Answers
The government can provide the efficient amount of a public good by adhering to marginal benefit equals marginal cost rule that is MB=MC.
Marginal benefit is the amount by which an additional unit of labor increases its total utility. The amount that extra french fries increase your satisfaction, or the extra revenue the company expects to bring in by hiring another employee.
Marginal cost is the amount by which an additional unit of labor increases total cost. You will pay more for the size of your McDonald's order; The company's labor costs will rise when it hires another worker.
The reason why we want marginal benefit to be equal to marginal cost is due to the fact that marginal cost and benefits are not constant as they are produced or consumed.
This idea of diminishing marginal benefits, and increasing value can be revisited by looking at the past that compares the law of demand (for marginal benefits) and the law of supply (for marginal costs). What we ended up with was to draw the following diagram that represents the relationship.
For more such questions on Marginal Cost:
https://brainly.com/question/7781429
#SPJ4
Related Questions
1. Think about the homeless elderly or the underprivileged children or the street animals or the exploitation of the environment or climate change or gender equality. Select any one challenge & chalk out a practical plan creatively as to how you will tackle it.
Answers
Answer:
Climate change :
Climate change, a very known fundamental in the 21 st century. The best way to tackle it is to go for strong powers of the world such as United nations organisation.
Strict decisions are needed to be made. As per the recent reports the carbon emissions has been increasing very quickly and western countries are the major source of it. Thus, it would first promote the use of electrical vehicles and will demote industries that emit such emissions.
What are the two most common settings for legitimate non-compete agreements?
Answers
6. What is the goal of social policy? Name some programs and state how they help communities.
Answers
The goal of social policy is in order to identify and find ways of reducing inequalities in access to services and as well as support between social groups.
The main goal of social policies is in order to ensure that everyone in the society lives in peace and harmony and also away from the conflicts. With the social policies, it is aimed to ensure that social development, social integration, social justice, social balance, and social peace to the social groups.
Social policy aims to improve human welfare and also to meet human needs for health, education, housing and also economic security. For instance, in the United States, a few programs are: Medicare- Health insurance for individuals over 65 and those with certain illnesses or disabilities.
Hence, important areas of social policy are welfare, social security, poverty reduction, justice, etc.
To learn more about social policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/25451003
#SPJ1
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
Answers
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
Which two Maryland protected classes, while not specified in federal fair housing law, may still qualify for protection under the federal Fair Housing Act under certain circumstances
Answers
Federal, state, and local legislation establish protected classes. Color, Familial Status, National Origin, Disability, Race, Religion, and Sex are all examples of federally protected classes that are applicable in Maryland.
What is a protected class?A "protected class" is a designation for a group of persons who are legally shielded from discriminatory laws, practices, and policies that target them because of a common factor (e.g. race, gender, age, disability, or sexual orientation). Federal and state legislation in the United States both protect these groups. The independent federal agency in charge of upholding all anti-discrimination laws is the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. These rules are specifically to be enforced as they relate to work by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA) and later federal laws and regulations made it illegal to discriminate against a person or a group of people because of certain characteristics.
To learn about legislation, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24366039
#SPJ4
Explain why the Executive office of the President is important to the President of the United States?
Answers
Answer:
The EOP has responsibility for tasks ranging from communicating the President's message to the American people to promoting our trade interests abroad. Overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, the EOP has traditionally been home to many of the President's closest advisors.
Explanation:
The EOP is in charge of everything from informing the American people about the President's message to advancing our trade interests abroad. Many of the President's closest advisors have historically called the EOP, which is overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, home.
The President of the United States, who also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, is given control over the Executive Branch. The President picks the leaders of all government agencies, including the Cabinet, in order to carry out and enforce the laws passed by Congress. The Vice President is a member of the Executive Branch and is prepared to take over as President if necessary.
The daily enforcement and implementation of federal legislation is the responsibility of the Cabinet and independent federal agencies. These divisions and organizations have objectives that are as dissimilar from one another as the Department of Defense's and the Environmental Protection Agency's, the Social Security Administration's, and the Securities and Exchange Commission's, are.
Therefore, the Executive Office of the President is important to the President of the United States.
Learn more about President, here;
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ6
Project: Create Your Own Crime
Construct Your Own Scenario
Answers
either create a case or a senario, give details but dont go like super indept. you need to decide what kind of crime you want to do in your senario.
- homocide
- burgrlary
- assult
- weapon charges
- violent crime
- drug possesion
ect..
not sure if this helps or not sorry if it doesnt
the idea of a criminal justice nonsystem, in which different criminal justice agencies are more self-serving and focus more on performance measures than on justice, is the basis of the ________.
Answers
The idea of a criminal justice non-system, in which different criminal justice agencies are more self-serving and focus more on performance measures than on justice, is the basis of the conflict model.
The conflict model of criminal justice, also known as the non-system viewpoint or system conflict perspective, proposes that a criminal justice system's organizations should or do operate competitively rather than cooperatively in order to deliver justice.
According to the system conflict theory, the criminal justice system is in conflict with itself because of concerns about success, money, promotions, and fame. As adversarial processes are considered as being fundamental to the "system," this perspective contends that there is no real system. It also highlights the fact that many criminal justice institutions have a tendency to divulge as little information as possible.
Both groups contend that the conflict perspective is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the goal, and groups that contend that the argument is both the reality and the ideal subscribe to this school of thought.
To learn more about criminal justice, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30629034
#SPJ4
Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are ________________fees.
a. Compensatory
b. Contingent
c. Exemplary
d. Per Diem
Answers
Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are Contingent fees. The correct option is b.
Lawyers are professionals who are trained and licensed to practice law, advise and represent legal clients in matters that range from civil litigation to legal transactions. Lawyers work in legal settings like law firms, private corporations, and government agencies.Lawyers' responsibilities include advocating for clients, interpreting laws and regulations, researching case law, drafting legal documents, and facilitating negotiations between parties. To become a lawyer, an individual must first obtain a law degree and pass the bar exam in the state where they plan to practice. Law is a discipline that deals with human behavior, crime, and legal power.Plaintiff fees are costs that are directly tied to litigation, and these costs must be borne by the plaintiff in most legal systems. These costs can be recovered from the defendant if the plaintiff wins the case or if the defendant settles, but if the plaintiff loses, the plaintiff will be held liable for all costs incurred. A plaintiff's costs will be calculated according to the nature of the case and the steps taken in the course of the legal process. These fees include things like the cost of filing a complaint, deposition costs, expert witness costs, and other related costs.Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are Contingent fees. In a contingent fee arrangement, the attorney agrees to receive a percentage of the client's recovery as payment. The attorney does not get paid until the client receives payment, either through a settlement or a court decision. The contingency fee percentage can range from 10% to 40%, depending on the type of case and the risks involved.Therefore, the correct option is 'b' Contingent.Learn more about Plaintiff: https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ11
4. Ultimately, why does Marks say that governments should struggle with, or even at times
directly engage in conflict with, corporations?
Answers
According to Marks, people think that compromise is good and disagreement is bad. Additionally, He says that this idea is too simplistic for the world's nations to support.
Explain the views of Marks on the conflict with, corporations?If one does not comprehend the parties of the conflict, the underlying reason, and the conflict's strategy, it will be challenging to judge if the disagreement is good or harmful, according to Marks.
Contrary to popular thinking, compromise can be damaging if it fails to safeguard the weak and the powerless, the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) remarked.The government should not have been left with this responsibility while attempting to enter a relationship only with corporations, according to Mark, who claims that whenever there is a struggle or conflict between the government and the corporations, the corporations are always acting to advance their own commercial interests.Thus, as per Marks, people think that compromise is good and disagreement is bad. Additionally, He says that this idea is too simplistic for the world's nations to support.
To know more about the views of Marks, here
https://brainly.com/question/19528818
#SPJ1
The law generally restricts the time within which an action can be brought by either party to a contract. This statement is:
Answers
Answer:
the statement is in regard to the Statute of Limitations.
Explanation:
It is good public policy to for citizens to be able to conduct their affairs with the knowledge of potential future litigation that may be brought against them.
Providing a statute of limitations gives citizens (including corporations and other business entities) to ability to plan and prepare for defenses in case of possible litigation . After a certain amount of time (usually 3 years in a breach of contract case, but some states as long as 15 years), a citizen can feel confident (as can the insurance carrier) that there are no pending or future actions against such person.
I need help please.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is true
Explanation:
because the force is greater than that which is needed to compel compliance
The judge ruled in favor of Sam. The statements made to the jury by Linda and Sam immediately after the jury was chosen were _____.
Answers
What is the name of the legal principle that "ensures that the judicial system is the same for every defendant?"
Answers
Answer:
Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.
Explanation:
.What impact did the structure of the legal system in the US have on modern procedures? Choose all that apply.
The Bill of Rights guarantees each person civil liberties to this day.
Some areas, like the philosophy of law, are used in most state proceedings.
When laws are broken, states may only use the kinds of punishment that was sanctioned in the Constitution.
It directly impacts all laws, legal proceedings, and kinds of punishment and sanctions today.
Answer: The Bill of Rights guarantees each person civil liberties to this day, It directly impacts all laws, legal proceedings, and kinds of punishment and sanctions today.
Answers
Answer:
O. The Bill of Rights guarantees each person civil liberties to this day.
O. It directly impacts all laws, legal proceedings, and kinds of punishment and sanctions today.
Explanation:
The above given statements are the impact which the structure of the legal system in US have on modern procedures. The ability to guarantee each individual civil liberties irrespective of tribe or religion is one of the fundamentals of the legal system in US. Also, its ability to issue out sanctions and punishment without fear or favour is another impact associated with it.
Answer:
The Bill of Rights guarantees each person civil liberties to this day.It directly impacts all laws, legal proceedings, and kinds of punishment and sanctions today.Explanation:
just took the quiz
The correct answers are it directly impacts all laws, legal proceedings, and kinds of punishment and sanctions today, and the Bill of Rights guarantees each person civil liberties to this day.
The Constitution specifically allows criminals to hold these civil rights even if they have broken the law. This was historically a most significant development, as many other countries have operated as if criminals have no personal rights.
in the landmark case, hawkins v. mcgee (the case of the hairy hand), the court determined that the correct measure of damages was:
Answers
Answer:
The court held that the proper measure of damages should be based on Hawkins's expected value from the parties' contract — the difference in value between a 100% good hand and the hairy hand that Hawkins actually received.
Which feature of a microblog allows a user to repost another user's content?
Answers
Answer:
Assuming this is for PLATO, the answer would be reblogging.
Explanation:
What if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no
way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or
criminal case?
Answers
Appellate Courts play an essential role in the legal system of every country as they are responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts and ensuring that legal errors are corrected.
The legal process would be significantly impacted if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or criminal case. Here's what would happen in such a scenario:Content loadedThe quality of justice would be affected: Appellate Courts offer a second chance at justice for those who feel like they have been wronged in the Trial Courts.
Without Appellate Courts, there would be no way to appeal decisions made in lower courts. This could lead to wrongful convictions and the denial of justice to those who are genuinely innocent.The stability of the law would be affected: Appellate Courts also play a crucial role in ensuring the stability of the law by establishing legal precedents that are binding on lower courts.
The lack of Appellate Courts would mean that there would be no authoritative interpretation of the law. This could result in inconsistent decisions being made by lower courts, which could make it challenging to predict the outcome of legal disputes.The time and expense of litigation would increase: Without Appellate Courts, all legal disputes would have to be settled in the Trial Courts. This would increase the time and expense of litigation significantly. It would also put more pressure on the Trial Courts to make correct decisions. This could lead to long waiting periods, delayed justice, and increased frustration among litigants.
In conclusion, Appellate Courts play an essential role in ensuring the quality of justice, the stability of the law, and the efficiency of the legal system. If they did not exist, the legal process would be impacted significantly, leading to an increase in the time and expense of litigation, inconsistency in the law, and wrongful convictions. Therefore, it is essential that Appellate Courts continue to function as a necessary check on the decisions of lower courts.
To know more about Appellate Courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ11
what information is published in the congressional record brainly
Answers
Debates that happened within Congress are published in the congressional record. It is a substantially verbatim account is the remark made by the representative of the congressional record.
What is meant by congressional record?Congressional record is the official records of the Congress of the United States, in which all the records of the debates and proceedings are recorded.
The record of the congress has started recorded and publications in the year 1873, and it is recorded till today.
Thus, Debates that happened within Congress.
For more details about congressional record, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14244150
#SPJ1
Can people get divorced without hiring an attorney.
Answers
Trafficking in persons consists of everything except?
Select the correct answer
Answers
Trafficking are also referred to as Modern slavery.
Trafficking is seen as illegal because its involves exploitation and profiting at the expense of adults or children by compelling them to perform labor or disgusting act.The act of Trafficking includes when individual are recruited, harbored, transported, or obtained for a purpose of exploitation.Sex Trafficking, Child Soldiering and Labor Trafficking are the most common forms of trafficking in the modern world.In conclusion, there are huge consequences for anyone found practicing Human Trafficking and this act is prohibited by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act 2000.
Read more on Trafficking here
brainly.com/question/19848240
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
When directors on a board serve for a fixed term but are not elected all at once it is known as a(n) ______ board. a. cumulative b. staggered c. proxy
Answers
Answer:
B- staggered
Explanation:
What are the benefits and drawbacks of ID requirements for voting?
Answers
Voter identity cards have the following benefits:
a trustworthy method of identification.a declaration that a voter is legitimately registered.To increase confidence that the voter is who he or she claims to be, the ballot may include many identifying elements, such as a portrait, signature, fingerprints, etc.drawbacks
Either the government, the electorate, or both must foot the enormous costs. The proportion of eligible voters who receive an identification card will inevitably drop if the cost is passed on to the voter. may be created to address low literacy ratesWhat are the more drawbacks of id?
When many voters lack a fixed address, an effective means of identification may be used.enables voting in places where the voter might not be directly recognizedcan be distributed alongside campaign materials for voter educationThe card may disappear.To learn more about voter id refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13895279
#SPJ2
What is another name for the national government?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
National Government is just the government of a single country
Answer:
federal government is the answer
Select the correct answer
Harry has been called to be part of a criminal trial as a witness on behalf of the prosecution. The trial concerns first-degree murder. Harry claims
to have seen the defendant, Shawn, near the crime scene. Which type of evidence is this?
OA
real evidence
circumstantial evidence
OC
testimonial evidence
OD
direct evidence
Answers
Option (b), As a witness for the prosecution in a criminal trial, Harry has been asked to testify. There is a first-degree murder trial going on. Harry claimed to have seen Shawn, the accused, close to the crime scene. Circumstantial evidence is what this is.
How does circumstantial evidence apply to this situation?In a case involving circumstantial evidence, the evidence must only support the guilt of the accused, and the Court must carefully analyze each and every circumstantial option that is given to it as proof.
A fingerprint discovered at the crime scene is an example of circumstantial evidence, which relies on an inference to connect it to a finding of fact. Direct evidence provides immediate confirmation of a claim's veracity as opposed to indirect evidence or assumptions, which need to be further supported.
Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact from which the court may infer other facts. If an attack took place there around 6:15 p.m., you may mention in your testimony that you observed the suspect walking down O'Connell Street at that time. In that case, you are offering suppositional evidence to the court.
Learn more about circumstantial evidence: https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ1
why were the men at war in 1651
Answers
They were at war because there were series of disagreements about religion and the way the country should be ruled
Answer:
Image result for why were the men at war in 1651
The English Civil Wars (1642-1651) stemmed from conflict between Charles I and Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The first war was settled with Oliver Cromwell's victory for Parliamentary forces at the 1645 Battle of Naseby.
Explanation:
If involved in an accident, you are required by law to show your driver's license and registration card to the investigating officer, and ____.
Answers
A copy of your insurance policy, your license, and your current address.
What is insurance proof?An insurance ID card or other paperwork from your insurance provider might serve as proof of insurance. Your ID card or form must display the policy number, policy effective dates, covered vehicle, and policyholder name in order to satisfy the proof of insurance requirements.
How would you define insurance?Insurance is a tool for risk management. You purchase protection against unforeseen financial losses when you purchase insurance. If something unpleasant happens to you, the insurance company pays you or someone else of your choosing. If an accident occurs and you don't have insurance, you may be responsible for paying all costs.
To know more about license visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/15829119
#SPJ4
parker enters into a contract with keep on truckin’ company to work as a driver. if a dispute arises over the deal, under the plain meaning rule, the court cannot consider any evidence not contained in the document if
Answers
From the plain meaning rule- the law cannot evaluate any documentation that goes against what is stated in the contract if the terms are straightforward, specific, and clear.
The literal rule, also referred to by the plain interpretation rule, is among the three interpretation and application principles that court have historically followed. The plain meaning law is a guideline for interpreting statutes and contracts. It indicates that since the written word is straightforward and obvious, the sense of the legislation or deed must be taken from its vocabulary alone rather than from outside sources of information. According to a form of legal principle known as the "plain meaning rule," laws are to be read in accordance with their plain meaning. When a will is clear-cut, this is applicable.
Learn more on plain meaning rule
https://brainly.com/question/12958173
#SPJ4
Which of the following answers is NOT an argument used by supporters of the death penalty?
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The death penalty supports the religious and social values of our country.
The death penalty acts as a deterrent for those who contemplate committing serious crimes.
The death penalty is “morally correct.”
Answers
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters.
What is an Argument?An argument refers to exchange of views or series of statements or words which are use in order to determine the degree of truth of another statement, conclusion or views.
It is normally a diverging statements.
Therefore, The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters because it does not support their views and interest.
Learn more about Argument from the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/509558