The Judiciary Act of 1789 established all of the following EXCEPT
O prison system
O inferior courts that make up the US court system
O structure of the Supreme Court
O office of Attorney General

Answer:

i think it is B I'm not sure

In a criminal court case, if Sike Muldoon was apprehended by the RCMP while attempting to carry out a terrorist act, the style of cause for the trial would be "R. v. Muldoon," indicating that it is a criminal prosecution.

In a criminal court case, the style of cause is typically represented by "R. v." (which stands for "Regina" or "Rex," meaning the Queen or the King, representing the state) followed by the name of the accused. In this scenario, the style of cause would be "R. v. Muldoon," indicating that it is a criminal prosecution against Sike Muldoon.

If Muldoon wanted to plead not guilty, he would attend a plea hearing, where he would formally enter his plea before the court. At this stage, Muldoon would have the opportunity to state that he disputes the charges against him and intends to defend himself against them.

During the trial, the burden of proof rests on the prosecutor. In a criminal case, the prosecutor must prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecutor needs to present sufficient evidence and establish that there is no reasonable doubt regarding Muldoon's involvement in the attempted terrorist act.

The judge or jury will assess the evidence presented and determine whether the prosecution has met this high standard of proof. If the prosecutor fails to prove Muldoon's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, he would be acquitted of the charges.

To learn more about court case click here: brainly.com/question/482275

#SPJ11

Answer: reformation and rescission

Explanation:

In the case of a unilateral mistake in making a contract any unilateral mistake is induced by means of fraud or misrepresentation, then the contract is voidable.

Learn more about unilateral mistakes here:-https://brainly.com/question/15158227

#SPJ2

When the light turns green, a driver who is waiting to turn left should wait until there is no danger from incoming traffic before making the turn. In general, all drivers should wait to make a left turn even with a green traffic light signal until there is evidence that there is no threat from incoming vehicles, as required by highway traffic laws and regulations.

There would be a significant decrease in the frequency of crashes or accidents on the roads if this were strictly followed by road users, such as drivers.

Driving properly and sensibly is your top responsibility as a driver. You must maintain a safe speed and driving style for both you and other road users, such as cyclists, pedestrians, and other drivers.

There are laws that specify who must give the right-of-way where cars or pedestrians are likely to collide and there are no signs or signals to control traffic. In certain traffic circumstances, these rules specify who must wait and who must go first. The law specifies who must cede the right-of-way; it does not grant the right-of-way to any particular driver. Whatever the situation, you must take all precaution to avoid hitting a pedestrian or another car.

To learn more about  traffic laws please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/8890043

#SPJ4

The police can question Chris about his involvement in the alleged incident if they have reasonable suspicion that he may have committed a crime.

If Chris's parents are out of the country, the police may still be able to question him if he is considered an adult under the law.

In this case, the police found Chris with a group of high schoolers near the scene of the incident, which may be sufficient grounds for them to question him about what happened. It is important to note that Chris has the right to remain silent and to request a lawyer if he is being questioned by the police. He should also be informed of these rights before any questioning takes place.

In most states in the U.S., a person is considered an adult at age 18. However, some states may consider a 16-year-old to be an adult in certain circumstances, such as when they are charged with a serious crime.

In this case, if Chris is considered an adult under the law, the police may be able to question him without his parents present or without their consent.

Find out more on circumstances at https://brainly.com/question/12178843

#SPJ1

Users will take longer to decide if they are presented with more stimuli (or options).

What is Hick's law ?

William Edmund Hick and Ray Hyman, a British and American psychology partnership, are the namesakes of Hick's Law (also known as the Hick-Hyman Law). These two researchers set out to investigate the connection between the quantity of stimuli present and a person's response time to each stimulus in 1952. It seems sense that the more stimuli a user has to pick from, the longer it takes for them to decide which one to interact with. Users that are presented with several options must take their time to understand and make decisions, which results in their being assigned tasks they don't want to accomplish.

In other words Hick's Law simply states that when  more options are provided it takes longer to decide which option to chose .

to learn more about hick's law click

https://brainly.com/question/13710772

#SPJ4

A key precedent that restricts the ability of any U.S. president to use executive privilege is United States v. Nixon. President Warren E.

Warren G. Harding, whose full name is Warren Gamaliel Harding, was the 29th president of the United States (1921–1923). He was born on November 2, 1865, in Corsica, Ohio (now Blooming Grove), and passed away on August 2, 1923, in San Francisco, California. Harding won the president with the largest popular vote margin ever, promising a nostalgic "return to normalcy" after World War I.

Vice President Calvin Coolidge succeeded him after he passed away in his third year in office. However, his brief term in office saw little of significance accomplished, and soon after his passing, a string of scandals condemned the Harding administration to be remembered as one of the worst in American history.

Learn more about President Warren E here:

https://brainly.com/question/1291396

#SPJ2

Answer: We all go underground but what you think you might go in the afterlife or after death is entirely up to your belief.

Answer:

What happened to everyone who was here? And when we die I would hope to say we go to purgatory which is like waiting to get into heaven ...

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Got it right on the test

Answer:

B- the right to a fair trial

Explanation:

correct on edge 2021

Answer:

better you write your own answer.... make creative mind not searching mind

hope u understood

Answer:

True

Explanation:

owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules

True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.

The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons  who commit crimes.

The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide  whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.

The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the  government and  has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.

Learn more about  criminal code here:

https://brainly.com/question/24706076

#SPJ2

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.

As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.

Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.

The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.

Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ1

Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option

a. not further a legitimate local interest.

b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.

c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.

d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.

answer:

Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests

( B )

Explanation:

The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,

The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant  the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination.  it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce

Answer:

Criminally poor.

Explanation:

In medieval times, the power and ability to exercise rights of each person was directly proportional to their wealth: the greater the wealth, the greater the power that this person had regarding their rights, and their ability to act within (and outside) of the law was expanded. On the contrary, low-income people had fewer possibilities of this type, with which their actions were constantly being evaluated by governments.

In this context, in case of crimes, the penalties were much harsher depending on whether they were rich people or poor people. The latter, if convicted, could be tortured or even sentenced to death; penalties that were not applied to people with greater purchasing power.

A , Drivers do do tests on traffic laws and road safety so they are the ones responsible for the safety of VRUs

Drivers are responsible for the safety of vulnerable roadways users because They are usually better acquainted with safety and traffic laws.

Driver software enables your operating system to launch, operate, and manage a hardware device. In other words, drivers are the translators that allow your operating system to instruct the hardware components of your computer to carry out your instructions. Drivers are the software packages in charge of ensuring that your hardware and operating system (such as Windows, Linux, macOS, etc.) are properly communicating with one another.

Transportation of people and products via roads is referred to as "roadways." A road is a path connecting two locations that has been constructed or improved to allow for travel.

To learn more about roadways here

https://brainly.com/question/18522414

#SPJ2

The links between the two crises and nationalism can be seen in the way both phenomena intersect and influence each other.

Nationalism often arises during times of crisis, as it fosters a sense of identity, unity, and resilience among a nation's citizens. In turn, crises can amplify nationalist sentiments by highlighting the need for self-preservation, protection of national interests, and a desire to regain control over perceived threats. During crises, such as economic downturns or political conflicts, nationalism tends to surge as people look for solutions and stability within their own national borders. This can lead to increased support for nationalist leaders or movements, who capitalize on fear, insecurity, and a sense of belonging to rally support. In turn, nationalism can shape responses to crises, influencing policy decisions, public opinion, and even international relations.

In summary, the links between the two crises and nationalism are evident as crises can fuel nationalist sentiments, and nationalism can shape responses to crises by emphasizing national identity and self-interest.

To know more about Nationalism, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ11

Answer:

c. Generally, each party to a contract owes a duty to disclose all the facts to the other party.

Explanation:

in law,silence does not lead to any legal liability.contractual relationship between 2 or more parties,  there is  generally no duty to disclose anything to the other side as just keeping silence does not constitute misrepresentation

Answer:

Here's a sample answer:)

No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the  legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.

The correct answer is A) suit for a particular performance.

If a buyer wants a court to enforce the terms of a contract, it can do so by filing a motion for specific performance. Concrete performance is the remedy sought when monetary damages are found to be insufficient or unenforceable and a court obliges the breaching party to perform its contractual obligations in accordance with the original agreement.

In the context of a contract, specific performance means that a court orders the breaching party to perform a specific act or obligation set out in the contract. This remedy is often sought in cases involving unique or rare property, such as real estate, works of art, and other property, where monetary compensation may not adequately relieve damages caused by infringement. An anonymous title litigation, on the other hand, is a court proceeding typically used to resolve disputes and uncertainties regarding the ownership of real estate. This is a legal action taken to establish personal ownership of real property and eliminate competing or adverse claims. This is not about directly enforcing the terms of the contract, but rather establishing clear ownership of the property. 

To know more about provisions of a contract -

https://brainly.com/question/31076213

#SPJ11

Reject the lawsuit because it lacks a justiciable issue or controversy and decline to decide on its merits.

A lawsuit is a legal action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against one or more other parties. Few statutes that are still in force today use the antiquated phrase "suit in law."

By submitting a complaint, you can begin a lawsuit. You may need to submit a petition or motion in certain situations. You can create your complaint using one of the many complaint forms provided by the court. Both online and at the Pro Se Intake Unit, the forms are accessible.

Learn more about civil court here brainly.com/question/16932522

#SPJ4

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

'The Two Kings' were referred as the collective names of the Sparta officers who were in charge of enforcement of laws and managing the collection of taxation charges thereunder.

The enforcement of laws has been a completely authoritative activity, which has seen the light of the day in the political governance of Spartan government as well. In fact, the two Sparta officers, collectively known as the ''Two Kings'' were given the responsibility of the same alongside the management of the tax collection.

Learn more about law enforcement here:

https://brainly.com/question/29422434

#SPJ4

Answer:

People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?A) natural lawB) riparian rightsC) real property rightsD) strict liability rightsE) environmental rights

Explanation:

it's RIPARIAN RIGHTS

MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST THANK YOU

Answer:

Breeding animals for use in national

research facilities

Explanation:

Interstate Commerce is related to the imports and exports of goods from state to state. This is an example of interstate commerce, and Congress has doesn't have the power to impose any tax on that kind of import or export, as stated in the US Constiution.

Mark Brainliest Please!