one of the most violent battles in the pacific, the united states attained 3 airfields at this battle needed to continually bomb the japanese mainland.
Answer:
Battle of Iwo Jima
Explanation:
one of the most violent battles in the pacific, the united states attained 3 airfields at this battle needed to continually bomb the japanese mainland
As restrictions and prohibitions are multiplied in the Empire, the people grow poorer and poorer. When the
people are subjected to overmuch government, the land is thrown into confusion. ... The greater the numb-
of laws and enactments, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
What were Lao-Tzu's views on government?
Lao-Tzu's views on government emphasized the negative consequences of excessive governance, such as increased poverty, societal disorder, and the proliferation of criminal behavior.
Lao-Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher, and founder of Taoism, advocated for a minimalistic approach to governance. His views centered around the idea that an overly intrusive government, characterized by excessive restrictions, prohibitions, and an abundance of laws and enactments, had detrimental effects on society. Lao-Tzu believed that when the government imposed too many regulations and intervened excessively in people's lives, it led to the impoverishment of the population and the disruption of social harmony. He argued that a heavy-handed government created a climate of confusion and disorder, fostering an environment conducive to criminal activities.
Lao-Tzu's philosophy suggested that a wise ruler should govern with minimal interference, allowing individuals to live by the natural order of things. He believed in the importance of non-action (wu-wei) and the cultivation of inner virtue rather than relying on external regulations and control. Lao-Tzu's emphasis on a less intrusive government and the negative consequences of excessive governance resonated with the Taoist principles of simplicity, spontaneity, and harmony with nature.
For more questions on Lao-Tzu's
https://brainly.com/question/28300061
#SPJ8
Who were the Patriots?
Answer:
“Patriots,” as they came to be known, were members of the 13 British colonies who rebelled against British control during the American Revolution, supporting instead the U.S. Continental Congress. These Patriots rejected the lack of representation of colonists in the British Parliament and the imposition of British taxes.
Following the French and Indian War (1753–1763), the colonies gained much greater independence due to salutary neglect, which was the British policy of allowing the colonies to violate strict trade restrictions to encourage economic growth. During the Revolutionary War, Patriots sought to gain formal acknowledgment of this policy through independence. Confident that independence lay ahead, Patriots alienated many fellow colonists by resorting to violence against tax collectors and pressuring others to declare a position in this conflict.
Prominent early Patriots include Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, and George Washington. These men were the architects of the early Republic and the Constitution of the United States, and are counted among the Founding Fathers. Prior to 1775, many of these Patriots were active in the Sons of Liberty, an organization formed to protect the rights of the colonists from usurpation by the British government. They are best known for initiating the Boston Tea Party in 1773.
The Patriot rebellion was based on the political philosophy of republicanism as expressed by the leading public figures of the time, including the Founding Fathers and Thomas Paine, author of the popular pro-revolutionary pamphlet “Common Sense.” The philosophy of republicanism entailed a rejection of monarchy and aristocracy and emphasized civic virtue. Patriots were also known as American Whigs, Revolutionaries, Congress-Men, and Rebels. Though not all colonists supported violent rebellion, historians estimate that approximately 45 percent of the white population supported the Patriots’ cause or identified as Patriots; 15–20 percent favored the British Crown; and the remainder of the population chose not to take a vocal position in the conflict. Ultimately, Americans remained Loyalists or joined the Patriot cause based on which side they thought would best promote their interests. Prominent merchants in port cities and men with business or family ties to the elite class in Great Britain tended to remain loyal to the Crown, whereas Patriots were comprised largely of yeoman farmers. Nonetheless, people of all socioeconomic statuses populated both sides of the conflict.
Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D
Please mark as brainliest if it helped!
4. To tell whether minorities have made progress in landing today's film and
television roles, it isn't enough to ask whether they are represented in stories.
Why is it important to discover whether minority actors are playing major roles,
and whether they are winning Oscars? (What aspect of the media are we trying
to spot?) (5 points)
It is important that minority actors play important roles because this shows that the industry has ventured into the inclusion of new talent.
What is a minority?A minority is a group that, as its name indicates, is a minority with respect to other cultures or communities in a specific society. Some examples of minorities are blacks, Latinos, Asians, in the United States, where the majority are white men.
Why is minority participation in film important?The participation of minorities in the cinema is important because this is a sign that the industry does not exclude anyone because of their origin, but only those who have the skills and talent necessary to be part of the industry get to participate.
On the other hand, their participation is important because it opens the door to new stories with new perspectives on life, which contributes to making the industry more inclusive in every way.
The aspect that we are trying to detect in the media is the inclusion of minoritary communities in the industry.
Learn more about minorities in: https://brainly.com/question/22251947
#SPJ1
describe in detail what happened in 1932 election?
Please help asap
How was the word McCarthyism formed and what did it mean?
Answer:
The word McCarthyism was formed because of the controversial practises of former US Senator John McCarthy where he made some unconfirmed allegations.
The word McCarthyism means to make an accusation of disloyalty against someone without proof or based on flimsy evidence.
Which of the following is not true of indentured servant‘s a:they could be bought and sold b:agreed to the contract c: the contract last for the rest of their life d:they got passage to the colonies in exchange for a number of years of service
Answer: c: the contract last for the rest of their life
Explanation:
Indentured servants were people who got passage to the colonies in exchange for a number of years of service. The person they would be indentured to would feed them and shelter them until these years of service elapsed and would sometimes give them some form of support to start their own venture.
Indentured servants could be bought, sold or even inherited while their contract was still in effect which made them a bit like enslaved people with the difference being that they would not be indentured for life.
how did world war 2 progress in europe
Answer:
millions of people were dead and millions more homeless,
Explanation:
At the end of the war, millions of people were dead and millions more homeless, the European economy had collapsed, and much of the European industrial infrastructure had been destroyed. The Soviet Union, too, had been heavily affected.
b. Why did the Abbasid Empire
move the capital to Baghdad?
Give two reasons.
Answer:
Explanation: the two important reasons are
1. it was located close to both the TIGRIS and EUPHRATES
2. Baghdad is an ideal part or spot for food production that can survive a large populations
please help me find SOAPSTONE for this article:
Primary source #4: Testimony from [British] Captain Thomas Preston (provides an entirely different perspective on the events of March 5, 1770)
About 9, some of the guard came to and informed me the town inhabitants were assembling to attack the troops, that that the bells were ringing as the signal for that purpose . . . In my way there, I saw people in great commotion, and heard them use the most cruel and horrid threats against the troops . . . about 100 people passed . . . towards the custom house where the king’s money is lodged. They immediately surrounded the sentry [British soldier] posted there, and with clubs and other weapons threatened to execute their vengeance on him. I was soon informed by a townsman their intention was to carry off the soldier from his post and probably murder him . . . he assured me he heard the mob declare they would murder him. This I feared might be a prelude to their plundering [stealing] the king’s chest. I immediately sent an officer and 12 men to protect the sentry and the king’s money . . . they [the soldiers] rushed through the people and by charging their bayonets in half circles, kept them [the townspeople] at a little distance . . . the unhappy affair took place without any loading in their pieces [muskets]; nor did I ever give orders for loading them. The mob still increased and were more outrageous, striking their clubs...and calling out, come on you rascals, you bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare . . . fire . . . At this time I was between the soldiers and the mob, parleying with and endeavoring all in my power to persuade them to retire peacefully, but to no purpose.
Answer:
Explanation:And has ever since their departure been breaking out with greater violence after their embarkation. One of their justices, most thoroughly acquainted with the people and their intentions, on the trial of a man of the 14th Regiment, openly and publicly in the hearing of great numbers of people and from the seat of justice, declared "that the soldiers must now take care of themselves, nor trust too much to their arms, for they were but a handful; that the inhabitants carried weapons concealed under their clothes, and would destroy them in a moment, if they pleased". This, considering the malicious temper of the people, was an alarming circumstance to the soldiery. Since which several disputes have happened between the townspeople and the soldiers of both regiments, the former being encouraged thereto by the countenance of even some of the magistrates, and by the protection of all the party against government. In general such disputes have been kept too secret from the offi- cers. On the 2d instant two of the 29th going through one Gray's ropewalk, the rope-makers insultingly asked them if they would empty a vault. This unfortunately had the desired effect by provoking the soldiers, and from words they went to blows. Both parties suffered in this afftay, and finally the soldiers retired to their quarters. The officers, on the first knowledge of this transaction, took every precaution in their power to prevent any ill consequence. Notwithstanding which, single quarrels could not be prevented, the inhabitants constantly provoking and abusing the soldiery. The insolence as well as utter hatred of the inhabitants to the troops increased daily, insomuch that Monday and Tuesday, the 5th and 6th instant, were privately agreed on for a general engagement, in consequence of which several of the militia came from the country armed to join their friends, menacing to destroy any who should oppose them. This plan has since been discovered.
A department store is selling a denim jacket for $60. It will be on sale next week for $42.
What is the percent of change in the price of the jacket?
Answer: 30%
Explanation: The answer would be 30%. (decrease) This is how I got this:
(First, I would show you the formula)
Formula= Old amount - new amount/ old amount. Quotient x 100 = answer.
Old amount = 60
New amount= 42
60-42 = 18
18/60 = 0.3
0.3 x 100 = 30%
Answer = 30% decrease
I hope this helped! If you can, may you please mark me as brainliest?
How did abolitionists in the north respond to Southern abolitionists
Abolitionists in the North responded differently to Southern abolitionists. The Southern abolitionists who opposed slavery and the conditions of the slaves, mostly white, stood on a minority ground in the South, and it made their advocacy very difficult. Most of the Southern abolitionists who lived in the Southern states, by nature, would avoid confrontation.
They faced extreme pressure from slavery advocates, and most of them held low positions in society and were considered radicals and outsiders. In contrast, the abolitionists in the North had more substantial numbers and were more influential. The Northerners saw themselves as civilized, and they supported and promoted progress. The issue of slavery to them was a crucial test for democracy. They believed that slavery was a violation of human rights, and their beliefs fueled their movement. Abolitionists, both black and white, worked together and gathered support for their cause through petitions, conferences, publications, and speeches. The Southern abolitionists had a hard time reaching the general public and getting their message across.
They had to be careful about what they said, as some were aware that the issue of slavery would divide the South and could even lead to violence. The Southern abolitionists were isolated, and it was challenging for them to build a network of support that could help them accomplish their goals. The majority of the white Southerners believed that slaves were property, and any attempt to challenge this belief was seen as a threat to their way of life.
Northern abolitionists viewed Southern abolitionists with suspicion, as some Northerners considered them to be traitors to their homeland. It was believed that Southern abolitionists were not doing enough to challenge slavery. However, some Northerners recognized the significant challenges faced by the Southern abolitionists and supported their efforts.
In conclusion, the Southern abolitionists faced a unique set of challenges, making it more difficult for them to advocate for the end of slavery. Northern abolitionists, on the other hand, had a more significant number of supporters and resources, which made it easier for them to gain the momentum required to end slavery. Despite the differences, both Northern and Southern abolitionists were united in their goal of abolishing slavery in America.
For more questions on human rights
https://brainly.com/question/28652679
#SPJ8
What are 10 distinguishing facts about absolute monarch
Answer:
1) Economic injustices - the poor were paying most in taxes, yet were starving while first and second estate were using the tax for their own personal pleasures 2) Enlightened ideas - people started questioning the monarchs 3) English and American examples - English Glorious Rev and the American Rev. provided inspiration 4) Ineffective Government - people were denied basic rights under absolute monarchy and Louis XVI was a weak and indecisive leader
Explanation:
Which best describes the influence of Byzantine culture on Russian culture?
it created a schism within the Christian church
it led to a decline of religious belief
it had no significant influence
it led to a flowering of art, literature, and architecture
It led to a flowering of art, literature, and architecture.
The Byzantines had extensive trade with Russia. Cultural diffusion was aided by trade. Russian churches were designed to resemble Byzantine churches. Furthermore, the absolute power wielded by Byzantine emperors served as a model for future Russian rulers.
Christian religious beliefs were blended with Greek science, philosophy, arts, and literature in Byzantine civilization. They also advanced Roman engineering and legal achievements. At the end of the Middle Ages, these aspects of civilization were reawakened in Western Europe,
Constantinople was an incredibly diverse Centre of Byzantine trade and culture. The Byzantine Empire left an important cultural legacy.
To know more about Constantinople here
https://brainly.com/question/14235394
#SPJ1
It led to a flowering of art, literature, and architecture.
The Byzantines had extensive trade with Russia. Cultural diffusion was aided by trade. Russian churches were designed to resemble Byzantine churches. Furthermore, the absolute power wielded by Byzantine emperors served as a model for future Russian rulers.
In Byzantine civilization, Christian religious beliefs were mixed with Greek science, philosophy, arts, and literature. In addition, they advanced Roman engineering and legal achievements. These aspects of civilization were reawakened in Western Europe at the end of the Middle Ages.
Constantinople was an incredibly diverse Centre of Byzantine trade and culture. The Byzantine Empire left an important cultural legacy.
To know more about Constantinople here
https://brainly.com/question/14235394
#SPJ1
How did Americans respond to the sinking of the Lusitania?
A. They were upset that the British were blockading trade.
B. They supported Germany's actions in declaring unrestricted
submarine warfare.
C. They demanded France answer for sinking merchant ships.
D. They were outraged that American lives had been lost.
Answer:
D. They were outraged that American lives had been lost.
Explanation:
Answer:
D. They were outraged that American lives had been lost.
Explanation:
The system of federal courts and a Supreme Court may give the judicial branch multiple opportunities to interpret the Constitution.
Yes this is true the The system of federal courts and a Supreme Court may give the judicial branch multiple opportunities to interpret the Constitution.
What is the judicial branch?This is the term that is used to refer to the branch of the government that the constitution has given the power to be able to interpret the constitution of the nation.
The judiciary is the one that has to determine if the law that is in the nation or that is deliberated on is a constitutional one. It is upheld if found to be constitutional.
Hence we can say that Yes this is true the The system of federal courts and a Supreme Court may give the judicial branch multiple opportunities to interpret the Constitution.
Read more on the judicial branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/1082644
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer from each drop down menu.
Complete the following paragraph about the Soviet union and the United States during the World War II
Compared to the Soviet Union, the United States experienced fewer civilian casualties during World War II. While the Soviet Union suffered extensive civilian losses due to the brutal nature of the conflict on its territory, the United States, being geographically distant from the major theaters of war, faced fewer direct civilian casualties.
What constitutes the Grand alliance conference?In terms of appearances at Grand alliance conferences, the United States had fewer than the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union played a significant role in the diplomatic negotiations and decision-making of the Grand alliance, attending numerous conferences such as the Tehran Conference, Yalta Conference, and Potsdam Conference. The United States, although actively involved in these conferences, had a lesser number of appearances compared to the Soviet Union.
On the other hand, the United States experienced more invasions during World War II. While the Soviet Union faced its fair share of invasions from Nazi Germany and its allies, the United States conducted several major invasions as part of its military strategy. Notable examples include the invasions of North Africa, Italy, and Normandy (D-Day), which marked significant turning points in the war.
In addition to these comparisons, the United States also had more battles on the Homefront. The country mobilized its economy and resources to support the war effort, leading to increased industrial production and significant societal changes. The war had a profound impact on American society, with rationing, war bond campaigns, and women joining the workforce in large numbers.
Furthermore, the United States suffered more military casualties than the Soviet Union. While the Soviet Union had staggering military losses due to the scale of the Eastern Front and its high casualty rates, the United States also incurred substantial losses, particularly in the Pacific theater. The island-hopping campaign against Japan's forces resulted in intense and bloody battles, such as Iwo Jima and Okinawa, where American forces suffered heavy casualties.
Lastly, the United States engaged in more battles in the Pacific theater. The Pacific War was a major focus for the United States, with its naval and air forces engaging in intense combat against the Japanese forces across a vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean. The famous battles of Midway, Guadalcanal, and Leyte Gulf were pivotal moments in the conflict, illustrating the fierce nature of the fighting in this theater.
In summary, compared to the Soviet Union during World War II, the United States experienced fewer civilian casualties, fewer appearances at Grand alliance conferences, more invasions, more battles on the Homefront, more military casualties, and more battles in the Pacific theater.
learn more about Grand alliance conference: https://brainly.com/question/29973118
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Complete the following paragraph about the Soviet Union and the United States during WWII.
Compared to the Soviet Union, the United States experienced
A- Fewer civilian casualties
B- Fewer appearances at Grand alliance conferences
C-More invasions.
And experienced
A- More battles on the Homefront
B-More military casualties
C-More battles in the Pacific theater
1. Should the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal be closed permanently to keep the Asian carp out of the
Great Lakes? Support your argument with multiple quotations from the text. Explain what your quotes
show and how they support your argument.
___________________________________
Answer: yes
Explanation: because
Why did feudalism and the Manor System develop and how did they relate to each other?
Answer:
Feudalism first originated partly as a result of Viking and Muslim invasions. Kings were unable to defend their lands, and lands of their nobles. Nobles had to find a way to defend their own land. The manorial system was related to the feudal system and it governed medieval economics.
Answer:
Feudalism first originated partly as a result of Viking and Muslim invasions.
Explanation:
Kings were unable to defend their lands and their nobles. Nobles had to find a way to defend their own land. The manorial system was related to the feudal system and it governed medieval economics.
Which of the following stands out in Native American culture compared to the cultures of early river valley civilizations? O Technology
O Agriculture
O Polytheism
O Tribal governments
Answer:
Tribal governments
Explanation:
How did the Aztec people decide where to settle?
Answer:
The Aztecs were a Mesoamerican culture that developed in central Mexico in the post-classic period from 1300 to 1521. The Aztec peoples encompassed different ethnic groups of central Mexico, especially those groups who spoke the Nahuatl language and who dominated large parts of Mesoamerica from the 14th to the 16th centuries. They organized into city-states.
The Aztec Empire constituted a confederation of three city-states established in 1427.
Explanation:
The person who asked this question, give him brainliest, not me.
Hope this helped you fellows! :D
PLEASE HELP
which of the following effects did the silk road have on the world
a the bubonic plague spread
b missionaries traveled along the routes spreading religions
c the one brought eastern luxury goods which created a drain or silver from romes economy
d all of the choices are correct
The answer is D.
All of the choices are correct.
According to some estimates at the current rate of use the U.S. has enough natraul gas to last about Years.
A.1000000
B.25
C.100
D.50
Answer:
it should be 100
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Select all the correct answers.
You are a historian studying Britain. You believe that a rise in the average British citizen’s income between 1800 and 1850 can be linked to a rise in literacy. You have many sources of data from a town in Britain covering that period. Which four types of data would you study to investigate this theory?
the amount of wheat produced compared to barley and millet
the average cost of a home
the number of inns and pubs in the town
the number of booksellers and libraries in the town
the number of people who emigrated from that town to the United States
the number of people who can sign their own marriage licenses and wills
the number of people coming to the town for employment
the number of people who died of the disease tuberculosis
Answer:
To research the link between income and literacy, some types of data that could be helpful include the cost of the average home, the number of booksellers and libraries, the number of people who can sign their own names on their marriage license or will, and the number of people coming to the town to find a job.
Explanation: plato
The types of data are given below.
The average cost of a home, The number of booksellers and libraries in the town, The number of people who can sign their own marriage licenses and wills,The number of people coming to the town for employment.What is a historian?A historian is a person who researches and writes about the beyond and it seemed like an expert on it. Historians are concerned with the non-prevent, methodical narrative and studies of beyond activities regarding the human race; in addition to the look at all records in time.
What skills do historians need?Analytical.Communication. Problem-solving. Research. Writing.Learn more about historians here https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ2
what service did a city boss provide for people?
Answer:
In politics, a boss is a person who controls a faction or local branch of a political party. ... When the party wins, they typically control appointments in their unit, and have a voice at the higher levels. Reformers typically allege that political bosses are corrupt
What two events happened in 1492 that benefited spain
Answer:
Explanaafter the Spanish conquest of the Moorish kingdom of Granada in January 1492, the Spanish monarchs, flush with victory, agreed to support his voyage. On August 3, 1492, Columbus set sail from Palos, Spain, with three small ships, the Santa Maria, the Pinta and the Nina.
Answer:
Columbus set sail to discover what would be called the new world
Explanation:
What was the army like under the rule of the Abbasids?
Answer:
5^2*78/3/5
to the side equals 48
plus 5x5 equals 25 so 25^3 to the side in total give you
625
Explanation:
Elections in a democratic society like the United States are supposed to represent the people. During Reconstruction, two African Americans were elected to the Senate for the very first time in American history—Hiram Revels and Blanche K. Bruce. The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments protected African American rights, like voting.
But during later periods of Reconstruction, new barriers to voting were raised against African Americans in the South. African Americans have made up a large portion of the population of many southern states for a long time. However, it was not until 1967, almost 100 years after Revels and Bruce, that another African American was elected to the United States Senate.
Why do you think it took almost a century for another African American to be elected to the Senate?
What might this reveal about American society?
Answer:
Jim Crow laws were in effect after the Civil War, and African Americans were already treated horribly after new changes. Furthermore, it takes a lot of money and votes to elect Senators, particularly if you're a person of color at the time. This suggests that this nation was built on old white men who were ignorant and prejudiced against people of color. The majority of senators today are old white men. Finally, Jim Crow laws restricted African Americans from doing the same actions as white people, morphing American society into one that favors Caucasians.
Moving down-market carries risks that include
cannibalizing sales of the core brand.
Odiluting
Oerasing
O confusing
O eliminating
Oreplacing
the core brand's quality image and
The main risk of moving down-market is erasing the core brand's quality image and cannibalizing sales of the core brand. The Option B is correct.
What is the risk of moving down-market?When a company decides to expand its offerings in order to reach a larger customer base, it must carefully consider all of the risks associated with moving downmarket.
When a company targets customers with lower-priced offerings, there is a risk that the core brand's image will suffer because customers will perceive the company as less high-end and less willing to pay a premium for its products.
Read more about market risk
brainly.com/question/31252942
#SPJ1
Reflect on Woodrow Wilson’s wartime leadership. Remembering that Wilson ran for the presidency as a progressive, assess whether or not he remained true to the tenets of progressivism during his leadership of the war, especially with regard to wartime propaganda, and his crusade for the League of Nations after the hostilities ended. In doing so, pick one of the Fourteen points and evaluate whether it should or should not be viewed as “progressive” based on the definition of progressivism from your chapter and your podcast. Use at the least two other documents to support your findings. Be sure to post at the least three times.
Please reed the instructions.
I really need your help.
Answer:
doing so, pick one of the Fourteen Points and evaluate whether it should or should not be viewed as "Progressive" based on the definition of Progressivism from your chapter and your podcasts. Use at least two other documents to support your findings. Be sure to post at least three times.
This is a discussion board. Posts must be substantial. Also respond to each of the following excerpts.
EXCERPT 1(RC): During World War I, Woodrow Wilson showed many qualities that correlated toProgressivism. For example, his policies were always put into place for the goal of keeping the peace, and allowing the countries taken by Germany to be freed for democracy. He didn't ask Congress to declare war for any selfish reasons as he states when he says, "we fight without rancor and without selfish object, seeking nothing for ourselves but what we shall wish to share with all free peoples" (6), but instead did so as a last resort following the numerous attacks by Germany on innocent submarines that made it clear staying only armed and neutral was no longer an option. Because of his efforts to only go into the war for reasons of peace, Wilson does portray himself as a progressive.
After looking through the propaganda posters that were posted in the PDF, it was noticeable that many of them have progressive ideals such as food conservation, allowing/encouraging women to participate in the war effort, and saying there won't be peace while Germany is running wild trying to dominate the world. With the political cartoons on the other hand, while many believed that Wilson's Fourteen Points were a sure way to rid the world of autocracy, some of the allies didn't agree with it because unlike the U.S., they still believed in Imperialism and wanted spoils of war (aka Germany's colonies). Also, many senators rejected the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations because they didn't think it an American value to have diplomatic international foreign ties as stated when Senator Lodge states, "It is in conflict with the right of our people to govern themselves free from all restraint, legal or moral, of foreign powers" (16).
Finally, after the war was over, one of Wilson's fourteen points--in fact the last of them--was to form a "League of Nations" that would ally together to prevent war, and handle disagreements in the public eye with diplomacy. However, many senators did not approve the League of Nations because they were worried that joining such an alliance would take away from their independence. This should however be viewed as Progressive because he was trying to form it in hopes of creating a more international peace.
Answer:
Explanation:
Post 1:
Woodrow Wilson's wartime leadership presents an interesting case for assessing whether he remained true to the tenets of progressivism. As a progressive candidate during his presidential campaign, Wilson advocated for various reforms and policies aimed at promoting social justice, democracy, and government accountability. However, his actions during the war and his pursuit of the League of Nations after the hostilities ended have sparked debates about the extent to which he adhered to progressive principles.
When it comes to wartime propaganda, Wilson's administration employed aggressive tactics to shape public opinion and garner support for the war effort. The Committee on Public Information, headed by George Creel, disseminated pro-war messages through various media channels. While this propaganda machine effectively mobilized public sentiment, it also raised concerns about the suppression of dissenting views and the manipulation of information.
From a progressive standpoint, Wilson's wartime propaganda approach can be seen as conflicting with the principles of open government and free speech. Progressivism, as defined in my chapter and podcast, emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties. Wilson's use of propaganda may be viewed as a departure from these ideals, as it curtailed free expression and stifled critical voices.
Post 2:
One of Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, specifically the point concerning "open covenants of peace, openly arrived at," warrants evaluation in terms of its alignment with progressivism. This point called for transparent negotiations and the elimination of secret treaties in the aftermath of World War I. It aimed to promote democracy and accountability in international relations.
From a progressive perspective, this point can be viewed as aligning with the principles of progressivism. The emphasis on open and transparent diplomacy resonates with the progressive ideal of accountable governance. By advocating for open covenants, Wilson aimed to dismantle the secretive and undemocratic practices that characterized pre-war diplomacy, thus promoting a more just and inclusive international order.
Support for this perspective can be found in Wilson's own words. In his address to Congress on January 8, 1918, he stressed the need for "open covenants openly arrived at" as a means to ensure lasting peace and prevent future conflicts. Additionally, contemporary commentary from progressive intellectuals such as Herbert Croly acknowledged the progressive nature of Wilson's call for transparency in international relations.
Post 3:
However, it is important to note that some critics argue that Wilson's pursuit of the League of Nations, a central component of his post-war agenda, deviated from progressive principles. While progressivism emphasizes democracy and accountability, critics argue that the League of Nations undermined democratic decision-making by concentrating power in the hands of a few nations.
Critics, including progressive figures like Senator Robert La Follette, argued that the League of Nations would perpetuate imperialistic practices and hinder true self-determination for smaller nations. They contended that it would create an unequal distribution of power, where major powers could dictate the fate of smaller nations without their consent.
This criticism challenges the progressive nature of Wilson's pursuit of the League of Nations. It raises concerns about the concentration of power and the potential erosion of democratic principles. Progressivism, as defined in my chapter and podcast, seeks to empower individuals and communities while promoting a fair and just society. The critique of the League of Nations aligns with this vision by highlighting the need for democratic decision-making and safeguarding the rights of all nations.
In conclusion, Woodrow Wilson's wartime leadership raises questions about his adherence to progressivism. While his pursuit of open covenants in the Fourteen Points can be seen as progressive, his use of wartime propaganda and the criticisms surrounding the League of Nations present challenges to his progressive credentials. This nuanced assessment underscores the complexities of Wilson's leadership and highlights the importance of evaluating his actions in relation to the core principles of progressivism.