The U.S. Constitution safeguards individuals. Inventors can make money off of their creations:
The supreme law of the United States of America is found in its Constitution. It defines the framework of national government and originally had seven articles. The federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, which is made up of the bicameral Congress; the executive, which consists of the president and other officials; and the judicial, which is made up of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. The doctrine of the separation of powers is embodied in the constitution's first three articles. Federalism ias embodied in Articles IV, V, and VI, which detail the roles and responsibilities state governments, the connection between the states and the central government, and the joint process of amending the constitution. Article VII lays out .
Learn more about U.S from
brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
what did political theorist john stuart mill argue for? A. freedom from government B. free traffic of ideas C. free love D. free access to healthcare
Political theorist John Stuart Mill argued for B. free traffic of ideas.
Mill believed in the importance of individual liberty and freedom of expression. He argued that individuals should be free to express their ideas and opinions without interference from the government or other authorities.
This freedom of expression, or "free traffic of ideas," is essential for the pursuit of truth and the development of society. Mill also believed that this freedom should extend to all aspects of life, including religion, politics, and personal relationships.
However, he did recognize the need for some limits on individual liberty, such as when one's actions harm others.
Hence Option B is correct.
For more similar questions on liberty:
brainly.com/question/30191259
#SPJ11
define the main concepts of citizenship?
Answer:
A citizen is a participatory member of a political community. Citizenship is gained by meeting the legal requirements of a national, state, or local government. A nation grants certain rights and privileges to its citizens. In return, citizens are expected to obey their country's laws and defend it against its enemies.
which of the following is true in the context of sexual harassment laws in the united states?
The following is true In the context of sexual harassment laws in the United States, A. it is crucial to understand the legal framework that governs such conduct.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the primary federal law that prohibits sexual harassment in the workplace. Under this law, sexual harassment is considered a form of sex discrimination, which is illegal in any work setting. There are two types of sexual harassment: quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a supervisor or someone with authority over an employee demands sexual favors in exchange for job benefits, such as a promotion or a raise. Hostile work environment harassment happens when unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature is so severe or pervasive that it creates an intimidating, offensive, or hostile work atmosphere, affecting an employee's job performance.
Employers are required to take all reasonable steps to prevent and address sexual harassment in their workplaces. This may include implementing policies and training programs, as well as promptly investigating complaints and taking appropriate action against the harasser. In conclusion, the true statement in the context of sexual harassment laws in the United States is that they protect employees from discriminatory conduct in the workplace and mandate employers to take measures to prevent and address such behaviors. So the correct answer is A. it is crucial to understand the legal framework that governs such conduct.
Learn more about sexual harassment at
https://brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ11
what is preemption in the supremacy clause?federal law is supreme over state law.state law that does not conflict with federal law preempts federal law.federal law cannot preempt certain areas of state law as delineated in the supremacy clause.preemption is not addressed in the supremacy clause. it is addressed in other areas of the u.s. constitution.
The correct answer is: Federal law is supreme over state law.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution provides that the federal law is the supreme law of the land, meaning that it takes precedence over state law. This concept is known as preemption. If a federal law and a state law conflict, the federal law preempts the state law and the state law is deemed invalid. This principle is based on the idea that a national government should have the final say in matters of national concern, while states retain the power to regulate matters that affect their own citizens.The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. It establishes that the federal Constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. This means that if a state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law must be followed.
Learn more about state law here:
https://brainly.com/question/21114560
#SPJ11
How to find out if there is a warrant out for your arrest.
One way to find out if there is a warrant for your arrest is to contact the local law enforcement agency, such as the police department or sheriff's office.
You can either go in person to the station or call the non-emergency line to inquire about any active warrants under your name.
You will need to provide your full name and any other relevant personal information, such as your date of birth or social security number, to verify your identity.
Another option is to check the public record databases maintained by the court system.
Many courts have an online search tool that allows you to look up court cases and warrants by name or case number.
You can also visit the courthouse in person and request to see your criminal record or any active warrants.
However, keep in mind that some court records may be sealed or restricted, especially if they involve minors or sensitive information.
There are also private companies that offer background check services that can include a warrant search.
These services typically require a fee and may have varying levels of accuracy and reliability.
You should do your research and read reviews before using any third-party background check service.
Know more about a warrant here:
https://brainly.com/question/29668617
#SPJ11
Which part of the First
Amendment says that citizens are allowed to practice
any religion they choose?
A. The separation clause
B. The freedom of association clause
C. The establishment clause
D. The free exercise clause
If the Lawyer's Association in Wonderland were to decrease the number of admissions to law schools, what would happen to the pay of lawyers in Wonderland? Assume that the number of lawyers needed in this area will remain the same. 1) The supply of lawyers will decrease, 2) shifts the supply curve to the left, 3) and the pay level of lawyers will increase. 1) The supply of lawyers will decrease, 2) shifts the supply curve to the left, 3) and the pay level of lawyers will decrease. 1) The supply of lawyers will decrease, 2) shifts the supply curve to the right, 3) and the pay level of lawyers will decrease. 1) The supply of lawyers will decrease, 2) shifts the supply curve to the right, 3) and the pay level of lawyers will increase.
If the Lawyer's Association in Wonderland were to decrease the number of admissions to law schools, the supply of lawyers will decrease, shifts the supply curve to the left, and the pay level of lawyers will increase. Option 3 is correct
The given scenario in the question can be explained using the basic law of supply and demand. It is based on the number of lawyers in the market and the demand for their services. The basic law of supply and demand states that the higher the supply, the lower the price, and the lower the supply, the higher the price. Therefore, if the Lawyer's Association in Wonderland were to decrease the number of admissions to law schools, the supply of lawyers would decrease, shifts the supply curve to the left, and the pay level of lawyers would increase.
This is because if there are fewer lawyers available to provide their services, their services become more valuable, and therefore, the pay level of lawyers increases. Therefore option 3 is correct.
Learn more about Association
https://brainly.com/question/30204739
#SPJ11
How does a counterclaim help support a position in an argumentative essay?
Answer:
A counterclaim helps support the writer position in an argumentative essay because The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect, as you write, think about your audience.
Answer:
The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect.
Explanation:
edge 2021
ALAP
What is law really
in a suit against olive, pimento obtains damages. in the u.s. legal system, this remedy at law is
In the U.S. legal system, obtaining damages in a suit against Olive means that Pimento has been awarded monetary compensation for the harm caused by Olive's actions.
This remedy at law is known as a legal remedy, as opposed to an equitable remedy which seeks to compel a party to act or refrain from acting in a certain way. Damages awarded in a lawsuit are intended to put the plaintiff in the position they would have been in if the harm had not occurred, and may include compensation for lost wages, medical expenses, and pain and suffering. The amount of damages awarded is typically determined by a judge or jury based on the evidence presented during the trial.
To learn more about legal system, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29358001
#SPJ11
Define Constitution and describe it's important
Answer:
Importance of a Constitution A constitution is relevant to maintaining the structure and framework of a country or organization. One cannot overlook the relevance of a constitution to a nation because they play significant roles and stand as laws governing the nation.
Explanation:
NOUN
a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed:
the basic written set of principles and precedents of federal government in the US, which came into operation in 1789 and has since been modified by twenty-seven amendments.
A low risk environment is a condition when
Lightly-traveled, two-lane roads in the city or in rural or suburban areas are generally considered to be Low-Risk Environments. In these areas, the speed limit is usually restricted to 35 mph or less and there are fewer right-of-way conflicts.
Hope this helps :P
Brainliest? ^///^
assume there is a u.s. supreme court case: galactic bargains v. state farm ins., 251 u.s. 1442 (2018). what does the citation indicate about the plaintiff's claim?
Answer:
Explanation:
A citation to a court case typically includes several pieces of information, including the names of the parties involved in the case, the volume number of the reporter where the case is published, the name of the reporter, and the page number(s) where the case can be found within that reporter. The citation may also include the name of the court that issued the decision.
In the example citation you provided, "Galactic Bargains v. State Farm Ins., 251 U.S. 1442 (2018)," "Galactic Bargains v. State Farm Ins." refers to the names of the parties involved in the case. "251" refers to the volume number of the reporter where the case is published, and "U.S." refers to the name of the reporter (in this case, the United States Reports, which is the official reporter of U.S. Supreme Court decisions). "1442" refers to the page number(s) where the case can be found within the United States Reports. "2018" is the year in which the case was decided.
Without more information about the case, it's impossible to say what the citation indicates about the plaintiff's claim.
What clause requires that states treat people from other states equally to their own residents?
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
a contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of a‹ _____ or a _____.
Answer:
A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of law or a tribunal.:
What is a correlation? What is a statistically significant correlation?
Explanation:
Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value.
Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p = .
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
Who filed a 1966 supreme court case because he was arrested and interrogated without being told of his rights?.
explain briefly the procedures in making arrest
Answer:
Explanation:
To make an arrest you have to obtain an arrest warrant or if the officer has probable cause to do so. Depending on the problem that is going on, the officer may do a warrantless arrest.
-The officer personally observed a crime.
-The officer has probable cause to believe that person arrested committed a crime
-The officer has an arrest warrant issued by a judge.
Section 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 is an essential
provision in the country’s social security system. This provision forms the basis for
various legislation and court litigation on social security law. Discuss how the rights
under this provision can be limited.
Opening statements are just statements, and cannot be considered as evidence by the jury
True or False
Answer:
I say false
Explanation:
Genital features useful in assessing a woman’s sexual
history
Answer:
a thorough physical examination of the reproductive tract includes a complete history, general physical examination, and evaluation of the external and internal genitalia. Ancillary tests that can be applied to this system include uterine culture, biopsy, cytology, and lavage.
What is the differences between law and ethic and law and religion?
— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.
pa brainlest po:) ThankYou
Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!
Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
Depends on what they were scamming people with
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
which of the statements below about park & burgess’ findings on the city is not true?
"The growth of cities in particular patterns is not random: When invading occurs, territory becomes less desirable." statements below about park & burgess’ findings on the city is not true. The correct option is b.
According to Park & Burgess research on the city, this claim is untrue. The Chicago School of urban sociology and its founders Park and Burgess argued that patterns rather than random growth determine how cities develop.
The theory of concentric zones which they proposed contends that cities grow in concentric circles, with the center zone being the most densely populated and the outer zones serving as suburban areas. They also noticed that as cities expand, the core tends to suffer from more social issues and deterioration while the periphery offers better living conditions.
Learn more about park & burgess at:
brainly.com/question/32468201
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which of the statements below about Park & Burgess' findings on the city is NOT true? The further you move away from the center of the city, the fewer social problems_ b. The growth of cities in particular patterns is not random: When invading occurs, territory becomes less desirable: d. None of the above"
what is proctor’s main purpose in bringing mary warren to court in act iii of the crucible?
In Act III of The Crucible, Proctor's main purpose in bringing Mary Warren to court is to prove that the accusations of witchcraft are false and to save his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, from being convicted.
Mary Warren, who is one of the girls accusing people of witchcraft, had previously admitted that their accusations were false, but she is now too afraid to speak out against the other girls. Proctor believes that if Mary Warren testifies in court and tells the truth, the accusations will be exposed as fraudulent and his wife will be cleared of any wrongdoing.However, Mary is afraid of Abigail and the other girls and eventually breaks down, claiming that Proctor is the devil's man. Proctor's attempt to expose the truth is thwarted, and he is ultimately arrested for witchcraft himself.
To know more about witchcraft click here:
brainly.com/question/8159939
#SPJ4
the usa patriot act allows domestic law enforcement agencies to conduct ________.
The USA PATRIOT Act allows domestic law enforcement agencies to conduct surveillance and gather intelligence.
What are the powers granted to domestic law enforcement agencies under the USA PATRIOT Act?The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, grants domestic law enforcement agencies expanded surveillance and intelligence-gathering powers. It enables agencies to conduct various activities such as wiretapping, obtaining business records, monitoring internet communications, and collecting data on individuals suspected of engaging in terrorism or related activities.
The Act enhances the ability of law enforcement to investigate and prevent potential threats to national security. It allows agencies to share information with other government entities, breaking down barriers that may hinder effective intelligence sharing. Additionally, it enables the use of roving wiretaps, which can monitor multiple communication devices used by a target individual, even if they change their device or phone number.
However, the USA PATRIOT Act has raised concerns regarding potential violations of privacy and civil liberties. Critics argue that the broad scope of surveillance powers granted by the Act may lead to indiscriminate monitoring of innocent individuals. It is important to strike a balance between national security and the protection of individual rights.
Learn more about USA PATRIOT Act
brainly.com/question/30524859
#SPJ11
antitrust laws can reduce social welfare if they prevent mergers that would lower costs through more efficient joint production.
It does not provide an incentive for the monopolist to reduce its cost.
Antitrust laws can reduce social welfare if they prevent mergers that reduce costs through more efficient co-production. There is no incentive for monopolists to lower their costs. We have many competitors. Antitrust laws generally prohibit illegal mergers and business practices.
Leaving it to the courts to determine which are illegal based on the facts of each individual case. Antitrust laws protect competition. Free and open competition benefits consumers by bringing new and better products at lower prices. In a free market competing companies generally try to attract consumers by lowering prices and improving the quality of their products and services.
Learn more about Antitrust laws here:- https://brainly.com/question/971420
#SPJ4