t t:p3→p3 be the linear transformation satisfying t(1)=2x2+4, t(x)=4x−9, t(x2)=−4x2+x−6. find the image of an arbitrary quadratic polynomial ax2+bx+c. t(ax2+bx+c)= .

it would be 1.56

hope this helps :)

Answer:

1,600 / 1.56

Step-by-step explanation:

Just round the 564 to a 600 :)

or the 4 just *poof*

Answer:

s=6 years

m=48 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

Mother's age=m

Son's age=s

m=8*s

m=8s (1)

m+6=9/2(s+6)

m+6=9/2s+27 (2)

Substitute (1) into (2)

m+6=9/2(s)+27

8s+6=9/2s+27

8s+6-9/2s-27=0

8s-9/2s-21=0

(16-9/2)s-21=0

7/2s=21

s=21÷7/2

=21×2/7

=42/7

s=6

Present age of the son=6

m=8s

=8(6)

m=48

Present age of the mother=48

Answer: True statement

The formula for the phi correlation coefficient was derived from the formula for the Pearson correlation coefficient is True.

Phi correlation coefficient is a statistical coefficient that measures the strength of the association between two categorical variables.

The Phi correlation coefficient was derived from the formula for the Pearson correlation coefficient.

However, it is used to estimate the degree of association between two binary variables, while the Pearson correlation coefficient is used to estimate the strength of the association between two continuous variables.

The correlation coefficient is a statistical concept that measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables.

It ranges from -1 to +1, where -1 indicates a perfectly negative correlation, +1 indicates a perfectly positive correlation, and 0 indicates no correlation.

To learn more about phi correlation coefficient :

https://brainly.com/question/33509980

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) and (b) see diagram

(c) you can see from the graph, the purple line hits the parabola twice which is y=6   or k=6

(d)  Solving simultaneously can mean to set equal

6x - x² = k                        >subtract k from both sides

6x - x² - k = 0                  >put in standard form

- x² + 6x - k = 0               >divide both sides by a -1

x² - 6x + k = 0

(e) The new equation is the same as the original equation just flipped (see image)

(f)  The discriminant is the part of the quadratic equation that is under the root. (not sure if they wanted the discriminant of new equation or orginal.  I chose new)

discriminant formula = b² - 4ac

equation:   x² - 6x + 6 = 0            a = 1      b=-6    c = 6

discriminant = b² - 4ac

discriminant= (-6)² - 4(1)(6)

discriminant = 36-24

discriminant = 12

Because the discriminant is positive, if you put it back in to the quadratic equation, you will get 2 real solutions.

The maximum number of sport drinks that can be purchased is 85.

Since a high school sports team is ordering sports drinks online from a company, and the price of sports drinks varies, based on the number of drinks purchased, and for orders a 50 or fewer sports drinks, the price is $ 0.80 per drink, plus $ 10 shipping and handling, while when more than 50 sports drinks are ordered, the price is $ 0.70 per drink, plus $ 15 shipping and handling, to determine what is the maximum amount of sports drinks you can purchase for $ 75 the following calculation must be performed :

Therefore, the maximum number of sport drinks that can be purchased is 85.

Learn more in https://brainly.com/question/1563742

The ratio of corresponding sides for the given similar triangles is 2/5.

In the given options, the ratio of corresponding sides is provided for each set of similar triangles. Let's analyze each option to determine the correct ratio:

a. 10

This option only provides a single number and does not specify the ratio of corresponding sides. Therefore, it is not the correct answer.

b. 4/5

This option provides the ratio 4/5 for the corresponding sides of the similar triangles. However, the ratio can be simplified further.

To simplify the ratio, we divide both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor (GCD). In this case, the GCD of 4 and 5 is 1.

Dividing 4 and 5 by 1, we get:

4 ÷ 1 = 4

5 ÷ 1 = 5

Therefore, the simplified ratio is 4/5.

c. 10/85

This option provides the ratio 10/85 for the corresponding sides of the similar triangles. However, this ratio cannot be simplified further, as 10 and 85 do not have a common factor other than 1.

Therefore, the correct ratio of corresponding sides for the given similar triangles is 2/5, as determined in option b.

For more such questions on triangles, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/17335144

#SPJ8

The function f(z) is given as z³ - 3z² + 2z. The poles of f(z) are identified as z = 0, 1, and 2, all of which are simple poles. The task is to determine which poles lie within the circle C: |z| = 2.

a) To determine the poles that lie within the circle C: |z| = 2, we need to check which poles have a magnitude less than 2. The poles are z = 0, 1, and 2. Among these, only z = 0 satisfies |z| < 2 since |0| = 0 < 2. Hence, the pole z = 0 lies within the circle C.

b) Residues are a concept used in complex analysis to evaluate the behavior of a function at its singular points, such as poles. The residue at a given pole is the coefficient of the term with (z - z0)^(-1) in the Laurent series expansion of the function around that pole. In simpler terms, the residue measures the "strength" or value of the function at the pole.

To find the residue of f(z) at z = 0, we can consider the Laurent series expansion around z = 0. Since z = 0 is a simple pole, the residue can be directly obtained from the coefficient of (z - 0)^(-1) in the Laurent series. The given function f(z) = z³ - 3z² + 2z can be written as:

f(z) = z³ - 3z² + 2z = (z - 0)^3 - 3(z - 0)^2 + 2(z - 0)

The coefficient of (z - 0)^(-1) is 2. Therefore, Res(f, 0) = 2.

Similarly, to find the residue of f(z) at z = 1, we again consider the Laurent series expansion. However, the coefficient of (z - 1)^(-1) is not readily available in the given form of f(z). To simplify the calculation, we can rewrite f(z) by shifting the variable, substituting z = t + 1. The function becomes:

f(t + 1) = (t + 1)³ - 3(t + 1)² + 2(t + 1)

= t³ + 3t² + 3t + 1 - 3t² - 6t - 3 + 2t + 2

= t³ - t - 2

Now, we can find the residue of f(z) at z = 1 by finding the coefficient of (z - 1)^(-1) in the Laurent series expansion of f(t + 1). In this case, the coefficient is -1. Therefore, Res(f, 1) = -1.In summary, the residue of f(z) at z = 0 is 2, and the residue at z = 1 is -1, as determined using the definition of residues and the Laurent series expansions.

Learn more about the Laurent series here:- brainly.com/question/32512814

#SPJ11

Hey there!

5 (-3 + k) = 20

-15 + 5k = 20

5k = 20 + 15

5k = 35

k = 35 ÷ 5

k = 7

Hope it helps ya!

\(\boxed{\underline{\bf \: ANSWER}}\)

\( \tt \: 5( - 3 + k) = 20 \\ \tt = (5 \times - 3 )+( 5 \times k) \\ = \underline{ \bf{ - 15 + 5k}}\)

Hope it helps!

RainbowSalt2222

Answer:

4 -1

Step-by-step explanation:

just trust me on this one :)

Answer:

c I think that is the answer

Answer:

5=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Use pemdas

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Its D

No, the presence of an effect does not necessarily imply that error variance will go away.

The presence of an effect does not necessarily imply that error variance will go away. In fact, error variance is an inherent part of any statistical model and represents the amount of variation in the response variable that is not explained by the predictor variables.

Even if a predictor variable has a significant effect on the response variable, there may still be some unexplained variation in the response that is attributable to error variance.

It is important to take into account and control for error variance in any statistical analysis, as it can affect the precision and accuracy of the estimates of the model parameters and can also influence the interpretation of the results.

One way to control for error variance is to use appropriate statistical methods, such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression analysis, or other modeling techniques that take into account the variability in the data.

Learn more about error variance

brainly.com/question/31592090

#SPJ11

Answer:

Subtract 75 from both sides.

Answer:

8/9

Step-by-step explanation:

add two fractions, such as 2/9 + 2/3, make sure that the two denominators are the same and then we simply add the numerators.In cases where the denominators are not the same, you would find the lowest common denominator and adjust the fractions to keep them intact.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 /9  + 2 /3 = 8 /9

Result in decimals: 0.88888888888889

Calculation steps:

2 /9  +  2 /3 =  2 /9

+  

2 × 3

3 × 3

=  

2

9

+  

6

9

=  

2 + 6

9

=  

8

9

Further explanation

For the problem:

2

9

+  

2

3

= ?

The Least Common Multiple (LCM) of 9 and 3 is 9. Multiply the numerator and denominator of each fraction by whatever value will result in the denominator of each fraction being equal to the LCM:

2

9

+  

2

3

=  

2

9

+  

2 × 3

3 × 3

=  

2

9

+  

6

9

Now that the fractions have like denominators, add the numerators:

2

9

+  

6

9

=  

2 + 6

9

=  

8

9

The result is:

2

9

+  

2

3

=  

8

9

Yan po correct me if im wrong po.. Salamat po...

Answer:

x = 13, y = -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability of a success can be calculated by dividing the number of successes by the total number of trials.

In this case, the number of successes is the sum of the occurrences of the numbers 0, 1, and 2. These numbers occur with equal probability, so the total number of occurrences of these numbers is:

3 * (1/6) = 1/2

This means that the probability of a success is:

P(success) = # of successes / total # of trials = (1/2) / 1 = 1/2

Therefore, the estimated probability of a success is 0.5 or 50%.

To estimate the probability of a success in this scenario, we need to determine the proportion of the randomly generated numbers that represent a success. Since the numbers 0, 1, and 2 represent a success, out of the possible six numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), there are three that correspond to a success. Therefore, the estimated probability of a success is 3/6 or 0.5.

It is important to note that this is only an estimated probability, as it is based on a simulation and not a true experiment with a large sample size. The actual probability of a success may differ slightly from this estimate.
In order to obtain a more accurate estimate, we would need to perform multiple simulations and calculate the proportion of successes across all of the trials. This would give us a better idea of the true probability of a success in this scenario.
Additionally, it is important to consider the context of the event being simulated and whether or not this estimated probability is sufficient for the desired outcome. If a success rate of 50% is not acceptable, alternative methods may need to be explored to increase the likelihood of success.

For more questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The amount of interest paid over the 3-year lease is $4,643.64 for a car.

A monthly payment is a payment made every month to disburse loans or advances.

First, we need to calculate the total amount paid over the 3-year lease.

The monthly payment is $429.95, and there are 36 months in the lease, so:

Total lease payments = 36 x $429.95 = $15,478.20

The down payment of $500 is separate from the lease payments, so we don't include it in this calculation.

Next, we need to calculate the interest paid over the 3-year lease. We are told that interest is 30% of the monthly payment, so:

Monthly interest = 30% of $429.95 = $128.99

To find the total interest paid over the 3-year lease, we can simply multiply the monthly interest by the number of months in the lease:

Total interest paid = 36 x $128.99 = $4,643.64

Therefore, the amount of interest paid over the 3-year lease is $4,643.64.

Learn more about the interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/24278810

#SPJ9

The question seems incomplete, the complete question would be as:

You lease a car valued at 23,495 for 3 years at $429.95/month with a $500 down payment. If interest is 30% of the payment, how much interest is paid over the 3 years?

Answer:One pint and 16 quarts or one pint and four gallons

Step-by-step explanation:there are two pints in a quart and there are 4 quarts in a gallon.

The first model of inequality satisfy the problem i.e 2w + 2* 4w ≤ 106

A rectangle is a four-sided, two-dimensional flat shape. The opposite sides of a rectangle's four sides are parallel and equal to one another. It belongs to a category of quadrilaterals where each of the four angles is a straight angle or measures 90 degrees. A particular kind of parallelogram that has all of its angles equal is the rectangle. A square is a rectangle with four equally sized sides. Let's now explore the characteristics of the rectangle in this essay.

Rectangles' essential characteristics are as follows:

A rectangle is a parallelogram.

The Perimeter of the rectangle is 2a + 2b where a and b are the two sides

Now , if w is the width of the rectangle then, the length is 4w given in problem.

Perimeter,

2w + 2* 4w

As it is given in the problem

2w + 2* 4w ≤ 106

The first model of inequality satisfy the problem.

To learn more about inequatity refer to :

brainly.com/question/2456006

#SPJ1

The classical errors-in-variables (CEV) assumptions require that the measurement error in tv hours is not related to the true value of television viewing.In other words, the error should be random and not correlated with the actual amount of time spent watching TV.

Additionally, the CEV assumptions require that the measurement error has a mean of zero and a constant variance. Whether or not the CEV assumptions are likely to hold in this application depends on several factors. One important consideration is the accuracy of the survey instrument used to collect data on tv hours.

If the survey is poorly designed or administered, it may introduce systematic measurement error that is correlated with the true value of television viewing.

Another important factor is the population being surveyed. If the population is highly diverse with respect to television viewing habits, it may be difficult to ensure that the CEV assumptions hold for all subgroups.

Overall, while it is possible that the CEV assumptions hold in this application, it is also possible that they do not. Researchers should carefully consider the potential sources of measurement error and take steps to minimize them if possible.

Additionally, sensitivity analyses can be conducted to explore the robustness of study results to violations of the CEV assumptions.

To know more about CEV assumptions refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/29414319#

#SPJ11

Answer:

So,

approximate solutions are x = 124.32 and x = 117.68

\(exact \: \: solutions \: \: are \\ \: \: x \: = \: \: - \sqrt{11} + 121 \: \: \: \\ and \: \: x \: = \sqrt{11} + 121\)

Step-by-step explanation:

13(x-121)²=143

or, (x-121)² = 11

\(x - 121 = \sqrt{11} \\ x = \sqrt{11} + 121\)

so, x = 124.32

OR,

\(x = - \sqrt{11} + 121\)

so, x =117.68

for exact solutions,

\(x = - \sqrt{11} + 121\)

\(x = \sqrt{11} + 121\)

Thus, the output of the loop is non-deterministic.

Let us consider the loop and the conditions given:

While the condition `x ≠ 0` holds, the loop will continue.

Within the loop, there are two possible paths: `y:=y1` or `y:=y2`.

Since the path to take is non-deterministic, there are two possible outputs:

Either y will be assigned a value of y1 or y2.

Here, it is impossible to determine which assignment will be executed; there is no way to know if x will be decremented once or twice.

This demonstrates that the behavior is non-deterministic, and the possible outputs are `[y1,y2]`.

Thus, the output of the loop is non-deterministic.

https://brainly.com/question/32094006?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

Answer: letter B. -2,-1.5,0

Step-by-step explanation: hope it helps

The order from least to greatest are;

⇒ -2, -2, -2, -2, -1.5, -1.5, -1.5, 0, 0, 0, 0, |-1.5|

Here,

The list of ordered pair are;

−1.5, −2, 0, , −2, −1.5, 0, , |−1.5|, −2, 0, , −2, −1.5, 0, ,

We have to arrange it from least to greatest.

What is Modulus function?

The modulus function give the absolute value of a number irrespective of the number being positive or negative.

Now,

The list of ordered pair are;

−1.5, −2, 0, , −2, −1.5, 0, , |−1.5|, −2, 0, , −2, −1.5, 0.

Since, |-1.5| = 1.5

And, -2 < -1.5

So, The order from least to greatest are;

⇒ -2, -2, -2, -2, -1.5, -1.5, -1.5, 0, 0, 0, 0, |-1.5|

Learn more about the modulus function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25971887

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is 16.

Step-by-step explanation:

You can eliminate first two functions, because the range of x in those does not include x=6. The third equation does. So input x=6 in that. 3(6) - 2 will give you 16.

Uranium-238 has a half-life of 4.5 billion years. Therefore, half of the original number of uranium atoms decay in 4.5 billion years. After another 4.5 billion years, half of the remaining atoms will decay.

The number of remaining uranium atoms after a specific amount of time can be found using the following formula:N = N0 x (1/2)t/Twhere:N0 is the initial number of atomsN is the number of atoms after time t has passedT is the half-life of the element is the amount of time that has passedIn this problem, we know that the sample initially contained 1.9 x 10^18 uranium-238 atoms when the universe was formed 13.8 billion years ago. We want to find out how many uranium-238 atoms it contains today, which is 13.8 billion years after it was formed. Since the half-life of uranium-238 is 4.5 billion years, we can calculate the number of remaining atoms as follows:\(N = N0 x (1/2)t/TN = (1.9 x 10^18) x (1/2)^(13.8/4.5)N = 6.58 x 10^17\)Therefore, the sample of uranium-238 would contain \(6.58 x 10^17\)atoms today.

To know more about remaining visit:

brainly.com/question/30559543

#SPJ11