DC chooses a non-voting representative to the US House of Representatives who can propose legislation but cannot cast a ballot. Washington, DC is currently represented by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton. DC residents cannot speak in Senate Committees or on the Senate floor.
Are there representatives from Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico?There are currently six non-voting members: one representative for each of the other four populated US Territories, including American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the US Vir-gin Islands; a resident commissioner for Puerto Rico; and one representative for the federal district of Washington, D.C.
Why are citizens of Washington, DC, not permitted to cast a ballot in Congress?According to the Constitution, each state is given voting representation in both houses of the US Congress. Since it is not a state but the capital of the country, the District of Columbia does not have voting representation in Congress.
Learn more about US House of Representatives : https://brainly.com/question/13835416
#SPJ4
A plaintiff has sued the government for injuries shereceived when her car was allegedly forced off theroad by a military convoy. At trial, an eyewitnesstestifies for the plaintiff and then is asked on cross-examination whether he belongs to a religious groupthat refuses on principle to file federal tax returns,because the revenues are used to build weaponsof war.Is the question proper?(A)No, because evidence of the witness’sreligious beliefs cannot be used forimpeachment in this case.(B)No, because the witness’s character cannotbe impeached by evidence of criminal acts,but only by convictions.(C)Yes, because a person’s willingnessto violate tax laws indicates possiblewillingness to testify falsely.(D)Yes, because the witness’s beliefs arerelevant to the possibility of bias.
Yes, because the beliefs are relevant to the possibility of bias. So, option D is accurate.
The question is proper because it pertains to the witness's religious beliefs and their potential impact on bias or credibility. In a legal setting, questions aimed at assessing a witness's potential bias or motives for testifying are generally allowed. The fact that the witness belongs to a religious group that refuses to file federal tax returns due to the use of revenues for building weapons of war may be relevant in determining their potential bias against the government or military. The question seeks to explore the witness's potential bias or motives for testifying, which is within the scope of cross-examination to evaluate the witness's credibility and the weight of their testimony.
To know more about witness
brainly.com/question/32240223
#SPJ11
what factors did President Obama take into consideration when he nominated Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Merrick Harland to fill Supreme Court vacancies? why did the vacancies occur for Obama to nominate these people in the first place? what were the results of the nominations? and why? what factors did the Senate take into account in voting in favor or against these nominees?
In his prepared remarks, the president referred to Sotomayor as "an inspirational woman" and said that because of her work at "practically every level of our legal system," she has a breadth of knowledge and depth of perspective that will be important as a Supreme Court justice.
Obama made an attempt to put forth this candidate for the Supreme Court.On March 16, 2016, President Obama suggested Merrick Garland, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to fill the vacancy on the Court.
The nominating process comes next.whole Senate. Once the committee reports, the nomination is placed before the full Senate for ultimate ratification. To be accepted or rejected, a nominee must receive a simple majority of votes. In the past, these denials have not happened very often.
To Know more about United States
https://brainly.com/question/8147900
#SPJ1
The defendant was charged with the bank robbery and with possession of the marijuana. At a preliminary hearing, he moves to suppress introduction of the money, gun, and marijuana. How should the court rule
The court should rule on the defendant's motion to suppress based on the specific circumstances and applicable laws.
During a preliminary hearing, the purpose is typically to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with a trial.
If the defendant moves to suppress the introduction of the money, gun, and marijuana as evidence, the court will need to evaluate the grounds for the suppression and consider the relevant legal principles.
The court will likely consider factors such as whether the evidence was obtained lawfully, whether the search and seizure procedures were conducted in accordance with constitutional requirements, and whether any exceptions to the warrant requirement apply.
If the evidence was obtained through an illegal search or seizure in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights, the court may grant the motion to suppress.
This would mean that the evidence (money, gun, and marijuana) would be excluded from the trial and could not be used against the defendant.
However, if the court determines that the evidence was obtained lawfully, such as through a valid search warrant, consent, or an exception to the warrant requirement, the court may deny the motion to suppress.
This would allow the evidence to be admitted and considered during the trial.
It's important to note that the specific details of the case, including the applicable laws and the evidence presented, will ultimately determine how the court rules on the defendant's motion to suppress.
To know more about defendant's motion refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31036436#
#SPJ11
how can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics
Explanation:
porque es importante saber que existen los derechos humanos
Answer:
Porque ay que saber cómo defenderse si uno es acusado sin gran motivo. Debemos saber que derechos tenemos como humanos cuando se nos acusa falsamente
Explanation:
an individual who has been the subject of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal
True, a person who has been the victim of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal.
Alleged: stated to be true but not yet proven to be true; the crime may be referred to as the "alleged crime" until the trial is completed.To allege is to assert or claim something as true; to make an allegation. [Last updated by the Wex Definitions Team in June 2021] criminal justice. Prosecute means to initiate criminal proceedings against someone in criminal law. The prosecuting attorney, for example, a local District Attorney, state Attorney General, or federal United States Attorney, initiates such actions. Alleged can also be used as the past tense of the verb allege, which means to claim before or without proof.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/29415296
#SPJ4
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
The environmental policy act of 1969 was instituted as a follow up regulation to major environmental issues that occurred in the 1960’s.
Answer:
That's correct! The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was passed in response to growing concern about the impact of human activities on the environment. The act established a national policy to protect the environment and created the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to advise the president on environmental matters.
1. After the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, African Americans continued to experience political and economic oppression mainly because
A. the amendments were not intended to solve their problems
B. many African Americans distrusted the federal government
C. Southern states enacted Jim Crow laws
D. poor communications kept people from learning about their legal rights
2. Sierra stands in line at her polling place to vote in the election. She is happy that women were granted the right to vote so she can voice her opinion thanks to this amendment!
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
3. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. to give women the right to vote
B. to allow the Confederate States to re-enter the Union
C. to give African Americans the right to vote
D. to abolish slavery
4. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. It freed the slaves
B. It led to less segregation
C. It led to more segregation
D. It gave equal protection of the law
5. What was the primary reason for the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868?
A. to make slavery illegal in the United States
B. to uphold the legality of "separate but equal"
C. to guarantee citizenship rights to African Americans
D. to allow former Confederate officials to hold public office
6. After the Civil War, the purpose of adding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution was to
A. expand educational opportunities for African American men
B. allow women to become full citizens
C. guarantee African Americans equal treatment under the law
D. extend constitutional rights to new territories
7. What was the purpose of the 15th amendment ratified in 1870?
A. to establish a federal income tax
B. to give African American males the right to vote
C. to give women the right to vote
D. to officially end the "Reconstruction Era"
8. John is struggling to pay his bills since he got hurt at work. He is thankful that when he goes to vote in the next election, he doesn’t have to pay a poll tax thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
9. Damian just turned 18 years old. He can’t wait to cast his vote for the first time in the election this year thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
10. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision and the concept of “separate, but equal” thinking was overturned by what follow-up case in 1954?
A. Marbury v. Madison
B. Tinker v. Des Moines
C. Worcester v. Georgia
D. Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
1. C
2. B
3. D
4. A
5. C
6. C
7. B
8. C
9. A
10. D
Explanation:
Which situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply
A. A car company increase sales when incomes rise in a city
B. A food truck shuts down after a better food truck opens nearby
C. A theme park gains customers after it lowers its ticket prices
D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Answer: D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Explanation:
The situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply “A factory stops making a brand of the phone after the phone's price decreases”. Therefore, option D is the correct option.
What is the “law of supply”?The law of supply states that when the price of a commodity or service increases their availability in the market because the manufacturers and the service providers get better prices for them therefore, they generate more.
The concept of the law of supply was proposed in the year 1890 by Alfred Marshall. The law of demand and supply drives the whole market. The needs and manufacturing of goods and services are determined by market sentiments.
The case "A manufacturer stops creating a brand of phone once the phone's price lowers" best exemplifies how the law of supply operates. As a result, choice D is the best one.
Learn more about the law of supply here:
https://brainly.com/question/17805586
#SPJ5
Summarize one landmark supreme court case related to the investigation stage.
Which function of government do you think is most important. Explain
Answer: Assuming international recognition and relative peace, the most important function of government are ensure public order and provide means for conflict solving. The other functions can be covered by people or the private sector (how effectively is a question that remains unanswered) but only the State should have an army or a police force and only the state can provide for a legal system and a political system in the national level.
Explanation:
The important function of government is "to ensure national security". A further explanation is provided below.
A means of administering organizational norms including determining policies is considered a system of government.The government however is important to strengthen a community of individuals together into the societal structure, a nationality that would be widely recognized by those of a similar kind.
Learn more about the function of government here:
https://brainly.com/question/17166802
Which amendment is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reporductive choice
The amendment that is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reproductive choice is the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, contains several provisions that have been central to modern debates on affirmative action and reproductive choice. Specifically, two clauses within the amendment are frequently referenced in these contexts: the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been instrumental in cases involving affirmative action, where individuals or groups challenge government policies that use race or ethnicity as a factor in promoting diversity or remedying past discrimination.
The Supreme Court has ruled that any governmental use of race must meet a strict scrutiny standard, meaning it must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
This clause has been the basis for protecting an individual's right to privacy, which has been cited in cases involving reproductive choice. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) established that a woman has a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause.
know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29517519
#SPJ11
Staff interaction in a childcare setting from which the child learns by example and instruction is known as
Answer:
Behavior modeling.
Explanation:
Behavior modeling is a therapeutic process that is focused on changing any undesirable negative behavior in an individual through the use of positive or negative consequence and biofeedback.
This simply means that, reinforcing desired behaviors in an individual while withholding reinforcement for any form of undesired behavior is achieved through the process of behavior modeling.
Behavior modeling is typically based on operant conditioning principles, through negative or positive reinforcement, undesirable behaviors developed by an individual are mainly replaced with more desirable ones.
Operant conditioning can be defined as an associative learning process which involves reinforcing the strength of a behavior.
Additionally, behavior modeling can also be used to correct human behaviors or disorders such as enuresis (bed-wetting), Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), phobias, etc.
Hence, staff interaction in a childcare setting from which the child learns by example and instruction is known as behavior modeling.
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
the national center for health statistics developed a standard certificate of birth that states adopt for their use. True or False
The statement "The standard birth certificate that states use was created by the national center for health statistics." is true.
What is the National Center for Health Statistics?The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) is a governmental organization that belongs to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). NCHS is in charge of a variety of national health data collection programs that are used to create statistics on various aspects of the population's health and wellness.
The US Standard Certificate of Birth
The U.S. Standard Certificate of Birth, which is used to document live births in the United States, was developed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The form collects demographic and health data on the infant, the mother, and the father, as well as information on the birth itself.
The U.S. Standard Certificate of Birth was created by the National Center for Health Statistics and is adopted for use by the states.
Learn more about national center for health statistics: https://brainly.com/question/19212034
#SPJ11
Q5 - Which of the following is NOT a benefit of integrated reporting?
A: It provides a true reflection of effective management of the opportunities and risks associated with sustainability considerations
B: It is a platform for strategic communication and conversations with stakeholders that provides a meaningful account of performance, builds trust and helps inform future strategy
C: The organisation can save costs by doing one report instead of many that addresses all stakeholders' concerns
D: It provides a wider view of the organisation’s impact beyond financials; which can reveal valuable opportunities for value creation
Option C The organisation can save costs by doing one report instead of many that addresses all stakeholders' concerns is NOT a benefit of integrated reporting.
The benefits of integrated reporting are well recognized in the field of corporate governance. Integrated reporting is a comprehensive approach that goes beyond traditional financial reporting by considering both financial and non-financial aspects of an organization's performance. However, among the given options, option C: "The organization can save costs by doing one report instead of many that addresses all stakeholders' concerns" is NOT a benefit of integrated reporting.Integrated reporting emphasizes the integration of financial, environmental, social, and governance information to provide a more holistic view of an organization's performance. The benefits of integrated reporting include:A: Providing a true reflection of effective management of opportunities and risks associated with sustainability considerations. Integrated reporting helps organizations assess and communicate their approach to managing sustainability-related issues, demonstrating their commitment to long-term value creation.B: Acting as a platform for strategic communication and conversations with stakeholders. Integrated reporting enables organizations to engage in meaningful dialogue with stakeholders, building trust and enhancing relationships. It provides a comprehensive account of performance, including non-financial aspects, which informs future strategy and decision-making.D: Providing a wider view of the organization's impact beyond financials. Integrated reporting considers the broader societal and environmental impacts of the organization, uncovering valuable opportunities for value creation and sustainable practices.In summary, the correct answer is C: The organization can save costs by doing one report instead of many that addresses all stakeholders' concerns. Integrated reporting involves additional efforts to capture and report non-financial information, which may increase costs initially but provides valuable insights and benefits in terms of transparency, accountability, and long-term value creation.For more questions on stakeholders
https://brainly.com/question/15532995
#SPJ8
in an empire, the hierarchical political relationship between a home government (empire) and a subordinate political organization (colony) is characterized by:
In an empire, the hierarchical political relationship between a home government (empire) and a subordinate political organization (colony) is characterized by a significant power imbalance.
The home government typically holds the majority of political and economic power and imposes its laws and policies on the colony, often through a colonial administration. The colony is subject to the authority of the home government, which may limit its autonomy and independence. The relationship is often exploitative, with the colony providing resources and labor to the home government in exchange for limited benefits. Additionally, the hierarchical nature of the relationship can create tension and conflict between the colony and the home government.
To know more about hierarchical politics click here:
brainly.com/question/3243750
#SPJ11
The ruling that schools can censor student publications if there is a legitimate educational concern was issued in which case ?
Answer:
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Explanation:
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose.”
The President welcomes Pope Francis to the United States on behalf of the American people. Which role is the president carrying out?
Answer:
He's representing the United States.
Explanation:
When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.
Use the quotation to answer the question.
"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."
-excerpt from the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution
Which of the following most clearly reveals the Founders ideas about the source of
government power?
O "We the People"
O "a more perfect Union"
O "this Constitution"
O "our Posterity"

Answer:
A
Explanation:
The founders wanted the people to be the source of government power. Hence elections.
How would change the power of the president with a constitutional amendment? Should the presidency have more or less power? Explain.
Answer:
why would you change the power of the president? is this a test or quiz question, because if so I can answer it
Explanation:
Which branch of the military requires their law enforcement officers to complete a Single Source Background Investigation (SSBI)?
OA. Navy
OB. Coast Guard
OC. Army
OD. Air Force
Explain why the federal system was just right for the new nation
Answer: a federal system was right for a new nation because it did not put one person in power but more than one in power to keep it from becoming one person making all the changes. Sorry if it didn’t make sense didn’t know how to word it.
Explanation:
Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be
a. dismissed during a trial.
b. dismissed or settled before a trial
c. resolved only after a trial.
d. settled at a trial
In a typical legal case where Edie files a suit against Frank, it is likely that the case will be dismissed or settled before a trial takes place. Option B is correct.
This is because the majority of legal cases are resolved through settlements or dismissals rather than going to trial. Settlements occur when the parties involved negotiate an agreement to resolve the dispute without going to trial. Dismissals can happen for a variety of reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff.
Trials are usually seen as a last resort, as they can be time-consuming and expensive for all parties involved. Additionally, trials can be unpredictable, and the outcome is ultimately in the hands of a judge or jury. Overall, the legal system aims to resolve disputes in the most efficient and fair manner possible, and settling or dismissing a case before a trial is often the preferred method.
Option B holds true.
Learn more about legal cases: https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizens, opinions, and propertyagainst arbitrary government interference are known as:
These guarantees are known as civil rightsare protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights.
Civil rights are protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as freedom of speech and assembly, protection against discrimination, and the right to due process. They are designed to prevent government interference with fundamental rights and freedoms, especially those that are essential to a democratic society. Civil rights also provide a platform for citizens to express their opinions without fear of retribution or censorship, and to enjoy the same privileges regardless of their personal characteristics. Civil rights are essential for a democratic society to function, as they ensure that all citizens are treated equally and enjoy their inalienable rights.
Learn more about civil rights. here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
evaluate based on transformative constitutionalism
Answer: human dignity, equality, and freedom with a legal system
Explanation:
(HELP I'LL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST! ) Which criminologist from history is MOST likely to agree with this statement: It doesn’t matter if you raise a child correctly; if they are born without the ability to understand how others feel, they will end up as psychopaths.
A.
Michael Gottfredson
B.
William H. Sheldon
C.
Hans Eysenck
D.
Gabriel Tarde
Answer:
D.) Gabriel Tarde
Explanation:
He was a criminologist and social psychologist
Answer:
It is C, Hans Eysenck.
Explanation:
I put Gabriel Tarde and got it wrong. So person above me is wrong.
If you had the opportunity to change the Constitution in one way in order to improve it, what would you
propose? In a short paragraph, explain your proposal and discuss why you think the Constitution will be a
stronger, better document with this change.
If I had the opportunity to change the Constitution in one way in order to improve it I will include stiffer penalties for those who are involved in corrupt practices.
What is Constitution?This is referred to as the laws of a nation or country which explains the power and duties of the government and it is important as it ensures everyone behaves well and are accountable for their actions.
The amendment of the constitution which I will consider is stiffer penalties for anyone involved in corrupt practices. this is because of the effect it has on the population. It puts people under unnecessary pressure to live a luxury life regardless of the means. It also deprives the populace of their right of well functioning social amenities.
Stiffer penalties will make people have a rethink before going into such practice which was why it was chosen.
Read more about Corruption here https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
Myron Effriham is out of money. However, he will be paid in two days. Myron knows that he can cash a personal check with his employer at any time. He also has figured out that if he folds the check he’s about to write many times and wets the crease over the electronic coding, the automatic check-routing machines will kick it out to be handled manually. Manual handling will cause at least another day’s delay before the check gets to his bank. Therefore, he could cash a check late today and, in effect, use his employer’s money to live on until payday. Is this ethical? Would anyone be injured by Myron’s action? Is it illegal?
This is not ethical, he should ask for their help instead of just taking it. No one would be injured and everyone would probably be okay. It is illegal because he would use his employers money to live on until payday and its not his money.
Myron's actions are not ethical, could harm his employer, and are illegal. It would be wiser for him to seek alternative means of financial assistance rather than resorting to deceitful tactics.
What is ethics?The study of ethics, often known as moral philosophy, "involves systematizing, defending, and endorsing conceptions of good and bad action,".
Axiology is a subfield of philosophy that consists of the fields of ethics and aesthetics. These fields are concerned with issues of value.
With the definition of terms like good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime, ethics aims to answer concerns about human morality.
The theoretical significance and context of moral claims, as well as how to assess their veracity, is the subject of meta-ethics. Normative ethics, which is concerned with the methods used in practice to choose a moral path of conduct.
Applied ethics, which deals with what a person has a responsibility to do in a particular circumstance or area of activity.
Learn more about ethics, here
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ3