Answer:
True
Explanation:
Just deserts is a theory that explains that there should be a direct relationship between the the seriousness of the crime.and the punishment given for it. In such a situation, it is said that the offender has received their 'just deserts'.
Given statement is ''The just deserts model argues that punishment is the proper and just thing for a society to do, regardless of its effectiveness in preventing crime.''
The statement is True.
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
Theory should be tested against___ to measure its accuracy and value
5. Which of the following is the best definition of
public opinion?
0 A the sum of many individual views
O B. what journalists think about issues
o C. the beliefs of one or more interest groups
o D. how politicians express common attitudes
Which amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws?.
The Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
What is the Fourteenth Amendment?The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was ratified as one of the Reconstruction Amendments on July 9, 1868. It was proposed in response to issues concerning former slaves following the American Civil War and is widely regarded as one of the most consequential amendments.It addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law. The amendment was fiercely contested, especially by the defeated Confederacy's states, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress.The first section of the amendment, in particular, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, serving as the foundation for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion (overturned in 2022), Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage. The amendment restricts the actions of all state and local officials, as well as those acting on their behalf.Therefore, the Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
Know more about the Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ4
Which state-level agencies are responsible for providing technical support to local agencies, such as laboratory analysis or record services?.
State-level agencies are responsible for providing technical support to local agencies, such as laboratory analysis or record services to federal regulation enforcement agencies as nicely.
Federal, national, county, and municipal regulation enforcement agencies. Federal law enforcement companies legally part of the executive department of the U.S. authorities, are unbiased of other regulation enforcement corporations and of legislative and judicial agencies.
There are essentially 3 sorts of regulation enforcement businesses, nearby, kingdom, and federal. nearby law enforcement companies consist of police and sheriff departments. kingdom organizations encompass the country or highway patrol. Federal corporations consist of the FBI and the U.S. secret provider.
Learn more about Federal regulation here
https://brainly.com/question/25563981
#SPJ4
how did the federalists spread the word about their pro-constitution views?
Federalists published the Federalist papers in publications in New York City. The Federalists issued a series of 85 articles in newspapers in New York City urging adoption of the Constitution in response to vehement Anti-Federalist opposition to a powerful national government.
They favoured indirect elections for public employees, longer term constraints for those in office, weaker state governments, a strong central government, and representational democracy rather than direct democracy. The term "federalist" was initially applied in 1787 to designate the proponents of the freshly written Constitution who highlighted the federal nature of the envisaged union. Between October 1787 and May 1788, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison penned 85 essays that make up The Federalist, also known as the Federalist Papers. After the Jay Treaty was signed in 1794, the Federalists, who were known for their advocacy of a strong national government, placed an emphasis on fostering friendly relations with Britain on the diplomatic and commercial fronts.
Learn more about Federalists here
https://brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ4
4. What does “all levels of government must be on the same page of the book” mean to you?
"All levels of government must be on the same page of the book" in my perspective means that all government entities must have the same level of responsibility. Maintain equality in government officials and level out the power.
Hope this helps. :3
Explain when, or under what circumstances, correctional officials may legally use force. Emphasise the requirements that should be complied with for the force to be deemed lawful and provide examples to illustrate your understanding
Which of the following was a critical outcome of the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954?
A. Schools must provide funds for special education
B. Schools may not segregate by race
C. Schools must mainstream students with disabilities
D. Students must use nondiscriminatory assessments
Schools may not segregate by race was a critical outcome of the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954. The answer is B
The Brown v. Board of Education case was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in 1954, which declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
The Court ruled that separate educational facilities for black and white students were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. This decision overturned the previous "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and paved the way for desegregation of public schools in the United States.
The decision in Brown v. Board of Education was a critical turning point in the Civil Rights Movement, and it helped to end legal segregation in the United States. It was also an important step toward creating a more equal and just society, as it challenged the notion that separate could ever be equal.
The ruling set an important precedent for future cases that would challenge discrimination and segregation in other areas of American life.
To know more about Brown v. Board of Education, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30820436#
#SPJ11
if the usa is experiencing a recession should the federal reserve bank pursue expansionary or contractionary monetary policy? what specific policy would you recommend? briefly explain.
One specific policy that the Federal Reserve Bank could implement is a decrease in the federal funds rate, which is the interest rate that banks charge each other for overnight loans.
In the case of a recession, the Federal Reserve Bank should pursue expansionary monetary policy to stimulate economic growth. This involves increasing the money supply, lowering interest rates, and encouraging lending and borrowing.
Lowering this rate can incentivize banks to lend more money to consumers and businesses, which can increase spending and stimulate economic growth.
Additionally, the Federal Reserve Bank could engage in quantitative easing, which involves purchasing government bonds to increase the money supply and lower long-term interest rates.
These policies can help boost consumer and business confidence, encourage investment, and ultimately contribute to economic recovery.
Leran more about recession here: brainly.com/question/14735206
#SPJ11
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
processed the scene for evidence. As they neared the end of processing the crime
scene, another child was abducted in a park, not far away. Some of the evidence
from the two scenes appears similar, but other evidence is different. Police want to
keep the restaurant closed and look for new evidence later if the investigation
suggests they should. Which statement is true?
The police need a search warrant to continue searching the restaurant, according
to Mincey v. Arizona.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Michigan v. Tyler.
The police do not need to get a search warrant, according to Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals.
Answer:
Explanation:
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The statement which is true as per the given scenario is - "The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States". Thus, option first is correct.
What is search warrant?A search warrant is a court order issued by a magistrate or judge authorizing law enforcement authorities to search a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and seize any evidence found. A search warrant cannot be granted in most nations to facilitate civil proceedings.
A youngster was kidnapped from a nearby eatery. The eatery was shuttered as police investigated the area for evidence. Police intend to shut the establishment and search for fresh evidence later if the inquiry leads them to believe they should.
According to the scenario, "The police need to seek a search warrant, pursuant to Frye v. United States," according to the stated circumstances. As a result, option one is correct.
Learn more about the search warrant here:
https://brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ2
Why might a convenience store in a crowded city be more likely to experience robbery than one that is the only store in a rural county?
Answer:
The answer is c. The more people in the neighborhood, the less likely a perpetrator will be identified.
Explanation:
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Compared to boys, girl often expierence a “double standard” in rates of incarceration of which type of offense
Answer:
sexual abuse
Explanation:
Answer:
I would assume this would be sexual as*ault/statutory r*pe.
Explanation:
Forgive me if I am wrong, but here is my thinking:
Women typically are believed more than men when it comes to r*pe and sexual as*ault, and there is a serious stigma with men speaking out about r*pe. Typically men are quieter about it too.
I think statistics have shown that women get shorter sentences than men when it comes to a charge like this.
which rationale looks at how close defendants came to completing their crimes?
The rationale that looks at how close defendants came to completing their crimes is called "attempt" in criminal law.
An attempt is a crime in which a person intends to commit a crime and takes a significant step toward completing it but fails to complete it. The rationale behind attempting the crime is based on how close defendants came to completing their crimes.
An attempt is defined as an offense in which the defendant attempts to commit a crime and takes substantial steps toward completing it but fails to complete it. Attempted crimes are punishable under criminal law with a sentence of imprisonment or other penalties such as fines or probation.
An attempt is determined by analyzing the defendant's conduct in the case. A person cannot be guilty of an attempted crime if he or she has not committed a crime or has not made any significant attempt to commit the crime.
You can learn more about criminal law at: https://brainly.com/question/32272183
#SPJ11
3. Debbie and Jim Lomach were driving from their home in Chicago to Dallas for a family reunion in their brand new
Airstream motorhome when a truck full of oranges from the Florida Floranges Company plowed into their Airstream,
causing over $100,000 of damages to the motorhome. Although no one was injured physically in the crash, the
Lomaches have come to you asking what they should do about the extensive damage to their Airstream (not to
mention the lingering citrus smell).
ich Hubisous Slant, has
The judicial branch may have numerous opportunities to interpret the Constitution thanks to the structure of federal courts and a Supreme Court.
Where does the Constitution state that criminal cases must be tried by the judicial branch in front of their peers?Every individual accused of a crime is guaranteed the right to a fair trial by a judge and jury of their peers under Article III of the United States Constitution.
By its original jurisdictional authority, which case would the Supreme Court hear?The Supreme Court is the first and only Court to consider a case, which is referred to as original jurisdiction. The Constitution restricts matters with original jurisdiction to those involving disagreements between states or among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers.
To know more about judicial branch visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/17479440
#SPJ1
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
Draft a heads of argument for your client Talkin (Pty) Ltd with regard to Joshua’s claim as a credit provider under the scope of the NCA. Consider the applicability and application of the NCA, to this specific scenario. Set out your argument in clear sections: an introduction, statement of fact
Answer:
Heads of Argument for Talkin (Pty) Ltd in Response to Joshua's Claim as a Credit Provider under the NCA
Introduction:
Talkin (Pty) Ltd is a registered credit provider under the National Credit Act (NCA) and has been operating in compliance with the provisions of the Act. The company has been providing credit to consumers in accordance with the NCA's requirements, and it is our submission that Joshua's claim against Talkin (Pty) Ltd is without merit.
Statement of Facts:
Talkin (Pty) Ltd provided Joshua with a loan of R50,000, which he used to purchase a vehicle. The loan agreement was signed by both parties, and it contained all the necessary information required by the NCA. The agreement included the interest rate, fees, and charges, as well as the repayment terms. Joshua defaulted on his payments, and Talkin (Pty) Ltd initiated legal action to recover the outstanding amount.
Applicability of the NCA:
The NCA applies to all credit agreements between credit providers and consumers. The Act aims to promote responsible lending and borrowing, as well as to protect consumers from unscrupulous credit providers. Talkin (Pty) Ltd is a registered credit provider under the NCA and has been operating in compliance with the provisions of the Act.
Application of the NCA to this Scenario:
Talkin (Pty) Ltd provided Joshua with a loan in accordance with the NCA's requirements. The loan agreement contained all the necessary information required by the Act, including the interest rate, fees, and charges, as well as the repayment terms. Joshua was fully aware of the terms and conditions of the loan agreement when he signed it.
Furthermore, Talkin (Pty) Ltd has been transparent in its dealings with Joshua and has provided him with all the necessary information regarding the loan. The company has also been compliant with the NCA's requirements in terms of affordability assessments and credit checks.
Conclusion:
In light of the above, it is our submission that Joshua's claim against Talkin (Pty) Ltd is without merit. Talkin (Pty) Ltd has been operating in compliance with the NCA's requirements and has provided Joshua with a loan in accordance with the Act. The company has been transparent in its dealings with Joshua and has provided him with all the necessary information regarding the loan. Therefore, we respectfully request that the court dismiss Joshua's claim against Talkin (Pty) Ltd.
How many delegates had signed the Declaration of Independence?
On August 2, 1776, members of Congress affix their signatures to an enlarged copy of the Declaration of Independence. Fifty-six congressional delegates in total signed the document, including some who were not present at the vote approving the declaration.
traditional roles of police
Answer:
Police typically are responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities. These functions are known as policing.
Is Carry a firearm a civil right or civil liberty
The Supreme Court has held that the Second
Amendment prohibits the enactment of any kind
of gun control laws.
True
False
ang bakuna ng mga bata tulad ng polio at iba pa ay libre sa health center? tama. .o. mali.
Answer:
TAMA
Explanation:
Answer:
TAMA
Explanation:
hope it helps you have a good day keep smiling be happy stay safe ☺️A dead body of an elderly gentleman was discovered in an abandoned building. Blowfly pupae were found on the body. A missing person’s report was filed for an elderly gentleman who had wandered away from home just two days before. The body found was similar in age, height, and weight to the missing person. Could this possibly be the same person as the person described in the missing person’s report? Explain your answer.
Answer:
It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically
According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.
What is report?The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.
According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.
As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on report, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ3
Analyze the “legal personality” and provide one relevant example.
Answer:
"Legal personality" means to be capable of having legal rights.
Explanation:
"Legal personality" means to be capable of having legal rights within a specific legal system such as to enter into contracts, sue, and be sued. Legal personality is a condition or requirement to legal capacity, the ability of any legal person to change rights and obligations. Example of legal personality is that how a law is applied if one is a home owner versus a renter.
How were the firefighters in Boston similar to the firefighters in Philadelphia? They were paid. They lived in the communities. They were highly trained. They were educated.
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
Which part of a supreme court decision presents the argument
Answer:
The part that presents the argument in opposition to the courts ruling is dissent.
Explanation:
Dissenting view refers to the judges' disagreement with public opinion. They also call it the report of a minority. There are different kinds of Dissenting opinions.
What do you mean by dissenting opinion?Dissenting opinions often occur when there is a consensus of part of the case.
A dissenting (or opposing) opinion is a legal opinion in certain legal cases written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the public opinion of the court that results in its decision.
Thus, Dissenting view part of a supreme court decision presents the argument.
To learn more about dissenting opinion:
https://brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ4
Which task should happen during the planning stage of a projec
A:reflect on the project outcomes
B: prevent set-backs
C: determine the budget
D: reschedule to account for project updates
Answer:
c. determine the budget
hope this helps!
Explanation: