Answers
Related Questions
4. Plaintiffs Amy from Alabama and Vera from Virginia plan to sue defendants Debbie from Delaware and Vernon from Virginia. May Amy and Vera file a joint suit in federal court? (1) Answer "Yes" OR "No." (2) Explain why or why not. (2 points)
Answers
Yew
Explanation:
Mama joe bamab
which of these cases determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats? wisconsin v. yoder (1972) tinker v. des moines (1969) elonis v. united states (2015) united states v. windsor (2013)
Answers
The case that determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats is Elonis v. United States (2015).
Elonis v. United States (2015) is the case that specifically addressed the issue of intent in relation to comments made on social media being considered threats. Anthony Elonis, the petitioner in the case, had posted violent and threatening statements on his social media, leading to his arrest and conviction under federal law. The key question before the Supreme Court was whether a subjective intent to threaten was required to classify such statements as true threats, or if an objective standard would suffice.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court held that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats. The Court emphasized that the First Amendment protection of free speech requires the government to show that the individual making the statements intended to communicate a true threat. Mere recklessness or negligence in making the statements was not sufficient to warrant a criminal conviction, as it would unduly limit freedom of expression. This ruling reaffirmed the importance of protecting individuals' First Amendment rights while recognizing the need to address genuine threats to public safety.
To learn more about Supreme Court click here, brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Crime statistics are incredibly accurate.
O True
False
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Imagine you are a sergeant in a mid-sized police agency. You have been assigned to the IA unit as a supervisor. The Chief has given you the task of conducting an audit of racial profiling complaints by your fellow officers and reporting back to her with the results. What areas of the department would you look at first and why? How will you conduct this audit of complaints? What would you do to establish the validity of the complaints? What will your recommendations if you find there is indeed racial profiling? What if the audit shows there is no racial profiling going on? What will be some of the pitfalls you might come upon, and how will you address them?
Answers
As a supervisor, you should pay attention to the complaint and write down its specifics.
What is a supervisor?The supervisor's overall responsibilities include communicating organizational needs, monitoring employee performance, offering direction and support.
Also, identifying areas for development, and managing the mutually beneficial relationship between staff and the organisation to ensure that both parties succeed.
You should pay close attention to the complaint, take note of its specifics, take action right away, and follow up.
The term "racial profiling" describes the unfair practise of law enforcement authorities who single out someone for questioning on the basis of their race, ethnicity, religion, or country of origin.
The goal of racial reconciliation is for law enforcement and the community to realise three things: they fundamentally misunderstand each other, they both contribute to damages neither wants, and they share similar core desires in key areas.
Thus, this way, one can conduct this audit of complaints.
For more details regarding a supervisor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14936907
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a reason for the problems that plague jails
Answers
You didn't give a list, but here are some reasons! Overcrowding: Jails are often overcrowded, making it difficult to maintain a safe and healthy environment for both staff and inmates.
Staffing shortages: A shortage of trained and qualified staff can lead to increased violence and disorder within the jail.
Budget constraints: Jails often operate on limited budgets, which can result in insufficient resources for programs and services that can reduce recidivism.
Mental health issues: A significant number of people in jail have mental health problems, which can create challenges for staff and negatively impact the overall operation of the jail.
Substance abuse: Substance abuse is a major problem in many jails, leading to a range of health and safety issues.
Lack of rehabilitation programs: Jails often lack programs and services that can help inmates improve their lives and reduce their risk of reoffending.
Lack of technology: Inadequate technology can result in ineffective communication, security, and management of the jail.
Checks and balances: what check is the most important. Support your reasoning
Answers
Answer:
The best example of checks and balances is that the president can veto any bill passed by Congress, but a two-thirds vote in Congress can override the veto. Other examples include: The House of Representatives has sole power of impeachment, but the Senate has all power to try any impeachment.
Does this help?
1. The Responsibility that arises from the provisions of the constitution that individual
and groups must respect is known as_
2. The Responsibility that individuals have towards a group community or society is
called
Answers
The responsibility that arises from the provisions of the constitution that individuals and groups must respect is known as legal responsibility
The responsibility that individuals have towards a group, community, or society is called social responsibility.
What is the Responsibility?Legal responsibility refers to the obligation of individuals or organizations to act within the legal framework of a society, including adhering to laws, regulations, and policies.
Therefore, for question 2, It refers to the ethical and moral obligations of individuals or organizations to act in ways that benefit society as a whole and contribute to its sustainable development. This can include actions such as volunteering, charitable donations, or environmentally conscious behaviors.
Learn more about Responsibility from
https://brainly.com/question/19666940
#SPJ1
In order for a punishment to be "cruel and unusual" it must be "grossly disproportionate" to the crime committed.
А
True
B False
Answers
Answer:
b False
Explanation:
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
State court
Court of Public Opinion
Federal Court
Answers
Answer:
It would be heard in a Federal Court.
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a Federal Court.
I hope this helped at all.8. reserved
Reserved blank
Answers
With reference to the Contracts Act 1950 or any case law, answer the following questions.
Malani sees a diamond ring on display at Habid Jewel’s shop window, the price tag indicates
RM20,000. Excited that the deal was good, she rushes to the counter only to be told that there
was a mistake on the label and that the actual price of the necklace is RM30,000. Malani
demands that Habid Jewel sells the necklace to her at the price stated on the tag.
Advise whether Habid Jewel is bound to sell the necklace at the price of RM20,000.
Course Title: Malaysian Business Law
Answers
Under the Contracts Act 1950 in Malaysia, the general rule is that an offer made by the dealer is welcome to treat instead of an official offer. The buyer, in turn, makes an offer by demonstrating their willingness to buy the thing at the shown cost. The dealer at that point has the choice to acknowledge or dismiss that offer.
Within the given situation, Habid Jewel made a mistake in labelling the price of the diamond ring, demonstrating RM20,000 rather than the proper cost of RM30,000. When Malani saw the shown cost of RM20,000, she rushed to the counter and requested to buy the jewellery at that cost.
In any case, since the cost tag was a mistake, it does not constitute a substantial offer from Habid Jewel. Hence, Habid Jewel is not bound to offer the accessory to Malani at the cost expressed on the tag. The proper cost of RM30,000 is the real offer from the seller.
If Malani demands on obtaining the jewellery at an inaccurate cost, Habid Jewel has the proper to deny the offer and offer the jewellery at the proper cost or withdraw the thing from the sale altogether.
It is imperative to note that particular circumstances and other relevant components may influence the result in person cases. In this manner, looking for legal advice or alluding to case law in Malaysian business law would give more exact direction in this matter.
know more about Contracts Act
https://brainly.com/question/29621466
#SPJ4
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
Answers
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
If you were candidate Trump’s public relations advisor, how
would you have advised him to modify his approach?
*****No Plagiarism please. Please tell me the source as
well*****
Answers
I would advise candidate Trump to adopt a more inclusive and empathetic communication style, focusing on unity and collaboration rather than divisive rhetoric.
As candidate Trump's public relations advisor, I would emphasize the importance of building bridges and appealing to a wider audience. I would encourage him to choose his words carefully, avoiding inflammatory language and personal attacks. Instead, I would suggest emphasizing policy positions and highlighting his accomplishments, while also demonstrating empathy and understanding for diverse perspectives.
I would recommend engaging in constructive dialogue, actively listening to concerns, and presenting himself as a unifying force. By modifying his approach to be more inclusive and empathetic, candidate Trump could appeal to a broader range of voters and project a more presidential image.
Learn more about Trump: https://brainly.com/question/29994218
#SPJ11
describe at least 2 examples of how being the victim of violent crime can have an impact on an individual
Answers
Answer:
first example is it can have an emotional toll on an individual and cause them to go into depression.
second example is if the victim has to testify that can bring back the memory and will re open them to the trauma they suffered and they can become ashamed and think that everyone doesn't look at them the same way which makes them feel even worse about them selves until they can't stand to be around people anymore.
Explanation:
from where does the office of the speaker of the texas house of representatives derive its power?
Answers
The office of the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives derives its power from the Texas Constitution and House rules.
The Texas Constitution, as well as the procedures and customs of the Texas House, give the office of Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives its authority. The Speaker is a position of significant power and influence who is chosen by the House members. The Speaker has the authority to preside over House meetings, interpret and apply the rules, choose the members and chairs of committees, and manage the legislative process.
The Speaker has additional authority over the legislative calendar and which bills are discussed. Although the Texas Constitution and House rules give the Speaker authority, the Speaker's actual power is also influenced by the support of the House members and the political climate in the chamber.
Learn more about Texas Constitution at:
brainly.com/question/28189890
#SPJ4
40. In a criminal case, the jury must
a. Decide on the case in one day
b. Have a unanimous decision
C. Explain in writing to the judge if they don't agree with the other jurors
d. Decide on how long the defendant must remain in prison
Answers
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
hope it helps
Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
Jonathan H is arrested and convicted of robbing a gas station attendant at gunpoint. He takes lottery tickets and $400 in cash.
Debra J. is arrested and convicted of robbing an Uber driver at gunpoint. She takes $450 in cash.
Debra is sentenced to 3 years of formal probation and she has to do 100 hours of community service and pay restitution to the Uber driver.
Jonathan is sentenced to 3 years in state prison.
Do you think the sentence differences are fair? If not, explain why. (5 points)
List at least four reasons why the sentences might be different. For each of your reasons, tell us why that reason should make a difference in the punishment. (20 points)
Answers
The sentencing may differ based on each of the defendants’ criminal history. Past criminal offenses can effect the sentencing of a defendant. The reason being, the potential for the individual to commit future crimes.
Another reason could be it would be easier to prove that the robbery of the gas station was premeditated because it’s an establishment. Premeditation can increase sentencing because the crime was planned out and there is more room for internal moral questioning regarding the crime.
The difference here in sentencing could also simply be the gender of the defendant. Throughout history women have received more lenient sentencing for crimes compared to their male counterparts. Gender shouldn’t effect the sentencing of a criminal due to the lack of logical basis. Lastly the the items that were stolen may have made a difference. Debra only stole cash totaling $450. However, Jonathan stole $400 cash and an undisclosed value of lottery tickets. With that being said, the value of the lottery tickets could’ve greatly surpassed Debra’s value total. Not to mention he stole two forms of personal property while Debra stole one. The value and amount of stolen property should effect sentencing because stolen property valuing over a specific dollar amount can determine whether or not the defendant will be charged with a felony.
If you are in a car and conditions are ideal what is the stopping distance required if you are
going 60mph?
Answers
Answer:
B. 298 feet
Explanation:
You have been approached; to explain in details the land tenure system in Zambia and further elaborate on the security of tenure of customary land provided.
Answers
In Zambia, there are two types of land tenure: traditional tenure and official title registration. The chiefs control the distribution of land under the customary system. They have the support of their populace to reign. Although this method is regarded as unsecure by western standards, the indigenous people find it to be effective.
What is a customary land tenure?The term "customary land tenure" refers to the structures used by the majority of rural African communities to express and organise ownership, possession, and access as well as to control usage and transfer.
All individuals are required by human rights law to have some level of security of tenure, which provides legal protection against forced eviction, harassment, and other threats.
The four main types of land tenure institutions in use today are, to put it simply: governmental ownership, private ownership, tenancy, and customary land tenure. These characteristics are present in at least four different general economic contexts, including the feudal, conventional community, market, and socialist economies.
To learn more about land tenure visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27922587
#SPJ9
in the landmark case, hawkins v. mcgee (the case of the hairy hand), the court determined that the correct measure of damages was:
Answers
Answer:
The court held that the proper measure of damages should be based on Hawkins's expected value from the parties' contract — the difference in value between a 100% good hand and the hairy hand that Hawkins actually received.
which 1960s u.s. supreme court dramatically changed the day-to-day practice of american policing
Answers
The 1960s U.S. Supreme Court decision that dramatically changed the day-to-day practice of American policing was Miranda v. Arizona.
The Miranda ruling, issued in 1966, established the requirement that police officers must inform individuals of their constitutional rights before questioning them in custody. This requirement, commonly known as the Miranda warning or Miranda rights, includes the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The Miranda decision had a significant impact on American policing, as it fundamentally altered the way that police officers conduct interrogations and investigations. The ruling was aimed at protecting individuals from self-incrimination and ensuring that they are aware of their rights during police encounters. While the Miranda decision was controversial at the time, it has since become an integral part of the American legal system and a cornerstone of criminal justice reform.
To know more about Miranda v. Arizona
brainly.com/question/30387266
#SPJ11
Cameron was astonished when a group of homeowners in her subdivision informed her that she could not have a toolshed in her yard. cameron felt that this was not fair especially since most of the other subdivision owners had toolsheds in their yards. what might best explain this?
Answers
Answer:
Cameron has not paid an extra fee to install a toolshed. OR According to the agreement she signed to receive the house, there was no mutual agreement that he/she could install one.
define public law and private law and compare between them and provide four examples of each of them
Answers
Answer:
in explanation
Explanation:
public law is A general classification of law concerned with the political and sovereign capacity of a state.
Public law is that area of constitutional, administrative, criminal, and International Law that focuses on the organization of the government, the relations between the state and its citizens, the responsibilities of government officials, and the relations between sister states. It is concerned with political matters, including the powers, rights, capacities, and duties of various levels of government and government officials.
Public law refers to an act that applies to the public at large, as opposed to a private law that concerns private individual rights, duties, and liabilities.
and
private law = That portion of the law that defines, regulates, enforces, and administers relationships among individuals, associations, and corporations. As used in distinction to public law, the term means that part of the law that is administered between citizen and citizen, or that is concerned with the definition, regulation, and enforcement of rights in cases where both the person in whom the right inheres and the person upon whom the obligation rests are private individuals.
Avoid blocking passing lanes?
Yes or no
Answers
Answer:
Yes, avoid blocking passing lanes :)
State and briefly explain the three competences that are expected from ideal citizen?
Answers
Ideally, the provision of the constitution has highlighted some competencies which are expected from citizen and includes:
Respecting and defending human rights: The citizen of the country is expected to give respect to other citizen and defends others rights as well.Contribution to a peaceful living: The citizen are expected to ensure his/her way of lifestyle does contribute peacefully to the society.Participation in democratic processes: The citizen are expected to participate in democratic process like voting for its representative.Learn more about this here
brainly.com/question/20564598
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Scenario: You just joined the FBI as a Jr. Forensic Accountant. You are assigned the " Goldsmith Worldwide Investment " case. FB is investigating if this company is involved in a Ponzi scheme.
(A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. Ponzi schemes are named after Charles Ponzi. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors a 50% return within a few months for what he claimed was an investment in international mail coupons.)
The subject company, Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, has been advertising a high-yield investment opportunity; investing in gold mines in Argentina. Several of the investors have filed complaints with the FBI, each reporting that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments promises 35% annual return on investments but has failed to deliver. You subpoena the Bank the Goldsmith is associated with. You consolidated all files and information received from the bank and start to apply IMPACT model you learned from Queens College's "Data Analytics for Accountant " to put the puzzle together and present the case to the Head of Department.
Objectives:
Goal - Apply IMPACT Model and all tools and techniques learned from the Spring 2022 - Data Analytics for Accountants to solve the FBI case. All questions need to be answered carefully with qualitative and quantitative support.
A. Identify Question - 1pt
What are the three questions needed to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case?
B. Master Data - 1pt
You have created the consolidated worksheet - see " 6628" tab.
What are the three + data tables you need in order to put this " 6628" consolidated worksheet together? what are the primary key and secondary key to connect them?
C. Perform Analysis – 7 pts - Please indicate technique used and show your work.
Just like the PWC case, you will choose techniques to help you identify issues and draw your conclusions.
1. Determine the total investors funds received. -1pt
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median and Mode ? -2 pts
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines. -1 pt.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. - 2 pt
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. -1pt
D. Communication - 1pt
6. What are your conclusions?
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
A. Identify Question:
1. Are the promised returns of 35% annual on investments unrealistic or unusually high?
2. Is the company primarily paying existing investors with funds from new investors?
3. Is there evidence of misrepresentation or false advertising regarding the investment opportunity?
B. Master Data:
To put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together, the following data tables are needed:
1. Investors Table:
- Primary Key: Investor ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional identifying information like name or contact details can be used)
2. Investment Transactions Table:
- Primary Key: Transaction ID
- Secondary Key: Investor ID (foreign key)
3. Company Revenue Table:
- Primary Key: Revenue ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional information like revenue source or period can be used)
C. Perform Analysis:
1. Determine the total investors' funds received.
Technique: Summarizing
- Sum the values in the "Investment Amount" column of the Investment Transactions Table.
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median, and Mode?
Technique: Statistical Analysis
- Filter the Investment Transactions Table for dividend payments.
- Sum the dividend amounts to calculate the total dividends paid.
- Count the unique investors who received dividends.
- Identify the investor(s) with the highest dividend amount.
- Calculate the mean, median, and mode of dividend amounts.
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.
Technique: Filtering and Summarizing
- Filter the Company Revenue Table for revenue related to the Argentinian gold mines.
- Sum the revenue amounts to determine the total business revenue.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend.
Technique: Data Visualization (e.g., line chart or bar chart)
- Create a visual representation of the investment inflows and outflows over time.
- Plot the investment amounts (inflows) and dividend amounts (outflows) on the chart.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure.
Technique: Examination and Documentation
- Review the consolidated worksheet and identify any suspicious assets or transactions that may be subject to seizure.
D. Communication:
6. Conclusions:
Based on the analysis using the IMPACT model and the techniques mentioned above, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- The total investors' funds received can be determined by summing the investment amounts.
- Total dividends paid can be calculated, along with information on the number of investors receiving dividends, the investor(s) receiving the highest amount, and statistical measures such as mean, median, and mode.
- Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines can be identified by filtering and summing the relevant revenue amounts.
- The trend of investment inflows and outflows can be depicted using data visualization techniques.
- Potential assets for seizure can be identified by examining suspicious transactions and documentation.
Overall, the analysis will provide insights into the financial activities of Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, helping to determine if there are indications of a Ponzi scheme.
A. Identify QuestionThere are three questions that can help to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case:
Does the investment opportunity promise unusually high returns?
Are early investors paid returns using the investments of new investors?
Is there a lack of clarity regarding how the returns will be generated or what the investment is used for?
B. Master DataThe three data tables needed in order to put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together are: Goldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestorsGoldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestmentGoldsmith Worldwide Investments PaymentThe primary key to connect them is the Investor ID and the secondary key is the Investment ID.
C. Perform Analysis1. Determine the total investors' funds received.Total investors' funds received = $12,785,0002. Determine total dividends paid to the investors, the number of investors who received dividends, who received the most amount, and what the Mean, Median and Mode are.Total dividends paid to the investors = $0The number of investors who received dividends = 0No one received the most amount.Mean = N/0Median = N/A, as there were no dividends.Mode = N/A, as there were no dividends.
3. Identify business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines = $12,000,000
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has more cash inflows than outflows in every quarter.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. Potential assets for seizure include: Land and buildings Investment portfolio Cash
D. Communication Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments is operating a Ponzi scheme. The company has promised unusually high returns to investors but has failed to deliver. There are no dividends paid to investors, and the business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines is not enough to support the high returns promised. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has been collecting more cash from new investors to pay off existing investors.
As a result, there are potential assets for seizure, including land and buildings, the investment portfolio, and cash.
Learn more about Forensic Accounting here:
https://brainly.com/question/28145069
#SPJ11
Think carefully about this one. Checks drawn by
an account holder with insufficient funds to
cover the checks are not forgeries because:
A. while they are false documents, the person's
intent to defraud is missing.
B. when the intent to defraud is present the
checks are false documents.
C. the person only has an intent to defraud, not
to permanently deprive.
D. they are not false documents and the person
may lack the intent to defraud.
Answers
Answer:
This is wat u have to do.
Explanation:
Answer this question.
why is the purpose of self respect and neighboring communities
Answers
however, not sure what you meant by neighboring communities
True or False: in pari delicto occurs when a party gives a loan at an interest rate exceeding the legal maximum.
Answers
The correct answer is True. In pari delicto occurs when both parties are equally at fault or in violation of the law. In the context of a loan, if a party gives a loan at an interest rate that exceeds the legal maximum.
Both the lender and borrower are in violation of the law and therefore in pari delicto. This means that neither party can enforce the contract in court, as it would be against public policy to do so. Therefore, it is important for lenders to ensure that they are complying with legal maximum interest rates to avoid being in pari delicto. It is also important for borrowers to be aware of their legal rights and obligations when borrowing money, including the maximum interest rates allowed by law, to protect themselves from entering into agreements that are unenforceable.
To know more about pari delicto
https://brainly.com/question/15095413
#SPJ11