the republican party founded in the 1850s strongly endorsed the same policy about slavery in the territories that had begun advocating in 1846.

Answer: Hey, I can't write you an essay, but here is a good start. Feel free to use it all. This was not plagiarized by me. :)

Explanation: Ramon's change of heart in Salt of the Earth can be attributed to a few different factors. Firstly, his experiences working in the mines alongside his wife and fellow miners opened his eyes to the injustices they were facing. He witnessed firsthand the dangerous working conditions and unequal treatment they received compared to their white counterparts. Additionally, Ramon's relationship with his wife Esperanza played a significant role in his transformation. As he saw her become more involved in the strike and become a leader in the community, he began to see her in a new light and recognize her strength and courage. Ultimately, Ramon's change of heart can be seen as a process of becoming. He started off as a passive observer, but through his experiences and relationships, he became an active participant in the struggle for justice.

The motivation behind Ramon's change of heart can be traced back to his desire for a better life for himself, his family, and his community. He saw the injustices and inequalities that existed in the mines and recognized that something needed to be done to address them. His love for his wife and her involvement in the strike also played a significant role in his transformation. Through his experiences and relationships, Ramon learned to recognize his own privilege and the systemic oppression that kept his fellow workers and their families trapped in poverty and danger. Ultimately, Ramon's change of heart was a testament to the power of empathy, education, and community action in the fight for social justice.

In the movie "Salt of the Earth," Ramon's change of heart is inspired by a number of things, including his increasing understanding of the injustices experienced by the striking miners and their families.

Along with his own development and evolution, he admires the fortitude and bravery of his wife Esperanza. Ramon initially opposes the strike and dislikes Esperanza's engagement, but as it goes on, he starts to see the significance of the workers' cause and the bravery of the female supporters.

As he witnesses Esperanza and the other women assuming leadership roles and battling for their rights, he also starts to doubt his own presumptions regarding gender roles and the place of women in society.

Learn more about on Ramon, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9803948

#SPJ2

Answer:

It put an end to the French monarchy, feudalism, and took political power from the Catholic church.

Explanation:

answer:

the french revolution, ended feudalism throughout france and took political power from the catholic church. it also spread new ideas throughout europe such as liberty and freedom to commoners, abolishment of slavery, and womens-rights.

Catalina de Erauso's performance of masculinity intersects with issues of social class in both the Old and New Worlds in that in the Old World, she used to be the victim of domestic violence. In the new world, the is on the other end of violence and boasts of having killed many men.

This type of masculinity, as indicated above, is associated with violence in her social class of origin.

With her new behavior, she feels more powerful than when she is in her feminine form. This is suggestive of the fact that Spanish Society has a culture of Machismo.

Antonio de Erauso, born Catalina de Erauso, also went by Alonso Daz and other male names before adopting the name Antonio de Erauso for the rest of his life.

Catalina de Erauso, commonly known as the 'Nun Lieutenant,' was a renowned 17th-century Basque soldier and duellist. De Erauso, who was raised in a convent, ran away at the age of 15 just before completing her vows as a nun. Because women had little independence in Spanish society, she disguised herself as a young man.

Learn more about Catalina de Erauso:
https://brainly.com/question/27928518
#SPJ1

Explanation: Putting soap in the fish bucket because tom and andy looked back and in a way they felt bad.

also i go to k12

Answer:

putting soap in the fish bucket

Explanation: i took the test on K12

Answer: Rhetoric is the study and art of writing and speaking well, being persuasive, and knowing how to compose successful writing and presentations.

Explanation:

Answer:

I don't know it may me economy

Answer:

10,999 Soldiers

Explanation:

There are no records for the average number if people that died in World War 1 every hour. On the final hour, there were 10,999 soldiers that were killed. We always use the final hour to calculate the number of deaths.

- Educationist

Answer:

Plantation owners made the system profitable by having slaves who were basically free labor

Explanation:

Please mark brainliest

William Levitt covertly employed redlining practices to limit racial diversity in the communities he built.

In conclusion, William Levitt employed covert redlining practices to intentionally limit racial diversity in the communities he developed, perpetuating racial segregation and inequality in housing.

For more questions on William Levitt:

https://brainly.com/question/22925088

#SPJ8

Answer:

c.) To instill fear and punish the people who remained loyal to the King

The Reign of Terror was a period of extreme violence and repression during the French Revolution, which lasted from 1793 to 1794. The radical faction in France, known as the Jacobins, who were led by figures such as Maximilien Robespierre, implemented the Reign of Terror as a means to consolidate their power and maintain control over the revolution.

Answer:

A crowd gathers at the jail. "This woman has brought shame upon us all, and ought to die.

i hope this helps<3 :)

Answer: c

Explanation: on edge

Answer:

Below:

Explanation:

The large land was isolated from much of the rest of the world by dry deserts to the north and west, the Pacific Ocean to the east, and impassable mountains to the south. This enabled the Chinese to develop independently from other world civilizations.

Hope it helps.....

It's Muska....   :)

Please add a question for help. I cannot explain how to help you without directions.

The international Muslim community overwhelmingly condemns the actions of groups such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

Al-Qaeda is responsible for a number of terrorist attacks, including the September 11th attacks in the United States, and the Taliban has committed numerous human rights atrocities in Afghanistan. According to a statement released by the World Muslim League in response to 9/11, Muslims around the world condemned the attacks.

A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2017 revealed that Muslims in many countries viewed al-Qaeda and the Taliban negatively, with the majority of respondents stating that the groups' activities did not represent the true values of Islam. Moreover, the survey found that Muslims in the majority of countries surveyed disapprove of the Taliban's intimidating tactics and al-Qaeda's use of violence. These findings demonstrate the international Muslim community's clear stance against the actions of al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

To know more about Muslims , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4681522

#SPJ1

Considering the historical facts, the second draft of the Articles of Confederation switched from a strong central government to an "even stronger central government."

The Articles of Confederation draft was written sixth times to weaken the central government's power and make the states and citizens have more freedom and liberty.

Benjamin Franklin and Silas Deane wrote the first and second drafts of the Articles of Confederation.

Eventually, the Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781 after Maryland ratified the document on March 1st, 1781.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "an even stronger central government."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/518671

Answer:

D. Arabs

hope this answer helps you....

Baybayin, a pre-colonial writing system used in the Philippines, was not considered to be higher in literacy than Madrid, Spain. In fact, the Spanish colonizers who arrived in the Philippines in the 16th century viewed Baybayin as a primitive and unsophisticated writing system. The Spanish introduced the Latin alphabet to the Philippines, which became the dominant writing system during the colonial period.

It is important to note that the concept of "literacy" is complex and multifaceted, and cannot be reduced to the use of a particular writing system. While Baybayin may have been well-suited to the linguistic and cultural context of pre-colonial Philippines, it was not widely used or recognized outside of the region. The Spanish, on the other hand, brought with them a writing system that was widely used and recognized throughout Europe and beyond.

Furthermore, literacy is not just about the ability to read and write, but also about access to education, cultural and political institutions, and economic opportunities. During the colonial period, the Spanish imposed their language and culture on the Philippines, which had a profound impact on the country's social, political, and economic development. While Baybayin may have been an important part of pre-colonial Philippine culture, it did not provide the same opportunities for advancement and mobility as the Spanish language and culture did.

Answer:

1. Independence 2. disputes with the British crown over taxation  3. Freedoms such as freedom of religion, speech, assembly, liberty

Explanation:

People wanted lesser taxes so they fled to North America to form their own country. they also fled because they wanted to have Freedom of believing one thing and they wanted to be independent

Answer:

it expanded their territory and increased the creation of city-states.     trade brought goods, it also brought along with it foreign ideas, beliefs, and customs to the country carried by the people

Explanation:

The divine prerogative of kings was most prominently practiced by King James I of England (reigned 1603-25), but it essentially vanished from English politics following the Glorious Revolution. (1688–89).

What is the divine right of kings?

The notion of royal and political legitimacy known as "divine right of kings" or "divine-right theory of kingship" is both political and theological. It states that a king derives his right to reign directly from God's will and is not subject to any earthly authority.

The divine right doctrine of royalty was broken when Parliament overthrew one monarch and installed another. The grace of Parliament, not the favor of God, made William king.

The idea of divine right holds that royalty has been granted permission from God to reign. "The State of MONARCHIE is the supreme thing upon earth," said King James I of England (reigned from 1603 to 1625). "For Kings are not only GOD'S Lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon GOD'S throne, but even by GOD himself they are called GODS."

Learn more about divine right of kings:

https://brainly.com/question/30341091

#SPJ1

In widespread, primaries use secret ballots for voting. Caucuses are nearby gatherings of citizens who vote on the stop of the assembly for a specific candidate. Then it moves to nominating conventions, at some point of which political events every pick out a nominee to unite behind.

Political parties and elections play an vital position within the evaluation of politics in developing international locations, in particular within the evaluation of democratization, and particularly the consolidation of democratic political regimes. Nominate candidates, rally their supporters, participate in authorities, act as a "bonding agent" for their own officeholders, and act as a watchdog over the alternative party. An election is a formal group decision-making process by means of which a populace chooses an man or woman or multiple people to preserve public office. A political party is a group of people who come collectively to contest elections and hold power within the government. They agree on some regulations and programmes for the society, with a view to promoting the collective correct. The Democratic party and the Republican party are the most powerful. yet different parties, including the Reform, Libertarian, Socialist, natural regulation, charter, and green events can promote candidates in a presidential election.

Learn more about Political party here:-

https://brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ9

Answer:

The North's victory over the South in the Civil War can be attributed to several factors, including technology, logistics, and communication. Firstly, the North had a significant technological advantage, particularly in the areas of transportation and manufacturing. They had access to more advanced and efficient modes of transportation such as railroads, which allowed them to move troops, supplies, and equipment more quickly and easily than the South. Additionally, the North's manufacturing industry was much more developed, allowing them to produce more and better-quality weapons, ammunition, and other supplies.

Answer:

During his lifetime, William Shakespeare was known primarily as a successful playwright and poet, but his fame did not extend far beyond his local London community. He was not regarded as one of the great English writers until about a century after his death. Today, of course, he is considered one of the greatest playwrights and poets in the English language. During his own time, however, his works were not considered to be of the same caliber as the works of his literary contemporaries like Christopher Marlowe or Ben Jonson. His plays were often dismissed as crude, unsophisticated, and lacking in moral complexity. His poetry, while admired, was not thought to be as refined or as aesthetically pleasing as that of his contemporaries. While Shakespeare was well-regarded in his own time, he was far less renowned than he is today.

Explanation:

The Cold War, which lasted roughly from the end of World War II in 1945 until the early 1990s, had a profound influence on global politics and led to the division of the world into two superpower blocs.

Several key factors contributed to this outcome:

Ideological Conflict: The Cold War was characterized by an ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. The United States championed democracy, capitalism, and individual freedoms, while the Soviet Union promoted communism and collective governance. These opposing ideologies created deep divisions and fueled competition for influence and dominance on a global scale.

Nuclear Arms Race: The development of nuclear weapons by both superpowers heightened tensions and served as a deterrent against direct military confrontation. The nuclear arms race led to the accumulation of vast arsenals of nuclear weapons and increased the fear of a devastating global conflict. This dynamic, known as mutual assured destruction (MAD), reinforced the division between the two blocs, as both sides sought to maintain a balance of power.

Formation of Military Alliances: The United States established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949, a military alliance consisting of Western democratic countries, to counter Soviet influence. In response, the Soviet Union formed the Warsaw Pact in 1955, comprising Eastern European nations under its control. These military alliances solidified the division of the world into two distinct blocs, with each superpower exerting influence over its respective allies.

Proxy Wars and Regional Conflicts: The Cold War witnessed numerous proxy wars and regional conflicts where the United States and the Soviet Union supported opposing factions. Examples include the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in Africa and Latin America. These conflicts became battlegrounds for the superpowers to advance their geopolitical interests and expand their spheres of influence, further entrenching the division between the two blocs.

Economic Competition: The Cold War also manifested as an economic competition between capitalism and communism. The United States and its allies promoted free-market economies, while the Soviet Union and its allies pursued centrally planned economies. This competition extended to trade, aid, and economic development, with each side striving to demonstrate the superiority of its economic system.

In summary, the Cold War profoundly influenced global politics by intensifying ideological divisions, fueling a nuclear arms race, fostering the formation of military alliances, fueling proxy wars and regional conflicts, and driving economic competition. These factors ultimately led to the division of the world into two superpower blocs, with the United States leading the capitalist Western bloc and the Soviet Union leading the communist Eastern bloc, each vying for dominance and influence on a global scale.

For more questions on Cold War

https://brainly.com/question/856013

#SPJ8

From 1948 through the early 1990s, South Africa had the deeply ingrained and harsh apartheid regime, which involved racial segregation and discrimination. It systematically disenfranchised and oppressed the non-white people, particularly the Black majority, and as a result, it contributed to considerable institutional racism and economic inequality. Various means of resistance, including as nonviolent demonstrations, civil disobedience, pressure from the international community, and military resistance, were used in the fight against apartheid.

In South Africa, Black people make up around 80% of the population.[16] The greatest populations of European (White South Africans), Asian (Indian and Chinese South Africans), and mixed (Coloured South Africans) heritage make up the remaining population in Africa.

The multiethnic society of South Africa has a wide range of cultures, languages, and faiths. The constitution recognizes Black majority 11 official languages, the fourth-highest number in the world, reflecting the country's multicultural character.

Learn more about South Africa, from :

brainly.com/question/16248215

#SPJ1

Malenkov's comparison of the US leader to Hitler likely stems from a combination of political motivations and historical parallels.

Malenkov's comparison is likely stems from perceiving authoritarian tendencies or policies in the US leader reminiscent of Hitler's regime.
To provide some context, Georgy Malenkov was a prominent Soviet politician who served as the Chairman of the Council of Ministers (the equivalent of the Prime Minister) in the Soviet Union during the early 1950s.

Comparing the US leader to Hitler could be seen as a rhetorical strategy employed by Malenkov to delegitimize and criticize the policies and actions of the US government. By drawing a parallel to Hitler, who is universally condemned for his authoritarianism, aggression, and human rights abuses, Malenkov is likely attempting to paint the US leader as similarly dangerous and unjust.

Moreover, Malenkov may be leveraging historical events to support his comparison. In the aftermath of World War II, the Soviet Union and the United States emerged as the two superpowers engaged in a Cold War, marked by ideological and geopolitical tensions. The rhetoric of comparing leaders to Hitler was not uncommon during this period, as both sides sought to portray their opponents as the embodiment of evil.

It is important to note that the comparison made by Malenkov should be understood in the context of political rhetoric and propaganda, rather than as a purely objective assessment. Such comparisons can be subjective and reflect the biases and interests of the person making them.

Know more about the political motivations here:
https://brainly.com/question/11740845

#SPJ8

Explanation:

I sorry I searched but couldn't find an answer

Answer:

Judges serve life sentences so if they are younger they’ll serve longer if older they’ll serve shorter

Explanation:

I can answer that Home Fronts helped World War 2 in several ways. Here are some of them:

1. Provided essential supplies and materials: The home fronts helped in producing essential supplies and materials such as weapons, ammunition, tanks, planes, and other equipment that were used in the war.

2. Provided labor: The home fronts provided labor for the production of war materials and supplies. Many women joined the workforce in factories to help with the production of war materials since most of the men were at war.

3. Boosted morale: Home Fronts provided a sense of purpose and boosted morale for civilians during the war. They were encouraged to participate in scrap metal drives and rationing programs to conserve resources.

4. Supported the troops: The home fronts provided support to the troops by writing letters, sending care packages, and fundraising for the war effort.

5. Produced food: The home fronts produced food for both the troops and civilians. Victory gardens were grown to provide fresh vegetables for people at home, and canned goods were sent to the troops.

In conclusion, the home fronts played a significant role in supporting the war effort and helping the Allies win World War 2.