Under a translation Point A ( 0, -3) maps onto A (-5, -4). What would the image of B ( 2,-3) be
under the same translation be?

For least amount of fencing, length and width of rectangular area should be 14 feet and 7 feet respectively.

Let us consider length and width are l and w respectively.

Area of rectangular region = l x w

l x w = 98

w = 98/l

Since, no fencing needed along the river.

So, perimeter of rectangular region, P = 2w + l

Substituting the value of w in above expression.

We get,    

P = 2(98/l) + l

= 196 /l + l

For least amount of fencing, perimeter should be minimum

Differentiate perimeter expression with respect to length l.

dP/dl = -196/l^2 +1 =0

l^2 = 196

l= sqrt(196)

l= 14 feet

so, w= 98/14

w = 7

Learn more about area and perimeter here :-

https://brainly.com/question/11957651

#SPJ4

Answer:36.36%

Step-by-step explanation:

Total people in the team =7+4=11

Percentage of girls =4/11 x 100/1= 36.36%

Answer:

x= 5

Step-by-step explanation:

bc 7x5=35 and under will work to but 7x6 will makeit 42 so 5is the best choice

hopes this helps :)

Answer:

We can use the formula for compound interest to solve this problem. The formula is:

A = P * (1 + r/n)^(n*t)

where:

A = the amount of money after t years

P = the principal amount (the initial investment)

r = the annual interest rate (as a decimal)

n = the number of times the interest is compounded per year

t = the number of years

In this case, P = $5000, r = 0.03, n = 12 (since the interest is compounded monthly), and t = 10. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

A = 5000 * (1 + 0.03/12)^(12*10)

A = 5000 * (1.0025)^120

A ≈ $6,621.36

So the investment will be worth approximately $6,621.36 after 10 years.

Number of seats in each row is 51 given that a rectangular auditorium seats 2244 people and number of seats in each row exceeds the number of rows by 7. This can be obtained by assuming the value of number of seats in each row, forming quadratic equation and using quadratic formula to find root.

Here in the question it is given that,

We have to find the number of seats in each row.

Let us assume that the number of seats in each row be x.

From the given statement, number of seats in each row exceeds the number of rows by 7, we can write that,

Number of seats in one row = Number of rows + 7

x = Number of rows + 7

⇒ Number of rows = x - 7

Total number of seats in the auditorium can be written as,

⇒ (Number of seats in one row)(Number of rows) = Total number of seats

(x)(x - 7) = 2244

x² - 7x = 2244

⇒ x² - 7x - 2244 = 0

By using quadratic formula we can find the root,

x = (-b ± √b² - 4ac)/2a

here in the question, a = 1, b = -7, c = -2244

√b² - 4ac = √(-7)² - 4(1)(-2244)

√b² - 4ac = √49 + 8976

√b² - 4ac = √9025

√b² - 4ac = 95

x = (-b ± √b² - 4ac)/2a

x = (7 ± 95)/2

x = 102/2 or x = -88/2

⇒ x  = 51 or x = -44

Hence number of seats in each row is 51 given that a rectangular auditorium seats 2244 people and number of seats in each row exceeds the number of rows by 7.

Learn more about quadratic formula here:

brainly.com/question/26926523

#SPJ9

The height of the building, using similar triangles, is given by:

36 feet.

Similar triangles are two triangles that share these two features, which are listed as follows:

The second bullet point, regarding proportional side lengths, is especially relevant in the context of this problem, as a proportional relationship is built to find the height h of the building.

From the similar triangles, the equivalent side lengths are presented as follows:

Hence the proportional relationship that models this situation is presented as follows:

3/18 = 6/h.

Applying cross multiplication, the height of the building is obtained as follows:

3h = 18 x 6

h = 6 x 6 (simplifying by 3)

h = 36 feet.

The diagram is given by the image shown at the end of the answer.

More can be learned about similar triangles at brainly.com/question/11920446

#SPJ1

Answer:

need points

Step-by-step explanation:

blah blah blah blah blah hope u pass

The correct statement is; Pentagon M’N’P’Q’R is smaller than pentagon MNPQR because the scale factor is smaller than 1.

The ratio between comparable measurements of an item and a representation of that thing is known as a scale factor in arithmetic.

If a polygon is dilated by a scale factor = k

Rule to be followed as;

(x, y) → (kx, ky)

Here, k = Scale factor

If 0 < k < 1, size of the image will be reduced.

Similarly, k > 1, size of the image will be enlarged.

We are given that Pentagon MNPQR is dilated with the origin as the center of dilation to form an image M'N'P'Q'R'.

Rule used for the transformation,

(x, y) → (1/4x, 1/4y)

Here, the scale factor through which MNPQR has been dilated is 1/4.

Since, scale factor is between zero and 1/4, size of M'N'P'Q'R' will be reduced.

Therefore, the size of pentagon M'N'P'Q'R' will be 1/4 smaller than pentagon MNPQR.

Option (2) is the answer.

To learn more about scale factors here :

brainly.com/question/8765466

#SPJ1

The complete question is: Pentagon MNPQR is shown on the coordinate grid. Pentagon MNPQR is dilated with the origin as the center of dilation using the rule (x, y)→(1/4x, 1/4y) to create pentagon M'N'P'Q'R'.

Which statement is true?

a. Pentagon M'N'P'Q'R' is larger than pentagon MNPQR, because the scale factor is greater than 1.

b. Pentagon M'N'P'Q'R' is smaller than pentagon MNPQR, because the scale factor is less than 1.

c. Pentagon M'N'P'Q'R' is larger than pentagon MNPQR, because the scale factor is less than 1.

d. Pentagon M'N'P'Q'R' is smaller than pentagon MNPQR, because the scale factor is greater than 1.

The total number of possible outcomes is given by the expression 6n × 52, where n represents the number of marbles to choose from.

To determine the number of possible outcomes, we need to consider the number of outcomes for each event and then multiply them together.

1. Picking a marble: Let's assume there are n marbles to choose from. If there are n marbles, then the number of outcomes for this event is n.

2. Rolling a die: A standard die has 6 sides numbered 1 to 6. Therefore, the number of outcomes for this event is 6.

3. Picking a card: A standard deck of cards has 52 cards. Hence, the number of outcomes for this event is 52.

To find the total number of possible outcomes, we multiply the number of outcomes for each event together:

Total number of outcomes = (number of outcomes for picking a marble) × (number of outcomes for rolling a die) × (number of outcomes for picking a card)

Total number of outcomes = n × 6 × 52

Therefore, the total number of possible outcomes is given by the expression 6n × 52, where n represents the number of marbles to choose from.

Learn more about probability at https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

Answer:

Answer:

Camille can make 6 cards and will have 2 ribbons left

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = ±2

Step-by-step explanation:

log 7 (x^2 + 11) = log 7 15

We know that log a ( b) = log a(c)   means b =c

x^2 + 11 = 15

Subtract 11 from each side

x^2 = 15-11

x^2 =4

Take the square root of each side

sqrt(x^2) =±sqrt(4)

x = ±2

The quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form is:

7/21 * (cos(584°) + i sin(584°))

To find the quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form, we'll express both complex numbers in trigonometric form and then divide them.

Let's represent z₁ in trigonometric form as z₁ = r₁(cosθ₁ + isinθ₁), where r₁ is the magnitude of z₁ and θ₁ is the argument of z₁.

We have:

z₁ = 7(cos(577°) + i sin(577°))

Now, let's represent z₂ in trigonometric form as z₂ = r₂(cosθ₂ + isinθ₂), where r₂ is the magnitude of z₂ and θ₂ is the argument of z₂.

From the given information, we have:

z₂ = 21(cos(-7°) + i sin(-77°))

To find the quotient, we divide z₁ by z₂:

z₁ / z₂ = (r₁/r₂) * [cos(θ₁ - θ₂) + i sin(θ₁ - θ₂)]

Substituting the given values, we have:

z₁ / z₂ = (7/21) * [cos(577° - (-7°)) + i sin(577° - (-7°))]

= (7/21) * [cos(584°) + i sin(584°)]

The quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form is:

7/21 * (cos(584°) + i sin(584°))

Option C, 21(cos(-7°) + i sin(-77°)), is not the correct answer as it does not represent the quotient of z₁ by z₂.

For more questions on trigonometric form

https://brainly.com/question/31744474

#SPJ8

a) There are 2^6 = 64 subsets total.

b)  There are 2^3 = 8 subsets total

c) There are 2^5 = 32 subsets total

d) There are 32^4 = 48 subsets total

e)  There are (6 choose 4) = 15 subsets total

f)   There are 32 = 6 subsets total

g) There are is (6 choose 4) - (3 choose 4) = 15 - 0 = 15 subsets total

h) There are (3 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) = 3  subsets total

a) There are 2^6 = 64 subsets total.

b)  Since we need to include elements 2, 3, and 5 in a subset, we have 3 elements fixed, and we need to choose 1, 2, or 3 elements from the remaining 3 elements (1, 4, and 6). Therefore, there are 2^3 = 8 subsets that contain the elements 2, 3, and 5.

c) There are 2^5 = 32 subsets that contain at least one odd number. This can be seen by noticing that if a subset does not contain any odd numbers, then it must be {2,4,6}, which is not a valid subset since it does not satisfy the condition that it be a subset of S.

d) There are 32^4 = 48 subsets that contain exactly one even number. To see why, notice that there are 3 choices for which even number to include (2, 4, or 6), and then there are 2^4 = 16 choices for which of the remaining 4 odd numbers to include in the subset.

e) There are (6 choose 4) = 15 subsets of cardinality 4. This is the number of ways to choose 4 elements from a set of 6.

f) Since we need to include elements 2, 3, and 5 in a subset of cardinality 4, we have 3 elements fixed, and we need to choose 1 element from the remaining 3 even elements, and 1 element from the remaining 2 odd elements. Therefore, there are 32 = 6 subsets of cardinality 4 that contain the elements 2, 3, and 5.

g) The number of subsets of cardinality 4 that contain at least one odd number is equal to the total number of subsets of cardinality 4 minus the number of subsets of cardinality 4 that contain only even numbers. This is (6 choose 4) - (3 choose 4) = 15 - 0 = 15.

h) The number of subsets of cardinality 4 that contain exactly one even number is equal to the number of ways to choose 1 even number out of 3, and then the number of ways to choose 3 odd numbers out of 3. This is (3 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) = 3.

To learn more about subsets:

https://brainly.com/question/2280091

#SPJ4

answer/explanation:

hope this helps

The reasoning presented lacks explicit explanations and logical connections between the steps, making it difficult to fully understand the intended proof strategy.

The given proof aims to show that the Separation Axioms can be derived from the Replacement Schema using a particular construction involving a formula p(x, y). Let's analyze the proof step by step:

Define the formula p(x, y) as x = yo(x).

This formula states that for each x, y pair, x is equal to the unique object y such that y is obtained by applying the operation o to x.

Define the set F as {(x, x) (x)}.

This set F contains pairs (x, x) where x is the unique object obtained by applying the operation (x) to x.

Claim: F(X) = {y (x = X)p(x, y)} = {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)} = {x: (3x € X)o(x)} = {x X: (x)}.

This claim asserts that F(X) is equivalent to {y (x = X)p(x, y)}, which is further equivalent to {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)}, and so on.

The proof states that since (x, y) satisfies the functional formula VaVyVz(p(x, y)^(x, z) y = z), it follows that (x, y) is a functional formula.This step emphasizes that the formula p(x, y) satisfies certain properties that make it a functional formula, which is relevant for the subsequent deductions.

Finally, the proof concludes that the Separation Axioms follow from the Replacement Schema, based on the previous steps.

For more such questions on explicit

https://brainly.com/question/30394385

#SPJ8

Answer:

21:25

Step-by-step explanation:

9:25 p.m. would be written as 21:25 in 24 hour time, since you simply add 12 to the hours.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let b>a

b-a=63

b=63+a

a+b=111, substituting 63+a from above in this equation gives you

a+63+a=111

2a+63=111

2a=48

a=24, since b=63+a

b=63+24

b=87 so the two numbers are

24 and 87

Answer:

area would be 98.35

Step-by-step explanation:

the area is 98.35 units squared

Answer:

The closet equivalent of the ratio of 'a' to 'c' is:

\(\frac{a}{c}=1.680\:\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

i.e.

a=0.63x

i.e.

c=3/8x

Hence,

\(\frac{a}{c}=\frac{0.63x}{\frac{3}{8}x}\)

\(\frac{a}{c}=1.680\:\)

Thus, the closet equivalent of the ratio of 'a' to 'c' is:

\(\frac{a}{c}=1.680\:\)

Answer:

None of them really,

A perfect square is a number that can be expressed as the product of two equal integers...which is not seen here.

Th closest perfect square that could be possible would be 64, but thats not an option, so go with none.

Answer: 48 feet squared is the answer

Step-by-step explanation: All you do is take the length which is 8 and multiply it by the width which is 6, and the answer is 48.

I hope it helped comment if you have questions. :)

Answer:

In explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

272 for part A because say you took a test out of 850 and you got a total of 272 of them right then you would of gotten a 32%

200 for 2 because if 75% of them liked pop music and 150 teenagers what the number of teenagers surveyed then that means 200 of them were surveyed because 150 out of 200 is 75%

I don't know the last one because if you had anything there only could get a 100%(im sorry for this one it's a little confusing.

Hope this helps have a great afternoon:)

Answer:

the value of \(a\) such that  there is no solution to the equation is \(a = -4\).

Step-by-step explanation:

Let first simplify the expression presented on statement. The equation has no solution if and only if \(a\) is eliminated in the process and an absurd is the result (i.e. \(0 = 7\)).

\(2\cdot (a\cdot x + 3) = 4\cdot x -3\cdot (4\cdot x + 8)\)

\(2\cdot a\cdot x +6 = 4\cdot x -12\cdot x -24\)

\(2\cdot a \cdot x+6=-8\cdot x-24\)

\(2\cdot a\cdot x +8\cdot x = -30\)

\(2\cdot (a+4)\cdot x = -30\)

\((a+4)\cdot x = -15\)

To obtain an absurd, we need that \(a+4 = 0\). Hence, the value of \(a\) such that  there is no solution to the equation is:

\(a = -4\)

Let prove the certainty of the result. We find that an absurd exist: (\(a = -4\))

\(0 = -15\)

Considering the equation  

\(\rm 2(ax+3) = 4x - 3(4x+8) \\\)

The equation given above has no solution when  a = -4

On  simplifying the given equation we can find that

\(\rm 2(ax + 3) = 4x-3(4x+8)\\2ax + 6 = 4x- 12x-24 \\2ax +6 +24 = -8x \\2ax +30 = -8x \\2ax+8x +30 = 0\)

The equation  has no solution when the equality of both sides does not hold true .

Hence by observation we can say that the equation has no solution when

\(\rm 2ax = -8x \\\\2a =-8\\\bold{a =-4} \\\)

So the equation given above has no solution when  a = -4.

For more information please refer to the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/16515610

The percentage of the calls were greater than 30 minutes in duration is 69%.

Let N = 77 Total long-distance calls

X= 24 calls are less than or equal to 30 minutes duration

Y = N - X= 77 - 24= 53 calls are greater than 30 minutes duration

To find the percentage of calls greater than 30 minutes duration. This goes thus:

= Number of calls greater than 30 minutes / Total calls

= 53 / 77

= 0.69

Therefore, 69% of the call were greater than 30 minutes in duration.

Learn more about percentages on:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

Answer:  j(x) = (x-1)(x+2)

The x-1 part is because of the root x = 1

The root x = -2 leads to the factor x+2

Answer:

can you explain the question better

Answer:

A- \(5.12*10^{-4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

1.6* 3.2

add the exponents so 10 to the -4