The rules that govern the corporation, including the number of directors it will have, the method of electing directors, the time and place of shareholder meetings, etc., are found in the corporation's ____ .
a. By laws
b. Articles of incorporation
c. Charter
d. State incorporation code
a. By laws

Answer:

appoints a replacement if there is a vacancy among the county commissioners

Explanation:

the rest of the options are true

Answer:

appoints a replacement if there is a vacancy among the county commissioners

Explanation:

idek

Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Student loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses  while  scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.

When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.

Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893

The most accurate statement is that any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal. (option c)This answer is consistent with U.S. federal and state laws, as well as international conventions, which generally prohibit discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, age, disability, religion, national origin, and other protected categories.

In addition, harassment and discrimination can take many forms, such as unwelcome conduct that creates a hostile or offensive work environment, unfair treatment in employment decisions, and retaliation against employees who complain about discrimination or harassment. Therefore, it is important for employers to have policies and training programs that promote diversity, inclusion, and respect in the workplace.

Company policies can be more restrictive than the law requires, as long as they do not discriminate or retaliate against employees who engage in protected activities. However, it is recommended to ensure that company policies align with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies are responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and employees who believe they have been harassed or discriminated against can file a complaint with these agencies or pursue legal action.

To know more about harassment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32417535

#SPJ11

In order to defend a law review paper, Sugarman exaggerates a minor issue. The assumption of risk doctrine, by whatever name one prefers to use, is a legitimate judicial principle that allows some activities that are intrinsically risky to be undertaken without worrying that participants would file a lawsuit if they are hurt.

A common law doctrine known as "assumption of risk" refers to a plaintiff's ineligibility for damages resulting from a negligent party's tortious activities in situations where the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of those actions.

They may avoid liability if the judge finds that you accepted the dangers involved in the action. In tort law, the defense known as "assumption of risk" is an affirmative one, which means that it can, if successful, outweigh both the defendant's legal obligation and the effects of their illegal conduct.

To know more about assumption of risk doctrine visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17371498

#SPJ4

A prison term for a felony offence could range from a year to life in jail or perhaps the death penalty.

Although felonies typically entail violent offences, they can also involve major crimes like murder, robbery, sexual assault, or kidnapping as well as white-collar offences like tax evasion and stock fraud.

Following conviction is defined as a reasonable period of time following the conviction, sentencing, or disposal of the case, but prior to the offender's release or transfer from state or county custody, as appropriate.

to know more about felonies visit link :

https://brainly.com/question/30175834

#SPJ1

Answer:

21 years old.

Explanation:

In America, the legal age for consuming and drinking alcohol is 21 years old. Texas is a state in America, so the legal age is 21.

"For most offenses, a majority of defendants are sentenced either on the day of conviction or the next day." is not completely true or false. Instead, it is partially correct. So, the correct answer would be: True and False.

The statement "For most offenses, a majority of defendants are sentenced either on the day of conviction or the next day." is partially true. The sentences which are already determined and already in the rule book are done on the day of conviction or the next day. However, the sentences which are not determined or if the judge or magistrate wants to reconsider the sentence, then the sentencing may be postponed.

Additionally, there may be some other reasons like pending an investigation or background check, conducting a mental health evaluation, or an evaluation of risk assessment.Along with that, the circumstances, such as severity, complexity, or magnitude of the crime, can also delay the sentencing process. So, the given statement "For most offenses, a majority of defendants are sentenced either on the day of conviction or the next day." is partially correct.

Learn more about defendants here:

https://brainly.com/question/30736002

#SPJ11

Doctors should care about social justice because it is essential to providing quality healthcare. Social justice is the fair and just distribution of resources and opportunities in society.

When people are denied access to healthcare, education, housing, and other essential resources, it has a negative impact on their health.

There are many ways that doctors can promote social justice. They can advocate for policies that improve access to healthcare, such as universal healthcare.

They can also work to address the social determinants of health, such as poverty, discrimination, and environmental pollution. Doctors can also educate their patients about social justice issues and how they can make a difference.

To know more about social justice, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28207883#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

Answer:

I think the answer is A.....

Answer:

The judge revoked Derek Chauvin's bail and said he would be sentenced in eight weeks. ... Chauvin was convicted on all three charges he faced at trial — second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter

Answer:

Different Terminologies:

This basically means that powers are specifically granted to the federal government; Examples such as: power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces,

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

Answer:

Ubuntu means love, truth, peace, happiness, eternal optimism, inner goodness, etc. Ubuntu is the essence of a human being, the divine spark of goodness inherent within each being. From the beginning of time the divine principles of Ubuntu have guided African societies.

Hope it helps

Please mark me as the brainliest

Thank you

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

The appointment of cabinet heads does not make it difficult for presidents to control the actions of federal agencies. Thus, option E is correct.

Federal agencies are defined as the unique government entities that are established for a particular function, such as resources development, financial control of industry, or national security concerns.

The Civil Service System problem networks (iron triangles), institutional incompetence, and bureaucratic disobedience are aimed at making it tough for presidents to exert control over federal agencies' operations.

The nomination of members of the cabinet somehow doesn't make it impossible for presidents to exert control over government agencies' activity. Thus, option E is correct.

Learn more about the federal agencies, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/9062206

#SPJ4

Answer:

$60

Explanation:

6 percent of 1,000 is 60

Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.

= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)

= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)

= $1,060

= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire

= 1,060 - 1,000

= $60

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.

the answer is c Economic growth

White collar crime involves  an increased number of professionals in the

field  who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes.

This type of crime is divided into groups which are occupational and

corporate crime. White collar crime mostly involves embezzlement of funds.

This is usually carried out by the professionals in that field.

The white collar crime are usually willing to risk client harm in fraudulent

schemes for their personal gains and is mostly carried out by men than

women as it is easier to convince people it is legit as a man than a woman.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/19320562

Answer: 70 t

71 t

72 f

Explanation:

Answer:

Ver respuesta abajo

Explanation:

Esto es de la asignatura química y no leyes, sin embargo te voy a ayudar con esto.

Para calcular el peso molecular de cualquier sustancia o compuesto, necesitamos los pesos atómicos de los elementos que componen la molécula. Iremos por parte.

Para cada compuesto, escribiremos el peso atómico necesario, y luego calcularemos el peso molecular

a) NaCl

Na: 23 g/mol;  Cl: 35.5 g/mol

PM = 23 + 35.5

PM = 58.5 g/mol

b) HNO₃

H: 1 g/mol; N: 14 g/mol; O = 16 g/mol

PM = 1 + 14 + 3(16)

PM = 63 g/mol

c) KI

K: 39.1 g/mol; I: 126.9 g/mol

PM = 39.1 + 126.9

PM = 166 g/mol

d) Na₂S

Na: 23 g/mol;  S: 32 g/mol

PM = 2(23) + 32

PM = 78 g/mol

e) Ca(OH)₂

Ca: 40 g/mol;  O: 16 g/mol;  H: 1 g/mol

PM = 40 + 2(16) + 2(1)

PM = 75 g/mol

f) H₂SO₄:

H: 1 g/mol;  S = 32 g/mol;  O = 16 g/mol

PM = 2(1) + 32 + 4(16)

PM = 98 g/mol

g) KCl

K: 39 g/mol;  Cl: 35.5 g/mol

PM = 39 + 35.5

PM = 74.5 g/mol

h) CuSO₄

Cu: 63.55 g/mol;  S: 32 g/mol;  O = 16 g/mol

PM = 63.55 + 32 + 4(16)

PM = 159.55 g/mol

i) CH₄

C: 12 g/mol;  H: 1 g/mol

PM = 12 + 4(1)

PM = 16 g/mol

j) LiOH

Li: 6.94 g/mol;  O: 16 g/mol;  H: 1 g/mol

PM = 6.94 + 16 + 1

PM = 23.94 g/mol

Exitos

If Natalie is negligent, the most likely outcome will depend on whether the court finds that the services performed by Natalie are voluntary for her customers.

If the court determines that the services are voluntary, it is more likely that the court will not enforce the release that the customer accepted. However, if the court finds that the public needs protection related to the services provided by Natalie, it is more likely that the court will enforce the release, even if the customer accepted it.

Ultimately, the enforceability of the release will depend on the specific circumstances and legal considerations involved in the case.
If Natalie is negligent and the court finds that the services performed by Natalie are voluntary for her customers, it will be more likely that the court will enforce the release.

This is because the customers have willingly accepted the terms and conditions, including the release of Natalie's negligence, prior to receiving her services.

Know more about customers here:

https://brainly.com/question/26313265

#SPJ11

Answer:

I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die

Explanation:

Based on the law and legal concepts, and the available question, the explanation for the following legal concept are:

The legal concept is a term that is used to describe the usual words that are considered "register" in the context of legal norms.

Generally, the term legal concept is a word used to illustrate the issue of identifying and interpreting (or constructing) the norms in which certain actions occur, and of using such norms in legal inference.

The words and meaning of legal concepts may be different from the literary meaning of words and sometimes have more elaborate and robust explanations than the actual meaning.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the short explanation of the legal concept of the aforelisted words in the question is described above in the main answer.

Learn more about the Legal concept here: https://brainly.com/question/28601298

#SPJ1

Whilst turning, you have to get into the proper turn lane as a minimum earlier than you switch. c) Two blocks

Turn lanes are traffic lanes that permit you to make a proper or left flip at an intersection or to a side street. flip lanes are managed by street symptoms and pavement markings that show you the direction of the tour from the lane. Regulatory street signs and symptoms that control separate lanes are regarded as lane-use management signs.

Start the flip within the left lane closest to the middle of the road. entire the flip, if secure, in both lanes of the crossroad (proven by using the arrows). Use the center left turn lane if one is to be had. A left flip can be crafted from the other lane if accredited with the aid of signs and symptoms or arrows.

The median strip or imperative reservation is the reserved location that separates opposing lanes of visitors on divided roadways including divided highways, dual carriageways, freeways, and motorways.

Learn more about lane here: https://brainly.com/question/24637611

#SPJ1

In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.

A trial  can be described a the formal examination of evidence  which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the  jury is available so that the  guilt in a case of criminal  can be known.

It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .

Therefore, option A is correct.

Read more about Detectives at:

https://brainly.com/question/26059088

#SPJ1

The cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).

a) The relationship between the vectors a and c is that c is the result of rotating vector a by 90 degrees counterclockwise. In other words, vector c is the perpendicular (or orthogonal) vector to vector a.

b) To calculate the dot product c ⋅ b, we multiply the corresponding components of c and b and sum them up.

c ⋅ b = (-a2) * b1 + (a1) * b2

c) The dot product c ⋅ b represents the projection of vector c onto vector b. The absolute value of c ⋅ b represents the area of the parallelogram formed by vectors a and b.

To prove that a × b = (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1), we use the cross product formula:

a × b = (a1, a2, 0) × (b1, b2, 0)

Expanding the cross product:

= (a2 * 0 - 0 * b2, 0 * b1 - a1 * 0, a1 * b2 - a2 * b1)

= (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1)

Therefore, the cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).

To know more about rotating vector visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30262632

#SPJ11

In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.

The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft  and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.

In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.

Read more about sales contract

brainly.com/question/28326714

#SPJ1