______this article discusses the rights of the states and the process for adding new states to the union.

Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000

The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.

The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.

For such more question on theft:

brainly.com/question/30293258

#SPJ4

Answer:

With a camera

Explanation:

Br uh how else

Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.

Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.

In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.

The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.

By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.

Learn more about validity, here

https://brainly.com/question/13012369

#SPJ1

The primary purpose of Tort law is to a) recognize duty of care and c) compensate an injured party.

A tort is a wrongful act that results in injury or damage to someone or their property. It may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. Tort law is a legal system that provides remedies for people who have been harmed by the wrongful actions of others.

There are several goals of tort law, but the primary ones are:

Recognition of the duty of care: Tort law recognizes that people have a duty of care to others, which means they are responsible for not causing harm to them. This duty can arise in a variety of situations, such as driving a car, operating heavy machinery, or providing professional advice. Tort law aims to ensure that people take this duty seriously and are held accountable when they breach it.

Compensation of injured parties: Tort law also seeks to compensate people who have been injured or suffered losses due to the wrongful actions of others. This compensation can take many forms, such as payment of medical expenses, lost wages, or compensation for pain and suffering. The aim is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred. This goal is often achieved through monetary compensation, but other remedies may be available as well, such as injunctions or orders to perform specific actions.

Remedial: Tort law is also remedial. Its primary aim is to provide a remedy to the aggrieved party and not to punish the wrongdoer. The law of tort seeks to ensure that an individual who has suffered a harm is adequately compensated for his losses and that similar situations do not occur in the future. In other words, the primary goal of tort law is to restore the injured party to the position he or she was in before the tort occurred. Punishing the wrongdoer is not the primary goal of tort law.

Therefore, the correct answer is  a) recognize duty of care and c) compensate an injured party.

Learn more about Tort law here: https://brainly.com/question/28213050

#SPJ11

Answer:

hey look up essaytyper.com and they'll create you an essay if you enter your topic

The country known for its extreme orderliness and tidiness is: Japan.

Japan has a strong cultural emphasis on cleanliness and organization, which is reflected in various aspects of daily life. This can be attributed to several factors, including the influence of Shintoism, a native religion of Japan that emphasizes purity, as well as a deep-rooted sense of social responsibility among citizens.

Japanese society values discipline and respect, which translates into a strong adherence to cleanliness standards in public and private spaces. For example, it is common to see Japanese people meticulously sorting their trash for recycling, sweeping the streets in front of their homes, and even wiping down their electronic devices.

The Japanese education system also plays a vital role in instilling these values, with students often being responsible for cleaning their classrooms and school grounds.

In addition to cleanliness, Japan is also known for its incredible efficiency and organization. The public transportation system, particularly the trains, is a prime example of this, as they are renowned for their punctuality and cleanliness.

Businesses and governmental organizations are similarly well-organized, contributing to the overall orderliness of the country.

In conclusion, Japan is the country most known for its orderliness and tidiness. This can be attributed to its cultural values, religious influence, and societal norms that prioritize cleanliness and organization in daily life. The combination of these factors has earned Japan a global reputation for being a remarkably clean and orderly nation.

To know more about Japan, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21218997#

#SPJ11

A motion presented prior to trial to determine the admissibility of certain items of evidence is called a pretrial motion.

Here are some additional points about pretrial motions:

This type of motion is used by attorneys to request that a judge exclude certain evidence from being presented to a jury at trial.

Learn More Abut Pretrial motion

https://brainly.com/question/30054312

#SPJ11

Explanation:

Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value.

Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p = .

Answer:

Medicine

Explanation:

They are saying that it can be used as medicine, but to be able to use it as medicine, they have to make it legal.

If jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday. The journal entry is Debit Salaries Expense $10,500; Credit Salaries Payable $10,500.

The appropriate entries to record the given transactions are:

1. Dec. 31

Debit Salaries Expense $10,500

Credit Salaries Payable $10,500

(To record  accrue salaries expense)

Salaries Expense = Weekly payroll ÷ Days in work week × Days to accrue

Salaries Expense = $17,500÷5×3

Salaries Expense =$10,500

(Days to accrue: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)

2. January 5

Debit salaries expenses $7,000

Debit salaries payable  $10,500

9$17,500 -$7,000)

Credit Cash $17,500

(To record salaries expenses)

Therefore the entry for Dec 31 is to debit salaries expenses and credit salaries payable.

Learn more about journal entry here:https://brainly.com/question/14279491

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday (january 5th) for the previous full week. assume juniper park senior center has a five day workweek and has an unadjuste balance in salaries expense of 510000

Record the adjusting entry for accrued salaries on December 31.

Record the journal entry for payment of salaries made on January 5.

Salaries Expense:

Answer:

a

Explanation: it makes sense

The states Luzerne and localities use a variety of strategies, including public defender programs, assigned counsel, and contract attorney systems, to the  provide indigent defense services.

If it is determined that you lack the financial means to hire an attorney, a public defense will be assigned on your behalf. For contempt, Luzerne, and revocation cases, eligibility is taken as given. If you appear to have the financial means to hire your own attorney, the public defender may decline to represent you. The indigent defendants frequently have to spend a lot of time waiting in the jail before speaking with a lawyer.

To learn more about defense, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/12252825

#SPJ1

Research has revealed that society's reaction to lawbreaking has often been shaped by a variety of factors such as the nature of the offense, the identity of the offender, the victim's characteristics, and societal norms.

The way society responds to lawbreaking is critical because it impacts how people perceive justice and can influence future offending behavior. In some cases, society's response may be punitive and punitive, whereas in others, it may be restorative and focused on rehabilitation.The society's reaction to lawbreaking has often been guided by the legal system. Legal officials have a duty to uphold the law and ensure that those who break it are punished appropriately. This may include fines, imprisonment, or other forms of punishment designed to deter future offending.However, the society's reaction to lawbreaking is not limited to legal officials. Members of society also have a role to play in shaping how lawbreakers are perceived and treated. For example, some societies may be more lenient towards those who commit certain types of offenses, such as drug offenses or traffic violations. Conversely, other societies may be more punitive towards these same offenses, resulting in harsher punishment.

To know more about lawbreaking  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/186782

#SPJ11

All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.

The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.

Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.

The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the circular flow model, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11324259

#SPJ2

In 1914, the Harrison Act made certain drugs illegal. All are true except abusing. Option B is the correct answer.

The Harrison Narcotic Drug Act, the first law to restrict drug trafficking, was approved by Congress in 1914. By mandating people who transported, sold, or possessed drugs to report them to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and pay taxes, the legislation used a revenue-generating strategy to drug regulation. Option B is the correct answer.

The Harrison Act restricted access to opium to only modest doses that were prescribed by physicians, who had to register and pay taxes on the doses they recommended. Drug misuse was viewed less as a criminal crime and more as a public health issue. Medicines frequently contained drugs like opium and cocaine.

Learn more about Harrison Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/28463686

#SPJ4

The complete question is, "In 1914, the Harrison Act made certain drugs illegal. All are true except:

a. buying

b. abusing

c. using

d. selling"

Answer: True

Explanation:

This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:

Explanation:

The US government did

Answer:

Legal practitioners have a fiduciary duty to their clients, the obligation to safeguard the client's trust funds. This duty arises from both legal and ethical principles. From a legal perspective, lawyers are bound by the rules of professional conduct and the laws governing the handling of client funds. For instance, in most jurisdictions, lawyers are required to keep client funds separate from their own personal funds and maintain accurate records of all transactions. Failure to comply with these legal requirements can result in sanctions or disciplinary action. Why struggle with assignments everyday? Get help from proffrank01[at]gma il. c om anytime.

From an ethical standpoint, lawyers have an obligation to act in the best interests of their clients and maintain their clients' trust. This includes handling client funds responsibly and transparently. Lawyers must exercise due diligence in the management of trust accounts. They must also avoid misappropriating funds and disclose any material information regarding the client's funds.

On the other hand, morality is concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior. Lawyers are expected to uphold high moral standards in their professional conduct. This includes being honest and trustworthy in their dealings with clients. Misusing client funds violates these moral principles. Therefore, lawyers who engage in such conduct risk damaging their reputation and losing the trust of their clients.

Explanation:

Answer:private prison

Explanation:

The following are Class 4 appeals:

1) Civil enforcement of planning or environmental rules by government agencies, typically to correct or prevent violations

2) judicial review of administrative actions and judgments made in accordance with environmental or planning regulations.

The appeal is more than just a fresh trial with a new judge. It is a legal defense made before an appellate court panel on a legal problem. In order to avoid favoring one party over another, the appellate court will not pronounce a "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict. The defendant may contend, in their appeal of the sentence, that it is disproportionately harsher than previous sentences handed down for the same kind of offense. They might also contend that the judge failed to adequately take into account their unique circumstances.

To know more about appeals:

brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

Answer:

the answer is protecting the governor and the capitol grounds and buildings

Explanation:

Answer:

well since you didn't give any answers I am gonna go off what I already know about it but the answer- In my opinion- would be that they are not aloud to bust down doors or anything to get into a house unless they have a warrant.

Explanation:

This may help you but I don't know because I don't have the multiple choice answers

The statement is true as the court reversed itself as the New Jersey court did regarding automobile search being the right decision to prevent crimes.

Stare decisis is Latin for "to hold fast to what has been decided." If a prior court has made a ruling on the same or a closely comparable matter when a court is faced with a legal argument, the court will follow that precedent when making its conclusion.

On September 24, the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld a decision that allowed police to search cars without first obtaining a warrant. No state rule or subjectivity is present in this situation, negating the need for such state-specific judgments. The court made the correct judgment to go in the opposite direction as the New Jersey court did with regard to car searches.

However, as in-state v. Witt, a new jersey supreme court case discussed in class, where a court will reverse itself as the new jersey court did regarding automobile searches stands TRUE.

To know more about the rule of stare decisis, refer to this link:

https://brainly.com/question/4997437

#SPJ4

Explanation:

Yes you are right she even did on mine I complained

The American Bar Association recommends that all felony cases reach disposition within one year of filing. The American Bar Association's Standards for Criminal Justice establishes that cases that go on for a long time raise issues for all the parties involved.

The accused, victims, witnesses, and their families, as well as society as a whole, may all be affected by the delay of justice. The Standards seek to decrease delays in criminal trials in order to increase the public's trust in the criminal justice system. The Standards aim to ensure that, while due process rights are upheld, criminal cases are dealt with promptly and efficiently by the system. The criminal justice system must work to guarantee that justice is done quickly, efficiently, and fairly, not only for the accused but also for the victim and society. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. When the criminal justice system is delayed, it harms the system's reputation, creates anxiety, and raises doubts about the legitimacy of the proceedings.

to know about American Bar Association visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28149117

#SPJ11

The Immigration Act of 1990 was a significant piece of legislation that made important changes to the immigration system in the United States.

The main provision of this act was to increase the number of legal immigrants allowed to enter the country each year. It did this by expanding the categories of immigrants who were eligible for visas and increasing the overall number of visas available. The Immigration Act of 1990 also created a new visa category called the Diversity Visa Program, which is also known as the Green Card Lottery. This program allows individuals from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States to enter a lottery and potentially win a visa to live and work in the United States. In addition to these changes, the Immigration Act of 1990 also established new rules and procedures for dealing with illegal immigration and asylum seekers. It created a new agency, the Office of Refugee Resettlement, to oversee the processing of asylum claims and the resettlement of refugees.

Learn more about immigrants from here:

https://brainly.com/question/18978893

#SPJ11