The following evidence is presented to a jury: Dr. Tom has to operate John for a heart condition at 9:00 am, but decides to drink a cup of coffee at the cafeteria, and does not arrive at the third floor until 9:15 am. John is unconscious on a gurney at St. Thomas Hospital’s third floor. The elevator shaft’s doors are open. Somehow the gurney rolls into the shaft at 9:00 am, and John falls to his death.


1. Dr. Tom had “breach of duty”.
2. Dr. Tom had “proximate cause”.
3. Dr. Tom had “Res Ipsa Loquitur”.
4. Both “a” and “c”.

The Court determined that the privileges and immunities of state citizenship had been entrusted to the State governments for security and protection despite the broad phrasing of this section. and had not been given special care by the Federal government as a result of the clause.

A privilege is an exclusive right to immunity that is bestowed by the state or another institution on a restricted group, either at birth or under specific conditions. Examples of transferable privileges that may be cancelled under certain conditions include land titles and taxi medallions. A privilege is only given after birth and is conditional in contemporary democratic governments. A right, on the other hand, is an innate, unalienable privilege that all citizens or all people possess from the time of birth. There are still many examples of the previous common law privilege, such as title deeds. According to its etymology, a privilege (privilegium) is a "private law" or regulation that applies only to a certain person or institution. Legal ethics refers to the standards of behaviour upheld by attorneys in the course of their work. As an early and well-known example, privilegium was granted to Boniface's monastery in Fulda, putting the abbot in direct touch with the pope and removing him from the local bishop's purview.

Learn more about privileges here

https://brainly.com/question/22436723

#SPJ4

Answer:

True :)

Explanation:

have great day

The statement "superposition cannot be used to solve for circuit values using ohm 's law in circuits having more than one connected voltage source." is false as superposition can be used to solve for circuit values using Ohm's law.

Even in circuits with multiple connected voltage sources, the circuit values can be determined using the superposition method and Ohm's law. By using the superposition principle, which is used in circuit analysis, we can examine the effects of each voltage or current source separately while treating the others as inactive or off.

We can calculate the resulting values using Ohm's law or other pertinent circuit laws and equations to determine the contribution of each source to the overall circuit behavior. This method simplifies the analysis by dividing it into separate calculations making it especially helpful in complex circuits with multiple sources.

Learn more about Ohm's law at:

brainly.com/question/1247379

#SPJ4

The complete question is "superposition cannot be used to solve for circuit values using ohm 's law in circuits having more than one connected voltage source. true or false"

Answer:

The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.

Explanation:

Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.

When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.

A military personnel who leaked classified information to unauthorized person may be purnished with jail term up to ten years.

Classified Information are information owned by either the goverment or an organisation whos content are not supposed to be given out to parties outside that organisation.

At the Bottom of a typical Classified documented it is usually stated "RESTRICTED"

Learn more about Classified Information here:

https://brainly.com/question/25775920

Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.

From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.

From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.

Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650

#SPJ1

The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".

The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.

Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486

#SPJ11

Answer:

The most common types of background checks search for criminal activity, verify employment and education, including identity verification, and request driving records. Some employers also review credit, and social media, and conducted drug tests.

Explanation:

Answer: you didn’t list the options.

Explanation:

This constitutes the crime of credit card fraud. Arthur committed credit card fraud.

This action constitutes the crime of credit card fraud. By watching over Melinda's shoulder and using her card number to make unauthorized purchases, Arthur has engaged in fraudulent activity with the intention of gaining something of value (the electronics) without Melinda's consent. Credit card fraud is a serious offense that can result in severe penalties including fines and imprisonment, and it is important to protect personal information such as bank card numbers to prevent such crimes from occurring.

Learn more about imprisonment here:

https://brainly.com/question/3249826

#SPJ11

Full question:

Arthur watched over the shoulder of Melinda, who was using her bank card at a local ATM machine. Arthur then used Melinda's card number without her permission to make a phone order for $1,000 worth of electronics. Which of the following crimes does Arthur's actions constitute?

The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that there was a special relationship that caused him or her not to use free will. Therefore, the option E holds true.

An injured party can be referred to or considered as a party that has faced the damages or harm to himself or herself in case of an accident, which may be a tort committed by an individual. Although in such cases the injured party can make the case for duress, they need to demonstrate that the existence of a special relationship in the case caused physical damages to him or her for not using the free will.

Learn more about an injured party here:

https://brainly.com/question/15312531

#SPJ4

Answer:

Harvard law school

Explanation:

As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.

In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.

It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.

Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law

Learn more about the law here:

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ6

Answer:

1. B

2. D

Explanation:

1. The police do have the missions of fighting crime, serving and protecting their communities, to provide "due process" and "equal protection" because of the Constitution, and promote public safety. They are not mission orientated around "protecting the vested interests of the police department", as their "vested interests" could possibly contradict with the interests of the community.

2. The Police serve the citizens of their respective communities. The citizens pay the taxes which provide for a police force. The chief is their superior but they do not "serve" the chief. City council may attribute funding for the police force but the police do not "serve" the city council. The courts may help police close cases but the police do not "serve" the courts. I hope this helps!

Answer:

Explanation:

Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.

The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.

For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.

In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Michael is not a Fijian resident for tax purposes, though the length of his stay in Fiji is not stated.

A resident taxpayer in Fiji is a person who earns income and is present in Fiji for a period of 183 or more days in a 12-month period.

Michael spends his time on French yachts that cruise the world and Michael occasionally visits Fiji.  Michael also spends three months in France.  We are not sure he spends up to three months in Fiji

Since the company that employs Michael is a resident of France, Michael is not a Fijian resident.

Thus, Michael is technically a resident in France, and for tax purposes, his earnings should be subject to France taxation, not Fiji's.

Learn more about international tax residency at https://brainly.com/question/14994967

#SPJ1

The courts consider the subjective intention of the parties when determining whether or not a contract was formed. This statement is False.

whether a contract exists based on a subjective or objective standard?

The objective standard test governs terms and conditions, which asks if a reasonable person observing the interaction would surmise that an acceptance and an offer had occurred.

Which of the four considerations is taken into account by courts in evaluating whether an argument is a term or solely a depiction?

The rule of parol evidence

A court's starting point in deciding whether a written term is a term or a misrepresentation is that it is a term and the only term.

To know more about parol evidence click here brainly.com/question/29679663

#SPJ4

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

27

Explanation:

in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa

The tort that could be used to impose liability and seek an injunction against the paparazzi is invasion of privacy. Invasion of privacy is a legal claim that protects individuals from unwarranted intrusions into their personal lives.

To establish liability and obtain an injunction against the paparazzi, the following elements of invasion of privacy generally need to be satisfied:

1. Intrusion upon Seclusion: This occurs when the paparazzi intentionally intrudes upon the private space or affairs of an individual, where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

2. Public Disclosure of Private Facts: It refers to the dissemination or publication of private and confidential information about an individual that is not of legitimate public concern.

If an individual can demonstrate that their privacy rights have been violated by the paparazzi, they may seek legal remedies, including monetary damages and an injunction to prevent further intrusions or privacy violations. The specific laws and regulations governing invasion of privacy may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

To learn more about Invasion of Privacy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30160636

#SPJ11

The tort that could be used to impose liability and seek an injunction against the paparazzi is invasion of privacy. Invasion of privacy is a legal claim that protects individuals from unwarranted intrusions into their personal lives. To establish liability and obtain an injunction against the paparazzi, the following elements of invasion of privacy generally need to be satisfied:

1. Intrusion upon Seclusion: This occurs when the paparazzi intentionally intrudes upon the private space or affairs of an individual, where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

2. Public Disclosure of Private Facts: It refers to the dissemination or publication of private and confidential information about an individual that is not of legitimate public concern.

If an individual can demonstrate that their privacy rights have been violated by the paparazzi, they may seek legal remedies, including monetary damages and an injunction to prevent further intrusions or privacy violations. The specific laws and regulations governing invasion of privacy may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

To learn more about Invasion of Privacy, click here:

brainly.com/question/30160636

#SPJ11

1. All of the options - laws, regulations, permits and incentives are some ways the government uses to implement environmental protections on businesses, 2. B. Monetize and count is not a common attitude, 3. E The actions of the leader impact the ethical environment of the company.

The leader will succeed because he has internalized these two key lessons: Men are complex and distinctive. Humans react to a variety of traits and thought patterns that define them as men, including ambition, patriotism, love of the good and the beautiful, boredom, self-doubt, and many more traits and thought patterns that go beyond the usual carrot and stick employed by a donkey driver.

However, not all employee's interests are the same in terms of their power and significance, nor are they all equally amenable to fulfillment in the workplace.  Fortunately, people from the same culture tend to have quite similar primary motivations, and there are certain universal motivational guidelines that really do work quite effectively.

To know more about leadership:

https://brainly.com/question/28487636

#SPJ4

White collar crime, often committed by corporate or government officials, primarily involves crimes committed for financial gain. The two types of white collar crimes from the options provided are b. embezzlement and c. mail and wire fraud.

Embezzlement is a form of white collar crime that occurs when an individual entrusted with managing or controlling another person's money or property fraudulently takes it for their own personal gain. In this type of crime, the offender usually has legal access to the funds or property but uses them in an unauthorized manner.

To explain further, let's consider an example: A company's financial officer might divert some of the organization's funds into their personal account without the company's knowledge or permission.

Mail and wire fraud is another form of white collar crime that involves using mail, telephone, or electronic communication (such as email or text messages) to deceive someone for financial gain. This crime can take various forms, including scams, fraudulent solicitations, or misrepresentations.

For instance, a person may send emails claiming to be a representative of a well-known company, asking the recipient to provide personal information or send money under false pretenses.

In summary, white collar crimes like embezzlement and mail and wire fraud are typically committed by corporate or government officials for financial gain. Embezzlement involves the unauthorized use of funds or property by someone in a position of trust, while mail and wire fraud involve deceptive communication to obtain money or property fraudulently.

To know more about white collar crimes refer here: https://brainly.com/question/15691073#
#SPJ11

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

In the United States, a rule on voting found in the Constitution or its amendments is No person eighteen years of age or older may be denied the right to vote on account of age. Thus the correct option is C.

An Amendment refers to any alteration or modification taken place in existing laws to support the welfare of the people living in the country by improving the objective for better implementation.

The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Explicitly forbade the federal government and the states from claiming age as a justification for refusing residents of the United States who are at least eighteen years old the right to vote.

Therefore, the option C Is appropriate.

Learn more about Twenty-sixth Amendment, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3307756

#SPJ1

The Westlaw directory Select “Secondary Sources” Enter the name of the secondary source you are looking for or search for the source by using keywords or phrases in the “Search” tab.

Westlaw is an online research tool used to retrieve legal information and resources that contains a directory that makes it easier to navigate the contents of the database.

To directly access statutes in the Westlaw directory, follow the steps below:

Access Westlaw directory Select “Statutes and Court Rules” Enter the name of the statute you are looking for or search for the statute by using keywords or phrases in the “Search” tab.

You can also use the “Advanced Search” tab to narrow down your search results Select the “Search” tab Secondary Sources To directly access secondary sources in the Westlaw directory, follow the steps below:

AccessYou can also use the “Advanced Search” tab to narrow down your search results Select the “Search” tab.

To know more about Westlaw visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31577734

#SPJ11

The only option that is not a fixed expense is E) Utilities. A fixed expense is a regular payment that is the same amount each time and is necessary to maintain a certain standard of living. A) Mortgage or rent payment, B) installment loan payment, C) monthly train ticket for commuting to work, and D) monthly allocation for life insurance are all examples of fixed expenses as they are necessary payments that are made on a regular basis. However, utilities such as electricity, water, and gas bills can vary from month to month and are not always considered fixed expenses.

While utilities are not typically considered fixed expenses, they can still be a regular and necessary expense for many individuals or households. In some cases, utilities may be included in a fixed expense category if they are billed at a set rate each month. However, because utility bills can vary based on usage and other factors, they are not always classified as fixed expenses. It is important to budget for both fixed and variable expenses in order to manage finances effectively.

Learn more about variable expenses: https://brainly.com/question/29617511

#SPJ11

Typically, the most important elections on a state's political calendar are the gubernatorial elections, state legislative elections, and midterm elections.

Gubernatorial elections allow voters to choose the chief executive of their state, who wields considerable power and influence over a range of issues, including education, healthcare, economy, and public safety. These elections often attract significant attention, media coverage, and campaign spending, as they shape the political landscape and can have long-lasting impacts on the state's trajectory.

The outcomes of gubernatorial elections can also have broader implications for national politics, as state governors play a crucial role in shaping policy debates and party dynamics at the federal level.

Learn more about elections: https://brainly.com/question/29628143

#SPJ11

The probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To satisfy Equation 5.1, we need to ensure that all values in the "Disposed" column are non-negative. In this case, all the values provided are greater than or equal to zero, so Equation 5.1 is satisfied.

Next, to satisfy Equation 5.2, we need to calculate the sum of all the values in the "Disposed" column and divide each value by the total sum:

Total Disposed cases: 43945

Probability distribution for the "Disposed" column:

Fred Cartolano: 3037 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Thomas Crush: 3372 / 43945 ≈ 0.077

Patrick Dinkelacker: 1258 / 43945 ≈ 0.029

Timothy Hogan: 1954 / 43945 ≈ 0.044

Robert Kraft: 3138 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

William Mathews: 2264 / 43945 ≈ 0.052

William Morrissey: 3032 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Norbert Nadel: 2959 / 43945 ≈ 0.067

Arthur Ney Jr.: 3219 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Richard Niehaus: 3353 / 43945 ≈ 0.076

Thomas Nurre: 3000 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

John O'Connor: 2969 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

Robert Ruehlman: 3205 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Ann Marie Tracey: 3141 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

Ralph Winkler: 3089 / 43945 ≈ 0.070

Now, if we sum up all these probabilities, we get:

\(0.069 + 0.077 + 0.029 + 0.044 + 0.071 + 0.052 + 0.069 + 0.067 + 0.073 + 0.076 + 0.068 + 0.068 + 0.073 + 0.071 + 0.070 ≈ 1\)

The sum of the probabilities is approximately 1, which satisfies Equation 5.2.

Therefore, the probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4