Answers
Related Questions
What is evidence derived from stories and personal experiences ?
Answers
Evidence derived from stories and personal experiences is known as anecdotal evidence.
Anecdotal evidence is a type of evidence that is based on personal accounts, stories, or experiences. It is usually not considered reliable because it is not based on any scientific method.
Anecdotal evidence is also known as testimonial evidence, and it is used in many fields, including medicine, education, psychology, and more. Anecdotal evidence can be helpful in some cases, especially when it comes to understanding people's experiences and perspectives.
However, anecdotal evidence should always be taken with a grain of salt, as it can be biased, incomplete, or simply inaccurate. It is important to verify anecdotal evidence with scientific evidence to ensure that it is accurate and reliable.
To learn more about anecdotal evidence, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/12119018
#SPJ11
In 100 words or more, discuss the forensic significance of bloodstain pattern analysis.
Answers
Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is a forensic technique that involves the examination of bloodstain patterns to infer the events that led to the bloodshed. BPA can provide crucial information for criminal investigations by reconstructing the sequence of events, identifying the weapon used, determining the position and movements of the victim and perpetrator, and corroborating or contradicting witness testimony.
BPA can help answer questions such as whether the victim was standing or lying down when injured, the direction of blood flow, and the number of blows or wounds inflicted. By analyzing the size, shape, distribution, and location of bloodstains, BPA can help investigators establish the credibility of a witness's account of events, and identify inconsistencies or discrepancies in their testimony.
BPA can also help identify suspects by analyzing bloodstain patterns on their clothing or body. For example, the presence of spatter stains on a suspect's clothing may indicate their involvement in a violent crime.
Overall, BPA is a valuable tool in criminal investigations and can provide crucial evidence that can be used in court to support or refute witness testimony, reconstruct events, and help identify suspects
is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not
Answers
Explanation:
The majority of Americans, for example, have more trust and confidence in the police than they have in almost any other institution. However, opinions of the police have long been lower in areas where crime is most heavily concentrated. ... The U.S. criminal justice system is more fair and effective than ever.
any one pls give me a gogle play gift card of 25 pls?
Answers
Answer:
k
Explanation:
Explanation:
sorry I can't. I'm broke
In a baseball stadium when the ball goes into the stands in hits a fan’s glove and bounces out in after melee another ends up with it who owns the ball
Answers
The ball is legally the property of the person who catches it (cases after the Barry Bonds balls seem to establish precedent that it is the first person who can demonstrate clear control of the ball). MLB now has unique IDs on balls that are going to be used when a record is possibly broken, so that they may be authenticated as the ball in issue after the event.
After the ball is caught, a park usher will approach the patron holding the ball and urge them to come to the team offices. The team will make an offer for the ball, but the patron is free to haggle or refuse to accept it if they so want. What happens next is up to the negotiation.
To know more about "baseball" refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/8037671?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ9
What is a criticism of the two-party system?
It impacts election outcomes by pulling voters from another candidate.
It favors liberal over conservative ideologies.
It is too polarizing and limits alternative viewpoints.
It leads to spoiler candidates.
Answers
Correct option is C.
The main criticism of the two-party system is that " It is too polarizing and limits alternative viewpoints."
However, two-party system have been criticized for ignoring alternative views and putting a damper on debate within a nation. It simply partisan appeals to the population.
In conclusion, A two-party system is one in which two main political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections at all levels of government, and as a result two parties can hold the majority of elected positions.
To know more about two-party system, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16917042
Examine the following situations decide whether the search violates the fourth amendment.explain your decisions.
d.Pam is seen shoplifting in a store.police chase Pam into her apartment building and arrest her outside the closed door of her apartment.A search of her apartment reveals a large quantity of stolen goods.
e. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house and ask Claire,her roommate,if they can search the house.Claire gives them permission,and they find stolen in Sandis dresser
Answers
Pam is seen shoplifting in a store and Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods this suggests that there is a violation in the fourth amendment with respect to the case of Sandi.
What is the fourth amendment?The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the U.s. Constitutional. It outlaws arbitrary warrantless searches.
In this situation where families have been seen shifting or is being seen to be taking the goods from a store. This music that she is a criminal police had the right to search her apartment but if a person is suspected without having any kind of proof which is the case of Sandi and still her house is being investigated without her permission then it is a violation of the 4th amendment right.
Learn more about fourth amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ1
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answers
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
According to the text, the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) was a result of
Answers
The Smiths decided to contract with Porches-R-Us to build a new front porch on their house.The Smiths asked them to use an ash railing; however Porches-R-Us used an oak railing. The Smiths may argue that they should have specific performance, in that they should receive the ash railing. Porches-R-Us may counter argue that they substantially performed because they look and function similarly.
Answers
Answer:
In the clarification segment underneath the definition of the query has been mentioned.
Explanation:
There seems to be a contract violation when Smiths required porches-R-US to use those same ash handrails, but perhaps the oak railings were chosen. This is also why it was a violation of the contract. Whenever the breach of warranty interacts with either the property and land appears distinctive, precise success throughout the contract breach is more appropriate. The details discuss the changes to either the land, but that will be at both the discretion of the judge.The substantive consistency doctrine seems to be a legal concept which states that unless sincerity is maintained to fulfill the provisions of the act, although it doesn't exactly fulfill the details of the contract or the legislative requirements, the achievement shall be deemed complete because the primary purpose is identified.There seem to be no examples according to the above situation to suggest that porches-r-us utilized intellectual honesty throughout the wrong timber.
There would have been no violation of the contract if indeed the contractor converted the timber towards oak instead of just ash.
Need this in the right order.
Answers
Hit thanks if this helped !!
How can you institute a criminal action
Answers
Notory public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary true or false
Answers
The statement "Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary" is true.
A notarial certificate is an official document issued by a notary public that certifies that the signer of a document has been properly identified and has signed the document voluntarily. The notary public's signature and seal are affixed to the notarial certificate, which serves as evidence that the notary's statements and signatures are genuine and have been executed correctly.
Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary, especially if the instrument contains deceptive information. When a notary is aware that a document is fraudulent, the notary should refuse to notarize it.
To know more about Notary public visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28204126
#SPJ11
how long is The Test for To go driving behind The wheel
Answers
On average, the entire driving part of the practical test lasts for around 40 minutes, although this depends on the examiner and traffic conditions.
Mica is an employee of Natural Gas Company and a member of a union of company employees. Under federal law, Mica and other union members have the right to
Answers
Answer:
a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.
Explanation:
As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.
Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answers
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
The model of criminal justice that is focused on protecting defendants’ rights is known as the ______ model.
Answers
Answer:
the due process model
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:process
Explanation:
Quik Results, Inc., a Maine corporation, makes and sells Power Up!, a weight-gain and muscle-building supplement. Orin, a citizen of New York, sees an ad for Power Up! in WorkOut magazine and buys it in New York City at a local health club. Within ten days of beginning to use Power Up!, Orin suffers internal injuries. Alleging that the injuries are caused by Power Up!, Orin files a suit against Quik in a New York state court. Quik asks the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that it does not have personal jurisdiction over Quik. What is the court most likely to rule and why?
Answers
Answer:
This court is likely to rule in favor of orin.
Explanation:
There is a great possibility that this court will not dismiss this suit due to the fact that Quik is a Maine corporation they went ahead to advertise their product in new York. The court in new York has every right to act on the jurisdiction over the corporation based on this fact. Any corporation involved in the production and distribution of food supplements can be held responsible for any negative effect of their product on users. Quik will face the law.
Give two types of laws/issues that civil law courts deal with
Answers
proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?
Answers
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas claimed that it would increase voter knowledge.
Texas currently holds partisan elections for all judicial offices. However, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county officials and confirmation by the Senate for interim court vacancies. The Texas constitution states that district and appellate judges will be elected by popular vote. Only a judicial candidate who has been declared the winner of a party primary is eligible to run on the official ballot in the general election, unless the candidate meets a stringent independent campaign requirement.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
In counties where the majority of the population supports capital punishment, should prosecutors have the discretion to decline to pursue the death penalty in aggravated murder cases? Why or why not?
Answers
Yes, you should prosecutors have the option to decide not to seek the death sentence in aggravated murder cases in counties where the majority of the public favors it.
Because It should be emphasized that, for all crimes for which the death penalty is the penalty, this is not the only capital punishment available; rather, it is the most severe penalty. As a result, these clauses by virtue of their language alone provide the courts the authority to determine the appropriate level of punishment.
The message sent by the death penalty is that if you commit a major crime like murder, you won't get a second opportunity. Some societies urgently require the dissemination of this message to reduce crime.
Learn more about capital punishment Visit: brainly.com/question/29452997
#SPJ4
John wants to work as a police officer and serve his nation which of these
Answers
Answer:
Police in a city decide that they want to host a "Coffee with a Cop" program that allows citizens to come talk to police about their jobs and concerns they have.
why does amy coney barret deserve confirmation and why doesn't she?
please help
Answers
Answer: hope one of them are right
Explanation:
In her Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Amy Coney Barrett dodges ... Letters to the Editor: Amy Coney Barrett refuses to give basic answers that Americans deserve ... To the editor: Senator: "Judge Barrett, can a president issue an ... That's how Barrett answers any question she doesn't want to answer.
Barrett said Tuesday that she is an "originalist" when it comes to interpreting the U.S. ... She continued: "But I want to be careful to say that if I'm confirmed, you would not be ... Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett arrives to testify before the Senate ... “She doesn't deserve that,″ Graham said
Answer:
Explanation:
President Trump and even Obama said ingenious things. That a President is elected to 4 years. Not 3 1/2 years, not 4 1/2 years but 4 years! President Trump is officially President of the US and has all the rights/obligations/duties of the President until the next president (whether he gets reelected or Biden gets in) takes the official oath of office in January the 20th at 12:00 pm. Trump had every right to nominate Barrett and any other suggestion that he did not, is ridiculous.
When you make a choice, the experience from what would have been your second option is called
trade-off
supply
demand
opportunity cost
Answers
Answer:
I believe it's opportunity cost - (D)
Explanation: I think this because the exact definition of opportunity cost is - "The loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen" which fit's perfect in this scenario here's an EX. you want to go to the movies that's your first option your second option is to go to an arcade but you don't so that experience you could've had you didn't is called opportunity cost which is what this question is referring to. Hope this helps have a good day!
Answer:
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
rate 5 stars and thank
can Nevada count those votes any slower jeez
Answers
right? like nevada please hurry up ;;
What is the real meaning of diction?
Answers
Diction referred to the way we talk because the way we pronounce our words and the words and phrases we choose to use. It refers to the choice of words their arrangement and the force accuracy and distinction.
It is the linguistic choices a writer makes to effectively convey an idea, a point of view, or tell a story. The art of speaking so that each word is clearly heard and understood to its fullest complexity and extremity and concerns pronunciation and tone rather than word choice and style.
In speech refers to pronounciation or how well a speaker pronounces their words. A person who speaks clearly has good diction, a person who mumbles or mispronounces their words has poor diction.
Learn more about Diction click the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/9170568
#SPJ4
to which duty of a House member does this quote most likely refer?
A. to propose in draft state laws
B. to hire and manage staff in Washington DC and in the district
C. to meet with constituents in Washington DC in in the district
D. to serve on committees in the house
Answers
The correct answer is C. To meet with constituents in Washington DC and in the district.
Explanation:
In the U.S. government system, the national government level is connected with the local government level including citizens of all states. An example of this is that constituents (individuals who vote) of all states are informed about the actions of national entities such as the House of Representatives and this entity integrates members from different states.
In the quote presented, the House representative Mike Honda refers to the role of House of Representatives to "meet with people who live in our states" who are the constituents and in this way keep them informed about the actions of the national House of Representatives "tell them about what is happening in government". According to this, the duty Honda is referring to is "To meet with constituents in Washington DC an in the district."
Answer:
to meet with constituents in Washington D.C. and in the district
Explanation:
Just did the quiz on Edge 2021
Plz click the Thanks button!
<Jayla>
which of the following statements accurately reflects the idea of ""reframing"" a conflict?
Answers
Reframing a conflict means changing the way we perceive or approach the situation in order to find a more positive or constructive outcome. This can involve shifting the focus from blame and negativity to solutions and mutual understanding.
By reframing the conflict, we may be able to identify common goals and interests that can be pursued together, instead of getting stuck in a cycle of hostility and mistrust. This approach can lead to more effective communication, improved relationships, and better outcomes for all parties involved. Reframing a conflict requires a willingness to step back from our initial reactions and emotions, and to consider alternative perspectives and possibilities. It may involve reframing our own goals and expectations, as well as those of the other party, in order to find a mutually beneficial resolution.
Reframing a conflict refers to the process of reinterpreting or redefining a conflict to view it from a different perspective, thereby finding new approaches to problem-solving and potentially transforming the nature of the disagreement. The purpose of reframing is to promote constructive communication, break down barriers, and encourage cooperation between conflicting parties.
To illustrate reframing in action, consider the following example: two team members disagree about the allocation of resources for a project. The initial conflict frames the issue as a competition between the two individuals' preferred strategies. Reframing this conflict might involve shifting the focus to the shared goal of maximizing the project's success, thus encouraging collaboration and joint decision-making. By reframing the conflict, the team members can explore alternative strategies and find a solution that benefits both parties, ultimately enhancing the overall project outcome. In summary, reframing is a powerful tool for transforming conflicts by promoting constructive dialogue, fostering understanding, and facilitating problem-solving.
To know more about conflict visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31934557
#SPJ11
Improper relationship between educator and student is ______
Answers
Improper relationship between educator and student is unacceptable.
Improper relationship between educator and student is unacceptable. It is considered unethical and can have serious consequences for the educator. It can lead to disciplinary action by the school, suspension, and even termination of employment. It can also have legal implications and can lead to criminal charges being laid.
In addition, it can damage the reputation of the educator, the school, and the student. It is important for educators to maintain a professional relationship with their students and to be aware of the ethical implications of any relationship outside of the classroom.
To learn more about Improper relationship link is here:
brainly.com/question/8603419
#SPJ4
Joshua Gnaizda received an envelope in the mail from Time, Inc. The front of the envelope contained two see-through windows partially revealing the envelope's contents. One window
showed Joshua's name and address. The other revealed the following statement: "JOSHUA A. GNAIZDA, I'LL GIVE YOU THIS VERSATILE NEW CALCULATOR WATCH FREE JUST FOR OPENING THIS ENVELOPE BEFORE FEBRUARY 15, 1985." Beneath the offer was a picture of the calculator watch itself. Joshua's mother opened the envelope and realized she had been deceived by a ploy to get her to open a piece of junk mail. The see-through window had not revealed the full extent of Time's offer. Printed below the picture of the calculator watch, and not viewable through the see-through window, were the following additional words: "AND MAILING THIS CERTIFICATE TODAY!" The certificate itself clearly required that Joshua
purchase a subscription to Fortune magazine in order to receive the free calculator watch. The good news was that Joshua could save up to 66% on the subscription, which might even be tax deductible. Even more important to the bargain hunter, prices may never be this low again. The bad news was that Time obviously had no intention of giving Joshua the versatile new calculator watch just for opening the envelope. Joshua's parents sued on his behalf for, among other things, damages equal to the value of the watch and $15,000,000 in punitive damages. Did Time, Inc. act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine? Did Joshua's
parents act ethically in filing the lawsuit against Time, Inc.? How would you decide this case?
Answers
Time, Inc. did not act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine by using deceptive practices such as making an offer in the mail, which seemed to be free, but was in reality, conditioned upon the purchase of a subscription to Fortune magazine.
It used fraudulent means to create a façade of a free offer and lure in subscribers. This violates ethical principles that require transparency in business practices. Joshua's parents acted ethically in filing a lawsuit against Time, Inc. The company's deception not only misrepresented the offer, but it also violated the rights of the recipient. Hence, it was imperative to file a lawsuit in the matter to protect their rights.
The lawsuit was the correct approach to hold the company accountable for its unethical practices. The case would be decided in favor of Joshua's parents, as the company's actions are a clear violation of ethical principles. The court may award compensation to Joshua for the value of the watch and may impose punitive damages on Time, Inc. to deter the company from using such fraudulent methods to obtain subscriptions.
To know more about lawsuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31360444
#SPJ11