The Legal Liability Coverage Form would not cover which of the following losses?
Fire damage to the roof
Fire damage to a common wall
Fire damage to the cash register
Fire damage to a permanent awning

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it is B ....

Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.

This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.

The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.

Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.

To know more about  presidential nominations refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31185431

#SPJ11

Once a trial starts, the parties can still choose to settle the lawsuit instead of relying on the jury's decision. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the trial process. So, the statement is false.

False. Once a trial starts, the parties still have the option to settle the lawsuit even if the trial is ongoing. Settling a lawsuit means that the parties reach an agreement and resolve their dispute outside of court. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the litigation process, including during an ongoing trial.

In fact, many lawsuits are settled before reaching a final verdict from the jury. Settling a case allows the parties to have control over the outcome and potentially avoid the risks and costs associated with a lengthy trial. Settlement agreements are typically reached through negotiations between the parties and may involve compromises and concessions.

It is important to note that once a trial reaches a verdict, the decision of the jury is binding and the parties must abide by it, unless there are grounds for appeal or other legal remedies. However, prior to the jury reaching a verdict, the parties retain the ability to settle the lawsuit and avoid the uncertainties of a trial outcome.

Learn more about lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30705473

#SPJ11

Answer:

i think its c.................

Answer:

Manually clean glassware using cold water

1. False. The Department of Education Management being a legal person would depend on the jurisdiction and legal structure in which it operates.  2. False. 3. False. 4. False. 5. True. 6. False.

1. False. The Department of Education Management being a legal person would depend on the jurisdiction and legal structure in which it operates. Generally, departments within an organization or government are not considered separate legal entities but rather part of the larger entity.

2. False. In the context of contract law, a bid at an auction is typically considered an invitation to treat rather than an offer. The bidder is expressing their intention to potentially make an offer but does not necessarily create a binding contract until the auctioneer accepts the bid.

3. False. Placing an advert or displaying an item with a price attached is generally considered an invitation to treat rather than a binding offer. It invites potential buyers to make an offer, and the seller retains the discretion to accept or reject those offers.

4. False. An invitation to tender is not considered a binding offer, but rather a request for proposals or bids. Binh's submission of terms would be seen as a response to the invitation to tender, which would require further negotiations and acceptance to form a binding contract.

5. True. A quotation of price, depending on the circumstances, can be accepted to form a binding contract. If the quotation clearly indicates an intention to be bound by the stated price and the acceptance is communicated accordingly, a contract can be formed.

6. False. While some contracts may require written documentation or written evidence for enforceability, many contracts can be formed orally or through other means of communication. The requirement for written contracts generally depends on the nature of the contract and specific legal provisions, such as the Statute of Frauds in some jurisdictions.

Learn more about jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

Answer:

1: Free speech

2: The right to stay silent

3: The right of life

4: Right of moving

5: The right of writing and more.

Explanation:

The prisoner can talk and write and be interviewed

The prisoner can stay silent if he/she pleases

The prisoner will be fed and educated (If they have no education, unless you are a maniac who already knows right from wrong.)

If you are the prisoner, you won't be confined in 1 space and not be allowed to go out. (Because I think police fear they might commit su1cide)

In prison there IS free time, so you can do basically anything. (For the same reason as last reason.)

I could be wrong, you can also talk with family as well. (to check up on things and tell them stuff)

If Judge Oh represents the legal philosophy of "Identification with the vulnerable" The correct option is C.

It implies that they place a higher priority on defending and advancing the rights and interests of marginalized or underprivileged people or groups. This viewpoint might influence Judge Oh to prioritize social justice, equality, and fairness when making judicial decisions.

It is crucial to remember that judges can hold a variety of legal philosophies and may employ different approaches depending on the particular case and legal issues involved, even without knowing more about Judge Oh's background or previous decisions.

Learn more about social justice at:

brainly.com/question/15132640

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Beyond its intrinsic value, biodiversity is necessary to human survival. Ecosystem diversity is crucial to ecosystem integrity, which in turn enables our life support, giving us a livable climate, breathable air, and drinkable water.

Answer:

O The Supreme Court's role as the

highest court in the land

Explanation:

Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.

For a person born on or after January 1, 1988, to operate a vessel of 10 horsepower or greater on Florida waters, the Florida law requirements follow.

Florida law requires a person born on or after January 1, 1988, to operate a vessel powered by a motor of 10 horsepower or greater on Florida waters to meet the following:

Thus, a legal requirement for a person born on or after January 1, 1988, to operate a vessel powered by a motor of 10 horsepower or greater on Florida waters is possession of a Boating Safety Education Identification Card issued by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) after the successful completion of an approved boating safety course.

Learn more about the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission at https://brainly.com/question/4478106

#SPJ1

Answer:

Because two states in the U.S. can't go to war,

Explanation:

States can not go to war or declare wars. To fix this they can meet a compromise.

75.8 percent. Inmates at state jails typically served an average of 75.8 percent of their sentences before being released, according to a 2020 report by the Vera Institute of Justice.

Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, fairness, and equity. It is fairness in the way people are treated, in the way laws are applied and in the way authority is exercised. Justice is the process of ensuring equality, fairness and respect for all people, regardless of their gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or other identity. It is about ensuring that the rights of all people are respected, and that their voices are heard and taken into account, regardless of their social or economic status. Justice is also about making sure that everyone has access to resources and opportunities equally, and that no one is discriminated against or treated unfairly. Justice is ultimately about upholding the rights of all people, and ensuring that everyone is treated with respect and dignity.

This rate of time served has remained relatively steady since 2005, with a slight decrease in time served in recent years.

To learn more about justice
https://brainly.com/question/30085240
#SPJ4

Answer:

what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.

Another example of criminal justice policy in Canada which I believe to be a more more influenced factor is PARTNER VIOLENCE

In Canada, the criminal justice system is designed to ensure public safety by protecting the society from those who violate the law. The system does and regulate this by stating the types of behaviours that are unacceptable and defining the nature and severity of the punishment for a given offence.

Learn more about the criminal justice system:

https://brainly.com/question/5111667

Roman jurists were able to provide a systematic framework for Roman law because of their education, method of work and social context.

In the first place, they received a higher education in law in schools such as the one founded by Sextus Aelius Africanus and this education was generally grounded in Greek and Roman philosophy.The method of work used by the Roman jurists, which was known as responsa prudentum, contributed to the systematic nature of Roman law. These jurists, who were often scholars, would interpret and clarify previous legal decisions that had been made and issue responsa which could be relied upon by judges when they encountered similar legal problems. These responsa were not legally binding but they were considered authoritative.

Over time, the responsa became codified and this eventually resulted in the formation of a systematic framework for Roman law. Finally, the social context of the Roman Empire also contributed to the systematic nature of Roman law. Roman law was seen as a way of unifying the diverse groups that made up the empire and creating a sense of commonality between them. This was especially important since the Roman Empire was constantly expanding and absorbing new territories. Therefore, a uniform and systematic legal framework was essential for the successful governance of the empire.

To know more about Roman law click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28281504

#SPJ11

Commercial AE are considered military munitions When it is created by or utilised by the military for national security and defence.

What are the definitions of military munitions?

Military munitions include all ammunition products or components under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defence, the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard as well as any ammunition produced for or used by the armed forces for purposes of national defence and security. Early cannonballs and "shells," which were comparable weapons intended to be fired from artillery instead of solid cannonballs, were hollow cast-iron balls packed with gunpowder. The term "shell," which derives from the casing, came to be used as a metaphor for the entire munition.

Know more about munitions- brainly.com/question/28342738

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is E

Explanation:

Whenever you're talking to a client there is always confidentiality, unless you or someone else is in danger they are not allowed to say anything PERIOD. whether it's over phone, email, text, or talking in person they are never allowed to share. <3 hope this helps

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Liebeck v. McDonald's is a famous case that revolves around a woman named Stella Liebeck who was severely burned by a cup of hot coffee she purchased from McDonald's. She sued McDonald's for serving coffee that was too hot and received a substantial monetary settlement.

In my opinion, the end result of this case was fair. While some may argue that Liebeck should have known that the coffee was hot, the truth is that McDonald's was serving coffee that was significantly hotter than industry standards, which made it more dangerous. The coffee was so hot that it caused third-degree burns on Liebeck's legs and required extensive medical treatment.

The monetary settlement that Liebeck received was not only meant to compensate her for her medical expenses and suffering but also to send a message to McDonald's and other companies to prioritize customer safety over profits. In the end, the case brought attention to the need for companies to adhere to safety standards and provided justice for Liebeck's injuries.

Know more about third-degree burns here:

https://brainly.com/question/30592567

#SPJ11

Answer:

backspace

Explanation:

delete

Answer:

When u wanna delete something

Explanation:

Have a Nice Day

Answer:b

Explanation:

Answer:

im most fascinated with the fact that they lean on people necks and choke them it is wrong and has caused deaths . I think i am intrigued by this because it is wrong and needs to change.

I do not think that any public order crimes should be legalized as they were all made illegal for reasons. Most of them could cause safety issues to those around them including themselves. And while there are a select few people would love to do, it still isn't a good idea.

A Federal Reserve decision to purchase dollars by selling foreign assets in the foreign exchange market has the same effect as an open market purchase of bonds to increase the monetary base . The correct answer is d. purchase; increase.

When the Federal Reserve purchases dollars in the foreign exchange market, it is effectively buying foreign assets and paying for them in dollars. This action increases the supply of dollars in circulation.

In an open market purchase of bonds, the Federal Reserve buys bonds from banks and other financial institutions. The purchase of bonds injects money into the economy and increases the monetary base. The monetary base refers to the total amount of currency in circulation plus the reserves held by banks.

By purchasing dollars and increasing the monetary base, the Federal Reserve expands the money supply. The money supply refers to the total amount of money available in the economy for spending and lending.

Therefore, a Federal Reserve decision to purchase dollars by selling foreign assets in the foreign exchange market has the same effect as an open market purchase of bonds to increase the monetary base and the money supply.

To know more about  Federal Reserve purchases, click here:https://brainly.com/question/4446110

#SPJ11

Owning a property in fee simple, which confers unlimited ownership, enjoyment, and transfer of interests in the real estate, does not mean that the owner will not abide by zoning regulations.  So the statement is FALSE.

Otherwise, a property in fee simple means that the owner can:

Thus, ownership of property in fee simple confers the highest ownership right in real estate.

Learn more about property in fee simple at https://brainly.com/question/17276804

Implementing comprehensive health and safety measures in construction is crucial to protect employees, visitors, and the environment, minimizing risks and promoting a safe working environment.

Health and Safety refers to the measures taken to ensure the well-being of employees, construction site visitors, and the environment during construction operations. Construction companies must ensure that their operations do not pose a danger to employees, passersby, or the environment.

Therefore, employers must put in place various safety measures and programs. They should perform thorough risk assessments to identify potential risks and hazards at construction sites. Additionally, employees should be trained on health and safety protocols to minimize accidents and injuries.

Therefore, it is important to follow best practices in construction safety to prevent accidents and injuries. This may include the use of protective equipment, ensuring safe work conditions, and training personnel on safe work practices.

To learn more about safety

https://brainly.com/question/29618609

#SPJ11

The court upholds the provisions of the BCRA that require the disclosure of funding for ads because it is necessary for political transparency and accountability.

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) was passed in 2002 to regulate the use of soft money in federal elections and to curb the influence of corporations and unions on political campaigns. One of the provisions of the BCRA requires the disclosure of funding sources for political advertisements.

The court upholds this provision because it is essential for political transparency and accountability. By requiring the disclosure of funding sources, the public can see who is paying for political ads and can make informed decisions about the issues and candidates being promoted.

In addition, disclosure helps to prevent corruption and unethical behavior by politicians and donors. It also promotes fair competition and a level playing field in the political process, as all candidates have to disclose their funding sources.

Furthermore, disclosure of funding sources helps to prevent foreign interference in the political process. By requiring the disclosure of funding sources, it is easier to detect and prevent foreign entities from influencing elections by funneling money through shell companies or other means.

In conclusion, the court upholds the provisions of the BCRA that require the disclosure of funding for ads because it promotes political transparency and accountability, prevents corruption and unethical behavior, promotes fair competition, and helps to prevent foreign interference in the political process.

Learn more about unethical behavior: https://brainly.com/question/9740334

#SPJ11

I would say that the statement "what I believe must be true if I feel very strongly about it" is a fallacious reasoning.