Answers
It is untrue that when deciding whether to create a trust, tax planning considerations typically take precedence over other goals. Instead, the choice to establish a trust is made before considering the tax implications.
Financial planning aimed at reducing taxes is referred to as tax planning. It aims to lower one's tax obligations and make the best use of benefits, tax breaks, and exemptions.Making financial and business decisions to reduce the impact of tax is a part of tax planning.Although there are many ways to approach tax planning, it primarily entails three fundamental strategies: lowering your actual income, maximizing the amount of tax deductions you claim throughout the year, and utilizing certain tax credits.Long ago, the fundamentals of effective taxation were established. The four pillars of efficiency, fairness, certainty and convenience were proposed by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776).Therefore, it is false that tax planning concerns tend to take primacy over other objectives when deciding whether to create a trust.
Learn more about Tax planning here: https://brainly.com/question/28330970
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Criminologists do not believe that biology has any effect on crime.
True or false
Answers
Answer Criminologists do not believe that biology has any effect on crime. True
Please brainliest
Which forms of protection of intellectual property requires that the property be the subject of a non disclosure agreement?
Answers
Answer:
pla
Explanation:
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
Answers
How are social insurance programs different from public assistance programs like TANF?
Social insurance programs are means-tested, and only the poorest qualify for aid.
Social insurance programs involve voluntary participation, not participation that is mandated by the government.
Social insurance programs have the primary goal of reducing poverty, not stabilizing the economy.
Social insurance programs are funded by taxes paid by beneficiaries or their employers, not the general public.
Social insurance programs are available to all, not simply those who qualify.
Answers
Social insurance programs are different from public assistance programs like TANF as Social insurance programs are available to all, not simply those who qualify.
The eligibility requirements, funding sources, and objectives of social insurance programmes and public assistance programmes like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are different. All people who meet certain requirements, such as attaining a particular age or paying into the system through payroll taxes, are often eligible for social insurance programmes like Social Security and Medicare.
Social insurance programme eligibility is typically not determined by need or income. In contrast, means-tested eligibility requirements are frequently present in public assistance programmes like TANF, requiring applicants to prove their financial need in order to receive assistance.
Learn more about Social insurance programs:
brainly.com/question/31955811
#SPJ1
Labeling laws require that ingredients in food products be listed on the container in descending order of their.
Answers
A label will have the item with the most quantity or weight as the first ingredient, and goes in descending order.
T/F section 230 of the communication decency act protects websites from lawsuits that stem from content posted by third parties.
Answers
It is true that section 230 of the communication decency act protects websites from lawsuits that stem from content posted by third parties.
No user or supplier of an interactive computer service may be considered the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider, according to Section 230 of the law (47 U.S.C. 230). To put it another way, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are shielded from a variety of laws that may otherwise be used to hold them legally liable for what others say and do.
In addition to standard Internet Service Providers (ISPs), the protected intermediates also encompass a wide range of "interactive computer service providers," which essentially includes any online service that distributes third-party content. Even though CDA 230 includes significant limitations for specific criminal and intellectual property-based claims, its wide protection has enabled online innovation and free expression to thrive.
Know more about Section 230 here:
https://brainly.com/question/15072842
#SPJ4
People are less likely to sustain serious
injuries if they are thrown clear of the vehicle
during a collision.
True or False
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
adr is typically faster and less expensive than litigation. t/f
Answers
True, ADR is typically faster and less expensive than litigation.
ADR refers to Alternative Dispute Resolution, which is a form of dispute resolution that avoids the involvement of a judicial system. It is a mechanism for resolving legal disputes outside of court that has become increasingly common in recent years. It is known to be a faster and less expensive alternative to litigation since it involves the parties coming together and discussing the matter with the help of a neutral third party.In most cases, ADR offers a quicker and less costly solution to disputes than litigation, and it is often more flexible, informal, and less adversarial. In comparison to the formal court system, it also allows greater participation by the parties involved.
Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") refers to any methods of resolving conflicts outside of court. ADR brings together all methods and procedures for resolving disputes that take place independently of any governing body. Mediation, arbitration, conciliation, negotiation, and transaction are the most well-known ADR techniques.
To know more about Alternative Dispute Resolution :
https://brainly.com/question/16174459
#SPJ11
In a few sentences, analyze the political ads. Explain the political symbols that are used, the primary messages being given, and in what ways you think they are trying to influence public opinion. Explain your answer.
Answers
Political ads use symbols, such as flags and landmarks, to evoke patriotism and align with specific ideologies. They convey messages about key issues, candidates' character, and party platforms, aiming to influence public opinion through emotional appeals, persuasive techniques, and targeted messaging.
Political ads often employ various symbols to convey their messages and influence public opinion. These symbols can include national flags, iconic landmarks, or even color schemes associated with particular ideologies. The primary messages in political ads typically revolve around key issues, party platforms, or the character of the candidates. Advertisers often try to appeal to emotions, using uplifting music, heartwarming images, or fear-inducing scenarios to elicit specific reactions from viewers. They may also use persuasive techniques such as testimonials, expert endorsements, or statistical data to bolster their arguments. By strategically crafting these messages and employing persuasive tactics, political ads aim to shape public opinion, sway undecided voters, and mobilize their supporters. The effectiveness of these ads depends on how well they resonate with the target audience and how successfully they convey their desired narratives.For more such questions on Political:
https://brainly.com/question/30422305
#SPJ8
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Should students who are expelled receive more due process than those who are suspended? explain why or why not.
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes because being expelled means you've been suspended already and can't go back whereas if you get suspended you can go back and you did something bad but not extremely bad.
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
public opion polls idnicate that which of thse is the strongest feature of american poltical culture?
Answers
Public opinion—citizens’ attitudes about political issues, leaders, institutions, and events—serves as a political basis of support for contemporary politicians.
Presidents, members of Congress, and even the Supreme Court must take account of public opinion in their efforts to govern and to make and implement policy.
As the standard by which we judge the strength of American democracy, public opinion—its origins, its development, and its influence—is a key concern of modern political science. Operating at both the individual level and the collective level, public preferences are quite complex.
Understanding the origins of public opinion, the state of contemporary public knowledge about politics, and the ways that political elites shape and measure public opinion are the key aims of this chapter.
To know more about public opinion:
https://brainly.com/question/984649
#SPJ4
The right way of asking the question is:
Do public opinion polls indicate which of these is an especially strong feature of American political culture?
Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of weeks after he gets released from the hospital, Jay receives a bill from the hospital for $10,000 for his medical care. If this went to court, the judge would probably describe this situation as:________.
a. a bilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
b. a unilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
d. no contract at all. Jay should not have to pay anything.
Answers
Answer: c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
Explanation:
An Implied contracts is usually between physician and a patient this contracts do not state the course of action or payment at the start or inception of the service. Example, a medical examination usually takes place the moment a patient's request for it, this tests are usually either at the patients home or at the medical facility where the doctor practices. After the examination a course of action or payment is decided. Same applies to Jay after been treated and discharged from the hospital a course of action or payment may be made.
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
Answers
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
What is the three-word phrase used to indicate that a body of congress shall approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges?.
Answers
The three-word expression used to describe whether a congressional body will approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges are senate, advice and consent.
What does advice and the consent of senate means?In the United States, the term "advice and consent" refers to the Senate's authority to consult with and approve the president's nominations to public positions, such as those of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, officers of the armed forces, US attorneys, ambassadors, and other lesser posts. This authority is shared by several state senates, which discuss with and approve the governor's appointments of state department heads, judges, and other statewide authorities (in some states).Learn more about the Constitution of US with the help of the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/838122
#SPJ4
What areas does the states laws impact statewide
Answers
Answer:
All State governments are modeled after the Federal Government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all States uphold a “republican form” of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.
Explanation:
pls mark as brain list
Which branch of the government is composed of federally and
provincially appointed judges ?
a) The executive branch
b)The judicial branch
c)The legislative branch
d)The sources of law branch .
Answers
The branch of government that is composed of federally appointed judges is the judicial branch. This branch is responsible for interpreting the law and determining whether actions taken by the other branches of government are constitutional. The answer in B.
The judicial branch is an essential part of the checks and balances system, ensuring that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. Additionally, the judicial branch includes the sources of law branch, which is responsible for reviewing and interpreting statutes, regulations, and legal precedents.
The sources of law branch is crucial for ensuring that laws are applied consistently and fairly throughout the country. Overall, the judicial branch plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law in the United States.The answer is B.
To know more about judicial branch, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1060250#
#SPJ11
The more predictable policy decisions by the Federal Reserve are, the more effective they are. True/false
Answers
The more predictable policy decisions by the Federal Reserve are, the more effective they are- False
The main financial instrument of the United States of America is the Federal Reserve System, also known as the Federal Reserve or just the Fed. It was established on December 23, 1913, with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, following a series of financial panics (most notably the panic of 1907) that led to the decision for extensive control of the financial system in order to ease financial crises. The Federal Reserve System's roles and responsibilities have grown over time as a result of events like the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Great Recession in the 2000s. In the Federal Reserve Act, Congress outlined three main objectives for financial policy: increasing employment, preserving prices, and lowering long-term interest rates. The first objectives are occasionally referred to as the twin mandate of the Federal Reserve.
Its responsibilities have grown over time and now also include overseeing and controlling banks, maintaining the stability of the financial system, and providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign respectable organizations.
For more such question on Federal Reserve:
brainly.com/question/17097530
#SPJ4
After a person has been found by a court to be legally incompetent or incapacitated, it is wise for that person to create a power of attorney in order to give someone else the power to sign legal documents or make health related decisions on behalf of himself/herself. 1) True 2) False
Answers
True. Legal incompetency or incapacitation may necessitate creating a power of attorney for decision-making.
Why create a power of attorney?True. After being found legally incompetent or incapacitated by a court, it is generally advisable for that person to create a power of attorney. A power of attorney is a legal document that allows an individual (referred to as the "principal") to grant another person (known as the "agent" or "attorney-in-fact") the authority to act on their behalf in various matters, including signing legal documents or making healthcare decisions.
By creating a power of attorney, the legally incompetent or incapacitated person can ensure that their affairs are properly managed and decisions are made in their best interests. The power of attorney can specify the extent and scope of the agent's authority, including whether it applies to financial matters, healthcare decisions, or both.
It is important to consult with an attorney experienced in estate planning and elder law to ensure that the power of attorney document is properly drafted and reflects the person's wishes and needs.
Learn more about Incapacity
brainly.com/question/32284766
#SPJ11
Annotated Bibliography:
unfair inequalities in the criminalization between white people and ones of color/different nationalities for similar offences? What are the negative consequences of the stereotypical representation of black people with concern to profiling and incarceration?
Answers
Answer:
It's a violation of the 14th Amendment, with equal rights under the law. So, profiling shouldn't make a difference. The negative effect is the overlooking of other races.
Roy and 2 friends are at a game center. Each person buys a hot dog for $3, fries for $2.49, and a drink for $2.50. They also have a coupon for $1 off each drink.
Which expression represents the total cost?
Multiple choice question.
A)
32+(3×2.49)+3×(2.50−1)
B)
32+(3×2.49)+(3×2.50)
C)
23+(3×2.49)+3×(2.50−1)
D)
32+(3×2.49)+(3×2.50)−1
Answers
Answer:
D
I hope my answer is helpful to u
a contract is said to be executed when all parties have completed their performances.
true
false
Answers
A contract is said to be executed when all parties have completed their performances - True.
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates legally binding obligations between them. A contract typically contains terms that describe the obligations of each party, the rights and responsibilities of each party, and the consequences of breach of the contract.
A contract is said to be executed when all parties have completed their obligations and performances under the terms of the contract. At this point, the contract has been fully performed and all parties are considered to have fulfilled their obligations. Once a contract is executed, it is considered to be a legally binding agreement, and the parties are entitled to the benefits and protections provided by the contract.
For such more question on contract:
brainly.com/question/25789642
#SPJ4
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back of the pickup is covered with a camper shell. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Answers
Answer:
C. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Explanation:
Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.
One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.
Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
When can a person ride in a pickup?The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.
For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.
Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.
How does an executive order differ from a federal law?.
Answers
An executive order differs from a federal law in several ways. An executive order is issued by the President of the United States and is meant to direct and guide the actions of the executive branch of the government. Executive orders are not laws and do not require the approval of Congress.
The president may use an executive order to implement policy changes, to provide guidance to federal agencies, or to take action on a particular issue.Executive orders are more like directives, which aim to set policy or direct action, while laws are formal, written rules that have been passed by Congress and signed by the president. Laws are more powerful than executive orders because they have the force of law behind them. They are also subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they are found to be unconstitutional.Executive orders are also temporary. Once a president leaves office, his or her executive orders are no longer in effect, unless they have been codified into law by Congress.
Federal laws, on the other hand, are permanent, and they can only be changed or repealed by Congress.Executive orders can be challenged in court, but the process is different from the process used to challenge a federal law. While a federal law can be challenged in any court, an executive order can only be challenged in the court that has jurisdiction over the issue in question. Overall, the main differences between an executive order and a federal law are their source of authority, their permanence, and their enforceability.
To know more about executive visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11422252
#SPJ11
What does this sign mean?
DETOUR
O Watch for a traffic signal ahead
O Stop and ask for road information
o Watch for a temporary route ahead
Answers
Alphabetical data cannot be stored true or false
Answers
your answer is true my friend
how far along is humankind in its search for knowledge of the ocean’s depths?
Answers
It's often said that 95% of the Earth's ocean floor is unexplored. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) puts that figure at more than 80%.
A new car is purchased for $ 34 , 000 $34,000 and over time its value depreciates by one half every 5.5 years. How long, , would it take for the value of the car to be $ 1 , 000 $1,000?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
We can use the following formula to find the value of an asset that is depreciating at a constant rate over time:
V = P * (1/2)^(t/h)
where:
V = current value of the asset
P = initial value of the asset
t = time elapsed (in years)
h = half-life of the asset's value
In this case, we know that:
P = $34,000
V = $1,000
h = 5.5 years
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
$1,000 = $34,000 * (1/2)^(t/5.5)
Dividing both sides by $34,000, we get:
(1/34) = (1/2)^(t/5.5)
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:
ln(1/34) = (t/5.5) * ln(1/2)
Solving for t, we get:
t = (5.5 / ln(1/2)) * ln(1/34)
Using a calculator, we get:
t ≈ 25.28
Therefore, it would take approximately 25.28 years for the value of the car to depreciate to $1,000.