Yes its true that according to tax law, capital gains and losses must be distinguished from other forms of profits and losses.
What regulations apply to capital gains exemption?
Taxpayers are only eligible for this capital gains exemption if they did not possess a primary residence on the day the capital asset was transferred. Within one year of the transfer in advance, the whole net selling proceeds from the sale of a capital asset must be invested.What does the Income Tax Act imply by capital gains?
Capital Gains are profits or gains that result from the transfer of a capital asset and are subject to taxation under the "Capital Gains" heading. What capital asset means. Any type of property owned by an assessee, whether or not it is related to their company or line of work, is included in the definition of a capital asset.To know more about Tax Act, checkout this link:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
que hacer cuando tu primo te hace bulling
THE EVALUATION/CRITICS/COMMENT ON THE REVIEW
Review on the highland tower of the incident to the citizens
Answer:
Although the criticism of every art will be based in the particularities that arise from its specific media, I am interested here in highlighting aspects of criticism applicable across the arts (and which are therefore relevant to film criticism). Equally, although the characteristics of evaluative criticism have developed through and in relation to written criticism, most of the aspects listed below would be germane to work currently taking place within audio-visual formats. I offer this interdisciplinary résumé because my experience is that many students of film studies ‘in the 21st Century’ are currently lacking an awareness of the practice of evaluative criticism.
Explanation:
Some might consider the phrase “evaluative criticism” tautological because the etymology of the word “criticism” implies evaluation. It is derived from the Greek word kritikos, which means to judge, and the kritikoi were the judges or jurymen who gave verdicts (often in competitions).
Which of the following has been used by states to ease the voting process and increase voter
turnout?
Specialized voting
Proxy voting
Early voting
Internet voting
Digital voting
The effective method used by states to ease the voting process and increase voter turnout is early voting.
How do early voting increase voter turnout?Many states used early voting which allows registered voters to cast their ballot in person before election day, however, the periods can vary in length and can begin as early as several weeks before the election.
This method is effective because its reduce wait times on election day and provide greater flexibility for voters who may have work or other obligations. Some states also allow mail-in ballots to be submitted before election day which increases accessibility and convenience for voters.
Read more about Voting process
brainly.com/question/29791364
#SPJ1
Which of the following is the clearest example of local government affecting the lives of citizens?
O A governor appoints a Secretary of Education
O A city council passes an ordinance banning skateboarding in public parks
O The Supreme Court declares an energy bill unconstitutional
The state legislature approves the development of a
Which of the following is not standard drink
12 ounces of beer
Answer: 12 oz of beer
Explanation: In the United States, one "standard" drink (or one alcoholic drink equivalent) contains roughly 14 grams of pure alcohol, which is found in: 12 ounces of regular beer, which is usually about 5% alcohol. 5 ounces of wine, which is typically about 12% alcohol. 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits, which is about 40% alcohol.
HOPE IT HELPS
The standard which is not considered a drink is 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
A standard drink is defined as the amount of alcohol that contains approximately 14 grams (0.6 ounces) of pure alcohol.
Let's analyze the given information:
1.5 ounces of spirits with 40% alcohol: This amount of spirits typically contains approximately 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.5 ounces of red wine with 12% alcohol: This amount of wine generally contains around 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.12 ounces of beer with 5% alcohol: This quantity of beer usually contains about 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.However, the 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol exceeds the alcohol content typically found in a Standard Drink.
Thus, it contains more than the usual amount of pure alcohol and, therefore, is not considered a Standard Drink.
Learn more about Standard Drink here:
https://brainly.com/question/28039452
#SPJ2
Who did Jeremy Bentham think deserved special consideration?
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Who was Jeremy Bentham What did he believe in?Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.
To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1085669
#SPJ4
Sunny enters into a contract with Trey to act as his personal sports trainer. If a dispute later arises and the contract contains unclear terms, the rules of contract interpretation will give effect to
the parties' intent as expressed in their contract.
what the promisor claims was the parties' intent.
what the promisee claims was the parties' intent.
what the parties now agree they intended.
The statement "the rules of contract interpretation will give effect to the parties intent as expressed in their contract" is correct.
The courts will typically interpret a contract to give effect to the parties intent as stated in the contract itself when there is a disagreement over the parties intentions or when there are ambiguous terms in the contract. According to the objective meaning of the words used and taking into account the context and circumstances of the contract's formation, the court's job is to interpret and uphold the agreement.
This method makes sure that the contract is interpreted in a way that is consistent with the parties understanding at the time of entering the contract and that the parties original intentions as expressed in the written agreement, are respected.
Learn more about contract interpretation at:
brainly.com/question/32810710
#SPJ4
a person is persuaded to rent or sellk a dwelling in a specific neighborhood because mebers race, religion or national origin are moving in scheme is called
A person is persuaded to rent or sell a dwelling in a specific neighborhood because members' race, religion, or national origin are moving in the scheme is called Blockbusting.
Blockbusting was a business practice in which realtors and developers persuaded white residents in a particular area to sell their property at a price below market value. This was accomplished by intimidating homeowners by telling them that racial minorities would soon move into the neighborhood. have used this technique in
Updated 10/28/2019. Blockbusting is the practice of real estate agents persuading homeowners to sell their homes at lower prices out of concern that the neighborhood's socioeconomic demographics will change and home values will decline.
Learn more about Blockbusting https://brainly.com/question/14977132
#SPJ1
The first US marshals were appointed by _____.
Answer:
Former late president George Washington
Explanation:
According to the supremacy clause, what three items are the supreme law of the land?
According to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution, there are three items that are considered the supreme law of the land.
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land and that state laws and constitutions must comply with these federal laws.
The first item that is considered the supreme law of the land is the Constitution itself. The Constitution is the foundational document of the United States, and it sets out the basic structure and principles of the federal government. The second item that is considered the supreme law of the land is federal law.
These laws are enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President. They cover a wide range of topics, from criminal law to environmental law to healthcare. Federal laws apply to everyone in the United States, regardless of which state they live in. The third item that is considered the supreme law of the land is treaties. Treaties are agreements between the United States and other nations. They cover a variety of topics, from trade to defense to human rights. Treaties are negotiated by the President and must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.
To know more about Supremacy Clause
https://brainly.com/question/1481445
#SPJ11
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict construction, originalism, pragmatism, etc.) and which mode you favor.
Answer:
There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.
The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.
I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.
The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.
Explanation:
The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.
the fact that stacy peterson was drew's alibi on the night of kathleen savio's death is an example of what type of evidence
The fact that Stacy Peterson was Drew Peterson's alibi on the night of Kathleen Savio's death is an example of Relevant evidence.
Relevant evidence refers to any information that has a tendency to make a fact of the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. In this case, Drew Peterson was a suspect in the death of his ex-wife Kathleen Savio, and the fact that his current wife Stacy was his alibi on the night of the death is relevant to the investigation.
The evidence is relevant because it goes to the issue of whether Drew Peterson was involved in Kathleen Savio's death. If he had a solid alibi, it would tend to make it less likely that he committed the crime. However, if Stacy Peterson's alibi was false or if she had been coerced into providing an alibi, it would tend to make it more likely that Drew Peterson was involved.
Relevant evidence is important in a criminal case because it helps to establish the facts of the case and determine whether the accused is guilty or innocent. The admissibility of evidence in court is determined by the judge, who must weigh its probative value against any potential prejudice or unfairness to the accused.
Know more about Evidence here :
https://brainly.com/question/31721636
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Which situation shows the president acting as head of state?
Question 7 options:
sending troops into combat
appointing members of the cabinet
delivering a budget to Congress
awarding a medal to a war hero
Answer:appointing members of cabinet
Answer:
The answer is (B) (appointing members of the cabinet)
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
1. What are at least two key distinctions between a developed and a developing nation that the
table suggests? What is a key distinction between the United States and both other nations? (2
points)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
You did not give the table but here are some differences between a developed nation and a developing nation.
First and foremost, we should note that a developed country is one that is highly industrialized, has a high GDP and has a high per capital income while a developing nation is one that has low industrialization, low GDP and low per capita income.
Secondly, a developed nation typically has a low unemployment rate while a developing nation has a high unemployment rate.
Thirdly, a developed nation has a low birth rate and a low infant mortality rate while a developing nation has a high birth rate and a high infant mortality rate.
Furthermore, a developed nation has a high standard of living and good infrastructural facilities such as good road network, constant power supply etc while a developing nation has a low standard of living and poor infrastructural facilities.
Lastly, the resources of a developed nation are effectively and efficiently used while a developing nation mismanages its resources.
1.
According to the Supreme Court, in a search incident to arrest, where are the police permitted to search if they do not have a search warrant?
The police may only search the area in the arrestee's immediate control.
The police may only search the arrestee.
The police may not conduct a search without a warrant.
The police may search the entire building in which the arrest occurred.
According to the Supreme Court, in a search incident to arrest, the police are permitted to search the arrestee and the area within the arrestee's immediate control without a search warrant.
The Supreme Court has ruled that police officers may conduct a warrantless search during an arrest to ensure their own safety and to prevent the destruction of evidence.
This includes searching the arrestee's person and the area within their immediate control, meaning the area from which they could obtain a weapon or destroy evidence. This principle was established in the case of Chimel v. California (1969).
In a search incident to arrest, the police are allowed to search the arrestee and the area in their immediate control without a search warrant. They cannot search the entire building or areas beyond the arrestee's reach.
For more information on search warrant kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/30080397
#SPJ11
The rational basis test is a standard that courts use to measure whether a legislature had a compelling interest for enacting a particular statute that infringes on an individual's rights. True False
Based on the given description, the answer to this is FALSE.
What is the rational basis test?This refers to the standard that is in use by the legislature to find out and discover whether there was a reasonable argument for the enactment of a particular statute.
Hence, we can see that the given description stated that the rational basis test was used to show whether there was a compelling interest for making a statute and this is false.
Read more about the rational basis test here:
https://brainly.com/question/3334211
#SPJ1
What is filed between two parties in a civil case?
Answer:
A complaint.
Explanation:
A complaint is a document that outlines the jurisdictional basis for the court demanding a judicial relief to the plaintiff. It is a pleading by the plaintiff that starts a case between the two parties in a civil case.
The complaint is to be drafted by an attorney, outlining the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. A complaint also specify any remedy that plaintiff desires from the defendant.
Therefore, the correct answer is a complaint.
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
A student took the state examination at a testing facility and failed. She wants to review the test and see what answers she provided. She knows that she can review the exam within two years of the date of the examination and she makes an appointment to do so. Will she be able to review the entire exam?
yes she will because she made an appointment to do so
She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
What is law?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.
According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.
As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
Learn more about on Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ5
a verdict of guilty to a criminal charge nearly always requires a unanimous jury.
T/F
True. A verdict of guilty to a criminal charge nearly always requires a unanimous jury decision. This means that all jurors must agree on the defendant's guilt in order to convict them of the crime.
In the United States, a verdict of guilty to a criminal charge almost always requires a unanimous jury. This means that all jurors must agree on the guilt or innocence of the defendant in order for a conviction to be reached. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. In some states, a less-than-unanimous verdict may be accepted for certain types of cases, such as misdemeanors or civil cases. Additionally, in federal court, a unanimous verdict is required for most criminal cases, but in some cases, a verdict of guilty can be reached with a 10-2 or 11-1 vote.
Learn more about verdict of guilty: https://brainly.com/question/29615449
#SPJ11
Greg invites his supervisor (Leslie) and two other colleagues (Wanda and Eileen) to go fishing on his boat. While fishing, they have some beers. Eileen gets so drunk that she falls overboard. Greg, Leslie and Wanda rescue Eileen with the help of the harbor police. Leslie reports the incident to the management of the company, which opens an investigation. Greg refuses to cooperate and is disciplined.
a. Greg has a privacy right to keep silent because the incident happened at a social occasion and away from the work place.
b. Greg has a 5thAmendment right not to cooperate because the information that he provides might be used against him by the company in a disciplinary proceeding.
c. Greg's rights have not been violated because the company has legitimate business reasons for seeking information about the fishing incident.
d. Although Greg's right to privacy has been violated, the company can discipline him based on the information that it gets from Leslie, Wanda and Eileen.
What happens when a party with the right to avoid a contract chooses to not avoid it?.
If a party with the power to reject the contract chooses not to reject the contract despite the defect, the contract remains valid and enforceable.
The legal cancellation of an agreement due to the fact an occasion occurs that makes the overall performance of the settlement phrases not possible or inequitable and that releases the events from their obligations.
Avoidance with respect to the unmarried installment is allowed if a party devoted a fundamental breach with respect to that single installment; avoidance of the agreement as a whole can be claimed in which the essential breach worries the whole agreement (Article seventy-three).
Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
no system of federal (national) courts was created. individual states could create their own courts within their state. what was some problems with this law
The lack of a federal court system under this law led to inconsistency, lack of uniformity, difficulty in resolving interstate disputes, and challenges in enforcing national laws and protecting individual rights.
Some problems with the law that allowed individual states to create their own courts without a federal court system were:
1. Inconsistency in laws: Since each state had its own court system, different interpretations of the Constitution and laws could lead to inconsistency across states.
2. Lack of uniformity: The absence of a federal court system meant that there was no uniformity in the application of laws across the nation.
3. Difficulty in resolving interstate disputes: Without a federal court system, it was challenging to resolve disputes between states, as each state's court might favor their own state's interests.
4. Inability to enforce national laws: The lack of a federal court system made it difficult for the national government to enforce its laws consistently across all states.
5. Limited protection of individual rights: Without a federal court system to ensure the consistent interpretation and protection of individual rights, citizens' rights could vary significantly from state to state.
To know more about national laws , refer here
https://brainly.com/question/8867273#
#SPJ11
Cagney and Lacey enter into a written contract to open a bookstore specializing in detective novels. The written contract is a 2-paragraph handwritten document, and states that each party will receive 50% of any net profits and that each will devote 30 hours a week to the business. Both parties regard the writing as a final expression of their deal. After being in business for a while, Cagney sues Lacey for breach because Lacey is only working 20 hours per week during the summer months. Lacy attempts to present evidence that shows just prior to signing the contract, Cagney orally agreed that Lacey could work 20 hours a week when her children were on vacation from school. Will Lacey be able to present this evidence at trial?
An employee is entitled to impairment income benefits beginning
A. The date medical treatment commences.
B. The day after the employee reaches maximum medical improvement.
C. The day that medical improvement is noted.
D. The date of the injury.
An employee is entitled to impairment income benefits beginning the date of the injury.
Impairment income benefits are provided to compensate employees for the loss of earning capacity due to a work-related injury. These benefits are typically calculated based on the impairment rating assigned to the employee's injury and other factors. The entitlement to impairment income benefits starts from the date of the injury itself, recognizing that the injury has already caused an immediate impact on the employee's ability to work and earn income.
To know more about impairment income benefits, click here: brainly.com/question/31109747
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a typical judge. After college, you went to law school. Then you passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law. After that, you spent years prosecuting or defending criminal cases. You have been involved in thousands of criminal trials. As a judge, should you be free to make any sentencing decision you want? Or should you be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense? Explain why you think your selection makes the most sense.
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the United States v. Booker (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer
Frank can type a report in 7 hours. James takes 2 hours to type it. How long will it take the two of them typing together
It will take frank and james approximately 1 hour and 33 minutes (14/9 hours) to type the report together.
to determine how long it will take frank and james to type the report together, we can calculate their combined typing rate.
let's say frank's typing rate is represented as "f report/hour" and james's typing rate is "j report/hour."
we know that frank takes 7 hours to type the report, so we can express his typing rate as:
f = 1 report / 7 hours = 1/7 report/hour
similarly, james takes 2 hours to type the report, so his typing rate is:
j = 1 report / 2 hours = 1/2 report/hour
to find their combined typing rate, we add their individual rates:
combined rate = f + j = 1/7 + 1/2 = 2/14 + 7/14 = 9/14 report/hour
now, we can determine how long it will take them to type the report together by taking the reciprocal of their combined typing rate:
time = 1 / (combined rate) = 1 / (9/14) = 14/9 hours
Learn more about reciprocal here:
https://brainly.com/question/15590281
#SPJ11
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
• A. Increased inflation
• B. Decreased production
• C. Economic growth
D. Per capita GDP
the answer is c Economic growth