those systems that provide information needed for supervisory, allocation, strategic, tactical, policy, and administrative decisions are .

Answer:

I think abuse is bad

Explanation:

honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry

Answer:

borrowing money on credit

Explanation:

The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

In general, you need to file a charge within 180 calendar days from the day the discrimination took place. The 180 calendar day filing deadline is extended to 300 calendar days if a state or local agency enforces a law that prohibits employment discrimination on the same basis.

In many legal systems, the general rule is that each party is responsible for their own legal expenses, regardless of the outcome of the case. This is known as the "American Rule."

If defendants that lose cases and plaintiffs that do not win cases were required to pay the other side's legal expenses, it could have a number of consequences. On one hand, it could serve as a deterrent for frivolous lawsuits, as plaintiffs and defendants would be more cautious about filing lawsuits if they knew they might have to pay the other side's legal fees if they lose. On the other hand, it could have a chilling effect on legitimate lawsuits, as parties with valid claims might hesitate to bring a lawsuit for fear of having to pay the other side's legal expenses if they lose. This could lead to a denial of access to justice for people with valid claims.

Additionally, it could also lead to an increase in settlement negotiations, as parties would be more likely to reach an out-of-court settlement to avoid the risk of having to pay the other side's legal expenses if they lost the case. This could lead to less transparency and accountability in the legal system, as settlements are often reached privately and are not subject to public scrutiny.

For such more question on legal systems

https://brainly.com/question/30307656

#SPJ4

Eddy committed a mistake known as a "mistake as to the nature of the thing" in terms of South African law of contract. This mistake occurs when one of the parties to a contract is mistaken about the identity or nature of the subject matter of the contract.

In this case, Eddy believed that the coin he found on the beach was a gold coin and represented it to Carl as such. Carl relied on Eddy's representation and bought the coin for a large sum of money. However, it turned out that the coin was not actually made of gold but rather brass. This mistake as to the nature of the thing is a type of mutual mistake, which means that both parties were under the same mistaken belief about the coin.

Under South African law, a contract can be set aside on the grounds of mistake if the mistake is material, i.e., it is so fundamental that it goes to the root of the contract. In this case, the mistake made by Eddy and Carl was a material one, as the identity and value of the coin was central to their agreement.

Therefore, Carl may have a valid claim to set aside the contract and demand a refund from Eddy.

Learn more about contract here:https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ1

The penalties for breaking the laws should be severe to deter people from using their mobile devices while driving.

Using mobile devices while driving is dangerous.

This behavior is not restricted by state governments by enacting laws. Even though there is substantial proof that utilizing a cell phone while driving is hazardous, many people still do it.

The reason for this is that people think they can handle the task without any difficulty. They fail to understand that using mobile devices when driving is similar to driving under the influence of alcohol. It's difficult to control and will almost always result in accidents.

As a result, all state governments must impose strict laws on mobile phone usage when driving to avoid accidents and save lives. It is necessary to impose hefty fines, suspensions, and demerits on individuals who use mobile devices while driving.

The penalties for breaking these laws should be severe to deter people from using their mobile devices while driving.

learn more about penalties here:

https://brainly.com/question/31318693

#SPJ11

Depends on what they were scamming people with

The Liquor manages Act prohibits an alcoholic liquor permittee or their employees from supplying alcohol to intoxicated individuals (CGS § 30-86(b)(1)). Violations are punishable by using as much as $1,000  up to at least one-12 months imprisonment, or, for every offense (CGS § 30-113).

Some commonplace signs and symptoms of intoxication are Loud speech, boasting, crude conduct, consuming on my own, ingesting too fast, slurred speech, ordering doubles, looking for rounds, and stumbling.

Single indicator as a way to particularly become aware of seen intoxication.

1)frequency of drinking.

2)Speech.

3)Incoherent, rambling, and slurring.

4)conduct.

5)impolite, offensive, overly pleasant, annoying, confused, aggressive, violent, and inappropriate.

6)stability.

7)Unsteady on toes, dazzling and swaying.

8)Coordination.

Learn more about the intoxicated person here: https://brainly.com/question/28019347

#SPJ1

Answer:

Deviance is behavior that violates social norms and arouses negative social reactions. Crime is behavior that is considered so serious that it violates formal laws prohibiting such behavior. Social control refers to ways in which a society tries to prevent and sanction behavior that violates norms.

Explanation:

hope that helps

Any on-premise alcohol server and manager must be certified by an accredited RBS training provider and pass an ABC exam within 60 calendar days from the first date of employment. The RBS exam is currently available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Punjabi.

Answer:

Explanation:

Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.

The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.

For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.

In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

The universal citizenship is provided to the citizens of a nation in all the country in which he is being present at the time of need universally. The global citizenship is provided to every citizen by any nation in which he is being present at the time of need globally on the basis of being a human.

Answer by : https://brainly.in/question/7556579

Explanation:

Answer:

Shoulder belt

Explanation:

In most states, each party has a certain number of peremptory challenges during the jury selection process.

A peremptory challenge is one of the few jury challenges each party was granted prior to trial.

The right of peremptory challenge is a right in jury selection that allows the attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without providing a reason.

Unless the opposing party makes a prima facie case that this challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex, 

Other prospective jurors may be objected to for cause, that is, by stating a valid reason why they might not be able to render a fair decision, but the presiding judge will evaluate the objection and may reject it.

To know more about peremptory challenges, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14516904

#SPJ4

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

In the Hernandez v. Texas case, the legal position of the state of Texas was that Latinos were not considered a separate race and therefore were not entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

In the Hernandez v. Texas case, the legal position of the state of Texas was that Latinos were not considered a separate race and therefore were not entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The case challenged the exclusion of Hispanics from jury service in Jackson County, Texas, on the grounds that it was unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees equal protection under the law, applied not only to African Americans but also to other racial and ethnic groups.

The ruling was important in extending civil rights protection to other groups beyond just African Americans.

In conclusion, the Hernandez v. Texas case determined that denying Latinos the right to serve on juries was unconstitutional, and the legal position of the state of Texas was that Latinos were not considered a separate race and therefore were not entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

To know more about Fourteenth Amendment, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29371683#

#SPJ11

Answer:

a, proposes an amendment and have congress vote on it.

Answer:

being under pressure could be one

Explanation:

Answer:

The 1984 draft treaty establishing the European Union specified that the Union must protect the dignity of the individual and recognize for everyone falling within its jurisdiction the fundamental rights and freedoms derived from the common principles of the national constitutions and the ECHR.]

Make sure to paraphrase this. I got this from the internet.

The amount of Austin's wages that California will tax, given when Austin became a resident of California, is C. $50,000 .

When you are from California and are considered a California resident, you are liable to pay taxes on income that you have made, wherever you are in the world . However , it is important to note that only income you earn while you are legally a California resident , will be liable for taxation under California law.

Now, Austin became a California resident on June 1, 2021. This means that every income he earned from this point on, would be treated as California income. This means that the entire amount of $ 50, 000 that Austin made in that period, would be taxable in California because he was a California resident at the time .

Find out more on California taxes at https://brainly.com/question/29236130

#SPJ1

When the Supreme Court sends a decision back to a lower court with orders to implement it, it is known as a remand. The Court may do so for various reasons, including clarifying issues, providing guidance, or correcting procedural errors.

A remand occurs when the Supreme Court sends a case back to the lower court for reconsideration in light of the higher court's opinion. This means that the lower court must follow the Supreme Court's ruling and apply it to the case before it. The lower court may need to take additional steps to ensure that the ruling is properly implemented, such as issuing new orders or conducting further proceedings.

In some cases, the lower court may need to make a new decision based on the Supreme Court's ruling. The purpose of a remand is to ensure that the Supreme Court's decision is properly applied and that justice is served.

To know more about Supreme Court visit-

brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.

Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:

Answer:

The answer is a.

People help each other.

I hope this is helpful!

Answer:

to celebrate the holiday

to show how the holiday started

Explanation:

This is the reading

The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.

—Chief Justice Warren Burger,

Opinion of the Court,

Lynch v. Donnelly

1984

From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.

Answer:

To celebrate the holiday

To show how the holiday started

Explanation: