The confidence interval around the sample mean value is (31.66, 35.26). This means that we can be 95% confident that the true mean age of all Native American inmates in state correctional facilities falls within this range.
Based on the information provided, the mean age of Native American inmates in state correctional facilities is 33.46, which is higher than the mean age of the entire inmate population (31.84). However, because this is only a sample of Native American inmates, we need to calculate a confidence interval to estimate the true mean age of all Native American inmates in state correctional facilities.
To create a 95% confidence interval, we will use the formula:
Confidence Interval = Sample Mean +/- (Critical Value x Standard Error)
The critical value for a 95% confidence interval with 111 degrees of freedom (n-1) is 1.98. The standard error can be calculated using the formula:
Standard Error = Standard Deviation / Square Root of Sample Size
Plugging in the values, we get:
Standard Error = 9.62 / Square Root of 112 = 0.91
Confidence Interval = 33.46 +/- (1.98 x 0.91) = 33.46 +/- 1.80
Know more about 95% confidence interval here:
https://brainly.com/question/15683202
#SPJ11
this activity will destroy trees and damage the environment?
(a) slash and burn
(b) replanting
(c)overfishing
(d)hunting
Answer:
a slash and burn
Step-by-step explanation:
A sample of N = 9 students has a ΣX = 55 and ΣX2 = 370. For this sample, what is the standard deviation? Use the formula shown below. BE SURE TO ROUND OFF ALL DECIMALS TO 2 DECIMAL PLACES.
======================================================
Work Shown:
We are given the following
N = 9 as the sample size\(\sum X = 55\) as the sum of the X values\(\sum X^2 = 370\) as the sum of the \(X^2\) valuesPlug those into the formula to get
\(s = \sqrt{\frac{N \sum X^2 - \left(\sum X\right)^2}{N(N-1)}}\\\\s = \sqrt{\frac{9*370 - \left(55\right)^2}{9(9-1)}}\\\\s = \sqrt{\frac{9*370 - 3025}{9(8)}}\\\\s = \sqrt{\frac{3330 - 3025}{72}}\\\\s = \sqrt{\frac{305}{72}}\\\\s \approx \sqrt{4.23611111111111}\\\\s \approx 2.05818150587141\\\\s \approx 2.06\\\\\)
the ratio of the area of two similar rooms is 4/25 find the area of the bigger room in the area of the smaller room is 8 m squared
Answer:
50\(m^{2}\)
Step-by-step explanation:
\(\frac{4}{25}\) = \(\frac{8}{x}\)
4 x 2 = 8
25 x 2 = 50
The area of bigger room in this question will be 50 square meters.
Given :
The ratio of the areas of the smaller room to the bigger room = 4/25
The area of the smaller room = 8 square meters.
Lets consider area of bigger room as x.
Now let's find the value of x. To do that, we have to equate both the ratio.
(area of smaller room) / (area of bigger room) = 4/25
Substituting the given values we have,
8 / x = 4/25
To get the value of x we have to cross multiply
4 * x = 8 * 25
This results as
4 * x = 200
Now we take 4 to the RHS and it becomes
x = 200 / 4
x = 50
Therefore, we find that the area of the bigger room is 50 square meters.
To learn more about ratio and proportion,
https://brainly.com/question/12024093Consider the equation x – 8 = 4 – 2x.
The picture shows the graphs of y = x – 8 and y = 4 – 2x.
Which statement is true?
Think Through Math question
!!!GIVING 20 POINTS!!!
From interpretation of the given graph, we can say that the equation given as ¹/₂(2x + 8) = x + 4 has no solution
How to find the solution to graphical equation?We are given the equation as;
¹/₂(2x + 8) = x + 4
Now, expanding the bracket using distributive property gives us;
x + 4 = x + 4
Since left hand side is equal to right hand side, then it means that the equation has no solution.
Now, looking at the given graph, we can see that the line of both equations overlap each other which means they don't intersect to provide a solution.
Read more about Graph Solution at; https://brainly.com/question/4025726
#SPJ1
The data on the right represent the number of live multiple-delivery births (three or more babies) in a particular year for women 15 to 54 years old. Use the data to complete parts (a) through (d) below.
Age 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40 44 45-54 Number of Multiple Births 89 508 1631 2822 1855 374 119 (a) Determine the probability that a randomly selected multiple birth for women 15-54 years old involved a mother 30 to 39 years old P(30 to 39) =______
(Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.)
(b) Determine the probability that a randomly selected multiple birth for women 15-54 years old involved a mother who was not 30 to 39 years old. P(not 30 to 39)=_____ (Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.) (c) Determine the probability that a randomly selected multiple birth for women 15-54 years old involved a mother who was less than 45 years old. P(less than 45)=_____
(Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.) (d) Determine the probability that a randomly selected multiple birth for women 15-54 years old involved a mother who was at least 40 years old. Interpret this result. Is it unusual? Find the probability that a randomly selected multiple birth for women 15-54 years old involved a mother who was at least 40 years old. P(at least 40) =_____ (Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.) Interpret this result. Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box to complete your choice. (Type a whole number.) A. If 1000 multiple births for women 15-54 years old were randomly selected, we would expect about of them to involve a mother who was at least 40 years old. B. If 1000 multiple births for women 15-54 years old were randomly selected, exactly of them would involve a mother who was at least 40 years old. Is a multiple birth involving a mother who was at least 40 years old unusual? A. Yes, because the probability of a multiple birth involving a mother who was at least 40 years old is greater than 0.05.
B. Yes, because the probability of a multiple birth involving a mother who was at least 40 years old is less than 0.05. C. No, because the probability of a multiple birth involving a mother who was at least 40 years old is greater than 0.05. D. No, because the probability of a multiple birth involving a mother who was at least 40 years old is less than 0.05.
Using the given data on the number of live multiple-delivery births for women aged 15 to 54, we need to calculate probabilities related to the age groups of the mothers. The probability of a randomly selected multiple birth involving a mother aged 30 to 39 will be determined, as well as the probabilities of not being in the age range, being less than 45, and being at least 40. Finally, we need to interpret whether a multiple birth involving a mother aged at least 40 is unusual.
(a) To calculate the probability of a randomly selected multiple birth involving a mother aged 30 to 39, we sum the number of multiple births in that age group and divide it by the total number of multiple births for women aged 15 to 54.
P(30 to 39) = 2822 / (89 + 508 + 1631 + 2822 + 1855 + 374 + 119)
(b) To find the probability of a randomly selected multiple birth involving a mother who is not aged 30 to 39, we subtract the probability found in part (a) from 1.
P(not 30 to 39) = 1 - P(30 to 39)
(c) To determine the probability of a randomly selected multiple birth involving a mother aged less than 45, we sum the number of multiple births for age groups below 45 and divide it by the total number of multiple births for women aged 15 to 54.
P(less than 45) = (89 + 508 + 1631 + 2822 + 1855 + 374) / (89 + 508 + 1631 + 2822 + 1855 + 374 + 119)
(d) To find the probability of a randomly selected multiple birth involving a mother aged at least 40, we sum the number of multiple births for age groups 40-44 and 45-54, and divide it by the total number of multiple births for women aged 15 to 54.
P(at least 40) = (374 + 119) / (89 + 508 + 1631 + 2822 + 1855 + 374 + 119)
Interpretation: The answer to part (d) will determine whether a multiple birth involving a mother aged at least 40 is unusual. If the probability is less than 0.05, it can be considered unusual. Therefore, we need to compare the calculated probability to 0.05 and select the correct choice.
To know more about probability here: brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
helppp please this is homework you will be marked as brainlest
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given trapezoid WXYZ, what is XY?
Applying the trapezium midsegment theorem, the length of XY is: 30.
What is the Trapezium Midsegment Theorem?Trapezium midsegment theorem states that the length of the median that joins two sides of a trapezium equals half the sum of he two bases of the trapezium.Thus:
Let XY = x
Therefore:WZ = 4/3(x)
DE = 35 (given)
Thus:
35 = 1/2(4/3x + x)
2(35) = 7x/3
70 = 7x/3
3(70) = 7x
210 = 7x
x = 30
x = XY = 30
Therefore, applying the trapezium midsegment theorem, the length of XY is: 30.
Learn more about trapezium midsegment theorem on:
https://brainly.com/question/4451516
Answer:
30
Step-by-step explanation:
Can someone please take the time out of day to help me with this
Answer:
a. 54, b. 117, c. 63
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Angle 11 is corresponding to angle 1, which is linear to angle 2, which is 126 degrees. So angle 11 is 180 - 126 = 54 degrees
b. Angle 8 corresponds to angle 14, which is 117 degrees.
c. Angle 7 is linear to angle 8, so it is 180 - 117 = 63 degrees
Answer:
a or <11 is 54 degrees, b or <8 is 117 degrees, c or <7 is 63 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
A. <2 = <12, <12 + <11 = 180, 180 - 126 = 54
B. <14 = <8, 117 = 117
C. <7 + <8 = 180, 180 - 117 = 63
In 88 minutes, he uses 132 balloons to make 22 identical balloon sculptures. How many minutes does it take to make one balloon sculpture? How many balloons are used in one sculpture?
Answer:
a) How many minutes does it take to make one balloon sculpture?
= 4 minutes
b) How many balloons are used in one sculpture?
= 6 balloons
Step-by-step explanation:
In 88 minutes, he uses 132 balloons to make 22 identical balloon sculptures.
a) How many minutes does it take to make one balloon sculpture?
22 identical balloon sculptures = 88 minutes
1 balloon sculpture = x
x = 88 minutes/22
x = 4 minutes
b) How many balloons are used in one sculpture?
22 balloon sculptures = 132 balloons
1 balloon sculpture = x
Cross Multiply =
22x = 132 balloons
x = 132 balloons/22
x = 6 balloons
Solve for x D (3x-4)° (6x) 112° F
The solution for x of the expression 3x - 4 + 6x = 112 is given as follows:
x = 12.89.
How to solve the expression?The expression for this problem is defined as follows:
3x - 4 + 6x = 112
The first step is combining the like terms at the left side of the expression, hence:
3x + 6x = 9x.
Then the expression is given as follows:
9x - 4 = 112.
Isolating the variable x, the solution for x of the expression is given as follows:
9x = 116
x = 116/9
x = 12.89.
More can be learned about solution to expressions at https://brainly.com/question/723406
#SPJ1
Suppose the expression a(b)n models the approximate number of people who visited an aquarium each day since an aquarium opened, where a is the initial number of people who visited, b is the rate of increase in the number of people who visited each day, and n is the number of days since the aquarium opened.
If the expression below models the number of visitors to a particular aquarium, what is the correct interpretation of the second factor?
Answer: I worked it out and got D but I'm not 100% sure.
The correct option is option B: There were 6.27 times as many people who visited the aquarium on the 7th as on the first day.
What is exponential function?The function which involves an exponent with a base so that the base is rises exponent times is called exponential function.
for example is f(x)=bˣ where b is base and x is exponent
Here it is given that
the following exponential equation:
y = A(b)ⁿ
where the following variables is defined as :
A: the initial number of customers applied
b: the rate of increase of the number of people applied every month
n: the number of months from the bank opened
Substituting values in the above exponential expression we have:
y = 64(1.3)⁷
y = 64*6.27
Therefore There were 6.27 times as many people who visited the aquarium on the 7th as on the first day.
Learn more about exponential function
here: https://brainly.com/question/1269112
#SPJ2
PROBLEM 1
Adrian said that g(x) = x +41 ls
translated up 4 units from the parent
function f(x) = |xl.
Do you agree or disagree? Why?
PROBLEM 2
Ezra determined that the graph
shown below is vertically
compressed by a factor of from the
graph of y= |x|.
Do you agree or disagree? Why?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:3
Use the Laplace transform table and the linearity of the Laplace transform to determine the following transform. Complete parts a and b below. (5e-t+41-7) EEE Click the icon to view the Laplace transf
Using the Laplace Transform table, the linearity of the Laplace transform, and applying the Laplace Transform to each term of the function, we find that the Laplace Transform of f(t) is (46s - 7)/[s(s + 1)].
We are given the function f(t) = (5e^(-t) + 41 - 7)
We are to use the Laplace transform table and the linearity of the Laplace transform to determine the Laplace Transform of f(t).
Using the Laplace Transform table, we have: L(e^(-at))
= 1/(s + a)L(5e^(-t))
= 5/(s + 1)L(41)
= 41/(s)L(7)
= 7/(s)We can now apply the linearity property and add the Laplace Transform of each term: L(f(t))
= L(5e^(-t)) + L(41) - L(7)
= 5/(s + 1) + 41/s - 7/s
= (5s + 41s - 7)/[s(s + 1)]
= (46s - 7)/[s(s + 1)]
Therefore, the Laplace Transform of f(t) is (46s - 7)/[s(s + 1)].
Using the Laplace Transform table, the linearity of the Laplace transform, and applying the Laplace Transform to each term of the function, we find that the Laplace Transform of f(t) is (46s - 7)/[s(s + 1)].
To know more about Laplace visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30759963
#SPJ11
what a statistical process control technique that permits only 3.4 defects per million opportunities.?
Statistical process control technique that permits only 3.4 defects per million opportunities is Six Sigma.
Six Sigma is a statistical technique that emphasizes the necessity of a standardized approach to enhancing and optimizing the efficiency of the production and management processes by reducing the variation and waste within them. It concentrates on controlling a process to ensure that the results of a process are consistent and reliable by using statistical methods. The objective of the Six Sigma process is to produce 3.4 errors or defects per million opportunities. If the process is better than Six Sigma, it is considered more consistent and predictable.
Six Sigma's statistical approach to process control encompasses a range of tools and methods. Six Sigma's primary objective is to increase revenue and profits by developing and delivering high-quality products and services while eliminating defects and reducing waste.
Six Sigma aims to improve quality by detecting and reducing the reasons for variations in production processes. It accomplishes this by developing quality management practices that enable it to assess quality, establish goals, and implement best practices to achieve those goals.
In conclusion, Six Sigma is a process control approach that emphasizes statistical methods for process control and improvement. Six Sigma is used to reduce variability and eliminate waste, and its goal is to achieve 3.4 defects per million opportunities.
For more such questions on Six sigma
https://brainly.com/question/30592021
#SPJ11
Let f: C\ {0} → C be a holomorphic function such that
f(z) = f (1/z)
for every z £ C\ {0}. If f(z) £ R for every z £ OD(0; 1), show that f(z) £ R for every Z£R\ {0}. Hint: Schwarz reflection principle may be useful.
The function f(z) = f(1/z) for every z ∈ ℂ{0} implies that f(z) is symmetric with respect to the unit circle. Since f(z) ∈ ℝ for z ∈ OD(0; 1), we can extend this symmetry to the real axis and conclude that f(z) ∈ ℝ for z ∈ ℝ{0}.
Consider the function g(z) = f(z) - f(1/z). From the given condition, we have g(z) = 0 for every z ∈ ℂ{0}. We can show that g(z) is an entire function. Let's denote the Laurent series expansion of g(z) around z = 0 as g(z) = ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) aₙzⁿ.
Since g(z) = 0 for every z ∈ ℂ{0}, we have aₙ = 0 for every n < 0, since the Laurent series expansion around z = 0 does not contain negative powers of z. Therefore, g(z) = ∑(n=0 to ∞) aₙzⁿ.
Now, let's consider the function h(z) = g(z) - g(1/z). We can observe that h(z) is also an entire function, and h(z) = 0 for every z ∈ ℂ{0}. By the Identity Theorem for holomorphic functions, since h(z) = 0 for infinitely many points in ℂ{0}, h(z) = 0 for every z ∈ ℂ{0}. Thus, g(z) = g(1/z) for every z ∈ ℂ{0}.
Now, let's focus on the real axis. For z ∈ ℝ{0}, we have z = 1/z, which implies g(z) = g(1/z). Since g(z) = f(z) - f(1/z) and g(1/z) = f(1/z) - f(z), we obtain f(z) = f(1/z) for every z ∈ ℝ{0}. This means that f(z) is symmetric with respect to the real axis.
Since f(z) is symmetric with respect to the unit circle and the real axis, and we know that f(z) ∈ ℝ for z ∈ OD(0; 1), we can conclude that f(z) ∈ ℝ for every z ∈ ℝ{0}.
To know more about symmetric , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31184447#
#SPJ11
A woman bought some large frames for $19 each and some small frames for $7 each at a closeout sale. If she bought 22 frames for $226, find how many of each type she bought. She bought large frames.
Answer:
6 large frames and 16 small frames.
Step-by-step explanation:
Make a system of equations, where l is the number of large frames and s is the number of small frames:
l + s = 22
19l + 7s = 226
Solve by elimination by multiplying the top equation by -7:
-7l - 7s = -154
19l + 7s = 226
12l = 72
l = 6
Plug 6 in as l into the first equation, and solve for s:
l + s = 22
6 + s = 22
s = 16
So, she bought 6 large frames and 16 small frames.
The number of each type of large frames and small frames bought is 6 and 16 respectively.
Given:
cost of large frames = $19
cost of small frames = $7
Total cost = $226
let
large frames = x
small frames = y
x + y = 22 (1)
19x + 7y = 226 (2)
multiply (1) by 7
7x + 7y = 154 (3)
19x + 7y = 226 (2)
subtract (3) from (2)
19x - 7x = 226 - 154
12x = 72
x =72/12
x = 6
substitute x = 6 into (1)
x + y = 22 (1)
6 + y = 22
y = 22 - 6
y = 16
Therefore, number of each type of large frames and small frames bought is 6 and 16 respectively.
Learn more about equation:
https://brainly.com/question/1397278
Help asap!! Will give brainlist
The combined area of dark pieces is 253.5 in².
First, Area of 5 light pieces
= length x width
= 3 3/4 x 39
= 15/4 x 39
= 146.25 in²
Now, Area of board
= L x W
= 29 x 39
= 1131 in²
Thus, the combined area of dark pieces
= 1131 - 146.25 x 6
= 253.5 in²
Learn more about Area here:
https://brainly.com/question/30307509
#SPJ1
Sample Response: First, I wrote each ratio as a fraction. Then I found a common denominator of 20. The fraction 4/10 is 8/20. Comparing numerators, 8 is less than 12, so the ratio 4:10 is smaller. Which did you include in your answer? Check all that apply. Write the ratios as fractions. Find a common denominator. Compare the numerators to see that 4:10 is the smaller ratio
In the case above, the option that one need to include in your answer is to Find a common denominator.
What is Fraction in lowest terms?When the numerator and denominator of a fraction are known to not have common factor other than 1, then a person can say that the fraction in its simple form or say its in its lowest term.
Since there is a common numerator and the common denominator will be between 10 and 20. Since 10 is less that than 20, the common denominator will be 20 as both can divide it.
Hence, In the case above, the option that one need to include in your answer is to Find a common denominator.
Learn more about Fraction from
https://brainly.com/question/78672
#SPJ1
write the ratio as a fraction in simplest form, with whole numbers in the numerator and denominator.
40 yd to 64 yd
the power of a test is measured by its capability of a) rejecting a null hypothesis that is true. b) not rejecting a null hypothesis that is true. c) rejecting a null hypothesis that is false. d) not rejecting a null hypothesis that is false.
The power of a test is measured by its capability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is false, so option C is the correct answer
what is power with respect to probability?
Power is defined as the probability of correctly rejecting the false null hypothesis. It is the measure of the capability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is false.
Power = P[ rejecting a null hypothesis that is false.]
So, option C is correct, the power of a test is measured by its capability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is false
To learn more about the null hypothesis refer here
https://brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ4
do you know how to bake a muffan
Answer:
yea by using a resipe
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
you need eggs, butter, flour, sugar, salt, oil (i prefer olive oil) and baking powder.
fruit if you like them in your sweets.
this makes 12 muffins
2 cups flour
3 tsps baking powder
1/2 tsp salt
3/4 cup sugar
1 egg
1 cup milk
1/4 cup oil
preheat oven. i usually do 350 F, increase the temperature if youd like them to cook faster but keep in mind youll need to check on them often with increased heat.
stir together your dry ingridents and in a seperate bowl beat your egg with a fork. stir in the milk and oil with the egg.
pour into your dry ingriedeints until everything is well mixed.
bake until golden
if you like fruit id suggest blueberries, 1 cup
6. There are 45 cans of mixed nuts. Each
can has 338 nuts. Below is Mary's work
to find the total number of nuts.
The total number of nuts is 15210 and the missing number is 5
Number of cans of mixed nuts = 45 cans
Number of nuts in each can = 338 nuts
The fundamental concept of repeatedly adding the same number is represented by the process of multiplication. The results of multiplying two or more numbers are known as the product of those numbers, and the factors that are multiplied are referred to as the factors.
Finding the total number of nuts we get:
Total number of nuts = Number of cans*Number of nuts in each can
\(338\\*45\\= 1690\\+ 13520\\= 15210\)
So, the missing number is 5
Learn more about multiplication:
https://brainly.com/question/5992872
#SPJ9
PLEASE HELP Clinical trials involved treating flu symptoms with a new medicine. Among 724 patients treated with the medicine, 72 experienced a side effect of nausea. The claim is that the rate of nausea is greater than the 6% rate experienced by flu patients given a placebo. Find a test statistic of the proportion.
z = 4.47
z = –1.41
z = 4.53
z = 1.41
The test statistic of the proportion is given as follows:
z = 4.47.
How to calculate the test statistic for the proportion?The equation that gives the test statistic for a proportion is given as follows:
\(z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}\)
In which:
\(\overline{p}\) is the sample proportion.p is the expected proportion from the population, or the test proportion.n is the sample size.In the context of this problem, the values of these parameters are given as follows:
\(p = 0.06, n = 724, \overline{p} = \frac{72}{724} = 0.0994\)
Hence the test statistic for the proportion is calculated as follows:
\(z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}\)
\(z = \frac{0.0994 - 0.06}{\sqrt{\frac{0.06(0.94)}{724}}}\)
z = 4.47.
Meaning that the first option is correct.
More can be learned about test statistics at https://brainly.com/question/13873630
#SPJ1
a drama class has a total of 42 students. the number of males is 8 more than the number of females. how many males and how many females are in the class?
Answer:
17 females and 25 males
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the amount of females, then the amount of males would be...
x+8
We can use this to set up an equation...
females + males = 42
x+x+8=42
2x+8=42
Subtract 8 from both sides
2x=34
Divide both sides by 2
x=17
x+8=25
There are 17 females and 25 males in the class
Your grandmother gave you $22.02 to buy a present this covered 3/4 of the cost how much did the present cost
Answer: it is 29.36
Step-by-step explanation:
when data with a bell shaped distribution is standardized, the result will have standard deviation 1. however, when data with a wider-spread, bimodal distribution is standardized, the result will tend to have standard deviation larger than 1. group of answer choices true false
The statement that 'When data with a bell-shaped distribution is standardized, the result will have a standard deviation of 1. However, when data with a wider-spread, bimodal distribution is standardized, the result will tend to have a standard deviation larger than 1' is false.
Standardizing data involves transforming it into a distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. This is done by subtracting the mean of the original data from each data point and then dividing by the original standard deviation. This process is called z-score calculation.
When data has a bell-shaped distribution, the result of standardization will have a standard deviation of 1, as this is the main goal of standardization. However, when data has a wider-spread, bimodal distribution, the standard deviation of the standardized data will still be 1 after the transformation.
The standardization process ensures that the shape of the original distribution is maintained while changing the mean and standard deviation to the desired values, so regardless of whether the distribution is bell-shaped, bimodal, or any other shape, the standardized data will have a standard deviation of 1.
Hence, the statement is false.
Learn more about Bell-shaped distribution:
https://brainly.com/question/18048847
#SPJ11
without using calculator prove that tan -1 1/11 +tan -1 5/6+tan -1 1/3+tan -1 1/2
We have:tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) + tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) = tan^(-1)(7/2)
To prove the equation tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) + tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) without using a calculator, we can utilize the trigonometric properties and identities to simplify the expression.
Let's start by using the addition formula for the tangent function:
tan(A + B) = (tan(A) + tan(B)) / (1 - tan(A) * tan(B))
We can rewrite the given expression as:
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) + tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2)
Using the addition formula, we can combine the first two terms:
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) = tan^(-1)((1/11 + 5/6) / (1 - (1/11)*(5/6)))
Simplifying further:
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) = tan^(-1)((11/66 + 55/66) / (1 - 5/66))
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) = tan^(-1)(66/66 / (61/66))
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) = tan^(-1)(1)
Using the same approach, we can combine the remaining terms:
tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) = tan^(-1)((1/3 + 1/2) / (1 - (1/3)*(1/2)))
tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) = tan^(-1)((5/6) / (3/2))
tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) = tan^(-1)(5/9)
Now, we have:
tan^(-1)(1/11) + tan^(-1)(5/6) + tan^(-1)(1/3) + tan^(-1)(1/2) = tan^(-1)(1) + tan^(-1)(5/9)
Using the addition formula again:
tan^(-1)(1) + tan^(-1)(5/9) = tan^(-1)((1 + 5/9) / (1 - (1)*(5/9)))
tan^(-1)(1) + tan^(-1)(5/9) = tan^(-1)((14/9) / (4/9))
tan^(-1)(1) + tan^(-1)(5/9) = tan^(-1)(14/4)
tan^(-1)(1) + tan^(-1)(5/9) = tan^(-1)(7/2)
For more such question on tan visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28587485
#SPJ8
Watches and bacteria: A group of researchers investigated the contamination of medical personnel watches at a New York hospital, since there is a potential for patient exposure to potentially dangerous bacteria.They sampled watches worn by physicians, physician assistants, and medical students at a teaching hospital in New York. Nearly half (46.6%) of the watches tested harbored microorganisms that can cause illness. By comparison, only one of the 10 watches worn by security guards tested positive for a disease-carrying microorganism. The researchers want to determine if the difference is statistically significant.Which of the following is an appropriate statement of the null hypothesis, H0?A. The proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from medical personnel is the same as the proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from security guards, i.e., H0: p = 46.6%.B. The proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from medical personnel is not the same as the proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from security guards, i.e., H0: p not equal 46.6%.C. The proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from medical personnel is greater than the proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from security guards, i.e., H0: p > 46.6%.
An appropriate statement of the null hypothesis, H₀ is that: A. The proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from medical personnel is the same as the proportion of contaminated wrist-watches from security guards, i.e., H0: p = 46.6%.
What is a null hypothesis?In Mathematics, a null hypothesis (H₀) can be defined the opposite of an alternate hypothesis (Ha) and it asserts that two (2) possibilities are the same.
For an experiment to test the contamination of medical personnel wrist-watches at a New York hospital, the appropriate null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis would be given by this mathematical expression:
H₀: p = 10.
Ha: p < 10.
In this context, we can logically that the proportion of contaminated wrist-watches would be the same for both sample proportion i.e., H₀: p = 46.6%.
Read more on null hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/14913351
#SPJ1
In how many years Rs 1200 becomes Rs 1632 at 12% p.a simple interest?
Answer:
3 years
Step-by-step explanation:
We would like to calculate in how much time Rs 1200 will become Rs 1632 at the rate of 12% per annum. Firstly we know that the SI can be calculated by ,
\(\longrightarrow \langle\pink{{\boldsymbol{ SI =\dfrac{Principal \times Rate \times Time }{100}}}}}\rangle\)
Also the total amount is calculated by adding SI and the initial amount ; as ,
\(\longrightarrow \pink{{\boldsymbol{ Amount= Principal + SI }}}\)
Firstly lets find SI as ,
\(\longrightarrow SI = Rs 1632-Rs1200\\ \)
\(\longrightarrow SI = Rs 432 \)
Using the first formula stated above, we have;
\(\longrightarrow Rs 432=\dfrac{(Rs 1200)(12)(t)}{100}\\ \)
\(\longrightarrow t =\dfrac{ 432\times 100}{1200\times 12} yrs \\\)
Simplify,
\(\longrightarrow \boldsymbol{\underline{\underline{{ time = 3\ years }}}} \)
And we are done!
A diver is at an elevation of -18 feet relative to sea level. The diver descends to an undersea cave that is 4 times as far from the surface
What is the elevation of the cave?
A: -14 feet
B: -18 feet
C: -22 feet
D: -72 feet
The elevation of the cave in feet will be negative 72 feet. Then the correct option is D.
What is Algebra?Algebra is the study of abstract symbols, while logic is the manipulation of all those ideas.
The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This approach is used to answer the problem correctly and completely.
A jumper is at a height of - 18 feet comparative with ocean level. The jumper plunges to an undersea cavern that is 4 times as distant from the surface
The elevation of the cave is given as,
Elevation = - 18 x 4
Elevation = - 72 feet
The elevation of the cave in feet will be negative 72 feet. Then the correct option is D.
More about the Algebra link is given below.
https://brainly.com/question/953809
#SPJ1