The ratio of the length of the piece of wire to the length of the rope to the length of the piece of string is 6:5:1.5
What is a ratio?The ratio shows how many times one value is contained in another value.
Example:
There are 3 apples and 2 oranges in a basket.
The ratio of apples to oranges is 3:2 or 3/2.
We have,
Let the length of the rope = x
Length of a piece of wire = (5/6)x
Length of a piece of string = (1/4)x
Length of the piece of string = 4.5cm
This can be written as,
4.5cm = (1/4)x
45/10 x 4 = x
x = 9 x 2
x = 18 cm
Now,
Length of the rope = 18 cm
Length of a piece of wire = 5/6 x 18 = 15 cm
Now,
Length of the rope : Length of a piece of wire : Length of a piece of string
18:15:4.5
We can simplify the ratio as,
Taking out the common factor 3.
6:5:1.5
Thus,
The required ratio is 6:5:1.5
Learn more about ratios here:
https://brainly.com/question/2462048
#SPJ1
20 POINT!!
Can someone help me I don’t understand it at all
Answer:
second
Step-by-step explanation:
substitute y=6 and x=1 in the given relations and see if works
y=2x will be 6 = 2*1 false
y=x+5 will be 6 = 1+5 true
because this is true check all the other y and x and if all true is good
7=2+5 true, 8=3+5 true 9= 4+5 true, 10=5+5 true, so second is good
y=2x+1 will be 6=2*1+1 false
y=3x+1 will be 6=3*1+1 false
Write the recurrence relation for the nth term which is defined by multiplying the prior term by 3 and subtracting 12.
Answer: Aₙ = 3*Aₙ₋₁ - 12
Step-by-step explanation:
Here our terms will be denoted as:
Aₙ
Where this is the n-th term of the sequence.
Now we have that the recurrence relation is defined by:
"by multiplying the prior term by 3 and subtracting 12."
Then we will have that:
Aₙ = 3*Aₙ₋₁ - 12
That is the equation to find all the terms in our sequence (remember that we need to know the initial term, A₀ in order to find all the other ones)
We want to find the zeros of this polynomial:
p(x) = (2x^2 – 9x + 7)(x - 2)
p(x) = (2x² - 9x + 7)(x - 2)
2x² - 9x + 7 = 0 or x - 2 = 0
x = 2
a = 2, b = -9, c = 7
Delta = (-9)² - 4 * 2 * 7 = 81 - 56 = 25
x = (-(-9) - 5)/(2 * 2) = 4/4 = 1
x = (-(-9) + 5)/(2 * 2) = 14/4 = 3,75
A pipe has a diameter of 2.5 inches. Insulation that is 0.5 inch thick is placed around the pipe. What is the diameter of the pipe with the insulation around it?
Answer:
So the diameter of the pipe with the insulation around it is approximately 18.84 inches / 2 = 9.42 inches.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the diameter of the pipe with the insulation around it, we can use the formula for the circumference of a circle:
C = 2 * π * r
Where:
· C = circumference of the pipe
· π = the mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14
· r = the radius of the pipe
Using the given information, we know that the pipe’s diameter is 2.5 inches and that the insulation around the pipe is 0.5 inch thick. Therefore, the radius of the pipe with the insulation around it is:
r = 2.5 inches + 0.5 inch = 3 inches
Plugging in the values:
C = 2 * π * 3
C = 6.28 * 3
C = 18.84 inches
Note that this is only an approximation, as the thickness of the insulation is slightly larger than the diameter of the pipe. To obtain a more accurate result, we would need to use a geometric area formula or a numerical integration technique.
Prove that,if one root of the equation ax^2+bx+c=0 is twice the other,then 2b^2=9ac
The proof of the quadratic equation is represented by the equation 18(m₂)² = 18(m₂)²
What are quadratic equations?Quadratic equations are second-order polynomial equations and they have the form y = ax² + bx + c or y = a(x - h)² + k
How to prove the roots of the quadratic equation?The quadratic equation is given as
ax² + bx + c = 0
From the question, we understand that
One of the roots is twice the other
This means that
m₁ = 2m₂
Where m₁ and m₂ are the roots of the quadratic equation
The quadratic equation is then represented as
(x - m₁) * (x - m₂) = 0
Substitute m₁ = 2m₂ in the equation (x - x₁) * (x - x₂) = 0
So, we have
(x - 2m₂) * (x - m₂) = 0
Expand the brackets
So, we have
x² - 2xm₂ - xm₂ + 2(m₂)² = 0
Evaluate the sum and the difference.
So, we have
x² - 3xm₂ + 2(m2)² = 0
In the above equation, we have
a = 1
b = -3m2
c = 2(m₂)²
Recall that
2b² = 9ac
So, we have
2 * (-3m₂)² = 9 * 1 * 2(m₂)²
Evaluate
18(m₂)² = 18(m₂)²
The above equation is true
Hence, it is true that if one root of the equation ax² + bx + c = 0 is twice the other, then 2b² = 9ac
Read more about quadratic equations at
https://brainly.com/question/1214333
#SPJ1
Diane sells boxes of cookies for each. Manuel sells boxes of cookies for each. Each of them sold the same dollar amount. It was the smallest dollar amount for which this was possible.
Part A : How many boxes did Daiane sell?
Part B : How many boxes did Manuel Sell?
Part C : What was the dollar amount each of them sold?
Part A: Daiane was known to have sold 5 boxes.
Part B: Manuel as known to have sold sold 4 boxes.
Part C: Daiane sold a total of = $40 while Manuel sold a total of $40.
What are the cookies?From the question, take the number of boxes Daiane sold as 'x'.
Note that she sells each box for $8, Hence the total dollar amount she sold is 8x.
Also take the number of boxes Manuel sold is 'y' because he sells each box for $10, so the total dollar amount he sold is = 10y.
Since the total dollar amount Diane sold is equal to the total dollar amount Manuel sold. the equation will bw:
8x = 10y
Then one can simplify the equation, by dividing both sides by the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 8 and 10, that is 2:
(8x)/2 = (10y)/2
4x = 5y
So the possible solution is that
x = 5
y = 4.
So one can say that:
Part A: Daiane sold 5 boxes.
Part B: Manuel sold 4 boxes.
Part C: Daiane sold a total of :
= 8 x 5
= $40
Manuel sold a total of :
= 10 x 4
= $40
Learn more about cookies from
https://brainly.com/question/14252552
#SPJ1
Diane sells boxes of cookies for $8 each. Manuel sells boxes of cookies for $10 each. Each of them sold the same dollar amount. It was the smallest dollar amount for which this was possible. Answer the following questions.
Part A : How many boxes did Daiane sell?
Part B : How many boxes did Manuel Sell?
Part C : What was the dollar amount each of them sold?
Find the indicated numerator 9/10
Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
The numerator of 9/10 is 9
Numerator is the top number, and denominator is the bottom one
If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!
If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!
-Chetan K
Answer:
How to find equivalent fractions?
Two fractions are equivalent when they are both equal when written in the lowest terms. The fraction 18/ 20 is equal to 9/ 10 when reduced to the lowest terms. To find equivalent fractions, you just need to multiply the numerator and denominator of that reduced fraction (9/ 10 ) by the same integer number, i.e., multiply by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ...
18/ 20 is equivalent to 9/ 10 because 9 x 2 = 18 and 10 x 2 = 20
27/ 30 is equivalent to 9/ 10 because 9 x 3 = 27 and 10 x 3 = 30
36/ 40 is equivalent to 9/ 10 because 9 x 4 = 36 and 10 x 4 = 40
and so on ...
At a glance, equivalent fractions look different, but if you reduce then to the lowest terms you will get the same value showing that they are equivalent. If a given fraction is not reduced to lowest terms, you can find other equivalent fractions by dividing both numerator and denominator by the same number.
What is an equivalent fraction? How to know if two fractions are equivalent?
Finding equivalent fractions can be ease if you use this rule:
Equivalent fractions definition: two fractions a/ b and c/ d are equivalent only if the product (multiplication) of the numerator (a) of the first fraction and the denominator (d) of the other fraction is equal to the product of the denominator (b) of the first fraction and the numerator (c) of the other fraction.
In other words, if you cross-multiply (a/ b and c/ d ) the equality will remain, i.e, a.d = b.c. So, here are some examples:
18 /20 is equivalent to 9 /10 because 18 x 10 = 20 x 9 = 180
27/ 30 is equivalent to 9/ 10 because 27 x 10 = 30 x 9 = 270
36/ 40 is equivalent to 9/ 10 because 36 x 10 = 40 x 9 = 360
Step-by-step explanation:
1/64 1/32 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 Decimal mm
1/64 0.015625 0.397
2/64 1/32 0.03125 0.794
3/64 0.046875 1.191
4/64 2/32 1/16 0.0625 1.588
5/64 0.078125 1.984
6/64 3/32 0.09375 2.381
7/64 0.109375 2.778
8/64 4/32 2/16 1/8 0.125 3.175
9/64 0.140625 3.572
10/64 5/32 0.15625 3.969
11/64 0.171875 4.366
12/64 6/32 3/16 0.1875 4.763
13/64 0.203125 5.159
14/64 7/32 0.21875 5.556
15/64 0.234375 5.953
16/64 8/32 4/16 2/8 1/4 0.25 6.35
17/64 0.265625 6.747
18/64 9/32 0.28125 7.144
19/64 0.296875 7.541
20/64 10/32 5/16 0.3125 7.938
21/64 0.328125 8.334
22/64 11/32 0.34375 8.731
7x + 3x + 4 - 24 (Given)
10x + 4 = 24 (Simplify)
10x = 20)
x = 2 (Division)
What is the missing reason for the argument shown?
A)
addition.
B)
division
C)
subtraction
D)
multiplication
Answer:
The missing reason for the shown argument is subtraction.
Step-by-step explanation:
if x=2 and y=3, then what is 5xy?
show your workings
Answer:
\(30\)
Step-by-step explanation:
\(x = 2 \\ y = 3 \\ \\ 5xy \\ 5 \times x \times y \\ 5 \times 2 \times 3 \\ = 30\)
Hope this helps youCan I have the brainliest please?Really bad at math please help
Answer:
X = 26
Step-by-step explanation:
triangle = 180 degrees
180 - (25+112) = 43
X + 17 = 43
43 - 17 = 26
x = 26
HOPE THIS HELPS
PLZZ MARK BRAINLIEST
Rewrite 14/32 in simplest form.
Answer:
7/16
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
14/32 = 7/16
Step-by-step explanation:
You divide each number by two
Which series of transformations would result in a figure that is congruent to the triangle ABC?
rotation of 180' clockwise about the origin and then dilation with a scale factor of -1, centered at the origin
rotation of 180' clockwise about the origin and then dilation with a scale factor of 2, centered at the origin
reflection across the line y ox and then dilation with a scale factor of -3, centered at the origin
translation 3 units to right and then dilation with a scale factor of 3, centered at the origin
Answer: rotation of 180' clockwise about the origin and then dilation with a scale factor of -1, centered at the origin
Step-by-step explanation:
Two triangles are congruent if all the corresponding angles are equal, and if the corresponding side lengths are equal.
Now, this means that if we have a given triangle, and we apply a dilation/contraction, then the resultant triangle will have different side lengths than the initial triangle, then those two triangles can not be congruent.
So we can already discard all the options with dilations.
Now, remember how the dilation works.
If we have a point that is at a distance L of the origin, and we do a dilation of scale factor K centered at the origin, then the new distance of the point and the origin will be K*L.
Notice that if the scale factor is equal to 1, then there is no change.
In the options, we have one where the scale factor is -1.
The minus sign means that will cause the enlargement to appear on the other side of the center of enlargement. But the scale factor still is of absolute value 1, so it will not change anything.
Then the only option that not dilates the triangle is:
Rotation of 180' clockwise about the origin and then dilation with a scale factor of -1, centered at the origin
So this is the only transformation that results in a figure congruent to the triangle ABC
To indirectly measure the distance across a lake, Bilquis makes use of a couple
landmarks at points R and S. She measures QU, US, and TU as marked. Find the
distance across the lake (RS), rounding your answer to the nearest hundredth of a
meter.
The measure of distance RS, if The sides QU = 140 m, US = 115 m, TU = 104.55 m, rounding to the nearest hundredth of a meter, is 200 m.
What is the triangle?Triangles are basic three-sided polygons with three internal angles. It is one of the basic geometric shapes, symbolized by the symbol, and has three vertex connections.
Given:
The sides QU = 140 m, US = 115 m, TU = 104.55 m
As you can see, the triangle QRS and triangle QTU are similar, thus the ratio of their sides will be equal,
QU / QS = TU / RS
140 / 140 + 115 = 104.55 / RS
140 / 255 = 104.55 \ RS
RS = 104.55 × 255 / 140
RS = 190.43 or 200 m
To know more about Triangles:
https://brainly.com/question/16886469
#SPJ1
Answer: 190.43m
Step-by-step explanation:
In Photo
There are 3 types of PercentProblems.
a) Number compared to the Base is unknown: x/100 = ?/b
b) Base Number is unknown: a/?= x/100
c) Percent is unknown: a/b = ?/100
Solve the following percent problems using the appropriate percent equation. Describe
the steps used to calculate each answer.
1) What distance is 24% of 710 miles?
2) 62 hours is what percent of 3 days?
3) 16% of what number is 8?
Answer:A. x= .100
Step-by-step explanation:because of the distance in miles
Find the general solution of the differential equation.
6y (4) +83y" +100y = 0
y(x) =
Refer to the attached image.
mega mart sells a large 5kg cake for $2500 while a 2kg chocolate cake cost $1200 what is the cheapest price sam would payfor 10kg of cake for the party
The cheapest price Sam would pay for 10kg of cake for the party is $5000 from Mega Mart.
To find the cheapest price Sam would pay for 10kg of cake for the party, we need to compare the prices of the available cakes and determine the most cost-effective option.
At Mega Mart, a 5kg cake costs $2500.
Therefore, the price per kilogram for this cake is:
Price per kilogram at Mega Mart = $2500 / 5kg = $500/kg.
At the same time, a 2kg chocolate cake costs $1200.
So, the price per kilogram for this cake is:
Price per kilogram for the chocolate cake = $1200 / 2kg = $600/kg.
Now, let's calculate the total price for 10kg of cake from each option:
Total price at Mega Mart for 10kg = $500/kg \(\times\) 10kg = $5000.
Total price for 10kg of chocolate cake = $600/kg \(\times\) 10kg = $6000.
Comparing the two options, we see that the Mega Mart cake is the more cost-effective choice.
Sam would pay a total of $5000 for 10kg of cake from Mega Mart, whereas the chocolate cake would cost $6000 for the same quantity.
Therefore, the cheapest price Sam would pay for 10kg of cake for the party is $5000 from Mega Mart.
In summary, Sam would pay the cheapest price of $5000 to purchase 10kg of cake for the party from Mega Mart.
For similar question on cheapest price.
https://brainly.com/question/1153322
#SPJ8
The table below shows how much paint it takes to paint the walls of a house. A 2-column table with 4 rows. Column 1 is labeled Paint (gallons) with entries 4, 6, 9, 12. Column 2 is labeled number of Walls with entries 1, 1.5, 2.25, 3. Does this table represent a proportional relationship? Yes, because both columns are written in ascending order. No, because the values on the right are less than the values on the left. Yes, because the ratios for each input and output are equivalent. No, because the difference between the values are not the same.
Answer:
the answer is c,Yes, because the ratios for each input and output are equivalent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of the following is true about a parallelogram?
The diagonals are equal.
All sides are congruent.
The diagonals bisect each other.
The diagonals are perpendicular.
Answer:
The diagonals bisect each other.
Step-by-step explanation:
Not all diagonals of a parallelogram are equal.
The only quadrilaterals with all four sides being congruent are rhombus and squares so parallelogram is wrong.
The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other.
The diagonals of a parallelogram are only perpendicular when it is a square.
When an object is weighed on a scale, the number displayed may vary from the object’s actual weight by at most 0.4 pounds. The scale says the object weighs 125.8 pounds. Part A: Write an absolute value inequality that describes the range of the actual weight of the object. Use the variable w to represent the actual weight of the object. Part B: Solve the absolute value inequality for w. Express your answer as a compound inequality.
The compound inequality that represents the range of the actual weight of the object is 125.4 ≤ w ≤ 126.2.
Part A: The absolute value inequality that describes the range of the actual weight of the object is:
|w - 125.8| ≤ 0.4
Part B: To solve the absolute value inequality, we can break it down into two separate inequalities:
w - 125.8 ≤ 0.4 and - (w - 125.8) ≤ 0.4
Solving the first inequality:
w - 125.8 ≤ 0.4
Add 125.8 to both sides:
w ≤ 126.2
Solving the second inequality:
-(w - 125.8) ≤ 0.4
Multiply by -1 and distribute the negative sign:
-w + 125.8 ≤ 0.4
Subtract 125.8 from both sides:
-w ≤ -125.4
Divide by -1 (note that the inequality direction flips):
w ≥ 125.4
Combining the solutions, we have:
125.4 ≤ w ≤ 126.2
The object is 125.4 ≤ w ≤ 126.2.
for more questions on compound
https://brainly.com/question/3989769
#SPJ8
When graphed on a coordinate plane Beth’s house is located at (4, 3) and the coffee shop is located at the point (–2, –1).
What is the distance from Beth’s house to the coffee shop? Each grid line on the coordinate plane represents 1 mile.
10 miles
square root of 8
square root of 52
52 miles
Answer:
the answer is c square root 52
Step-by-step explanation:
just got a 100
The distance from Beth’s house to the coffee shop, which are graphed on a coordinate plane is √(52) units.
What is a distance formula?The distance formula is used to measure the distance between the two points on a coordinate plane.
Let the two coordinate point on a coordinate plane is (\(x_1,y_1\)) and (\(x_2,y_2\)). Thus, the distance between these two can be given as,
\(d=\sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2+(y_1-y_2)^2}\)
When graphed on a coordinate plane Beth’s house is located at (4, 3) and the coffee shop is located at the point (–2, –1).
Here, each grid line on the coordinate plane represents 1 mile.
Using the distance formula for these point, the distance from Beth’s house to the coffee shop can be given as,
\(d=\sqrt{(4-(-2)^2)+(3-(-1))^2}\\d=\sqrt{6)^2+(4)^2}\\d=\sqrt{36+16}\\d=\sqrt{52}\)
Hence, the distance from Beth’s house to the coffee shop, which are graphed on a coordinate plane is √(52) units.
Learn more about the distance formula here;
https://brainly.com/question/661229
Solve and check answer:
2(x-2)=6
Answer:
x=5
Step-by-step explanation:
2(x-2)=6
2x-4=6
2x=10
x=5
Jina invested 5300 in an account that pays an annual interest rate of 3.4%, compounded daily. Assume there are 365 days in each year. Answer each part. If necessary, refer to the list of financial formulas.
The Amount after one year is $5,483.288.
We have,
P = 5300
R= 3.4%
T= 365 days
As, the formula for compound interest is
A = P( 1 +r/n\()^{nt\)
A = 5300 ( 1 +3.4%/365\()^{365\)
A= 5300 ( 1 +0.034/365\()^{365\)
A = 5300 x 1.03458270988
A= $5,483.288
Learn more about Compound Interest here:
https://brainly.com/question/14295570
#SPJ1
Convert improper fraction to a mixed number
9/2
My sallary was first increased by 10% and then decreased by 10%.find the net change in my salary.
Hello,
x = departure's sallary
increasing a value by 10% means multiplying it by 1,1decreasing a value by 10% means multiplying it by 0,9x*1,1*0,9 = 0,99x
multiplying by 0,99 is equivalent to decreasing by 1%the net change in my salary is 1%
due in an hour please help!!! :(
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1,7 are same side exterior
1,8 alternate exterior
2,4 none
3,5 same side int
2,6 corrosponding
4,6 same side int
4,7 is none
5,4 alternate int
8,5 vertical
8,7 alternate exterior
kenia spent 270$ on 6 chairs to find out how much she spent on each chair she did the following work in long division
Answer:
can u put the entire problem so i can help? :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Question:
Kenia spent 270$ on 6 chairs to find out how much she spent on each chair she did the following work in long division.
045
6 / 270
− 0
27
− 24
30
− 30
0
Did she do the problem correctly? Why or why not?
Multiple choice answers:
A. No, because there is a remainder of 0.
B. Yes, she worked the problem correctly.
C. No, because the first digit in the quotient should be 5, not 4.
D. No, because the problem should be 270 / 6.
Answer:
B. Yes, she worked the problem correctly.
While reviewing the previous day’s arrest report, a police sergeant notices that five suspects were arrested, all of whom had either one or two previous arrests. Including yesterday’s arrests, there were 12 total arrests among them. How many suspects had less than two prior arrests?
The number of suspects had less than two prior arrests are 3.
Given that, While reviewing the previous day’s arrest report.
Let x be the number of suspects have been arrested once before and y be the number of suspects arrested twice before.
Here, x+y=5 -----(i)
2x+3y=12 -----(ii)
From equation (i), x=5-y in equation (ii), we get
2(5-y)+3y=12
10-2y+3y=12
10+y=12
y=2
Substitute y=2 in equation (i), we get
x+2=5
x=3
Therefore, the number of suspects had less than two prior arrests are 3.
To learn more about the linear system of an equations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27664510.
#SPJ1
based on the graph how many tiles are im figure 0
For figure {0}, the number of tiles will be equal to 2.
What is a mathematical function, equation and expression?Function : In mathematics, a function from a set X to a set Y assigns to each element of X exactly one element of Y. The set X is called the domain of the function and the set Y is called the codomain of the function
Expression : A mathematical expression is made up of terms (constants and variables) separated by mathematical operators
Equation : A mathematical equation is used to equate two expressions.
Given is a graph as shown in the image.
The line passes through point -
(3, 8) and (4, 10)
So, the slope of the line will be -
m = (10 - 8)/(4 - 3)
m = 2
y = 2x + c
For the point (3, 8), we can write -
8 = 6 + c
c = 2
For figure {0}, the number of tiles will be equal to 2.
Therefore, for figure {0}, the number of tiles will be equal to 2.
To solve more questions on functions, expressions and polynomials, visit the link below -
brainly.com/question/17421223
#SPJ1
The z-score with a two-tail probability of 0.55 is
Answer:
-0.61
Step-by-step explanation:
0.55/2=0.275
Read 0.275 from normal distribution tables
Gives -0.61
Aaron wants to draw the development of a cylinder. Which method of development should he use?
A.
parallel line
B.
approximate
C.
triangulation
D.
radial line
E.
non-curved to non-curved triangulation
Answer:
The correct option is A. Parallel line.