because of socially ascribed power imbalances between males and females.

All GBV activities are human rights violations.

Thus, by spreading awareness, communicating gender-based violence, and giving the victims a platform to report their grievances and get mass support, discussions, projects, campaigns, and events support victims of GBV.

Learn more about GBV at https://brainly.com/question/16923564

#SP J1

The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.

Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.

The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.

To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961368

#SPJ4

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

a. cases from other jurisdictions.

b. social values and customs.

c. public policy.

d. survey data from the local community.

Answer:

d. survey data from the local community.

Explanation:

If there was no such case, previously in the city, it is not possible that there is relevant local research data in the community to help the case unfold, since the community has no background on this matter. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for the judge to consider these data, in addition to that it would show his unpreparedness to deal with this type of situation.

Answer:

conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.

Does this help?

A Direct Examination occurs when Bibi’s attorney asks questions of Bibi’s witness Drummond during the trial.

The party who called the witness to the stand will ask them their first questions during the Direct Examination, while the opposing party (in this case, Cocteau) will ask questions during the Cross-Examination to expose any flaws in the claim of the witness.

For additional information, since Voir Dire is a formal examination specifically designed to ascertain a witness' qualifications as a proposed witness and to ascertain a witness' or juror's competency, when a Bibi's attorney questions Bibi's witness, that is not "to speak the truth" or Voir Dire.

Find out what happens when a lawyer attempt to undermine a witness’s credibility during a portion of the trial: https://brainly.com/question/4710125

#SPJ4

In writing Paragraphs, you must consider the structure of the Paragraphs. Paragraphs contain three main parts:

Generally, The cornerstones of American foreign policy are advancing democracy, freedom, and the protection of human rights throughout the world.

The principles upon which the United States was established more than two centuries ago are consistent with those enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international and regional agreements.

The President of the United States sets foreign policy in accordance with the Constitution. The President's top foreign policy advisor is the Secretary of State, who was chosen by the President with Senate advice and consent.

The United States' behavior toward other nations is referred to as its foreign policy. Setting out how American organizations, businesses, and individuals should behave toward other nations is another aspect of U.S. foreign policy.

Read more about foreign policy

https://brainly.com/question/27950081

#SPJ1

Answer:

It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!

Explanation:

It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.

Answer:

Please if you want to get the answer correctly and understanding, check your question first.

Answer:

its a

Explanation:

Answer: A. The electrical force is reduced.

From the above experiment, the number of vehicles or drivers showing a proper right turn signal are 150.

Using the right turn signal is important for several reasons. Firstly, it communicates your intentions to other drivers, alerting them that you intend to turn or change lanes.

This promotes safety and helps prevent accidents.

Also, signaling allows for smoother traffic flow, as other drivers can anticipate your actions and adjust accordingly. It is a fundamental aspect of responsible and courteous driving.

Learn more about driving at:

https://brainly.com/question/1071840

#SPJ1

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

Shirley can purchase insurance to protect Reid's life-sized elephant lawn ornament from loss or damage during shipping, but only if she has a legally recognized insurable interest in the property.

An insurable interest is a financial stake in the property that is being insured, such as ownership or possession of the property. In this case, since the lawn ornament belongs to Reid, Shirley has no insurable interest in it, and therefore she would not be able to purchase insurance to protect it during shipping.

Therefore, while Shirley may admire Reid's use of lawn ornaments, she could not purchase insurance to protect his life-sized elephant lawn ornament during shipping to his friend in another state unless she has a legally recognized insurable interest in the property.

To learn more about insurable interest, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28938508

#SPJ4

The first step in preparation for testifying in court for a law enforcement witness is to review all notes, reports, electronic recordings, and physical evidence prior to testifying.

This step is crucial to refresh the witness's memory and ensure accuracy and completeness in their testimony. By thoroughly reviewing all relevant documentation and evidence related to the case, the law enforcement witness can effectively recall details, accurately answer questions, and provide a comprehensive account of the events or investigation in court.

While it is important to ensure that a complete investigation was conducted and that all investigative leads were followed, these steps are broader aspects of the investigative process and may not be specific to testifying in court. Reviewing all notes, reports, electronic recordings, and physical evidence is the immediate and essential step directly related to preparing for testifying as a law enforcement witness.

To know more about law enforcement

brainly.com/question/29422434

#SPJ11

Answer:

PLease make this the branliest answer!!! Hope this helps, I had the same Homework!

Explanation:

1. Rico's could file a motion claiming that a federal court lacked jurisdiction to hear the dispute, but the motion would likely be denied. Because there appears to be diversity of citizenship in the situation set out here, if the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount, a suit can be filed in a federal district court.

2. Bento's first option might be to file a motion to set aside the verdict and hold a new trial. This motion will be granted if the judge is convinced, after examining the evidence, that the jury was in error (assuming the trial involved a jury) but does not think it appropriate to issue a judgment for Bento's side. Bento's second option would be to appeal the trial court's judgment, including a denial of the motion for a new trial, to the appropriate court of appeals. An appellate court is most likely to review the case for errors in law, not fact. In any case, the appellate court will not hear new evidence.

The military aid provided by the United States included equipment and supplies such as tanks, planes, and ammunition, as well as military training and support. This aid helped the Greek government to resist the communist insurgency and stabilize the country.

President Truman's request for military and financial aid for Greece in 1947 was made in response to a perceived threat from communist forces in the region. The aid package, known as the Truman Doctrine, aimed to support Greece and other European countries that were threatened by Soviet expansionism.

The financial aid provided by the United States was used to support Greece's economy and help the country become more self-sufficient. This aid was used to rebuild infrastructure, improve transportation and communication networks, and provide social services to the Greek people.

To know more about Greek government, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/889089

#SPJ4

Answer:

The PDEA is a regular law enforcement and regulatory agency which is responsible for the efficient and effective law enforcement of all provisions on any dangerous drug and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals.

Explanation:

Tort law is a branch of civil law that deals with civil wrongs and provides remedies for individuals who have been harmed or injured due to the wrongful actions of others.

In tort law, the standard of the "reasonable person" is often used to assess whether a person's conduct or behavior was appropriate or negligent.

The reasonable person standard evaluates whether an individual's actions align with what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances.

It considers factors such as the person's knowledge, experience, and the circumstances surrounding the situation to determine whether their behavior meets the expected standard of care.

By applying the reasonable person standard, tort law aims to establish a benchmark for assessing the conduct of individuals and determining liability for any harm caused.

If a person's actions fall below the standard of a reasonable person and cause harm to another person, they may be held responsible for their negligence or wrongdoing under tort law

To know more about civil law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/493036#

#SPJ11

Answer:

this is correct, is this cyber security or ccna ?

Explanation:

I can provide you with a good content for ccna

An enumerated power is one that is given explicitly by the constitution.

Implied powers are assumed by the exercise of the enumerated powers

This means that the answer is D - Only enumerated powers are directly stated in the US Constitution. This is because, as I mentioned earlier, the enumerated powers are explicitly stated, while Implied powers are outlined and assumed based off the enumerated powers.

I hope I've helped! :)