Answers
The correct quotation is: United States v. Hanson, 303 F. Supp. 2d 850, 861-863 (E.D. Tex. 2009).
In this citation, "United States v. Hanson" refers to the case name, "303 F. Supp. 2d" indicates the volume and series of the Federal Supplement where the case is reported, "850" specifies the page number where the case begins, "861-863" indicates the specific pages where the quoted material can be found, and "(E.D. Tex. 2009)" specifies the court and year of decision.This citation format is used by legal writers to provide precise and uniform references to legal sources.So, the correct Bluebook citation for a quotation taken from pages 861 to 863 of United States of America v. Erica Hanson, reported at volume 303 of the Federal Supplement, Second Series, at page 850, decided by the Eastern District of Texas in 2009, would be this.How should a citation be Bluebooked?Always begin with the author's complete name, followed by a comma. Then, put a comma after the article's complete name (which should be underlined or italics). The legal review's volume number is then listed, followed by its abbreviation (see T13, starting on page 510).
What is an example of a Bluebook citation?Name of Author, Title of Article, Journal Abbreviation, Date of Issue, First Page of Work, and Page Cited. For instance, Barbara Ward's Progress for a Tiny Planet, HARV.
To know more about Bluebook Citation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30814583
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Do you support a second impeachment trial?
Answers
Simple.yes. Do you need any information lol?
Diana is the owner of a business in the United States. Her company has purchased a warehouse in Thailand, and it is managed by Diana’s associate, who is an American citizen. The government of Thailand seizes the warehouse and all the goods stored there. Diana’s attorney informs her that the US courts cannot help her take legal action. To which law or convention is the attorney referring?
Answers
The law or convention is the attorney referring to is sovereign immunity.
According to the legal doctrine of sovereign immunity, the federal government cannot be sued without its permission. This principle stems from the notion that the sovereign or state is the ultimate authority and shouldn't be subject to the jurisdiction of another sovereign or state without its permission. According to this rule, foreign governments and their agencies are typically exempt from legal action in courts in other nations, including the United States.
In this instance, the lawyer is notifying Diana that since Thailand is a sovereign state and its government has seized the warehouse, it is not subject to legal action in American courts. The Thai government has the authority to confiscate the warehouse even if it is owned by a US firm and run by an American citizen, and US courts lack the authority to file a lawsuit against the Thai government.
Read more about sovereign immunity on:
https://brainly.com/question/14185506
#SPJ4
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answers
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
the probable cause panel has how much time to file a formal complaint
Answers
Answer:
30 days
Please give brainliest answer!
the constitution states that the president must be elected by
Answers
The results of the popular vote, the electoral college chooses the president. Rule of law or limited government is one of the founding principles. This implies that the law is always applicable to public servants.
According to the notion of the rule of law, everyone is responsible for obeying laws that are: Publicly disseminated. similarly enforced independently decided upon. And in line with universal human rights standards. Everybody must abide by the law, including elected officials, law enforcement agents, and judges, according to the rule of law. In this way, it differs from tyranny or oligarchy, where the ruling class is considered above the law. All facets of American life are governed by the Rule of Law. For instance, traffic laws specify who has the right of way, and environmental laws and regulations specify what we are permitted to release into the earth, the air, and the water.
Learn more about Rule of law here
https://brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4
Answer: Electoral College
Explanation:
PLEASE HURRY IN THE MIDDLE OF TEST!!!
Select the correct answer.
Which statement is true of the zero tolerance policy?
A.
It builds trust between offenders and police officers.
B.
It increases serious crime rates in poor neighborhoods.
C.
It improves tolerance between victims and offenders.
D.
It immediately takes care of crime in the community.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is C
Explanation:
It improves tolerance between victims and offenders.
The act of Fifth Amendment may be used by the prosecution to imply an accused person's guilt.
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
i just did the test and picked true and thats WRONG
Answer:
False!!!
Explanation:
look up hess' law and discuss how this experiment is an illustration
Answers
Hess's Law states that the heat absorbed or released during a chemical reaction is the same, regardless of the number of steps or the sequence of the reaction. This law is based on the principle of energy conservation, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.
The experiment to illustrate Hess's Law involves determining the heat change that occurs in a chemical reaction by using two different methods. First, the heat change is determined for the reaction as it occurs in one step. Then, the reaction is broken down into several steps and the heat change is determined for each step.
The total heat change for all the steps is then calculated and compared to the heat change obtained from the one-step reaction. If Hess's Law is correct, the two results should be the same.
To read more about hess' law, visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30024746
#SPJ11
An arrest is considered a seizure under the what amendment
Answers
Answer:
A seizure of a person, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the police's conduct would communicate to a reasonable person, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the encounter, that the person is not free to ignore the police presence and leave at his will.
Explanation:
Shared left turn lanes are common on 2 lane county road true or false
Answers
Answer:false
Explanation:
Answer:
False would be correct
Select the correct answer. Santiago is a new manager at a restaurant. He is creating a system to prevent deliberate food contamination using the ALERT tool. Which action should he take under the term "Look" in the program? A. hold any product suspected to be contaminated B. restrict access to prep and storage areas C. use approved suppliers, who practice good food defense D. train staff to spot food defense threats
Answers
Answer:
B. restrict access to prep and storage areas
Explanation:
'Santiago, inorder for him to prevent the food contamination, he would need to find a way to restrict access to preparation and storage areas in the restaurant. This is because, the higher the number of people has access to those areas, the high probability of the food to be contaminated by some of thse people either deliberately or not.
Which of the following is an example of domestic policy?
OA
A peace treaty is signed with another country.
OB.
A local government issues new parking regulations.
O c.
The government increases federal aid for school districts.
D.
A state repaves its major roads and highways.
Answers
Answer:
The government increases federal aid for school districts.
Explanation:
The government increasing federal aid for school districts is an example of domestic policy. Hence, option C. is correct.
Domestic policy is a body of laws, rules, and initiatives intended to influence the lives of a nation's citizens. It comprises regulations for the environment, welfare, healthcare, and education.
The correct option is C."The government increases federal aid for school districts" while the alternative options are not examples of domestic policy. Peace compacts, which are agreements between two nations to stop a war, are Option A. New parking rules are provided by the local authority as Option B. Repaving important roads and highways is Option D, a task carried out by a state government.
The purpose of domestic policy is to minimize unrest and dissatisfaction among the country's citizens. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Learn more about domestic policy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32041681
#SPJ5
Your walking and someones dog runs out of their yard. It is acting aggressive towards your dog. You let go of your dog in case they start fighting. You dogs snaps at the aggressive dog and it runs back to the house. The dog comes after your dog again and you ask the owner to get the dog. The owner pretends to scream and you say that their dog almost attacked your dog. You continue walking. You feel at the time that your dogs life and yours was in danger. You dog is also a service dog.
What could the owner of the dog be charged with?
Answers
Answer:
if you are located in cali the dog owner can be charged with :
strict liability .
Scarlett and Mark want to lease an apartment from Connor for a year. Connor first agrees, but upon finding that they have two small children, refuses to lease them his apartment. Is Connor's refusal legal?
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cuz Connor is the land owner he has the right to say rather or not he wants children in his apartment.
post,
Discuss when reasonable suspicion existed in this scenario.
Make sure to justify your decision.
Next, discuss when probable cause existed in this scenario.
Again, make sure to justify your decision.
Answers
Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard of evidence than probable cause, and requires a reasonable belief that a person has been, is, or is about to be involved in criminal activity. This belief must be based on specific and articulable facts, rather than on a hunch or a general suspicion. Reasonable suspicion can justify a brief detention or a limited search for weapons or contraband.
Probable cause, on the other hand, requires a higher level of certainty than reasonable suspicion, and is defined as a reasonable belief that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed, based on specific and articulable facts and circumstances. Probable cause is required for various legal actions, such as obtaining a search warrant, effectuating an arrest, or conducting a more intrusive search.
Therefore, without a specific scenario or context, it is not possible to determine when reasonable suspicion or probable cause existed, or to justify such a determination.
parole is accused of unhinging the scale of justice because:
Answers
Parole is accused of unhinging the scale of justice because parole is a privilege granted to prisoners who have demonstrated good behavior.
Parole is supposed to help ease the transition from prison to the community while ensuring public safety by monitoring parolees. However, it is accused of unhinging the scale of justice for several reasons.Explanation:Parole is a privilege granted to prisoners who have demonstrated good behavior. It is supposed to help ease the transition from prison to the community while ensuring public safety by monitoring parolees.
However, it is accused of unhinging the scale of justice for several reasons.First, there is no consensus on what factors should be used to determine whether a prisoner is eligible for parole. As a result, the decisions of parole boards are subjective and can vary widely from one board to another.Second, there is no agreement on what criteria should be used to evaluate the success of a parole program.
Some argue that the goal of parole should be to reduce recidivism, while others argue that the goal should be to reduce the overall prison population.Third, there is little transparency in the parole process, which can make it difficult for the public to understand how decisions are made and to hold decision-makers accountable.Finally, some argue that parole is too lenient and that it allows dangerous criminals to be released into society.
They argue that the focus should be on punishment rather than rehabilitation and that the justice system should be more punitive overall.In conclusion, parole is accused of unhinging the scale of justice because of the lack of consensus on eligibility criteria and success evaluation, the lack of transparency in the process, and the perception that it is too lenient.
To know more about Privilege visit
https://brainly.com/question/32729888
#SPJ11
A man walking down the street appears to have an illegal weapon. What can a police officer do?
The officer must immediately go before a judge to obtain a search warrant.
With reasonable cause, the officer can stop this individual and frisk him.
With reasonable cause, the officer can arrest the individual without reading the Miranda warning.
Nothing. The officer cannot stop anyone based on appearance alone.
Answers
Answer:
B edge 2020
Explanation:
If the man walks down the street with an illegal weapon, the officer can stop and frisk him.
Let understand that "the man appears to have an illegal weapon" means that the police have gotten an intelligence that such man may possess an Illegal weapons.
After series of observation about the person, the police can appear and proceed to frisk him by searching for a concealed weapon in his clothing, pockets, apartment.
Therefore, the option B is correct because he is still a suspect.
Learn more about this here
brainly.com/question/21440747
Silas asks his friend Shelby to come to his property to go fishing at his pond. If he fails to warn her that the pier has a rotten spot and she falls through and is injured, Silas would be held liable in most states. Group of answer choices True False
Answers
Answer:
True in most States. He knew there was a rotten spot but did not tell her. Shelby got injured because of the rotten spot. Well it's not all of Silas fault because someone else might owns the place but did not fix it.The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey found that there was a surplus of practicing physicians in the U. S. In the 1960’s. True or False
Question 2
According to the principal-agent problem;
A) Patients chose to be rationally ignorant
B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor
C) Both 1 and 2
D) Health maintenance organizations do not insure people for their pre-existing conditions
Question 3
The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is;
A) GDP per capita
B) Population size
C) Medical Insurance System
D) Availability of physicians
Answers
1. True. 2. B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. 3. The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System.
1. In the 1960s, there was indeed a surplus of practicing physicians in the United States. The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey conducted during that time period found evidence of an oversupply of physicians relative to the demand for their services. This surplus was attributed to various factors, including the rapid growth of medical schools, changes in healthcare financing, and increased government support for medical education. As a result, the number of physicians entering the workforce exceeded the demand, leading to a surplus.
2. The principal-agent problem refers to a situation in which an agent (in this case, the doctor) is entrusted by a principal (the patient) to make decisions on their behalf. The correct statement regarding the principal-agent problem is B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. In this context, patients often rely on doctors' expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions about their healthcare. However, this delegation of decision-making can sometimes lead to issues of information asymmetry, where the doctor may prioritize their own interests or have different goals than the patient. The principal-agent problem recognizes this potential conflict of interest and the need for mechanisms to align the doctor's actions with the patient's best interests.
3. Among the given options, the strongest predictor of the variation in healthcare demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System. The type and structure of a country's healthcare insurance system can significantly influence healthcare demand. Countries with comprehensive and accessible healthcare insurance systems tend to have higher demand for healthcare services due to increased affordability and availability of care. On the other hand, countries with limited or fragmented insurance systems may experience lower demand for healthcare services. While factors such as GDP per capita, population size, and availability of physicians can also contribute to healthcare demand variation, the medical insurance system has been found to be a key determinant.
It is important to note that these answers are based on general knowledge and may not encompass all possible perspectives or nuances related to the topics.
To learn more about delegates click here: brainly.com/question/30112239
#SPJ11
QUESTION 2
Which of the following can the president issue regarding the execution of legislation that oversees the behavior of
officers and agencies of the executive branch?
the U.S. Constitution amendments
state statutes
executive orders
U.S. Criminal Codes
Click Save and Submit to save and submit Click Save alLaners to save all answers
Save Answers
ere to search
о
RI
а
Answers
Answer: Executive orders
Explanation:
One of the powers that comes with being the Head of the Executive branch of government is the power to issue Executive orders. Executive orders are binding to the officers and agencies under the Executive branch as they are under the President.
Executive orders are to be treated as legislation with the full weight of the law. They are still subject to Judicial Review however, to ensure that the President is not issuing orders that contravene the Constitution.
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Answers
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
Do you think Lori Vallow should be able to have a cell phone to contact her lawyer
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes,I do believe so because she should always be in contact with her lawyer if anything happens or there is an legal issues.
Edit:If you would like a further explanation,I would need more information on the question
You’re given an assignment to write a brief for your supervising attorney, in a lawsuit
between two local businesses over payment of a construction contract totaling $100,000.
In preparing this document, it’s important that you educate the judge on
A. the procedural rules of your state court system.
B. the law applicable to the case in question.
C. the difference between substantive law and procedural law.
D. the constitutional standards for admitting evidence.
Answers
Based on the peculiarity of rule of law in different localities and the content of this question, when preparing this document, you must educate the judge on the procedural rules of your state court system.
What are the Procedural rules of the state court systems?The term Procedural rules of the state court systems are used to describe the law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the state court system.
Generally, it is believed that state court systems follow their own state rules of civil procedure which may be widely different from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).
Therefore, since the court case involved two local businesses, and to ensure there is fairness, the Judge should be aware of the procedural rules of your state court system to determine the right judgment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the. the correct answer is option A. "the procedural rules of your state court system."
Learn more about the procedural rules here: https://brainly.com/question/28560902
#SPJ1
If a technologist threatens a patient during the course of a procedure and has an apparent immediate ability to perform the threatened act, which of the following torts may be claimed?
A. assault
B. battery
C. negligence
D. false imprisonment
Answers
If a technologist threatens a patient during the course of a procedure and has an apparent immediate ability to perform the threatened act, the tort that may be claimed is assault.
Assault is a legal term that refers to the intentional act of causing apprehension or fear of an immediate harmful or offensive contact. It does not require physical contact to occur but focuses on the creation of fear or apprehension in the victim. In this scenario, the technologist's threat, coupled with the apparent immediate ability to carry out the threat, can reasonably induce fear or apprehension in the patient.
Battery, on the other hand, refers to the intentional and wrongful physical contact with another person without their consent. Unlike assault, battery requires actual physical contact to have taken place. Since the scenario described only involves a threat and does not mention any physical contact, battery would not be the appropriate tort to claim.
Negligence involves the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person. It pertains to situations where a duty of care is breached, causing damages. In the given scenario, while the technologist's behavior is inappropriate and threatening, negligence may not be the most applicable tort since it does not necessarily involve a breach of duty of care.
False imprisonment refers to the intentional restraint or confinement of an individual without their consent or legal justification. It involves restricting a person's freedom of movement unlawfully. Although the scenario mentions a threat, it does not specify any physical restraint or confinement of the patient. Therefore, false imprisonment would not be the appropriate tort to claim.
In summary, based on the scenario provided, the patient may claim the tort of assault due to the technologist's threat that creates a reasonable fear of immediate harm or offensive contact.
Learn more about assault here
https://brainly.com/question/28390258
#SPJ11
How long will it take for a $1000 investment to double if the bank gives you a rate of .25%?
Answers
Answer:
Number of period(n) =277.65
Explanation:
Given:
Amount invested(p) = $1,000
Amount at the end of period(A) = 2 × Amount invested = 2 × $1,000 = $2,000
Rate of interest(r) = 0.25% = 0.0025
Find:
Number of period(n) = ?
Computation:
\(A=p(1+r)^n\\\\2,000 = 1,000 (1+0.0025)^n\\\\2=(1.0025)^n\\\\n = 277.65\)
Number of period(n) =277.65
A guess who sway and have difficulty picking up anything show which sign of intoxication
Answers
Most time, the guest who sway and have difficulty picking up anything show the sign of intoxication which is an impaired motor coordination.
What is an Impaired motor coordination?In the body system, the Impaired motor coordination means the inappropriate and uncoordinated movement or when the physical coordination or ability are lessened.
Often, it happens when drinking of alcohol has reached intoxication level or stage. Some of other signs of intoxication are slur speech, difficulty in lighting cigarette, stumble or fall into objects, Spill drinks or miss their mouths when drinking, among others.
Therefore, the guest who sway and have difficulty picking up anything show the sign of intoxication which is an impaired motor coordination.
Read more about impaired motor
brainly.com/question/5628904
#SPJ1
Please help me??
after learning about the correctional system in the united states, do you agree or disagree with prison privatization? do you think it would work for one type of facility (i.e. local, state, or federal) more than another? explain your stance.
Answers
Prison privatization helps the government to reduce costs associated with running a correctional facilities, and it will work for any type of facilities local, state, or federal correctional facilities.
Prison privatization refers to the transfer of ownership and operation of prisons from the government to private, for-profit companies. Proponents of prison privatization argue that private prisons can save money by operating more efficiently and effectively than government-run facilities.
In terms of which type of facility might be more suited to privatization, this would depend on factors such as specific laws and policies of the jurisdiction. Ultimately, while privatization work for any level may it be local, state, or federal facilities, the decision to privatize prisons, is a complex one that involves balancing a range of considerations, including cost, efficiency, accountability, and the impact on stakeholders such as inmates, staff, and the community.
To learn more about prison privatization visit: https://brainly.com/question/16901807
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
backspace backspace backspace
Answers
Answer:
backspace
Explanation:
delete
Answer:
When u wanna delete something
Explanation:
Have a Nice Day
You are driving on a road where rain has left large pools of water, and you have driven through water that was several inches deep. Now your brakes are not working. You may have A: Wet brakes. B: Water in the power brake booster. C: Mud or sand in your brake master cylinder.
Answers
Answer:
B: Water in the power brake booster.
Explanation:
Driving on a road where rain has left large pools of water, and you have driven through water that was several inches deep. Now your brakes are not working. You may have Water in the power brake booster due to the contact with the deep pool of water.
Brake boosters ensures that lesser pressure is added in order to halt a car and the presence of water in it may hinder its functions as a result of damage to the fluid.